Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
If there is no opportunity to recover energy "stored" in the mass of the vehicle via it being in motion then the Toyota Hybrid synergy drive system has very little advantage. Energy recovery via regenerative braking occurs only during coastdown and braking periods. For mostly freeway, primarily cruising at a set speed, you would be better off with a non-hybrid vehicle.
The HSD system offers the Toyota models the opportunity to use the more efficient Atkinson cycle while cruising on the highway.
In addition while highway driving is normally at a constant high speed it is not uniformly an accelerating speed. There are periods of highway driving during deceleration or during lessened load on the ICE that the battery/e-motor assists the ICE and thereby saves fuel.
The proof is that the Prius is more efficient on the highway than both the Corolla and the Camry.
Yes, on the hwy the THSD will often use the electrics for BOOST for even the slightest level of acceleration. But then the battery must be recharged via the ICE and that increases the loss factor.
I suspect that if a switch were provided wherein the driver could choose to live with slower "ICE only" acceleration on the hwy the hwy FE would improve dramatically.
Looking at the specs of a vehicle that is offered in both non-hybrid and hybrid, the Toyota Camry, the specs say this:
2008 4 cylinder, automatic trans.:
Mileage Estimates: city 21 mpg / hwy 31 mpg;
2008 Hybrid:
Mileage Estimates: city 33 mpg / hwy 34 mpg;
--------
This proves true, though to a lesser degree, with the Highlander as well:
2008 Highlander 3.5L v6:
Mileage Estimates: 18 mpg / 24 mpg;
2008 Highlander Hybrid:
Mileage Estimates: 27 mpg / 25 mpg;
Granted there are ICE-only vehicles that you can purchase that get better hwy mileage than the 34mpg Camry hybrid, but then, the '08 Prius is rated at Mileage Estimates: city 48 mpg / hwy 45 mpg, and few non-hyrid cars can compete with that hwy mpg rating. That carries over for the highlander hybrid. How many SUV can compete with the hybrid mileage?
On a related subject, there is definitely a fall-off on winter mileage with a hybrid, but there is mpg drop-off on a non-hybrid as well. And note that the winter mileage on a Prius, even for short trips, is still much higher than the winter mileage of a non-hybrid for short trips. I would think the same would hold true for the HH compared to other SUVs and to it's non-hybrid self, too.
It's been pretty clean from the get-go that the EPA estimates are aways off the mark for hybrids.
I've only had the Prius on a hwy trip once, ~300 miles round trip, and I remember the MPG being pretty disappointing in comparison to city.
It's been pretty clear from the get-go that the EPA estimates are aways off the mark for hybrids.
I've only had the Prius on a hwy trip once, ~300 miles round trip, and I remember the MPG being pretty disappointing in comparison to city.
Results come only from the on-board computer readings which I know aren't perfectly accurate but they are all I had. Hit all the same lights as luck would have it, although I did have to go through amber for one and slow down a little early to stop at another to keep it even.
Hybrid 10.6L/100km (22.1 mpg) and I forgot to set to ECON mode for the drive from work to home.
Highlander Limited 16L/100km (14.6 mpg).
Both were as expected well below EPA but the relative economy difference was maintained. That would mean about $800 per year gas savings at current prices for us on top of the gov't rebate and tax break. It actually makes the HY financially worthwhile in less than 5 years of use .
Another note: The "Cruising Range" tells how many miles more one can drive. I believe when that is 0 one would still have about 1.5 gallons in the tank. My last fillup the cruising range was down to 2 miles left and the tank took 14.55 gals, when capacity is, I think, 17.2. Hmm.. maybe 16.2? I am out of town and cannot check. But it seems like one can easily drive to cruising range of 0 with no fear of running out of gas.
The HSD is only geared for forward motion. Reverse is electric. You might check the Prius board for a further discussion.
I maen the top tire pressure in display represent Front Left Wheel or what?
If somebody know, please share with me.
Thanks.
Anyway , thanks for your reply Stanwagon.
2. I can tell at times that the ICE is powering the front wheels while in reverse.
Just because the ICE is running does not mean it is providing power to the rear wheels.
Take a look under the vehicle and see if there is a transfer case attached to the rear wheels, or if there are electric motors. I suspect you will find the latter.
The HSD is a completely different system than the transmission / engine used in the conventional HH.
Of course the ICE does not drive the rear wheels, there is no transfer case or drive shaft to the rear. However, that does not mean that the ICE cannot power the front wheels in reverse. How would you drive this car if the traction battery pack failed (something I hope does not happen for 200K miles or so)? Do you think Toyota would produce a vehicle without the ability for the ICE to back the car?
Or even more simply, if the traction battery is below the cutoff point for use (40% charge?), the ICE would power the front wheels.
If the traction battery is way low (two red bars on the energy flow display, 25%), the ICE will charge the battery and power the car simultaneously. In some situation, the ICE is so busy powering the car, it takes forever to recharge the battery. This has happened often to us on uphill climb either at low speed or high speed.
Last night, we ran the charge down to two red bars and had to reverse uphill to drop off some gear. As I did the reverse, the ICE stayed on but the energy flow diagram stopped showing any trace of power flows. Identical to what it does when I shift into NEUTRAL. That means one of two things:
(1) ICE is driving the front wheels in reverse. If so, why not just show it as it always does when the ICE drives the front wheels in forward motion and charging at the same time?
(2) ICE is powering front wheels and battery pack is powering the rear wheels in reverse. Again, this is no different than when we are moving forward and climbing a steep grade at low speed. The ICE boosts the front, the battery pumps power to the rear. It has shown this countless times.
(3) ICE is charging the battery like mad, the battery is powering ALL FOUR WHEELS like mad to go in reverse. There is no way to show this on the display without erroneously showing that the ICE is powering the front wheels. So the best approach is to show nothing.
I am 90% sure that (3) is the case. Only the battery pack powers the four wheels (AWD version) in reverse.
Not sure why this is such a critical topic though. I am not here to argue the point, just trying to provide observation.
As long as the car will reverse nicely, I won't care if the ICE does it or the pack.
Cheers!
Coincidentally, that was precisely what we did last night. Had to back a 4+ x 12 flatbed trailer uphill to unload. We had to pull it up a steep switchback that gains about 500+ ft in 0.2 mile first, it ran on battery where it could and that depleted the battery to 25%. About 2000 lb gross for this load. We have gone as high as 2500 lb but that is max because our old trailer cannot handle more. The reverse uphill at the end was not too bad, it gains only about 3 ft for the length of the car and the trailer.
I have never tried reversing it up anything steeper though because this old trailer is just long enough to make me uncomfortable. You can check the torque specification and see what it says.
For a 4x8 trailer, I imagine the loaded gross will be around 1500 lb? if so, that is well within the car's spec. I will strongly suggest using good trailer tires if there are slick grass. We use GY Wrangler but whatever brands that provide toughness and strong traction will do.
For the HH, AWD is absolutely essential in this case because I want powered traction on all wheels especially where we work. It is often loose gravel, dirt or tall slick grass. Good SUV or truck tires is a must. Van-type tires will just spin on tall grass and slide downhill. If your HH stock tires are van tires, best to replace them ASAP. We had to do that to ours.
Hope this experience helps a bit.
I think this may have been answered, but yes; the Prius cannot use the ICE to back the vehicle. It is electric only.
Also, the HSD will not operate if the traction battery fails. You must have the hybrid battery or the car won't operate. This is the reason there is so much concern about how long the traction batteries will last...
Thanks in advance.
Vince
2) This problem is more mundane, but just as irritating. The radio will drift off of the station (The JBL set-up that came with the Limited trim). Most of the time it will tune itself back in, but not always. This happens when in motion and at a dead stop.
Anybody else have one of these problems?
I find that to prevent premature fuel flow shutoff with my RX I must not insert the fuel dispensing nozzle fully into the filler pipe neck.
Are you by chance referring to the "picket-fence" effect, rapid loss and regain of the signal, common to mobile FM radio recievers..?
Neither has the filler neck flap, just a hole for the nozzle. I do not remember if there was ever a flap on either.
I will inspect some other cars. If the Prius is supposed to have a flap, then that's the cause of my recent problem even thought the problem is now gone, the flap must be in there somewhere, and hard to get out.
the sound did go away after a while. i'm not sure if it will stay away.
any thoughts?
thanks/
If you have the energy display, see if the sound returns when the car is in full electric mode.
The radio problem is frequent and random, and it just started occurring a couple of weeks ago. I would think that if it were standard RFI i would have noticed it before. Maybe not! Thanks loads for the replies!
http://smg.toyotapartsandservice.com/index.php
You can enter model, year and mileage and it shows the recommended service. It is not precise but it will help.
Good luck!
thanks
I am wondering if there is a lag (say of at least a month or two) between the month that sales occur and when Edmunds calculates its TMV because the TMV has trended down since March in my area while the selection of vehicles has significantly decreased and demand has escalated. There also seems to be a conflict between Edmunds TMV data and the Kelly Blue Book "new car blue book value" which purports to reflect what people are actually paying for the vehicle. KBB says people are paying MORE than MSRP for Hi Hy Ltds, whereas Edmunds says TMV is approximately 3,500 less. I understand that Edmunds data is supposed to be more targeted (my zip code vs. nation wide), but I still find the discrepancy interesting.
In my area Edmunds seems to be closer to the truth. The vehicles are hardER to come by, but dealers are not demanding or getting more than MSRP.
I was able to negotiate a deal (waiting for actual vehicle) on a Ltd with Nav, Sunroof, and dual front/auto rear A/C, for $800 over invoice, which in my area worked out to about three grand under MSRP. I tried to get in under TMV, but the dealers were not having it.
Anyone else care to share recent purhasing experiences?
Unless you have an IRON CLAD contract you may be in for a long wait...
What's to keep the dealer, what are the "penalties" for selling the vehicle to the higher bidder once it arrives...??
The dealer gets to place a hybrid order above his factory quota in a "hot" market.
Got the purple one. My wife loves it. First tank has been amazing at 29 mpg currently 300 miles. :shades: