Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
2001 Ford Ranger
Take a look at the new 2000/2001 Ford Ranger.
http://www.auto.com/2000chicagoautoshow/stories/truck11_200002//.htm
The 4.0 SOHC 200HP/240ft/lbs of torque V6 will
also be availble! About time Ford.
http://www.auto.com/2000chicagoautoshow/stories/truck11_200002//.htm
The 4.0 SOHC 200HP/240ft/lbs of torque V6 will
also be availble! About time Ford.
Tagged:
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I currently drive a '99 B3000 4WD extended cab with a manual tranny. I really like the truck. But I would certainly take a serious look at the new Ranger or B-Series with the SOHC if I can get the right combinations of trim/options. Now the waiting begins...
http://www.blueovalnews.com/ranger_edge.htm
The monochromatic paint that you see in the pictures is apparently only for the "Edge" version of the Ranger, so I guess chrome-bumper versions will still be available in XL/XLT trims. Also, 4-wheel ABS will be standard "across the board".
Looks good!
Dan
According to the blueovalnews.com page (linked in #4), there's also a new I4 coming in November offering "improved power, performance, fuel
economy and emission levels". Since I'm not sure I need 4x4, I'd definitely consider the I4 if it gets 140-150HP. This should definitely be possible with a large OHC (2.2-2.4L) I4. An engine like this should offer performance roughly on par with the current 3.0L OHV 4x2--and much better MPG. 24/30 (vs. current 22/27 for the 2.5L OHV) would be great!
Regards,
Dan
Explorer II room asking how owners liked the SOHC 4.0L engine. A couple of responders indicated that their highway mileage is 20-22 MPG. Not bad for an Automatic Transmission in a heavier SUV. Mate this engine with a 5-spd manual in the lighter Ranger, and the MPG should be pretty respectable...
Thanks!
I had heard that ranger made a crewcab for European production already and would offer it in the U.S. in 2001. Maybe my source was incorrect. Why do you think that Nissan, Toyota,and Chevrolet are getting into the compact crewcab truck market and ford is not?
Dan
Ford is coming out with a couple of new engines for the Ranger over then next couple of years.
I believe the body is the only difference in the 2001 Ranger. The front grill area/hood/ and rear are new. I also have to say, Its about time!
Dan
If the 2.3L is good enough, I guess I'll wait around until the fall to trade in my 1985 Ranger. Particularily if it can hit 29-30mpg with the 5sp. That's a solid 6-7mpg better than a 2wd 3.0L 5sp.
Dan
balls to do it. Think about it! Why would they
put a 3.0 200 hp engine with better gas mileage
then a 4.0 outdated 200 hp engine in the same
lineup. I am interested in the 2001 Ranger
because I will by a pickup in Aug. 2001 when
clearances come on. I worry about Ford reliability though especially about there
trannys. I like Fords but question them. Take
toyota for example. They do have a premium
product, along with a premium price but when
it comes down to it, I want a vehicle that has
the ability to perform and age GRACEFULLY. I
don't want to go to the shop all the time.
Even the taco has a dohc v6 (i think) why
can it haul more then a bigger displacement
ford 4.0?
www.blueovalnews.com/trans_manual_newr4.htm
Man, I hope they get these problems resolved...
it is unwieldy to manage, and difficult to use for "newbies." There is entirely TOO much topic duplication, so I will be doing some SERIOUS topic consolidation in the next few weeks, getting us down to not more than 2-3 topics per vehicle type, and ultimately down to 200 topics or less.
THIS weeks consolidation candidates are: Tundra's, Tacoma's and Rangers.
In that vein,please consolidate this Ranger topic to Ford Ranger II and continue these discussions there.
Thanks!
Front Porch Philosopher
SUV, Pickups, & Aftermarket and Accessories Host