Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Ford Ranger III
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
The Tempo/Topaz used a cam in block design. The 2.3 was introduced around 1984, and in '86 it grew to 2.5l, and came with EFI.
The 2.3l family found in Rangers, Mustangs, and T-Birds, and even Aerostars uses a belt driven over head cam design. (OHC). The 2.3l variety was largely used from 1974 to 1995. The 2.0l (non european) is a smaller bore 2.3l. The 2.5l came out for Ranger in 1998, and with an increased stroke.
As far as bellhousing bolt patterns and motor mounts, I am not sure of the compatability or similairity of these two engine groups. That is in case you want to swap an engine. But if you're looking for parts, you pretty much gotta stick with the above.
There is a new 2.3l engine, which I think is based on the same engine block, but it does have 4 valves per cylinder. I don't know much more about this new engine.
Remember Pink or Red is good. Brown or Amber means time to flush and get new filter. Black or Burnt means time to get the checkbook handy.
First thing you would have noticed if the transmission fluid was too low was improper shifting, especially in overdrive or while engine was cold.
The only other concern would of been lack of fluid for coolant. Since automatics run transmission fluid to the radiator for cooling, a low fluid amount could have caused a 'hot smell'. But if only half a quart was the boiling point, then I would consider a secondary electric fan or transmission oil cooler (mini-radiator) or both. It's a small investment, but will lengthen the longevity of those automatics! But more than likely that smell was just spilled oil or antifreeze that was burning off the radiator or block or manifold. See if you can locate the source of the smell if it re occurs.
The dealership should have checked it, but I don't think it's a requirement on their part. But it would have been going that extra mile for the customer. Next time ask to have it checked specifically, and then it will be noted for any warranty issues.
as i mentioned, the fluids were low and i couldnt seem to find Mercon 5 fluid. I found some plain old Mercon and so i added the 1/2 quart just so it wasnt low. the guy at Advance Auto said it wasnt a good idea at all and that i should drain it and refill with Mercon 5. is he right or just trying to sell fluid?
i have less than 10k to go, before i change it all anyway, so i may as well let the dealership drain and fill it then, right?
is 1/2 quart even enough to worry about? how close is the Mercon to the Mercon 5?
Thanks for the swift feedback and help.
and my manual says DO NOT MIX MERCON AND MERCON 5. THEY ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE.
am i screwed?
Best bet is to just pick up a Transmission filter, pan gasket, some silicon, and a case of fluid. The manual might tell ya how much you need, or just have the dealership do the flush and filter change. They won't be able to tell about the mix-up of fluids, especially only 1/2 a quart of the mercon. Besides early maintenance is good maintenance.
so i am arranging a visit to my favorite garage. thanks again, stang!
You could worry about it, but you did all you could at this point. But you are good to go now. Have fun, and a good christmas.
My 94 2x4 Extended Cab 4L V6 gets 14.5mpg in around-town driving. BEST I've seen with 100% highway driving is about 19.5mpg.
13.5 around town isn't that bad.
And please, don't give us that "'xxx' miles on a tankfull". If you want to check the milage, fill the tank, write the milage down, drive the truck, fill the tank again, write the milage down again and the gallons to fill the tank, subtract the milage difference and divide it out - you then have an accurate milage, for that fillup.
tbunder--->If you want to confirm it's a computer problem, disconnect the battery overnight. The next morning your your computer should be reset as well as your radio presets . Do you have a bit of the ole lead foot? But unless your engine light comes on, there shouldn't be any major sensor problems. But you might attempt to clean out everything, throttle body, air filter, try a some zmax, injector cleaner or whatnot.
That's why I'm not happy about Ford dropping the 4.0l from the 4x2 regular cabs in 2002... I wanted the power, just not the weight...
Our lil' four bangers have to rev higher to drive than larger engines, so every little bit counts. To be very safe, keep it at idle for a minute or so after startup, and under 3200 for the first 5 minutes of driving. Heck, I rarely need to go past 3000 RPM anytime...
And small hands might help out... Or you can always do the shadetree mechanic way, and use a spare fuel line hose (about 12 inches long or so) to unscrew the plugs. Just use the ratchet socket to break the seal. Then put the hose over the top of the spark plug, nice and snug, and it should be easier to screw the plug off (or new one back on).
Have fun....
its gets around 22 mpg in mixed city and highway use, and i have been impressed with it so far.
i do find myself wishing i had bought a five speed instead of the auto, but its not a regret, more like not being used to driving an auto. five years with a stick will do that.
thanks for asking.
i have an annoying rattle coming from the right side. i think its either that the seat isnt tight to the floor or that the jack behind the seat is loose in its compartment. thats a pretty small complaint, and its my only one. hows the 1993 going?
My next vehicle will be standard, looking at the Regular cab 3.0l Edge. So that should be a nice upgrade in power. I'm still gonna give the new 4 valve 2.3l a chance. Plus the manual transmission means my girlfriend will never want to drive the truck, oh well! I just haven't decided if I want to wait for a redesign, or for the 2003 vehicles to come out. I love my truck and I love not having car payments, so I think I'll keep on going for a year or so.
Well, the engines are pretty much the same, with your 2.5 having a longer stroke. Longevity is mostly based on driving and maintenance habits. Since 4 cylinders have to work harder than larger engines, it just depends on how high you let the RPMs go regularly. You should expect a minimum of 100,000 miles of severe driving. I've seen about 4 or 5 of them at Autozone (one of my old workplaces) go past 200,000. Just keep on top of your maintenance, by checking replacing everything on schedule. Keep a clean air filter, fuel filter, good plugs. Run synthetic oil for better cold start protection. Put zmax(This stuff is awesome) in once a year http://www.zmax.com/. Do everything you can, and it will keep running.
Breakin is a little harder to say, as I bought mine used. Typically you don't rev past 75% of redline in the first 500-750 miles. Then the next 3000-5000 miles you try to vary engine speed as much as you can, while still avoiding red-line RPM. Older engines would receive a few valve adjustments during this time, but after 5000 miles or so, the rings should be seated and the bearings broken in.
Like the lyrics by the Stray Cats song 'Rev it up and Go'
"I got a thirty nine Ford, this old heap just won't die, But I got a thirty nine Ford, this old heap just won't die, Well, this thirty nine Ford might outlive you and I..."
does the 3.0 last a good ong time as well? i know a friend's taurus has like 200,000 or more on it and still alive and kicking.
a couple people have told me that the 2.3 and 2.5 are good motors and will last forever, but then some have told me that they just arent that great. i guess time will tell. this is my first four cylinder, and of course i got one with auto. DUH!
rob
About only solution is to use higher octane gasoline.
http://media.ford.com/products/presskit_display.cfm?vehicle_id=524&press_subsection_id=421&make_id=92
I bought a new (in 2000) Ranger XLT, 4x4, 5 speed auto 4.0 pushrod, extended cab. It has an annoying vibration IN THE SEATS AND FLOORBOARD most noticeable in OD and at freeway speeds (of say 60 to 75). I have put on new Michelins [balanced with Hunter 9700 system], had driveshaft rebalanced, and have had the slip joint lubed on the driveshaft. It currently has about 14000 miles on it. Is there something that I am overlooking ? Could this maybe be a torque converter or tranny problem ? Tire rotation does NOT affect anything.
Could it possible be a faulty SHOCK ? Or, vibrating exhaust system ?
I am open to any ideas before I sell at a huge loss and buy another truck [which I really DO NOT want to do].
Had a 4 cylinder (2.3 Lima) Ford Pinto 1980 which lasted till traded in a 167,000 miles and worked OK.
i have no idea why. the dealership said it was a "stone crack" and that they didnt have to do anything about it. i think it's something else, like the glass cracked due to the wild temperature variations we've been having, or that someone hit it. anyway, its another in a long line of disappointing incidents. i know i said i liked the truck but we STILL havent gotten our payment booklet in the mail (bought it 3 months ago), we have made countless calls to the dealership and the bank, and we dont like the four cylinder and auto combo much anymore and its only getting about 19 to 20 mpg now. this sucks. i am thinking of finageling for a 3.0 with a manual now.
The 32x11.5x16 tires fit on them.
The tires are all the same, the rims are just built of different material. The steel, chrome and alum rims are all 16". Beats me why a 32" fits on alum. rim only, probably alum. rims are wider so they can in fact accomodate the 32x11.5x16 tire.
Sure, Ford puts 16" rims standard. On Tacoma, for $600, you get both rims and tires for the truck (all 5 of them). However, it seems that you were the one who said "I only need 31s to compete with Tacoma". The tires you guys get in stock arent enough for you? 31x10.5x16 tires are $113 or so a piece. I say thats a hefty investment.
I believe there are also a few boots on the steering input shaft. May just need a little squirt of lube.
scorpio, at least you have a clock in the Ranger that you don't pay 80 bucks extra for, and can't see while driving.
actually, the stock size of ranger tires are 245/75/16- this tire is 30.6 inches tall. your tacoma's tires (if you pay the minimum $600 to get them, again ford includes them standard) are 265/70/16. this size is 30.7 inches tall. a .1 inch advantage. the tacoma tire is wider though. so if you're talking stock tires to stock tires- the crappiest of the two- since the FX4 is available with the best stock tires, and the TRD is available with decent BFG tires, the crappy goodyear wrangler rt/s is tons better than those crappy dunlops coming on non aluminum rimmed tacoma's. for serious wheeling, one would switch. but one would also just buy the FX4 of TRD if they're serious wheelers. and then the range has the tacoma beat with its BFG all-terrains in your beloved size of 31x10.50x15.