Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Does that little singular piece of datum clear things up? (gawd, I had that word).
Steve, Host
Lou
didn't i read a post that said effectively this is what would be done, if replacement was required...
...but...read the information on the michelanman website and it will be clear than in cases of tire damage...it must be inspected, maybe to determine if the inner ring has been compromised?
if you don't have the equipment to dismount the tire from the rim to inspect the innards of the tire, what else are you going to do but replace everything as a unit?
hmmm.
i would agree with the poster - the company also wants good experiences for early adopters...but also...perhaps they might want some real-world damaged tires to inspect...
I may know someone that is interested in trading brand-new OEM EX wheels and tires for touring PAX wheels and tires.
If you are interested, you can email me at the address in my profile.
Then, there's the Tweel. What a brilliant idea, except for road noise and ride quality issues . . . the same issues that made Dunlop's pneumatic tire patents such a great success over a hundred years ago!
Further proof that journalists are paid to act dumb and gullible. Like Thomas Jefferson once said, the less newspapers you read, the better informed you are.
Steve, Host
Hope that helps.
--Rob
Hope that helps clarify.
--Rob
--Rob
Pretty slim chance of metal fatigue.
The weight savings doesn't just stop at replacing 5 tires with 4.7. It had to be less than 5 because that's what all the cars carried, just a starting point.
Due to the new domed profile of the pax, which allows it to carry the more weigh while being the same size (or carry same weight while being a smaller size), there is additional weight savings. The smaller rolling resistance (compared to a 'regular' tire or a stiff side wall tire) allows it to carry more weight at the same fuel economy. The asymmetrical profile of the wheel also allows for some interesting design options with regards to brakes and support structure, creating more room. Instead of designing a car with 4 of the same tire/wheels, one may be so bold as to use different size wheels front vs. back to distribute the loads more efficiently. Rumor has it that the dynamic weigh issues took Michelin 18 months to resolve. How? I do not know.... I'd imagine as this "standard" progress, we'd see more immediate weight savings comparison. Dow provides the materials for the rubber ring support structure. They were able to shaved some rotational mass using a certain polyurethane.
This is just the beginning. Things may get more interesting as materials construction techniques change for the new PAX system (wheel, support ring, tire, pressure monitors) to come. New automobile manufacturers definitely have to take the option to incorporate PAX designs into their car to reap the benefit of the weigh gain.
After the TRX debacle where Michelin attempted to sell the technology as its own niche product, the largest opposition to the PAX is not from the consumer and auto manufacturers. It actually comes from Michelin's internal people who still still feel the lingering effects of the TRX failures. Thus the PAX was introduced as a potential "standard", openly licensed to the competition as a generic product.
One of the by-product of the PAX system is apparently its quieter ride compared to stiff side-wall tires. Interesting.... And there really is no comparison between PAX, which is designed to mechanically hold on to a tire while deflated to one that doesn't (whether runflat or not). For all those what-if's about the PAX, consider the what-if about a conventional wheel/tire-beads that can be dislodged in an unlikely event of a blow-out.
Michelin's own research shows that people are willing to pay more to keep a spare tire. They've prepared for a 4-5 year time period to overcome the initial resistance. And service and support is a big part of it. We've got a couple more to go before all the support infrastructure is in place. We're just at the leading edge of the discussion
The rating on the Sienna run-flats is around 240. The only guarantee one gets with such a low number is that the tire will not last long.
stickguy, "Ask Connor at The Tire Rack" #681, 27 Jan 2005 7:01 pm
I thought the Touring suspension was tweaked for the PAX set-up, but that you could swap out the tires and wheels.
Clarifications please.
Steve, Host
C'mon Stickguy, we won't bite :-)
Steve, Host
I suspect that suspensions in those cases are tuned for the 18" or larger wheels too (say, the FX45?).
Steve, Host
stickguy, "Ask Connor at The Tire Rack" #686, 30 Jan 2005 8:54 pm
And a news release:
Michelin® PAX System™ Scores With Honda Owners
May as well throw this one out there too:
Michelin announces two fitments for its revolutionary non-pneumatic Tweel™
Steve, Host
Unless there's a TSB out amending it, the Ody Touring manual says to use the PAX system and if you don't the warranty may be void. Tirerack reps have been told by Honda USA that it's ok to swap out the wheels.
What part of the warranty is at risk? If the tire placement warranty goes away when you swap the wheels, that's logical.
If it's the tire pressure system, that's a gray area in my mind. Seems like it should be covered by Honda though.
If someone swaps the wheels and then has suspension problems that aren't covered by the warranty, then that's a significant issue.
Steve, Host
And you didn't answer my question.
thanks,
Steve, Host
I just know that Honda and Michelin are very smart companies that don't leap into new technology blindly.
I don't think ANY of know what the future will be for the PAX system.
Also, it is my opinion that limited application (Ody Touring and R-R Phantom & maybe a few others) + priorative technology will NEVER = low cost, wide tread selection, and easy availability.
I just found it amusing that in its press release, Michelin mentioned PAX and the general increase in Odyssey sales in the same paragraph. The words were parsed very carefully enough to be accurate and true, but the casual reader who is not familiar with the various Ody trim levels might think these statements are related. And they're not.
He was not aware of specific detriment to swapping wheels and said vehicle warranty would remain in effect, but that if a failure of some part was attributable to the change in wheels, Honda might not cover the repair.
Michelin rep. said that if an EX/LX owner put PAX on and used an appropriate TPMS -- the rep gave the name of a few manufacturers, such as TRW (which manufactures Honda's) -- that Michelin would honor the 24 month warranty. Of course, I would want this in writing, since the warranty refers to the vehicle in which the tires were originally installed. Michelin was not aware of a detriment to using PAX on EX/LX but questioned whether Honda used a different suspension in Touring. (Honda customer service said Honda did not.)
Honda's TPMS cannot be installed by the dealer b/c it has too many sensors integrated into the car.
I haven't heard a reason why PAX, with appropriate TPMS, would not work in the EX/LX. Anyone know of a reason?
And as long as the EX wheels can accomodate the weight of the Touring, I don't see why they wouldn't work in the Touring. Am I right?
Honda also mentioned that changing the wheels could affect the calibration of the odometer, etc.
Anyone know of anyone who has actually switched wheels or intends to?
Unless someone knows better, I would want any switch acknowledged in writing by Honda so that if I needed to have repairs done away from home my warranty claim would not be automatically refused.
These tools are being sold to tire shops all over, so I don't know why you think only a certified shop can change a PAX tire. If you want reimbursement by Michelin, then you may need to find a "certified" shop.
Steve, Host
Steve, Host
TRX???
What tire technology (which required a special set of rims) have they NOT pulled the plug on?
Btw, I think the real profit center is the used car lot, but I wasn't about to step in on your other discussion, LOL.
Steve, Host
Who's buying them? Good question. Restorers?
I average about 20k /year on the main family vehicle and, putting the safety aside for the moment, what is it going to cost me in tire replacement over the course of say, 8 years. The Ody/Touring is a sweet penny to start out with but I would hate to be raked over the coals every two years.
You might try and find a neighbor with a Rolls-Royce Phantom and ask him....
I've seen various figures thrown around as to cost but nothing defintive. They are not inexpensive - you might want to call a Michelin dealer to be sure.
The B380s were decidedly average to lower than average in performance (dry, wet and snow) compared to other all-season passenger tires at double the price of a premium passenger tire, and having a tread wear rating of 1/2 to 1/3 of typical premium passenger tire (240 vs. 500 to 700). The noise level was significantly higher than other premium passenger tires. Let’s sum up: less than average overall for 4 to 6 times the price per mile driven...
So what is the selling point? Run flat operation. I have had plenty of real world experience in this regard. During less than 1 year and 10 months that I had the minivan, had punctured these tires 3 times. Two times out of three, could not use the widely advertised and vastly over-rated runflat feature. Both times metal objects which were lodged into the tire (piece of somebody's exhaust hanger and a sizeable bolt) could not be removed except using shop tools, because the tire is made so rigid to run without air. Could not drive because in both cases because these metal “studs” were protruding 1 to 1.5 inches out of the tread, making tire jumping and limping up and down. One of these damages was repaired for about $70.00 by a Toyota dealership, another required tire replacement at about $300 after shipping from tire rack and installing at the dealer (four days after the incident). The third damage was minor with tire loosing about 1 psi per week, so again no chance to use run flat feature. Based on my experience with these, I am convinced that the very same construction features that make tire rigid enough to operate without air makes them also more vulnerable to punctures. After all soft, more pliable tire is more likely to run over a metal object without lodging it into the tread, than tire so rigid, that it requires a special machine to remove / install it on the rim.
Now the most interesting question: How was I able to get to the dealer if I could not run these tires flat (because of 1 to 1.5 inches protrusions)? I never believed in having four tires run flat or not without the spare, especially with availability problems for these tires and special machines required for installation. Within a month of getting the minivan in April 2003, ordered steel wheel + inexpensive tire form tirerack (about $100, including shipping) to use as a spare.
To anybody who is not buying into the hype of novelty at absurd prices, and interested in replacing runflats with regular tires, a new Yokohama tire is coming to the market this month: Yokohama Avid TRZ (Triple Riding Zone, see yokohamatire.com for more info) is similar, at least in concept, to Goodyear triple tread tires. I ordered these at $116.00 per tire (including installation and all associated charges) from the local Yokohama dealer. Should have them installed by the end of the month.
I love everything about the Sienna, and definitely do not regret getting the AWD model, but strongly dislike these tires. Toyota, being a company with conservative business and engineering culture should have never bought into this hype without clearly thinking it through.
1. If I want to stay with the run flat, the Bridgestone seems like a better choice than the Dunlop, but I should be diligent about the tire pressure.
2. If I want a non run flat for a spare, go with an inexpensive tire, but be sure to have it with me at all times.
3. You personally are ditching the run flats altogether in favor of the new Yokohama that is coming out. I assume you will be getting 5 tires.
So you had no problem driving for a few days with 3 run flats and 1 regular tire? Did you keep your spare in the back well or on the roof? I just had another thought. If one switches to non run flats and down the road they become more available, more reliable, and cheaper, there is nothing stopping you from going back to run flats for the third set of tires. They use the same rims. Something to think about. Thanks.
Anyone have other experience of knowledge of run-flat tires and trailer towing issues?
The idea of leaving a trailer at the side of the road while hunting around to find a tire and service center that can do the work isn't comforting. Of course, this would only happen at night, on a holiday weekend. In the rain.
Phil
-------
From http://www.michelinman.com/assets/pdfs/doc_paxwarranty.pdf
Operation of PAX System tires at low or zero air pressure with a trailer in tow, is dangerous and not recommended. If the low pressure warning indicator is activated when a trailer is in tow, stop, disconnect the trailer and do not continue to tow the trailer until the tire has been repaired and re-inflated to the proper air pressure. If the tire cannot be repaired, it must be replaced with a new PAX System tire, and inflated to the proper air pressure, before the trailer can be safely towed again.
Run-flats for trailers; now there's a good idea.
Steve, Host
In particular, it doesn't seem that current run-flat technology is suited for vehicles that tow trailers (even occasionally).
A run-flat tire that requires me to leave the trailer at the side of the road while hunting down a new tire (within the rated 50 to 100 miles) doesn't seem to be terribly useful.
But I'm curious what others have learned.