Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Dodge Caliber
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I've owned 7 Chrysler products and all of them were very trouble-free vehicles. My 1990 Dodge Omni went an incredible 240,000 miles with the only required repairs being two timing belts and two brake jobs. The car still ran perfectly and used no oil when I sold it in 1999. The CV joints were just beginning to make a little noise at that point. My most recent Dodge was a 2001 Dakota which was perfect and never had a second's trouble up until January of 2006, when it was totalled in an accident.
My only negative experience with Dodge has been refusal of Chrysler to honor the warranty. My brother and I both bought new Dodges in 1988 and we both had minor problems with them within weeks of buying them. The manager of the dealership from which we purchased the cars told us (and I'm quoting his exact words to me) "We're not going to fix it and there's nothing you can do". My problem was a warped brake rotor (a common complaint on Chrysler products). I opted to pay a private garage to replace the rotors and I kept the car (a Daytona) another 90,000 miles with not a hint of a problem. My brother, after being totally ignored by both the dealership and Chrysler's arbitration board, opted to trade his Dodge (an Aries) in on a Chevrolet. He never purchased another Chrysler product. I am always concerned about any manufacturer's refusal to honor a warranty, but I've had so little trouble with Chrysler products that I'm willing to accept not having a warranty. The warped rotor problem is the ONLY problem I have ever had with a Chrysler product, and that is VERY minor. I am also sure that there are some good Dodge dealerships out there who DO care about keeping their customers happy. Dealerships are only as good as their management.
As for the Caliber, I have driven two of them and love them. I found them to be comfortable, smooth, and well appointed for the price. The acceleration with the 2.0 and the CVT transmission was acceptable, though not stunning. I would not count on getting the advertised 30mpg. None of the advertised mileage figures on any car are very realistic. I'd deduct about 15% from the advertised figure. I WILL NOT be buying a 2007 Caliber because I have a firm policy of never buying a first year model of ANY car. There are ALWAYS minor (and in some cases MAJOR) problems that show up on new models. Considering my less than stellar experience with Chrysler's lack of warranty service I will not risk getting stuck with a problem that I'll have to pay a private garage to fix. I will definitely consider buying a Caliber next year, when most of the bugs are (hopefully) worked out. It is a beautifully styled car at a very good price.
Although I don't own one, I did sit inside the one at the auto show and one at a dealer. Two things that Consumer Reports did mention in their review that I thought of the moment I sat inside the Caliber. (1) Cheap looking dash materials and (2) poor rearward visability.
My 2 cents.
And no one will prefer this piece of crap to a Magnum or Charger or even a Neon.
I predict the Caliber will never meet any sales goals."
I've only started reading this forum and am on post number 129 so I don't know if dialm4speed has been back to post how he enjoyed eating his words yet. Has he/she? Reports say that dealers can't get enough of them, and that as of the middle of July, it is the best "days on lot" number that Dodge has ever had for the period from 2 months into launch (apparently where they start measuring) until now.
And as far as meeting their sales goals, my information tells me that the only reason the Caliber is not blowing the sales goals out of the water is that production can't keep up with demand, and now they are cutting back on Caliber production to increase the Compass production to get the Jeeps out in good numbers at the start.
dialm4speed.... where are you? I'll keep reading and see if you've found out that the Caliber is as good as the 300, the Magnum and the Charger, and will probably outsell every one of those.
Greg
I drive a 92 Toyota Previa (yes...a mini van w/ over 370,000kms) right now - so I am sure the Calibre will be better on gas!
I am also happy to comprimise the best possible gas mileage in a car for something that I can 'throw' my mtn bike/snowboard/dog etc into with (relative) ease.
I love the exterior styling of the Calbre ... and like you was slightly dissappointed with the interior. Could they not have had a lock on the adjustable arm rest???? But all the added 'extra's' in the Calibre are VERY appealing.
I also am a 'standard' kinda girl and wish the 2.0 came with this option ...... but maybe the 2.0 Calibre will convert me into an automatic fan!
Ive narrowed my choices to a Calbre or a Impreza 2.5 SportsWagon .....agh, decisions! :confuse:
Thanks again
Quote:
"And I am glad to see the automatic is a Nissan CVT (with steel "push belts"), which should be MUCH more reliable than those marginal Eastern European CVT's that were making it over here in Saturns and giving CVT's a bad name. (Ford did a joint venture with the same Eastern European company, I believe, which explains some of Ford's teething problems with CVT's as well.)"
A Nissan salesman (take this for what it's worth, however it seems logical) says that the CVT in the Caliber is NOT a Nissan CVT. It is a DaimlerChrysler design that is MANUFACTURED by JATCO, which is owned by Nissan. He stresses that the Nissan designed CVT is a better and more reliable design and that they wouldn't just let DCX use their CVT in direct competition with Nissan.
FWIW!
Greg
"I am glad that DaimlerChrysler is using the CVT system that Nissan is using, one that has a very good track record of reliability in Nissan JDM models. That same CVT unit will be used on the Nissan Versa and next-generation Nissan Sentra models, too."
See what I said above about it NOT being "Nissan's CVT", FWIW.
I'm now up to post 566:
To caliberchic (and nonnemacher..... if this hasn't already been answered..... you asked about this)
caliberchic wrote:
"Oh, I got the driver convenience group solely for the temp display. I love knowing the temp. It's probably not really worth it but we added just about every other option so it made sense."
I tried out what nonnemacher (sp?) was asking about earlier on in this forum, which was whether anyone else without the drive convenience package had the temp display in the right hand LCD area where the miles/PRNDL is.
The car I tried did indeed have the TEMP DISPLAY when you pressed the button to go through Trip A, Trip B, Temp Display, and then back to the number of miles on the car.
So, if anyone doesn't need the driver convenience package, but does want the Temp Display, it is there....... at least in the one I tried in the showroom.
Greg
Folks still ask me about the car and nobody has said they did not like the size and style.
On a down note, my dealer mechanics seemed to have screwed up when they hoisted my car. I noticed a consistent line or bite marks along the bottom painted panel inside the door frame. Not the sill area but the bottom piece. Not a truly big deal as my buddy did not notice, but I will be letting them know Wednesday when the spark plug stuff is fixed.
SE and SXT comes standard with 1.8L and manual trany. Optional CVT which comes with the 2.0L, right?
What is the difference between the SE and SXT?
I know with the SXT the air conditioning and chill zone is standard. SXT also comes with 17' tires and alloy wheels, while the SE comes with 15" tires and steel wheels. Also the SXT has a fold flat and reclining rear seat, right? The SE rear seats don't recline or fold flat, right? Options included with the SXT like the two toned seats and dash, right?
Anyone has the 2.0L with CVT? How is the ride?
I also noticed all trims comes standard with side curtain airbags. Was this added recently?
"(As a sidebar, I have to admit it was with much trepidation, bordering on embarrassment, that we bought another PT Cruiser earlier this year; it is so "not masculine," but at the same time the PT is darn near the most practical small vehicle you can buy today, what with an enormous amount of rear seat legroom and decent trunk space for hauling a small family around. I really wanted the Caliber, which had just come out, but as a new car it was priced much higher than the long in the tooth PT Cruiser.)"
I have to laugh when I hear people say "The Matrix is a chic's car. The PT cruiser is not masculine."
Maybe where you are, but up here where I live (Winnipeg, Canada), we are men whatever we drive. We drive SMART!
If the PT Cruiser is the right vehicle, then we drive it. If the Matrix is, we drive it.
You'll see more men driving the PT and Matrix up here than women? Why? Because they are great vehicles!
You're going to see the same thing with the Caliber. We pick the vehicle that does the job for us. If you need a certain vehicle to be masculine, than are you really masculine in the first place?
I just thought it's funny since I hear this and see this from so many people.
I guess that's why the 5-door subcompact doesn't do anywhere near as well in the States as it does in Canada. Perception.
- Greg (no offense meant to those who won't drive a PT or a Matrix! It's all good!)
Thanks!
While I don't always put a lot of stock in one person's car review, it does seem that the CVT is going to be a winner. And knowing that this reviewer likes it almost as much as the Murano CVT makes me that much more comfortable buying the Caliber.
The 2.0 CVT is a very nice combo, although I suspect the 1.8/manual is good too.
This makes the SE a loser trim line for me, since an optioned SE still lacks some of the extra features of the SXT, like the reclining rear and front passenger seats and larger, wider wheels and tires.
The only problem in "real" life is that it is a lot easier to find optioned SE's on dealer lots that are close to what I want, than un-optioned SXT's. Most SXT's I have found on inventory searches have a LOT of stuff on them beyond the basic SXT "goodies." (On the other hand, even well-optioned SE's are often missing stuff now taken for granted, like power windows.)
Of course if you decide to order, the SXT is a better place to start, rather than loading up an SE. And an SXT should hold its value better than an SE, since an SXT won't be born with a "bottom trim line" stigma.
I WOULD like to see ABS thrown in on the SXT package so you get it even with a stick shift. Right now you get ABS on most SE's, since most SE's come with CVT's and the ABS is bundled with the CVT, but the minute you "upgrade" to an SXT without the CVT, you lose the ABS.
Of course stick shift drivers are already being shortchanged, not only on ABS, but since you can't even get a stick shift with the better 2.0 engine (or with a 2.4). (Meanwhile, every Ford Focus has a 2.0, and every Cobalt has a 2.2.)*
Dodge needs to come up with better packages - for example how about this:
1. SE should remain simple so Dodge can advertise a low entry-level price and high gas mileage. Thus the small 1.8, the stick shift, no ABS, no power windows, locks, or mirrors. Even no aircon, although I think leaving out aircon in 2006 is a bit of a come-on. But at least everyone gets side curtain airbags, a great crash test series, and lives a little longer.
2. The SXT has definitely GOT to be a "real" car - as in, no 1.8 (except on a "delete" option) even with the stick shift, and ABS in addition to the side curtain airbags. Then for "fans" make the 2.4 the optional engine, on both stick shift and CVT variants.
3. The R/T line needs FWD sooner rather than later. The AWD drags down performance too much.
4. Where are stability control and side torso airbags, at least as options?
Dodge has all the ingredients to match the VW Rabbit. Why aren't they trying to get more enthusiast drivers?
(*In anticipation that someone will comment that the 1.8 HP rating is better than the 2.0 Focus and matches the 2.2 Cobalt, keep in mind that the torque doesn't, and torque is what you need for everyday driving....)
So he did a search and located the exact model, colour and options that I ordered, in Montreal. After a few calls, the car was in Ottawa, and I had the keys by the end of that week. I haven't a clue what happened to the original one I ordered, but I suspect the dealer still has it on order, because he'll be able to sell it no problem.
Good luck to 'ya.
Finally managed to pry the VIN number from the dealer mid-July, and learned that it was due to be built the third week in July.
We were so close... it was about to get on the train, new arrival date of August 12, then... foiled again!! Assembly hold, then back to the plant.
So now not only do we not have our car, but apparently there was something wrong enough with it to merit some sort of regression back to the plant. I'm starting to feel like I'm never, ever, ever going to get my car...
Any one had a similar experience?
Cheers
I think that you'll see more options and better packages starting next year. You have to remember that this is the first year that the car has been made & it's pretty common for cars to lack options in the first model year.
Mike
Greg
thanks!
Not that we would have considered buying a Caliber, but now I will actively dissuade anyone I can from buying this sad overweight, underpowered sled. :lemon:
The good news is that when you fill the tank completely it will stay on full for a good while making you think you are getting really high mpg (unless someone already told you about this - oops). And, once you get used to its operation, the gauge always behaves the same way.
I usually monitor the trip odo and fill-up every 300 miles. If you want to use a trip odo for something other than re-fill reminders, the Caliber does have two trip odos in the display that can be reset separately.
If you want a faster Caliber try the R/T or the SRT4 versions.
Also I'm not sure how not liking One Dodge car equates to not buying Any Dodge cars??? Perhaps a Dodge Viper would be to slow for you too? Or maybe a Dodge Charger R/T is to slow?
You get what you pay for and this is the Least Expensive car that Dodge currently makes, so perhaps you should keep that in mind - to me it sounds like you already had a bias against Dodge products before you even drove the car, so no matter what happened you weren't going to like the car.
What kind of car do you own that was in the shop for a few days getting repaired? (I'm curious what you are comparing the Caliber to)
I reported this to Chrysler and the told me that they were no responsible as this was "a private enterprise". It seems the designation does not protect you in a 5 Star sort of way.
This signed invoice sounds to me like another Chrysler boondoggle.
Either way, I hope that you all enjoy your Calibers. As someone who drives an unconventional vehicle, I salute you. :shades:
Thank you for your witty response. You may find it hard to believe, but I was born in the 70's and have no love for Chevy's in the 80's. I may have been too hard on the Caliber. I am sure the high re-sale and reliability all Caliber purchasers experience in a couple years will be a very jagged pill for me to swallow. Best wishes for all and their Calibers. :shades:
I don't mean to ruin it for you, but your fine automobile does not win the day...
As I said before, best wishes, I hope you enjoy your new vehicle. I am glad it is you behind the wheel and not me. :shades:
I guess the depends upon whose day you are seeking validation to justify your purchase of a new automobile. I've read the review you have posted; I'm not too impressed with its content. I can give you five others that happen to rate Caliber highly. If you are in doubt look at the personal reviews of people who own one. I don't think an average of 9.2 is bad. If you don't want to buy a caliber--fine. It just lessens the wait that much more for those of us who have them on order. But stop trying to spoil it for those of us who have selected it as our car of choice. Do yourself a favor: go complain to a thread that sympathizes with your anti-dodge, anti-caliber rhetoric and buy yourself a European rice-burner that has no personality and looks the same as everything else on the road. :mad: