Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Midsize Sedans Comparison Thread
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Here yes this is the impetus for the across the board implementation. However in europe it had already been in effect in high end vehicles and even as long as two years ago EURO/NCAP had been recommending that no consumer should buy a vehicle without ESC.
If it really does cut down one vehicle accidents by 50% as the IIHS indicates then that's a good thing.
I think the phenomenon that was in the article is probably smaller than what they think it is. However, I too would probably drive a lot more conservatively if I had a spear in the middle of my steering wheel ;-)
It would however explain some of the boorish behavior you sometimes see with folks in the huge trucks/suvs/vans (disclaimer - I own a full size conversion van). Some think that they are invincible with all that sheetmetal around them.
Have a safe night!
thegrad
It'll certainly be harder for Ford to post years of big sales figures when they shed 50% of their workforce. Ouch.
I'm surprised you didn't pick up on the redundancy of that statement which made the statement meaningless.
Good luck to you and family and let's hope the people who had no warning are all OK.
Keep safe.
Now, about mid-sized sedans. Since this thread started in April(05 or 06? I forget).... we have had the new Sebring(like it or not) and new Optima( not bad).
Have test driven both, and like both.
But, if I had to choose, I might pick the Optima(07) over the Sebring.
Sebring seems to be about 1000-1,500 over priced. I noticed that the price was advertised 3 weeks ago as 18,995 for a base sedan, and it is now down to 18,329! Also, chrysler sent me a $1,000 Cash Back coupon for 07 (and any unsold 06 model cars, new). Now, if they would just lower the price 1,000 to begin with, and sell it for 17,329 (every day), they might get somewhere.
Considering you can get a Manual (5 speed)Optima(a rarity in this class, isn't it?), for less than 17K.....and after arguing, bargaining, get a decent auto-manual I-4 for maybe same price as Sebring on sale...
(I like the auto-manual).
Anyhow.... pretty soon, the new Malibu will debut, early in 08(?). If the interior shots recently posted on the net are any indication... it may be a good buy.
take care/not offense.
Oh it WILL, huh? Got any facts or figues that prove this? Didn't think so...
Ford is doing the right thing offering buyouts to their (admittedly) excessive workforce. They've realized that they don't have as much of the market as they used to, so they're doing what they can to adjust, and become profitable again. It may take up to 2009 (by some estimates), but who knows? It just might actually work...
"Big sales figures" aren't achieved by 3-shift factories puking out 1 million cars per year that are garbage, they're achieved by QUALITY product, as proven by Honda and Toyota. Their quality has come from heavy investments into R&D, money that was wasted by the Big Three for years in below-capacity factories, with workers (both blue- and white-collared) that were paid big $$$ to do next to nothing, with insurance and pension plans that drained even more $$$.
Buyouts to baby-boomers (and others) make sense, both to Ford and the workers that can benefit from this. Will it help Ford to become profitable again? I don't know, you don't know, nobody does...
Ford doesn't want or need big sales figures. Market share is worthless if it's not profitable. That's why you're seeing the Fusion and Edge with modest sales goals, modest production numbers and low or no incentives. The goal is profit and being able to shed the costs for those workers that took the buyout (a lot may change their minds so the final number will be less) and close plants/shifts that aren't needed is one thing that will help Ford weather this storm.
And Ford has already stated it will start adding features and upgrades instead of cutting costs and decontenting like it did in the past. One sign of that is the Edge offering Navigation and the Vista Roof which, in the past, would have been exclusive to Lincoln.
The Fusion debuted in 06, added AWD in 07, scheduled for a hybrid in 08 and a platform refresh in 09 which should include an upgraded interior, powertrain and more features. They're not letting cars die on the vine anymore.
Horizon displays have a lot of legibility benefits, especially for older drivers. That large numeral for the speed and its position further from the driver reduces accommodation effects while providing a lot of the advantages of a much more expensive head up display (HUD). The Prius uses similar technology.
I personally thought the prev. Civic cluster was hard to read with minimal markings for speed (every 20 mph) and limited number of markings in between. If 70% of the time the car is between 0-50 mph, you might as well make it easy to read at those speeds.
Our dealer is very smug when it comes to negotiating - it's essentially take it or leave it, as he says: "Someone else will buy the car if you don't."
Not sure what you consider loaded, but buyers have reported offers on the top-line Sonata Limited around $18.5k in the Sonata Prices Paid discussion. Go check it out if you don't believe me.
If I was still driving on snow covered roads, the first thing I would want to do is shut something like VSC/TRAC off, an option that many cars do not have. And if you do have to do that a lot, you should understand why!
This is a major league cluster when the rest of the world is going all out to capture the millions of new car buyers coming down the pipe. China, India, Latin America, Brazil, in addition to North America are all BOOMING!
Hyundai, VW, Honda, Toyota, BMW - all jamming.
Ford, Mitsubishi, Volvo, Jaguar, Isuzu - not.
Or maybe CR faked the tests because they want people to buy cars with ABS. :surprise:
If Ford wants to compete globally, they'll build plants out of the US, where labor is cheap, for markets out of the U.S. Besides, Ford of Europe is actually doing very well, from what I've heard.
When you skid you melt rubber off the tire. Melted rubber is a liquid. The coefficient of kinetic friction (dry pavement) is .8, the coefficient of kinetic friction (wet pavement) is .7 in good condition, .4 in a more worn condition.
Friction of Various Surfaces
Since you didn't read CR's tests, how can you say the test was biased or make any kind of informed guess as to what rules they may have applied?
stopping on snow or ice may be an exception to this is, where abs may lengthen stopping distance.
Why? My wife's car has ESP (VW version of ESC). The only time you would turn it off would be if you want wheels to spin to help get through very deep snow. In normal snowy road conditions you should want it on as it will help maintain control.
The only fair test is to use a car where the ABS can be turned off and on.
Do you know any cars on which ABS can be turned on and off? I don't.
Bad news. To me and some others CR is not the end of automotive knowledge. They have biases and prejudices and that's from their original green (environmentally friendly) goals they have always tried to portray.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
But you are right that driving along and then hiiting a patch of ice or something, ESC will stop you at that point from doing anything that would lose control, if it is possible.
Did it ever occur to you, what your ESP equipped car would or would not do if that pickup in front of you on the hwy. lost a ladder or something and you had to swerve violently to avoid it? Or that idiot that just ran a light is about to braodside you and what you really need to do is accelerate HARD while swerving away from him? I just don't think that we are quite ready yet to be trying to program 'intelligence' in our cars.
Research has shown this to be false.
HUD's distract and remove a drivers focus from the road to a greater degree than digital speedometers do, however, it is analog speedometer and gauges that were determined to be the superior format. They convey a greater amount of information to the driver and require less eyes-off-the-road time.
Digital speedometers were found to be more effective in decreasing speeding. The negative side effect was drivers were more likely to miss important safety information outside of the vehicle.
HUD's are effective in aircraft, HUD's and any legibility offered by large digital numerals have shown no benefit in autos and are a driver distraction.
Horizon displays have a lot of legibility benefits, especially for older drivers. That large numeral for the speed and its position further from the driver reduces accommodation effects while providing a lot of the advantages of a much more expensive head up display (HUD). The Prius uses similar technology.
Why did you lump HUDs and digital speedometers together? I didn't see a mention of horizon displays at all.
Research has shown this to be false.
Please feel free to pass along any sources. Right now this is considered opinion.
HUD's distract and remove a drivers focus from the road to a greater degree than digital speedometers do, however, it is analog speedometer and gauges that were determined to be the superior format.
A HUD is not the same as a horizon display. Cognitive capture can be more of an issue with HUD, which is why it is used more for warnings, or times you want to grab attention.
They convey a greater amount of information to the driver and require less eyes-off-the-road time.
They convey rate of change information, but again, this is dependent on gauge layout. The original study was performed using clusters very different than what is available today (think '70s GM/Ford cars), if you have newer sources, I'd love to see them.
Uh, yeah...I expect that, if necessary, it would prevent understeer by applying inside rear brake or if needed to prevent oversteer it would apply the outside front brake. Applying braking to single wheels INCREASES the capabilities of the car.
Not exactly dead, however, these heads up projected displays in things like Caddies really distracting, IMO.
Yes, location is very important, however, horizon displays are also distracting since they are in the field of "automatic selection". They are IMO better used for warning displays, not constant information such as speed.
The time period of the research is from the 90's to current time.
or
Kind of like saying diesels suck because someone had a 70s Delta 88.
I disagree however, that horizon displays have the same cognitive capture attributes, I haven't seen any reports stating that yet. What I have seen appeared to be suggesting that they help driving performance as drivers age (read: old people can still see how fast they are going even when using glasses for distance, and reduced accommodation effects).
Its also interesting that you mention Keifer's research as it seems like he is a proponent of HUD.
I am curious, how do you feel about center mounted displays like the Scion and Mini?
Look for The falling box
In the recent Prius changes of last Dec we were told that in such a slippery situation now Toyota allows the wheels to spin - a little - so that the vehicle just doesn't go dead. It would be interesting to see if this modification to Trac is now across the board in all new models.
ESC will only kick in when the yaw sensors detect that the vehicle is going offline from the intended steering direction.
This will only happen if you are out of control and skidding/plowing. If you are in control then ESC remains in the background.
I hate to hear that. How many dealers are within, say 50 miles of where you live (or of that dealer)? Where I live (suburban community of Birmingham) there are at least 4 dealers that I can name off; this competition undoubtedly helps us get better deals.
As is true of a lot of things, when it comes to buying cars, what becomes important is "location, location, location."