Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
There is a square connector on the rear of the radio, which is allegedly an industry standard connector (separate from that of the connector for the optional XM module) that any car audio ship will carry (I haven't checked yet, but I will).
I'm just hesitant to let someone start pulling the dash apart, so I'll probably just order the sevice manual and do it myself (the dealer is 50 miles from home, so unless there is some other reason to make the drive, it's not worth my time to kill 2-3 hours on the road plus wait time).
Suzuki does not sell the cable.
I do wonder if the plug is compatible with other Clarion head units and accessories (like the SIR-CL1 Sirius receiver), so I'll probably call Clarion and see if they don't give me too much of a run-around about giving me data on an OEM unit.
I'll update the post with my findings.
jay
Just wondering if anyone looked at the VUE?
The Vue's advantages over the GV should include better mileage and more cargo space. I don't know about pricing. I've heard good and bad things about the plastic panels. The Theta underpinnings should be pretty good.
If someone needs the space and/or power more than the ruggedness of the GV, then the Vue would make more sense, all else assumed equal.
so far, m very much pleased with the GV's performance. traction, acceleration, exterior and interior, comfortable ride and power. i get good mileage too 22 combined..i test drove CRV and RAV4. they don't come close..and the fact that its a few grand cheaper makes it more appealing...i got mine for $21700..all in (taxes, destination charge, auto tran, dealer protective paint)
i used to own a suzuki samurai (from 1995-2004,back in the philippines), a true compact off-roader. it has been used and abused every weekend...not only by me, but also my friends and cousins who at times, had to take their off-roader for repairs...mine is a tough...
if you guys doubt suzuki's reliability, dont be...mine is stil running good...(sold to it to a friend...m now in florida). in fact, it is still being used in competitions back ther...
the only thing is that suzuki is not that well known here in the US, not yet..unlike in asia. i dont see a lot of suzukis on the road..
Selling of GV '06 started in late september. But one dealer near where i live didnt have any on display til 3rd week of December...I had to drive 40 miles to get to the next dealer. But its worth it...
Someone has a GV in our neighborhood, so much for that "custom" feeling for me.
Clarion would not give me any information on the head unit in the GV; they referred me to a 1-800 number, which was simply an installer referral automated system.
Called 5 local installers, who had no idea what I was talking about when I brought up the cable Suzuki stated would be available from any car audio shop.
Called the dealer, who said the only way to get the cable was to buy the XM unit (which I tried to explain was allegedly not the same cable as the AUX input cable, but he kept on insisting was).
I've scoured the web, called companies like PIE & Metra & Blitzsafe (who say that due to the low volume of vehicles Suzuki sells in the states, they don't support the hardware), to no avail.
I have not yet purchased the service manual for the vehicle, but intend to do so in the near future, just so I can tear down the dash and get to the back of the radio.
Anyone know where the CD changer (external to the radio) would be installed? Perhaps there is some cabling there that might be useful.
Any suggestions as to how to solve this problem are appreciated!
This site is worth a look also link title
Pulled the radio and the socket you see on this interface is the same square socket on the rear of the radio. I've read some user's comments on this clarion interface and some weren't too pleased. I'll wait awhile and see what others come up with.
Any help would be appreciated it's nice to let it warm up a bit when it's cold outside without worrying if someone is going to steal it.
What's done is done. But congrats to you all for considering & buying the GV. If I had looked at it last fall, there might be one in front of my house.
I do hate how long it takes for the idle to come down. Maybe it's old school, but I like to wait until the rpm is under 1,000 before I shift(auto)
I considered the CRV on the basis of the standard stability control and claims it does reasonably well off-road. But the clearance just wasn't adequate for us.
The X-Trail was at the top of our list as the most capable small suv for off-roading (other than the Liberty). But we actually use low range gearing sometimes, so we waited to see what the new GV was like. After seeing the specs and reviews, the decision was easy and we bought one sight-unseen without even going to see anything else.
Looking at the long term test on the Chevy Equinox and they seem happy with it getting less than 20 mpg. Most reviews on the GV didn't care for the mileage it was getting even though it was almost 24 mpg. I hope ours will get a bit more mpg over time, but it sure beats my truck's 9 mpg.
I was told by Suzuki that there are 2 plugs, one for the AUX Input cable, one for the XM Radio input (anyone come up with a manufacturer and part number for the AUX Input cable?).
What was involved with pulling the radio?
jay
Check this link:
http://www.suzuki-forums.com/t3000-2006-grand-vitara-and-ipod.htm
Now if we could just get a manufacturer and part number for a cable that terminates in either RCA or 1/8" plug.
K&N's reply: At this time K&N has not released a replacement air filter or a performance intake system for your vehicle, if you want to be notified when it does, blah blah blah blah blah bs bs bs.
Don't you love these replies? I hope all of you can do me a favor and bombard this guy with emails from us Suzuki owners demanding they make a filter for us. It's not alot to ask for, and if they get enough emails they may actually help us out.
One theory is that the TC backs off the throttle in response to one wheel spinning, and doesn't restore the fuel flow until all four wheels are spinning. Or, as the wheels start spinning, one by one, the TC applies the brakes to them, but it's smart enough to know to release the wheels before all four wheels are being braked. I don't know.
What I do know is that this will cost you almost all your momentum and will make the difference between making it or not making it up some hills or through some crap. I suppose I should have turned off the ESP before I got into the deep stuff, but that's exactly what I expect TC to deal with.
I guess they work under certain conditions. I had a car with a similar system. If you had to accelerate to get out of the way or cross a street in a hurry, the motor would fall on it's face if the tires would start to spin. It's scary when you aren't going anywhere with that loss of power and cars coming at you. I feel more in control with wheels spinning and burning rubber.
So maybe the stability control kicked in. Whatever happened, it felt like a total loss of power, and I lost momentum. I thought I was getting stuck, (how that would have looked after the old car made it!) until the throttle came back and the GV just leapt through the stuff.
I too have found that if you suddenly give this thing a lot of gas, there is a second or two of utter hesitation while it thinks about whether to go along with what you want. I've heard this car has a "fly by wire" throttle, maybe someone could confirm that. I think there's grounds to list this hesitation as a safety hazard.
Whatever the case, if this is a system Mercedes uses, I'm surprised MB would use something with such an obvious deficiency. Maybe Suzuki should have bought Nissan's system.
.............................................................
A couple of trips on forestry roads in the mountains has turned up something else I dislike strongly. Coming downhill I like to engine brake, even with automatics. You can leave the GV's automatic in Drive, which gives a bit of engine braking. You can push the lever to the right, which presumably is 4th gear, and gives a little more engine braking. Next, you can downshift to 3rd gear. This again gives more engine braking, depending on your speed. But not enough for these roads. Lastly, you can put it down in 1st gear.
Depending on your speed, with the lever in 1st, the transmission won't downshift itself down into 2nd or 1st. It just happens that logging roads in our part of the world generally are built to a certain grade, width and condition such that descending is frequently done around 30kph. 3rd gear doesn't provide adequate engine braking at that speed and angle. If you put it in 1st, it stays in 3rd and slows. At a certain point, or if you're going slowly when you shift from 3rd to 1st, (I'm not sure, maybe about 25kph), it suddenly downshifts to 1st, almost locking the wheels and putting the revs up around 5000. And slows to a speed far below what you want, say 10kph.
So this seems pretty stupid, and is part of the whole marketing bs around combining the low range gearing only with a set of features least suited to "off-roading". What it means is that unlike any vehicle with automatic or manual transmissions I've used coming down these roads, I'm going to have to use the brakes most with the GV. Dumb, dumb dumb.
Finally I can also see the advantage of a "manumatic" auto transmission, where presumably you can put it in any gear you want.
.............................................................................
Changing the subject, the driver's seat on the fancy GV's is spec'd as height-adjustable. This gives the impression the seat goes straight up and down. What it really does is not so simple. Most of the action is like being hinged at the front of the bottom cushion, so it's the backrest and the back of the seat cushion that moves up and down the most. This means that while the height changes, the back angle does also. The seat moves a bit forward when you "raise" it, but very little. So it's as much a tilt mechanism as a height adjustment. Do short people like sitting up straighter? Odd, because you can adjust the backrest and the sliding seat anyway.
Keyless start is not the same as remote start. You still have to turn the ignition key bezel to start, but don't need to insert the key as long as you have the fob with you.
The GV does not come with an alarm system. So far as I can determine, all other cars with keyless start also come with alarm systems. Suzuki's implementation of keyless start is also atypical. You can still unlock and start it using the key, in case the fob's battery is dead. Most other keyless starts have button for the ignition and therefore can't be started with a key.
So the fact the GV can be started using a key suggests it's vulnerable to common attacks on the ignition cylinder. Therefore one would want to add an alarm with an immobilizer.
Unfortunately alarm installers are unfamiliar with this situation.
Suzuki sells an alarm, but it has no immobilizer function. The dealer said I could install an alarm with immobilizer, but it would disable the keyless start. Suzuki Canada washed their hands of the matter, saying they endorse no alarm systems and warned about causing problems tampering with the car's complex electronics and wiring.
A car alarm installer said they could install a system with an immobilizer, but there was no way a system could be integrated to use the stock keyfobs. So we'd have to carry two bulky keyfobs to operate the car. Or not use the keyless start.
It seems utterly silly that Suzuki has created an unacceptable situation, and then refuses to help solve it. It would seem to be fairly simple to offer a proper alarm system that integrates with the stock features. The GV will sell in relatively low numbers in North America, so I don't expect any alarm company to design and offer a system to match the peculiarities of the GV's keyless start. Anyone planning to buy one of these cars should be aware of this problem.
thanks
Consumer Ratings & Reviews
Steve, Host
Steve, Host
Nope, the reviews are for 2005's, and I can't find any for the 2006.
Steve, Host
Other review # 1.) appeared last week on TSN Canada's weekly Motoring 2006 tv show, (unless this was a repeat I'd missed earlier?). The tester was a fellow who is seldom shy about ranting about this or that, along with the compliments when due. He was pretty well uniformly complimentary about the new GV. Disappointingly though his only "off road excursion" seemed limited to a mostly level muddy road. You will be interested to know that he DID make special note of the apparent incongruity of Suzuki's choice to only offer the low range transfer case option, in the all the bells and whistles, auto trannie equipped model, (in my own words here).
Review two, (read and weep?)...
Just posted online on a UK site is the first review I've seen from the more fortunate side of the Atlantic, re: their new Suzuki Grand Vitara DDis 5dr. At 16,500 British pounds, that would put this diesel engined model up there with the cost of our full boat GV model on this side of the pond. But what'll she do? Yes, there are the odd quirks reported, probably having to do with break in issues and the fact the test was conducted in Austria in freezing conditions, but: underway the 1.9 litre common rail diesel is referred to as being a perfect match for the vehicle, producing 127bhp, and an "impressive" 221Nm of torque at only 2,000rpm. Also, they felt the vehicle accelerates "keenly" in every gear, feeling quicker than it's 0-60mph time of 13.2 seconds might suggest. Further, the diesel's laudable fuel economy, (compared even to the four cylinder engine that's the standard mill in UK Grand Vitaras), of 36 plus mpg, a combined city/highway average, is prominently mentioned, as well it should be. Also that the engine has lower CO2 emissions than the four cylinder gas engine.
"And for off-roading, the Grand Vitara makes even more sense. The unit is ideal for hauling the 4x4 over hills, while its strong engine-braking helps to control descents. On really tough terrain, drivers can electronically lock the 4wd transmission, while a low ratio gearbox provides even more grip."
To rub yet more salt in [my] wounds: Three pictures accompany this road test. What better color for an also obviously "green" environmentally conscious vehicle?, yup, a lovely sort of a forest green. But that wasan't the only green thing, the other one being my being deep green with envy when noting that the one interior shot showed that the test vehicle, (equipped as noted above), had a 5 speed manual transmission...
Dear, (oh dear), Suzuki, for cripes sake when and where will we oppressed Colonials in the new world be able to sign up to order ours? If the UK deserves to have theirs for fox hunts, why oh why can't we have our own diesel GV's to use thriftily and greenly here in the deep dark Northwoods?!
Steve, Host
The mileage has me apprehensive about getting one. Actually, for the power it has, it appears to be a quite a gas hog.
What's the best mpg that you have gotten?