Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Nissan Pathfinder Real World MPG

Karen_CMKaren_CM Posts: 5,024
edited April 18 in Nissan
This topic is for Pathfinder owners to post their actual MPG.

"Real World" Fuel Economy vs. EPA Estimates

Community Manager If you have any questions or concerns about the Forums, send me an email, karen@edmunds.com, or click on my screen name to send a personal message.

«1

Comments

  • damavrdamavr Posts: 15
    For our new 2005 Pathfinder LE 4x4 using the computer MPG it shows an average of 15 mpg which is very low. This is a mix of highway and city miles and it is very low.
  • keeferbkeeferb Posts: 81
    With about 5,000 miles on our '05 SE 4WD, we get between 18-19 mpg with 75% hwy commuting. I've seen 20-21 on pure hwy trips. I drive it fairly conservatively because I know lead-footing will drop these numbers signicantly. MPG is a tad higher than what I was getting with my '01 PF. For a vehicle this size, I'm not complaining.
  • 16211621 Posts: 1
    I've only got 1300 miles on my SE 4x4, and I am getting 22 on the freeway at about 65 mph and 16 in mixed city/freeway driving. I am using 87 octane. During purely stop and go driving [lots of stoplights], I am getting 14 or 15 mpg.

    Overall, this is a little better than I expected.
  • thrbekthrbek Posts: 14
    I have about 500 miles on my 2005 Pathfinder LE and I'm getting similar gas mileage. (21-22 on HWY and 15-17 in town)

    This is about what I expected. I think I could get even better mileage on the highway if I didn't live in such a hilly area. There are a few long flat highways that I've driven and the real-time MPG settles in around 23 MPG when I set the cruise control at 60MPH. (The speed limit.)

    :)

    -Tony
  • With almost 4,000 on our 2005 LE using mid-grade gas, I am turning in the following results:

    Highway: 19-21. My best tank on pure highway driving was 21.5.

    "worst case" local: 12.5. This on one tank dedicated entirely to very short trips (drop off at school, pick up dry cleaning, run over to the mall). Probably the worst driving you can do short of just idling in your driveway.

    Mixed Use: 16-17. :surprise:
  • I have a 96 Nissan Pathfinder XE 3.3L. It has 120K miles, and has had all repair work done but I have not yet replaced timing belt. When cruise control is engaged, in other words, at constant speed, the engine will randomly rev up 400-1000 rpm and then drop back down. Then rev back up again and down. Not always at the same speed, but commonly on highway. Additionally, at times I will take foot off the accelerator, and the engine will not drop to idle rpms, but hold at a level higher than normal. If I jam the accelerator to free this problem, then there is a jerk underneath as if engine catches itself, and then rpms are normal. For a while at least. Any help is greatly appreciated.
  • I'm looking at buying a 2005 Pathfinder LE. I read the specs and it recommends that premium fuel is used. But I see that some people are using regular. My question is can the 2005 Pathfinder run under regular unleaded gas?
    Thanks
  • I think the answer is yes based on what I've read. They recommend premium but you don't have to use it.
  • pathstar1pathstar1 Posts: 1,015
    However, past experience indicates you would get poorer mileage, enough to more than offset the lower cost of the fuel. In other words, you would probably experience a lower cost per mile using premium.
  • Hey Guys,

    I drive a 2001 Pathfinder SE 4x4....the specs say that the fuel tank is 21.1 gallons. But each time my guage hits empty, I could fill only 15.5 gallons max. Is there like a 6 gallon safety net? Thanks.

    Jish
  • I think so. The '05 seems to be the same way.
  • jbates99jbates99 Posts: 9
    My 99 Pathfinder SE (3.3 L engine) can get 23.4 MPG at 65 MPH hiway driving with A/C OFF.

    At 70 MPH will usually get 22 MPH easily hiway only.

    These are a bit better than EPA for this year I think. I'm happy, considering the cost of gasoline !
    John
  • I drive a 1995 Pathfinder4WD SE 3.0. This old steed has 150000 miles on it. I put in Bosch Plus 4 plugs, and dropped in a K&N filter. Milage went from 15mpg to ~19 city, ~20 hwy consistently for the last 6 years or so. Doing research on Green air filter. Anyone have any experience with these?
  • jimesqjimesq Posts: 7
    I own a 2005 Pathfinder LE 4x4 (wife's vehicle) 8000 miles on it. I consistently get 17-18 mpg in mostly city driving, on all highway trips I will get 20-21 mpg. Unleaded 87 Octane. Dealership told me that regular is all that is needed. Although I have heard you may get slightly better mpg with premium fuel. Nowhere on the vehicle itself or owners manual does it require use of premium fuel.
  • brown3brown3 Posts: 26
    2006 Pathfinder LE 4x4. After 5000 miles, I'm averaging about 18.5 MPG (regular grade gas) in what I'd call "hill country suburban" driving - mostly hilly roads with posted speeds of 50-60 MPH and occasional stoplights, with some residential (30 MPH) driving thrown in. This is 2+ MPG better than I was getting in my smaller, less powerful '93 Explorer 4x4. The dashboard gage is consistently within 0.2 MPG of what I get when computing fuel economy manually, so the Nissan engineers did their homework.
  • my PF se 2003 with 47000 miles I get about 19 MPG,city and highway miles mixed. miles driven devided by gallons to fill the tank.
  • I just bought a 2005 Pathfinder LE 4x4 with only 15,500 miles on it. After my first tank full i only got 13.2 mpg.
    I would have bought a v8 if i new my milage was going to be this poor.

    Pete :confuse:
  • This is my 3rd Pathfinder. In the past I've had a '91, 97' and now a 2001.

    Best economy of the 3 was pure highway with the '97, I could get 19mpg with 89octane gas. The 2001 gets much worse mileage. City driving can drop the mpg to 12, highway is usually 15-17mpg at best. I do have AT style tire on it now, I got better mileage running a highway rib style tire.

    The 3.5 Engine needs Premium from my experiences. I kept getting check engine lights running 89 octane.
  • You would have bought a V8 what? Toyota 4Runner is the only comparable truck with a V8 that I'm aware of. After both companies revised their HP ratings to reflect power at the drive wheels, Yota's V8 is at 260hp, vs Nissan's 266hp V6. Don't know about the MPG, but I'd bet a month's IRA distribution that Yota's is no better. Sure, there's the Ford Explorer V8. But it's . . . a Ford Explorer. :sick:

    One full tank isn't sufficient to establish overall mileage. I'm on my fourth full tank of premium in my '06 PF LE, and I'm at about 16 mpg with NO highway miles. Reset the MPG readout now, drive it for a month without resetting it, then tell us how you're doing.
  • My wife's V8 06 4runner gets about 22 mpg in the highway driving 70+mph, and around 18 in the city, driving in a hilly area. I test drove both before we bought it and the 4runner engine defintively felt more powerful, quieter and smoother. A friend has an 05 PF and had been complaining about the poor mileage he gets, which we confirmed when we went on a ski trip from So Cal to Mammoth driving both cars, he spent $5 to $10 more both times we filled up the tank.
  • paisanpaisan Posts: 21,181
    Well a V8 is going to be more torquey than the V6 is. $5 is like 1.5 gallons at most. The ride in the 4-wheel indy suspension PF should be better.

    -mike
  • It was actually 2 to 4 gallons more on the PF ($2.40/gal). More torque, power, better ride, better mileage and quality? I'll take the 4runner any day.
  • paisanpaisan Posts: 21,181
    4wheel indy suspension will ride better than the 4-runner, oh and cost.... toyota will be way more as well.

    -mike
  • We got the sport edition with XREAS suspension, handles great...Resale value in a toyota is way higher than a nissan, and when I quoted both, the 4runner was only $400 more, to me it was a no brainer. Sorry you made the wrong choice.
  • These are the closing comments on the review of the 05 Pathfinder, and below the 03 4runner, by Edmunds.com

    05 PATHFINDERAfter a week with a 2005 Pathfinder SE 4x4, we can't deny the wide-ranging capabilities of this SUV. It's certainly quick and it can haul kids and cargo with the best of 'em.
    But it sacrifices the surefooted handling and braking of the old Pathfinder in the name of off-road capability. And although its cabin is comfortable and well equipped, it's not put together with a great deal of care. Were it our money, we'd think long and hard before spending it on the 2005 Nissan Pathfinder.

    03 4RUNNER
    Mulling over our week with the 4Runner, we were struck by how Toyota nearly always hits the nail on the head when revamping one of its vehicles. With the 2003 Toyota 4Runner, the company has done it again by providing a level of ride comfort and on-road handling that rivals most car-based "soft-roaders," while also enhancing its already renowned off-road skills.
  • paisanpaisan Posts: 21,181
    You still have a solid rear axle, and $400 more for a v8 4-runner? would you mind breaking down the prices and also breaking down the Actual price one would pay v. list price?

    Toyota does make a good truck however, your comments "sorry you made the wrong choice" are a bit un-called for.

    Then again I paid $34k OTD for my Armada LE 4wd w/60 mo 1% financing so who really made the wrong choice? :)

    -mike
  • A solid rear axle, and yet better ride than most car based SUVs.

    The armada is not a mid size SUV, so it is not really comparable to the 4runner, so why even bring it up? However, read any reviews on the Armada and it is usually on all the worst reliability full size SUV lists. Here is one of such lists from Consumer Reports:
    Least reliable (Worst score first)
    Nissan Armada
    Infiniti QX56
    Lincoln Navigator
    Hummer H2

    (http://money.cnn.com/popups/2006/autos/reliable/9.html)

    Here is a list of midsize SUVs, most reliable:
    Most reliable (Best score first)
    Toyota Highlander Hybrid* (pictured)
    Toyota 4Runner
    Toyota Highlander
    Honda Pilot
    Lexus RX400h* (hybrid)
    2006 Acura MDX

    (http://money.cnn.com/popups/2006/autos/reliable/8.html)

    Cheaper to me is not necessarily better. I paid $27k for the 4runner, but again it is a smaller SUV not comparable to the Armada.
  • paisanpaisan Posts: 21,181
    Thanks for proving my point. This Pathfinder MPG, not Toyota v. Nissan....

    Let's move on....

    -mike
  • dreamer9dreamer9 Posts: 1
    I have 1998 Pathfinder SE with 100K. It is a very reliable car except for the gas milage. It gives about 14 in city and 18 Hwy MPG. With the incresing gas prices, I am in a dilema whether to keep it or replace with a smaller more fuel efficient car. The problem is that it will be difficult to get any money for this old car.

    Is there a way to improve its fuel efficiency somehow? Or is it has average MPG? Appreciate for your :confuse: advise?
  • I am just looking for thoughts from those of you that have a 2008 Pathfinder (or from 2005 on I guess) and how you feel about the mileage and what kind of gas you use. I currently have a 1999 Pathfinder and have been considering trading up. I like the look of the new Pathfinder, even though they have gone to a truck base. But I am surprised they recommend using premium fuel. While my '99 wasn't exactly mileage friendly, I could still deal with it, it wasn't too bad. I could also use 87 octane. Some say 93 burns slower, but is it really that noticeable? I don't want a secnd job just to pay for gas as I do drive a lot, but I really like the vehicles. Any thoughts or comments?

    All the best,
    Paul
«1
This discussion has been closed.