Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Luckily my cousin got rid of it, or it committed suicide. After many problems the engine decided to cough it's last breathe one night we were at my aunt's house. Think it swallowed a valve, barfed up a couple push rods and choked on it's oil pump. It was a nasty death.
Poor Cava-I mean Cimmaron.
There was a lot about cars Roger Smith didn't understand - also about the competition...
Rocky
Rocky
Instead of trying to run his family's corporation, Bill Ford should've just left the job to some far more competent outsider. He should just live the life of a bon vivant and party with Paris Hilton - another worthless successor to a family fortune.
http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=93
i'm pretty sure i still remember his response to a question about gm's answer to the gen II k-car for about 7k was, 'buy a 2 year old buick/olds'.
I think it was his response to what was GM's response to Hyundai, when it first debuted in the U.S.
i'm pretty sure it was a k-car.
I think it was his response to what was GM's response to Hyundai, when it first debuted in the U.S. "
Now Toyota and Honda behave in same arrogant manner. Like "it is used car but it is still Honda". Or two years old certified Camry is better than new Ford.
i have learned that the mkz is based on a fusion, but i still like it.
The MKZ has a different engine and totally different interior. It's a shared platform. There is a difference.
Cars like MKZ have barely moved away from the badge engineering end of the spectrum. But again, it was the best effort Ford could offer under the circumstances, and a lot of MKZ owners don't care about...or don't even notice...the close similarity to Fusion, so it wasn't a bad move for Lincoln. Still, Lincoln cannot afford to keep issuing models on the cheap like MKX, MKZ and Mark LT. Hopefully, the MKR is a portend of better things to come...and hopefully as well it will get here before Lincoln is pushed out of the marketplace by Cadillac and others (the 2008 CTS leaps way ahead of the MKZ).
I think the 09 models will really tell us how well they execute the strategy.
Well, since Mulally is the big cheese, we should call them the "MF-ers" I think.
Just think - the CTS was a pipe dream when the LS was released, began to compete head-to-head with the 5-Series, came close to beating it in several comparos, won Motor Trend COY and brought Lincoln's reputation up several notches.
Now, the CTS is what the LS could have been and the LS is history and Lincoln has NOTHING to compete with the Europeans OR Cadillac for that matter. You just cant say the emmkayzee competes with the ceeteeess. The CTS is a luxury-sport sedan. The MKZ is a castrated luxo-Mazda.
Gee, I wonder if Cadillac loses money on every CTS they sell like some people say Ford did with the LS. My guess is NO. As for the emmkatarr - it is a non-sequitor. It will never be produced. Something like it maybe in around 2012 or so. Til then we can buy a Mazda-Lincoln or maybe in a year or two a Volvo-Lincoln.
To illustrate just how bad it is, Lincoln has begun featuring the emmkayrrr on its website. A car you will never be able to buy is what they are featuring. Do they really think people will buy the second-rate stuff they're selling now because they produced a winning one-off concept car?
I'm not sure of much. But I am sure you'll never be able to buy a mkr. By that I mean as it is pictured now on the Lincoln site. That's what I said - they're featuring a car you'll never be able to buy. I think you'll agree with that.
Now, they might, check, probably WILL design and build something based on the mkr design. Maybe as close as the Z is to the original Zephyr concept, though I doubt that. I think the rear end will need to be substantially redesigned for crash-worthiness. And I hope they tone down the cowcatcher on the front a bit.
I hope they do, it is an exciting look and Lord knows they need something exciting. Tell u what though, I think it'll be a LOT more expensive than the LS or MKS, so it'll be a moot point for me.
I *think* we'll see a RWD sedan with at least 400 hp with at least 5 of the 7 Lincoln styling cues that looks much closer to the MKR than previous Lincoln concepts.
That and $5 will get you a grande soy latte.
And u know IMHO, I still see no rudder or even oar in the water. Take the stupid name thing for instance. They couldn't even make up their mind if it's emmkay or mark. Finally, they chose the nonsensical one. Even the badging on the cars implies that it should be pronounced "Mark Z". Take a look - the M and K are smaller and the Z is spaced further from the other two. I dont think they yet have a frickin clue what they're doing. And with all the best people taking buyouts (if history repeats) I'm in the pessimist column until I see different.
And, I hope it's not too little too late. Here in SF bay area, 3 LM and 2 Ford dealers have gone out of business in the last year or two. And those are only the ones I know about. There may be more.
What are u driving now? Mine is 6 years old now. Yikes. Tempis fugit eh?
I can imagine how Fusion and Milan were designed. It is not a fault of designers. It is a fault of project manager who allowed coming up with this kind of uncompetitive interior design. It lacks integrity. When Veraldi was managing development of original Taurus it is well documented how he was fighting for integrity of the whole vehicle, for each detail. Of course there was a pressure from upper management and bin counters but he risked everything to make car a success. And in the end of course he has been punished even though Taurus was a huge success and saved the company.
Current Ford management came with such a lame designs like 500 and Freestyle and even Fusion could be done better if they took their job more seriously like Veraldi and his team did. 500 lacks any integrity or purpose, I don't know why you have to buy 500 if there is a better car like Avalon or 300. I figured out Ford 500 being a failure as soon as I saw first photos, driving a car just confirmed my judgment. Now I am a SW engineer but it seems that I better understand cars and car business than Ford management. How it can be possible? How company like this can survive and actually survived for 100 years? Of course you always can say because of people like Veraldi who saved company every time when it was on brink of collapse. But you cannot count on miracles forever.
The numbers present a grim picture at Ford Motor. When Bill Ford looks out his office window he will see the smoke-stacks of The Rouge. The iron ore smelters were lighted by his grandfather. Two men toured those factories almost twenty years apart, and now the companies they formed and built afterwards---based on Ford methodology---threaten to overtake or subsume Ford Motor. Ferdinand Porsche toured The Rouge, meeting the Henry Ford in July 1937, later recruiting Ford men to run the new VW-Werke in Germany. Eiji Toyoda would follow in his footsteps as soon as Japanese citizens were allowed to leave Japan after 1945, touring The Rouge in 1954. Today, those two firms now threaten the very position of Ford Motor as the second largest auto firm in America and the world. VWAG is a half million units away from surpassing Ford if the trends at Ford continue---and will beat them in 2007/08. Toyota has already beaten Ford once in 2006 for that title in America----this from a company that imported TWO cars to L.A. in 1957! When Henry Ford II drove a VW March 3, 1948 he told Ford-Werk Chief Engineer Richard Busseein: "Well, at least it's a car..." Ford's interest in VW never came to fruition.... Eiji Toyoda toured The Rouge and saw amazing things, astounding production feats, matched equally by a similar degree of waste he thought he could improve upon---simply by removing the "warehouse" aspect of the factory, and having the parts arrive just-in-time as they did at Ford's Fordson tractor factory. Thus the two men set their path from "Fords" and now it is Ford that is fighting for its future.
Thus the "ARMS RACE" has begun. Mr. Katsuaki Watanabe at Toyota has said: "I personally would like to become number one in terms of the qualitative level of our company..." Mr. Mulally has been engaged at Ford, and must now engage in an "ARMS Race" against the competition. Just as Mr. Wiedeking at Porsche has declared: "This is a business war..." in reference to CO-2 emissions standards the EU Commission is seeking to impose. Mr. Mulally must now take the same position with respect to Ford Motor and Porsche-VWAG (the two companies have effectively, but not legally merged) and Toyota.
The key to salvation: the kind of reaction that makes a man trade in his Zephyr for a MkZ. Levels of quality here-to-fore not seen in Ford Motor or Lincoln products. Just as VWAG uprated their cars in the 1990's, as did Audi under Martin Winterkorn, so must Lincoln move now. Not next year, but this instant. When a customer opens the door on a Lincoln (presuming you can get the car to him or her to do that) they must go; "wow, I didn't know they were that nice..." Start with interiors...and move on from point to point. Eventually the cars will have a seemless level of quality that no one can compete against. And it will take the herculean efforts of the suppliers like Collins & Aikmen to do so.
Lincoln can regain the initiative because no expects them to do so. Take all the knowledge gleaned from the Jaguar project and put it into Lincoln without breaking into market segment mistakes that has turned Jaguar into a deep cat box. Take the smaller Jaguars and turn them into Mercury's---along with a Mustang varient bringing back Cougar. Ford has 37,000 salaried workers at the Glass House and they want to reduce that to 28,000 in '07/'08 That's 82 engineers and design staff working per day on project X, Y or Z to solve any one problem. Even if half that number are real car people and numbers crunchers or sales staff, alot can be done with motivation.
Innovation, superb design, etc. all comes from the soul--often from one person---and the underdogs trying to save Lincoln might well be able to save all of Ford Motor if the can push their way through the top floors of the Glass House. One would not know it, but 'The Duce' said it best when he said it: "Never complain, Never explain..." and this time Team Lincoln must step forth, stop complaining, and stop explaining and just do it. Don't look for proposal guidance...just create ideas whole cloth from the wares that Ford can build, plus a few new ideas. That's how Bob Gregorie designed the Continental: In half an hour...
Tell me that that can't be done again...? IF you beleive that, then our nation truly is finished in terms of manufacturing excellence and innovation. Talk of mergers or cooperation with Toyota is a carbunkle on the side of the Blue Oval. Hybrid technology bought-in will not save the company. Because Mr. Ford has made an empty promise about such things, and the public (now) knows better. So it falls to Mr. Mulally to ARM the public with designs that can inspire them to reconsider Ford and Lincoln once again. 27.4% of the world GDP belongs to America, and tell me there is not enough room in that pie for Ford to regain its share.
"At least its a car" is no longer game in the auto industry. You have to be twice as good as the competition because they are aiming at you every day. Everytime someone opens a car door....
Mr. Mulally will you win the game with Lincoln? If Bill Ford wants to see those smoke stacks billowing with Ford ore in the future, you must do it. Bring new Lincolns to the people, don't wait for them to come to you....
DouglasR
(Sources: FT; WSJ; 'Small Wonder' Walter Nelson Little Brown & Co 1967; 'Battle for the Beetle' karl Ludvigsen, Bentley Publishers, 2005; 'Toyota Way' Liker, NY 2006; Ford Motor Company Annual Reports)
Further, will they actually be around to service my current 2004 Crown Vic???
If they lost $13 billion after borrowing $24 billion, and most of their profit is from slow selling SUVs, I can almsot assure you that they will lose another $10-15 billion in 2007...
That brings the cash pretty low with which they pay ongoing bills like payroll and suppliers...what happens if the suppliers no longer extend credit if Ford starts paying bills 30-60-90 days late???
If they file Chapter 11, they still msut pay the notes on the collateralized loans where they put up their plants and property as collateral...
They may be able to restructure their unsecured loans, like their suppliers, but if they do not lokk like a viable company, will suppliers continue to extend credit???...(I am assuming that the $24 billion has already been financed over the maximum amount of time for the smallest possible payment to conserve cash flow, but I may be wrong on that)...
The January results are in:
GM: 244,688---a 16.9% drop
Toyota: 175,850---a 9.5% gain
Ford Motor: 165,688---a 20% drop over last year.
Even VWAG gained 3.2% to 23,251 cars!
The clock is ticking at Ford Motor. Why Lincoln needs to work round the clock on a "war-time" basis to save itself and the company. No one can argue with any veracity that Ford Motor can survive without its upscale brands, specifically Lincoln. (The counter agrument: Bill Ford let it languish, so perhaps a new owner might do better...) It would, however, be turning the clock back to 1922. GM surpassed Ford because it stratefied its product range to entice customers as their incomes increased. Ford must do the same thing, and selling off divisions would merely seek to drive customers further away. Sadly they are selling off the one division that (finally) did make money: Astons. The Billion they will get from Doughty Hanson (UK), Simon Halabi (Syria!), James Parker (Australia), or the UBS consortium will not solve their problems. It will buy another couple of months for them at best. And it will tarnish Ford's image for having come so far to develop the car and then cut and run. Both Jaguar and Astons should have been sold together....if they were going to dispose of assets.
There is, however, hope...it is soon in the offing.
DouglasR
(Sources: Reuters, Automotive News)
The first model that will be more modern and be Lincoln alone will be the MKS, and it won't arrive for more than another year (and already had to be re-worked because the original concept was so boring).
The MKR shows that Lincoln COULD produce exciting vehicles..if it survives. Any MKR-related Lincoln is more than two years away at the very least.
What they plan to do about the earlier proposed Fairlane clone (due in 2009) is anyone's guess, but I bet Mullaly put his foot down on issuing yet another Ford clone with a Lincoln grill and interior. Yes, there is hope, but not great gobs of it yet.
And, with a number of Ford's designs anemic (IMO), where are the future sales going to come from???