Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
The Mazda MIGHT be a fine vehicle. Let's see in 3-4 years where it stands. We know how the MDX fares.
This type vehicle was new to Mazda.
The Mazda MIGHT be a fine vehicle. Let's see in 3-4 years where it stands. We know how the MDX fares.
Exactamundo.
Also looked at BMW X3.. too small and she likes to sit up a bit higher. I dont think the Lincoln MKX is going to woo us at all. I think it is going to come down to the MDX and CX9.
This type vehicle was new to Mazda.
2 time Miata owner here.
Miatas have been incredibly reliable. My two have been pretty much bulletproof (outside of regular maintenance / tires, in 9 years of ownership, I've only replaced the battery & spark plug wires). But, even with the Miata, the first year they came out ('90), they had a fairly big problem with the crankshaft.
That was remedied shortly thereafter, but it does go to show that even with possibly the most reliable car (it is extremely simple), there were still first year issues.
Avi...yeah I order all the cars. I'm being a bit conservative with the CX-9 orders. I'm leaning towards the low end. I don't have many people who will pay $39K for a Mazda....Im also waiting to see how the MKX does. If that takes off, I'll adjust my Mazda orders accordingly.
Actually, the 3.5L engine in the CX-9 does have VVT
And, at the Ford site, the new Edge has what is called a Particulate Air Filter, which is included as an option package? Again, Edmunds makes no ref. to interior air filter and is not included in any option when trying to price out!
I notice, mistakes like these are never found when reading specs. & pricing options for any of the Japanese vehicles.
I do love Edmunds.com, but sometimes its very frustrating here.
olen
That's good news, however, the car wont be here for another month and a half!
The Coral Leader will be unloading in Tacoma on 12/27 and in California about 1/5.
I saw that the Coral Leader left on the 12th for North America making 2 stops in Wash. and Cali.
You have to figure in as well, that we will have to wait until there is decent supply before they will be shipped to dealers. Also figure in any last minute things that need to be addressed at the port, such as installing accessories.
At best, I do not think I will see any CX-9's until late January.
Pictures at link title
I have found AWD to be useful in snowy or very rainy weather, where it seems I have a little more stability than my wife's Geo Prism when going in a straight line. Otherwise, AWD is useful if you're taking corners on a track at the limits of the car, which I'm sure no one will do in a CX-9.
So I'm still on the fence with the AWD. Probably will wait until the car mags report back on it.
This is true, the AWD system is not full time, but, rather alert full time. Rear wheels will engage when slippage is dectected. If you live in an area that gets snow, or lots of rain, your 1K could be a life saving investment.
It is the same AWD system in the CX-7, which just won a comparo between the Santa-Fe and RAV4 in off road situations. (Edmunds.com comparo)
Currently I am having a Civic and Corolla for last ten years, not happy with Civic due to high maintenance cost but pretty happy with Corolla. I am want to be happy with CX-9 too. Is Mazda as reliable as Toyota? Also how does Mazda retains resale value compared to Toyota?
No, and no. Especially since the first year of any model can have more issues, and the Sienna's been around for a while. But Mazdas are more than reliable enough (see publications like Consumer Reports) for most buyers (e.g. better than the German marques). Just don't expect it to be at the level of Toyota.
As far as resale value, while it won't hold it as well, you have to factor in that the initial acquisition price should be good. E.g. heavy discounts, rebates, etc. after the model's been established.
http://www.whatcar.co.uk/news-special-report.aspx?NA=217350&EL=3142812
The Sienna's up to "better than average" after its initial model year, but still isn't at the top level of reliability. So there's room to beat it. I doubt if the CX-9 will in the first year.
If you look at brand reliability based on CR scores, Toyota beats Mazda significantly. Which is remarkable given that the Toyota model range is much larger In the U.S. than Mazda's.
In that UK survey you linked to, Toyota has not only several more models in the UK, but they're much more complex SUV's (Mazda only sells one truck). So Toyota finishing 3rd place behind Mazda's 2nd doesn't mean as much.
If we compare models with relatively similar levels of complexity (e.g. don't extrapolate Mazda3's to CX-9's), the less-sophisticated Tribute started out with more/less average reliability and then improved. The Mazda5 started out as "average" and will doubtless improve.
That's why I think the new CX-9 in its first model year should be more than adequate for most buyers. Way better than a European brand. Just don't expect the same level of reliability you'd get with a mature Sienna. Subsequent model years of the CX-9 should show improvement.
Even Toyota and Honda have had some issues with their first-year models.
One thing that a potential CX-9 vs. Sienna buyer should be wary of, though. If you want AWD, the Sienna's AWD doesn't leave room for a spare tire. So it comes with run-flats. There's been a lot of negative comments about the run-flats.
Couple of Bay Area dealers mentioned that they will have CX-9 in before mid-Jan. Can I expect lot of discounts and rebates at the very beginning itself? Or will they demand premium price?
Ford is betting the farm on this 3.5L V6, and to a certain extent, the platform that the CX-9 rides on so I don't really feel that there are going to be too many problems with it from a quality standpoint. Refinement, however, may be a different ballgame. The CX-9 certainly could receive significant upgrades especially with Ford bringing out an all new crossover aroun 2009.
We're expecting it to arrive later this month! Full report to follow.
Jay
There will be so many choices coming out that dealerships won't be able to command premium choices. I'm personally waiting for the CX-9/Veracruz/Enclave to come out.
I did more research on CX-9 and found that major components are not Mazda's own stuff. Look at these: (you can consider these as pro also as cons)
1. Engine is from Ford (Cyclone duratec35 used in Edge).
2. Base platform is from Ford (CD3 Platform).
3. 6 Speed Auto transmission is from Ford & GM joint innovation. (This transmission is used in new Ford models and I believe in GM Acadia and saturn outlook).
Also, Moonroof is not a base option even on high end Grand Touring and when you do a price compare in truedelta.com against 2007 MDX it's only 3K difference. MDX has lot better resale value and proven vehicle.
You also might have to wait a while to pay $150 over invoice for either of those vehicles... The MDX seems to be a great value and is probably stealing RDX sales at this point. Seems like there are also a lot of posts from people that are waiting for the CX-9 to get here. So demand is liable to be high for both of these through the spring. Either way, good luck.
1. True
2. False - The CD3 (for "C/D-class") is a Ford global midsize car automobile platform. It was designed by Mazda in association with Ford and debuted with the Mazda Mazda6 sedan in early 2003
3. False - Transmission is Japanese' Aisin.
#1 is the base V6 for most Ford's upcoming vehicles. It better be good.
That is incorrect, the transmission is built by Aisin, the same company that built tranny's for Toyota for many years.
The platform is from the Mazda6, designed by Mazda for Ford.
The only Ford part is the engine. The rest is Japanese, built in Japan.
Also, Moonroof is not a base option even on high end Grand Touring and when you do a price compare in truedelta.com against 2007 MDX it's only 3K difference. MDX has lot better resale value and proven vehicle.
While I will not argue that the MDX is a proven vehicle (also numerous proven tranny problems) and has good resale, the MDX starts at $40,665. A comparable equipped Mazda CX-9 GT with the Bose Audio and moon roof is $36,230. That is a $4,435 difference. If you want to pay the extra THOUSANDS, then you will get the extras that come with the Acura name.