Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Does running a K&N filter add to the carbon/oil build up? Dealer seemed to think so.
How many miles did they drive in order to get that 17 mpg reading? I reckon they must have gone onto the freeway or some other road where they could drive it at freeway speeds, as it is practically impossible to average 17 in city driving, at city speeds...well, not entirely impossible--one could "coast" down a city street at 45 mph for a mile and probably get a 17 mpg readout.
Turned out to be some metal shavings in the Blinker switch on the column. I believe it was caused by me not engaging the blinker fully when passing a car and only pushing on it slightly enough to get the blinker to blink.
It was not an easy task to take apart and clean out the shavings with a pocket knife but it did work. When you get it apart you should be able to see the arcing across the contacts causing the module to make a clicking sound. It did not turn on the lights because of the additional circuitry that was not made.
Thanks
The tire pressure sensor in my 2004 Tahoe has a small rattling ball or something inside that moves around with tire vibration. You can hear it if you shake the sensor in your hand. You could argue that the re-charge does not happen if the sensor is mounted in a wrong angle. Perhaps, but a failed sensor (no power in battery or otherwise broken) should give you an alarm on the dash. It should have the alarm light ON that indicates a system problem. This is different than alarm for low pressure.
Of course the new system in '05 Denali can be different and show zero pressure even when the sensor is dead but I would highly doubt that. It could also be that the one having a dash is not working at all and the others take a zero reading until all sensors work.
22" wheels did not come with the truck so were you present when they were put on? If the tire guys broke one sensor and didn't even tell you? It breaks easily if you don't know about it when taking the tire off or it breaks when putting a new tire on if you don't know how to do it right. This happened to me once.
If a sensor is replaced the system must be 'trained' for it. This will not work before the new sensor is charged. It takes a couple of miles to drive with the new sensor to have its battery charged or you can shake it in your hand for a few minutes before it is installed in the rim.
You should have instructions in your owners manual of the procedure how to teach the system all the sensors. My guess is that one of your sensors is broken or missing or is in the wheel but the system was newer set-up correctly for it.
--Arrie--
There is a message that comes on my DIC that says "check tire pressure". I assume that I am getting this reading because of the 0 reading on 3 of the wheels. These wheels were put on by a dealer for the "our cost is your cost sale" as a little something extra to beat the competition.
they printed up a service bulletin that was addressing the sensors not working correctly on aftermarket wheels. something to the effect that the sensors needed to be at a 45 degree angle to the ground. the sensors on my wheels are at a 90 degree to the ground. this answer suited me til i started seeing posts from several people with aftermarket wheels and no one was talking about any sensor issues. I called the dealer where i purchased the Denali and they already addressed this issue with me. Should i go see another dealer or will they just give me the colds shoulder?
Thanks
If you are getting low pressure reading it means that the sensors work. The angle of the sensor should have nothing to do with that. There is just a hole through the sensor's plastic casing and pressure transmitter inside. It doesn't matter what position the sensor is to read pressure. The angle I think could have something to do with re-charging battery as that little ball (or something) inside the sensor must move for it but if you are getting a zero reading it means that the sensor works. It could be that the one with dash does not work but it could also be that this sensor was not programmed for the system correctly.
Go through the re-learn procedure. It is quite simple to do, if it goes like in my Tahoe. It should be in your manual.
In mine it goes:
- Start with turning lights ON and OFF four times quickly, you will hear the horn and warning light starts blinking.
-lower air pressure in left front wheel for about 15 seconds and you will hear the horn.
-Move to right front and lower air pressure until horn, then do same in right rear and left rear in this order.
This procedure teaches the on board computer which sensor is in which wheel as it sees the air pressure changing. Your procedure might be different but I guess it is the same.
In my Tahoe if tire pressure is low I get the 'Low Pressure' warning. If I have one of the sensors out I get 'System Fault' warning.
The different warnings and how to charge the sensor I learned when the tire guys broke one of my sensors. I carried the broken sensor in my vehicle and got the 'Low Pressure' warning for a couple of days when it changed to 'System Fault" warning. System failed when the battery in the sensor ran out and was not charged. When I took the sensor in my hand and shook it for a few minutes the 'System Fault' warning changed back to 'Low Pressure' warning obviously when the sensor started sending the signal again, which indicated low pressure in that sensor.
--Arrie--
Me--I have an XL, which is one price class higher than yours; I wound up getting a 3/45 w/ $0 deductible for $1020. A 4/48 would have cost me $1280; since in my situation the miles are more important than the term length, it wasn't worth paying $260 more just for an additional 3K miles. Heck, a 4/60 is a better deal compared to the 4/48 when you break down the cost per mile...but I wasn't ready to shell out $1560 for it.
Now I have a wire from my head unit that I need to hook up to my reverse lamp, here's what it says
"Connect to plus side of the car's reverse lamp that lights when the transmission is shifted into reverse"
so my question is how and where can I find the wire to tap into? Thanks for any help
Thanks.
Thanks for you info. When you say "Major Guard 4/48 w/ $0 deductible on can be had for $1020, or $865 w/ $100 deductible...both options substatially lower than what you were quoted", what do you mean by "can be had"? How do I get it? Do I simply call GMPP and ask for a cheaper rate? Or are you talking about a comparable warranty from another provider? Thanks again.
Berob
From racermd's post on the GMC Yukon XL / Yukon XL Denali forum:
If you go this route on the turn signals, you'll need to make sure you get a "load balancer" - a resistor that tricks the signal switch into thinking you don't have a blown bulb (LEDs pull less current than an incandecent bulb, which looks like a blown bulb to the switch).
I tried to get to the rearm sensor and i was unable to get it to come up. I found a "getting to know your Yukon Denali". It says see section 5 in your owners manual. I looked in my owners manual and was not able to find the procedure.
Looking for any more ideas on how to reset this error message.
BTW the error message is actually " Check pressure sensor"
thanks for all the help
Twinned Vehicles
Steve, Host
I'm not saying that they have the lowest GMPP prices, but they're the lowest I've been able to find from a seemingly-reputable GM dealer. Well, not really "seemingly", as I have my GMPP card and policy sitting at home...so there's nothing to really worry about as far as dealing with gmoutlet.com.
The Bulletin was "PIT3655A"
Yoshii in Tampa
The point though about the depreciation varying tremendously between twins is well taken and drives the total cost of ownership. (Depreciation afterall is the largest cost most of us confront.)
I have a 99 Yukon with 100K miles. The truck is in excellent condition (like new). My only mechanical beef is a clunk when I come to a stop and then take my foot off the break. It feels like something in the differential is releasing when I take my foot off the brake. The only time it happens is when I’m driving and come to a stop, then release the brake. Is this transmission related or differential related or some suspension problem. Help.
Thanx (from Technology Impaired), Moosetrax.
Any comments are appreciated
Did the spray foam work?
I never like to bring in outside air, so a permanent sealing is ok by me...
2005 Denali XL
I also wanted to ask if anyone has put optional bulbs on theirs and what they recommended. Manual shows 9005s for both high and low.
Can't help you with your NAV problem - it wasn't available on the '02 models.
I currently have an 01 YXL w/ the 5.3L & 3.73 gears & have been satisfied with the performance. My 01 was rated at 14/16 MPG, & I bet your 05 is rated much higher. I even tow a 34' travel trailer, weighing in excess of 8000 lbs w/ no problems. I know I am pushing the limit, but I had the 01 YXL before we upgraded to the bigger trailer. Next time I'll probably go with a 3/4 ton & 4.11 gears for more towing capacity. Enjoy your new truck, & hopefully better fuel economy.
Good Luck,
Dave
Steve, Host
Charles
2000 GMC Yukon Denali 4x4 5.7 Vortec
We went from an '02 Avalanche 1500 2wd Z66 with the 5.3L and the 3:73 axle to an '04 Suburban 1500 2wd also with the 3:73 axle, and I've noticed very little difference between the two in feel--in all honesty, the Suburban has the same level of grunt, more accelerates more smoothly because of the electronic throttle. With the older style on the Avalanche, it would often buck and roar like a bronco if you didn't keep your foot 100% steady--the Suburban's pedal compensates for that and smooths things out a bit.
Another change in '05-06 models is electric fans, but that actually should make it feel MORE powerful because of less draw on the engine than the old mechanical fans.
Then again, if your new '05 "sputters and coughs" something else might definately be wrong.
I assume they can disable the original frequency too.
I think you were misinformed as it would be stupid if GM would build cars where the remote frequencies could not be disabled as you must not be the only person who had keys lost/stolen, but of course, I'm not 100% sure...
Arrie
I have a '04 Tahoe with the 5.3 L Vortec Z-engine. I have posted a lot of it in Tahoe forum and if you are interested go there and read.
In a nutshell, I think my main problem was LOOSE INTAKE MANIFOLD BOLTS. It is hard to believe but all 10 bolts that hold the plastic intake manifold down were loose.
Before I went to inspect these bolts I checked all sensors and replaced half of them while trouble shooting the issue. And I had to do this all by myself during warranty period. My Chevy dealer would not even believe I had a problem.
My Tahoe at first was good and powerful but after about 1500 miles it started acting up. Gas mileage went very low, only about 14 - 15 MPG highway. What also was bothersome was that the engine was so weak. When GM advertise it to have almost 300 hp you would think it to be a little bit faster from standstill.
One interesting symptom was that when I started from a complete stop and tried to make fast acceleration my Tahoe would first hesitate and when speed went high enough the power suddenly kicked in. It felt like power was in the engine but it would not come out before certain engine speed was reached.
This all lead me think about possible intake vacuum leak, which I also could hear under the hood, just didn't know it really was an intake leak sound.
Intake vacuum controls engine timing and I thought that perhaps timing is off due to leak and engine can not give out all power because of that. Then when accelerating and vacuum builds in engine power suddenly kicks in.
To verify this I made an intake vacuum delay apparatus to see if it really is an issue with vacuum level. I had bought another MAP sensor earlier so it was easy for me to do. I bought dia. 1/8", 3 ft long vacuum hose that I connected to the new MAP sensor. I T-ed off of the vacuum line to the fuel pressure regulator and of course connected the map sensor harness to the new MAP sensor. THIS MADE A BIG IMPROVEMENT IN POWER OUTPUT.
After my little experiment I went to check intake manifold gasket. I found a GM Techlink page in the net where they explain about the intake gasket problem and how they need to use the green color gasket in the L59 engine instead of the orange gasket. Mine was green but all of the bolts were loose.
There was a lot of dirt build-up under the manifold also, which I think is because the leak in gasket pulled dirt in there. That much dirt should not be present since there are good foam seals at each end of manifold to seal the cavity between intake manifold and engine valley cover.
From the gaskets and sealing surfaces I could clearly see how the gasket had not even touched all the surface around intake ports. This problem comes from the fact that the plastic intake manifold is slightly off shape and if bolts are not tightened correctly the surfaces don't compress on the gasket correctly.
I bought a set of new gaskets (about $93 + tax) and installed using bolt tightening instructions in Haynes repair manual and MY TAHOE JUST GOT RE-BORN.
The power from the engine now comes almost immediately when I step on gas pedal. That power kick now happens when it is supposed to happen. I have not even tried my vacuum delay apparatus with it since the gasket change.
I think my intake manifold gaskets still have a small leak problem because the engine still runs rough idle at times.
Rough idle is also a clear sign of gasket leak, which you might also be experiencing.
Go read my posts in Tahoe forum (and Suburban). There is a lot of writing I did but I think my problem really was the intake manifold gasket leak, which I covered here.
Here is the link to GM Techlink that explains about the gasket problem.
http://www.gmtechlink.com/images/issues/may05/TLmay05e.html
Arrie
I just got a new 2005 Denali XL. So far so good. My dealer said if you setup everything the way you want, then hold the UNLOCK button on the key simultaneously with the corresponding seat number on the door until it beeps - then it will "remember" the driver's settings based on which key starts the car. 2 questions:
1. Is that the correct procedure? I can get it to beep, but doesnt seem to save anything. Not sure it's doing anything different than if you just saved the seat setting by itself.
2. What all exactly is supposed to be saved? He thought the radio and satellite settings would be saved as well, but I can't seem to get those to save (I could be doing it wrong).
Thanks much to anyone who takes the time to respond.
-RS