Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Chevrolet Malibu Maxx Design Love It or Not?

Karen_CMKaren_CM Posts: 5,030
edited July 2 in Chevrolet
What do you love and not love about your Malibu or Malibu Maxx design?

Community Manager If you have any questions or concerns about the Forums, send me an email, karen@edmunds.com, or click on my screen name to send a personal message.

«13

Comments

  • It appears the upcomming Malibu MAXX SS is a combination of show car with performance enhancments.

    Question is, should the Malibu Maxx SS be;

    1. mostly show ("look at me" dubbed wheels, bad boy wing, lowwww to the ground, black interior, lots of chrome, etc?

    2. Mostly go (variable valve timing, increased HP engine, 6 speed manual/manumatic, flow thru exhaust, tuned suspension (to enhance handling _and_ ride over typical roads),

    3. Both?
  • paopao Posts: 1,867
    Mostly go....Chevy has lost the image of the SS badging....remember the SS camaro and chevelle....wow..true GO cars.....look at what the return of the Hemi has done for the Chrysler brand...Cobra Mustang for SVO Ford.....and the revamped GTO for Pontiac.....If I was in the market...I would want a improved performance package first and unique looks second....
  • chris65amgchris65amg Posts: 372
    It should be GO in line with the SS line, but it will be more Show, I fear.
  • navigator89navigator89 Posts: 1,080
    The Malibu SS seems like a decent buy, but only if you're on a budget. Otherwise, there are better vehicles like the Charger, Maxima, 6, Legacy, Altima SE-R.

    I think Chevrolet is misusing the SS badge. It should only be reserved for a few select vehicles, like the Cobalt, Impala and Silverado. I'm not sure about the Trailblazer, but if Jeep has the guts to put 425hp in a Grand Cherokee, then I guess the Trailblazer has a competitor. The Malibu seems more like a bargain sports sedan to me than a worthy competitor to the Charger, 6, Maxima, Altima SE-R or Legacy.
  • carlisimocarlisimo Posts: 1,280
    If their suspension is anything like the Impala SS's, I'm going to cry.

    SS vehicles should have both go and show, but the show that goes with go has nothing to do with bling show. Bling is about cruising so slowly you can get girls' numbers as you drive by, but accelerate away softly if it looks like they're about to say no - or raise a tinted window if you're approaching ugly ones. You're supposed to be late. Dubs and chrome make sense in that application, and some extreme lowering (and tints, of course). The ideal bling car interior is extravagantly upholstered, lots of lights, and with a deck chair for the driver.

    Go show is less lowered than bling show (no wheel rubbing), with a cool wing (which never look as distateful on hatches), nice but light-looking wheels (polished lips and painted centers are popular now), and sports seats. Simple interior with gauges that stand out - lots of gauges. American go show has stripes... Ford makes it work on their little Fiesta, so it could work on the Malibu.
    But they'd have to fundamentally change the car before anyone would take a performance version seriously.
  • ...but not fully working. 2006 build section does not include either Malibu or Mailbu Maxx.

    was curious about available interior colors on the SS (I fear you can have any color, so long as it is black).
  • It seems that automobiles are constantly in a "fad" mode. Some time ago it was fender skirts, and recently it's ridiculous tire sizes and wheels. A continuing fad is a lower than standard suspension with the usual punishing ride. Hint - roads in America, for the most part, are rough - I want a suspension designed for the roads I drive on, not a smooth race track.

    What I'm looking for in a Maxx SS is the same as any other car: competence as an automobile for my driving conditions. I want good handling and a good ride - not one or the other. No tire series below 60's, and preferabley 70's. Useability, as in a hatchback, full instrumentation - preferably the ability to tap into the cars computer and display the information on an existing screen. And, of course good performance, as in a 15.5sec. quater- mile minumum.

    Most important of all, and why Detroit has lost huge market share, RELIABILITY.
  • They're canning the Maxx next year, so why are they bothering with the SS package? This should have been done for the Equinox.
  • well they did lower the suspension but at least the wheels don't look as ridiculous as I feared.

    But why do people feel that a dark color car with all black interior is so "cool"? In many places like Southern California, a black interior's going to get terribly hot, and outgassing of the plastics will fog the windows within a day.

    So what other suspension changes did they do aside from the retuned shocks and lower ride heigth?
  • What is the last MODEL year of the Maxx? Is it '06 or '07? I may want to buy another one - good hatchbacks are hard to come by. It would be nice if GM would offer some more interesting colors - even Mazda has more desirable hues for their hatchback.
  • Found it:

    "Malibu, Malibu Maxx: The 2006 Malibu and Malibu Maxx receive a freshening. SS models are added, with a 3.9-liter, 240-hp V-6 four-speed automatic transmission with manual shift mode, sport-tuned suspension and exterior styling enhancements. The Maxx will be dropped at the end of the 2007 model year."
  • probably killed it. I think the Saturn Aura has more of a chance of being a future 5 door hatchback. If Saturn picks up more Opel models, it would seem easier to just bring over a rebadged Opel rather then produce a model with low demand.
  • I'd love hearing if they end up having problems with window fogging in hot climates.

    Previous black interior cars I've owned fogged their windows in a matter of hours in the hot sun. By comparison, tan interiors allowed a couple of days or so between cleanings.
  • Saw a Mailbu SS yesterday (not the Maxx, unfortunately):

    Was all black save for interior which was a mix of gray/titanium (seats, sides, etc.) and a painted black dash (surface of dash looked cheap/plasticky .vs. what I've seen in the Maxx.).

    Interior colors reminded me of the HHR I drove on a 1.3K mile trip. And if GM thinks the HHR will replace the Maxx, nooooo way for me unless it gets:
    1. Malibu's V6 in it (or better, one with an aluminum block,
    2. Better seats (narrow, absolutely no side support)
    3. Sorted out rear bay (move the shelf up and you have a huge hole in the floor that makes it hard to get stuff in and out of
    4. Less tacky gauges (chrome on 'em looks stupid and makes them glare in sun),
    5. Overall higher quality feel.
  • I just purchased a 2005 certified maxx with 25000 miles and while driving home my son head a wind noise from the passenger rear side. Anyone else with this issue? Also notice condensation inside the headlamps on the car. Looked @ 5-8 other Maxx's and saw the same thing on most of them. Is this common? I do enjoy the ride and price of the car - reason I purchased it Hope it goes well. Also any idea why I only recieved 1 key flob with 2 keys on it instead of 2 remotes.? I also was not happy that there was less than a 1/4 tank of gas in it from Joe Romanno Chevy in Syracuse NY.
  • you might want to post in the Problems and Solutions forum. This one's only about the Maxx SS
  • e2helpere2helper Posts: 1,002
    Kurt - yes this message was posted in another forum as well. I originally answered here as well but deleted post when I noticed the other post and that someone else already answered it :)
  • Thanks didn't I realized after I posted. Sorry about the error.
  • Car and Driver tested the SS in the Feb.06 issue and gave it a favorable review.
  • pretty favorable, anyway. They did not like the ride or tires much. They did like its ability to burn rubber and corner better.

    In fact, if one visits tire rack they'll see the Eagle LS2 was the lowest rated tire available for the SS. The compared-to Bridgestone Potenzia were much better.

    That goes for other Maxxes as well - the Bridgestone Insignias on those are another low rated tire.
  • I test drove the Maxx SS yesterday. It is the first Malibu I have ever driven, so I had no idea what to expect. It was very peppy with quick acceleration. It is a bit on the noisy side with the tires and engine, but not a deal breaker. The Goodyear tires are on the harsh side, but not a deal breaker in my opinion. I am in MA and the side streets are all frost heaves and potholes at this time of the year. I found the ride firm but acceptable.

    The only real negative I found in my 15 mile test run was the torque steer. Under quick acceleration from low speeds it is very noticeable, making the steering wheel and front end quite squirrely. I have never owned a front wheel drive car and this may be part of the problem. Any FWD car I have driven feels a bit strange to me, and the more powerful they are, the worse they seem to be.

    I don't know how I would feel about this over a long period of time. I guess I would either get used to it or end up never really being satisfied with the car.

    I plan on going back on a warmer day and really check out the build quality and features when I have more time. Anyone else driven one?
  • also commented on SS's considerable torque steer and the harsh ride. They liked the hydraulic power steering, handling, and loved the tire burn ability.

    The normal Maxx's also have some torque steer, but since I've added the TripleTreads, it has not been very noticeable.

    Would be interesting to see how the SS works with Bridgestone Potenzias, the __only__ other tire that will fit the Maxx SS wheels. Those tires are summer-only.

    Oh yes; C&D measured the SS's turning circle at being 3 feet wider than the regular Maxxes (41.5 .vs. 38'), 3 feet more than a Chrysler 300 SRT-8. Thank the huge tires, and plan ahead if you need to U-turn!
  • mybooomybooo Posts: 92
    Hello! Been following the threads on torque steer. I think you should remember that the MAXX is putting out a decent amount of HP - around 200hp and torque. You will feel it when you give her some gas :-). I do not find that my MAXX has that much torque steer, but my previous car was an 03 Grand Prix GTP - Supercharged that had 260 hp and 280 lbs of torque - when you stepped on the gas it that car you could torque steer right off the raod if you had a loose grip :-) Man that was fun! But I have no problem with the MAXX. Nice power and acceleration!
  • Hi,
    I was at my chevy dealer yesterday and the 2006 Malibu Maxx LT on the display floor caught my eye. I am trading in my 2003 Blazer and looking for something that will save on gas and also afford me the space we need to transport things my wife uses in her scrapbooking business(tons). I liked the size of the Maxx and the body style is sharp. Although I got there at the end of the day and did not get to test drive one, it appears that I will probably lease this model.
    I was just hopping to get an overall feeling on this car from people who may have one. I have read many of the posts here, and most seem to have relatively minor concerns and it does not appear that there is anything more posted than what you would find on most other vehicles.
    Any comments on whether this is a good vehicle to buy or lease would be welcomed!
    Does anyone have any major concerns about the Malibu?
  • Was into the dealer the other day checking out the Maxx SS, read the info on it and was wondering how come they went back to hydraulic power steering? Seems to me if any car wants to minimize the load on the engine the SS would be one of them.
  • ..complained so much about the electric steering, Chevy appeased them by restoring Hydraulic steering to the SS. That same system is on the Pontiac G6 "sports version".

    ...and guess what? The reviewers still complain it lacks feel and is sluggish. It also hurts the SS's mileage, which is none too good for a car its size (18 mph .vs. 24 mph of regular Maxx, so says C&D). Loose, Loose, sadly.

    Meanwhile Electric steering systems get better. The Saturn ION Red Line brought few complaints about steering; it uses a recalibrated version of its Electric steering.

    And have others found their Maxxes steer/handle better with the new steering rack? My Maxx actually has road feel now and responds quite well.
  • csandstecsandste Posts: 1,866
    Other than a propensity to wander on some strange road crowns, I have no complaints about the electric steering. Could never figure out the numbness rap.
  • my mistake...C&D did not like Hydraulic steering on the Pontiac, but did seem to like it on the Maxx. Ironic as they use the same engines and suspension parts (perhaps tire and other tweak differences account for this).
  • csandstecsandste Posts: 1,866
    CD certainly likes hydraulic steering on the Maxx SS better than the original take on the 04's electric steering. Me-- I'm happy with the electric. My LS's first year has been trouble free and enjoyable...

    04- LT

    "Like its sedan sister, the Maxx features electric power steering with variable assist. Combining steering and electronics to have a natural feel has eluded even the likes of BMW, and Chevrolet has done no better. In any given driving session, the steering feels tight, loose, heavy, and light. Its only consistent trait is a kind of leadenness. Need to know the texture of the road surface? Climb out and feel it with your hands. Under hard accel in 90-degree turns, there’s also some torque steer that is occasionally distracting. But on the freeway, the steering is quick to self-center, and the Maxx tracks like a champ."

    06 SS

    "Chewing the front tires was a behavior we noted often in the base Maxx. The SS corners with far less understeer at speed, whether through extra rubber or better tuning of the suspension or both. We thought the electric motor providing the power assist was supplying unusually good feedback until we realized there’s no motor. In the Maxx SS, GM replaces the electric-power-steering servo with a hydraulic one, and the SS tracks a turn flatly and impressively faithfully to the path you aim it along. Granted, it does try to aim itself under hard acceleration, tugging at the rim with torque steer, but the change in steering hardware is definitely applause material."
«13
This discussion has been closed.