Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Jeanne Jennings (Automobile) talks about her love of the BMW 1 series($36K base!!). Then discusses how great the GM vehicles are including the CTS coupe and CTS-V and SR1.
Jim Hall (ex-AutoPacifica) says the the CTS coupe is astonishing. Says it was the most succesful car, from a styling point, of any car at NAIAS.
Even Wolfgang Puck was there and he loved the Escalade. I guess that answers this question: "There are only a few hundred professional athletes out there and a few dozen rappers. Who is buying the rest of these Escalades?"
Jason Vines (ex Chrysler) says CTS Coupe was stunning and GM won the NAIAS show. Wagoner doing great and the best press conference ever.
http://www.autolinedetroit.tv/ The New Frontier
What this means is that the CTS is a much bigger car than the entry level BMW used to be, and perhaps should be. I do hope that Cadillac is not planning to bump the CTS price range up by $15 to 25,000 over the next 5 years. I recall what GM did to the G-body pricing (the Buick Park Avenue in particular, but the DeVille too).
If that were true, I'd be willing to put up with the aggravation of owning a German car. The 2002 was about the same size and weight as a Yaris, while the 1er is half a foot longer and half a ton heavier.
I need to correct myself. In looking at the BMW website the 3L turbo 1 series is $35k. The 3L nonturbo is $29K. I must have missed the words turbo from Jeanne.
Anyway in ~two years my pricing guess( in todays dollars) with comparable equipped:
BLS 3L 263hp (1 -3 series size) $27K vs. 1 series 3L 230hp $29k
BLS 3L 300hp $32K vs. 1 series 3L 300hp $35K
CTS 3L 263hp (3-5 series size) $35K base vs. 3 series 3L 230 hp $34K
CTS 3L 300hp $36K vs. 3 series 3L 300hp $39K
CTS-V 550hp $49k VS. M3??? series 330hp $65K
STS 3L 300hp $44K vs. 5 series 3L 300hp $52K
STS-V 3L 550hp $80K vs. M5 series 360 500hp $83K
BLS 3L 300hp $32K vs. 1 series 3L 300hp $35K
Do you think GM would really stick that big old 3.6L V6 into a car that needs to sell well in Europe and other displacement-sensitive markets to cover its development costs? A 240 hp turbo 2.0 and 330 hp turbo 2.8 would be wiser choices, plus the 1.9 turbodiesel from the Vectra.
BLS 3L 300hp $32K vs. 1 series 3L 300hp $35K
Do you think GM would really stick that big old 3.6L V6 into a car that needs to sell well in Europe and other displacement-sensitive markets to cover its development costs? A 240 hp turbo 2.0 and 330 hp turbo 2.8 would be wiser choices, plus the 1.9 turbodiesel from the Vectra.
I was talking NA sales only and direct models to the BMW US competition. Base engine in the 1 series is the 6 cylinder 230 hp with the 6 cylinder turbo 300 hp version as an option in the US. I believe Cadillac will put the same engines in the Alpha as the CTS to compete with BMW. With the new CAFE rules it could also come with the smaller powertrains here. However if they fit the 2.8 turbo in it the 3.6 would drop in. hint: Alpha is being developed in Austrailia and the 3.6 engine is also built there now as are a number of other versions of it. Also the current version of the 2.8 Turbo only develops 255 hp and GM needs 300 to compete with BMW.
As far as other engine choices GM will need to have both a 4 and 6 diesel versions for the world and US. And most likely that would mean a gas 4 cylinder also. Really doubt GM would put all those engines in but I see at least 4 engines available in it sowewhere in the world.
That is a lot of powertrains but GM would have them also available in the CTS and STS. The 1 series has at least 5 different engines available with the actual selection determined by country of sale.
C&D cover story is that the CTS-V is an M5 beater. Unfortunately there is little meat in the article. Just discusses the CTS-V content and possible performance. They had no car to drive yet.
The acceleration numbers ( same day, driver & venue, apparently ) show that the 535i is a lot quicker.
0 – 60 = 5.1 vs 6.0 for the CTS w/DI.
Quarter Mile = 13.7 @ 102.6 vs 14.5 @ 98.2 for the CTS.
They also mention 0.91G lateral grip vs the CTS 0.86 ( each w/Sport Perf. Pkg. )
Those acceleration numbers are different enough that I’d expect those who care about such things ( that would include me ) could easily tell which is quicker.
And the lateral grip numbers + many other comments about the 535i’s handling + ride suggest that the BMW provides some additional value in these departments – for the significant additional cost.
I think that the CTS is an excellent vehicle for the money. It really is not either a 3-series or a 5-series vehicle, it is something in between. It is a Cadillac sports sedan in the $35 to 50,000 price range.
They said that both the tires and brake pads had "light wear" :confuse:
With nearly 12,000 miles there is 10mm of brake lining left and 8/32 tread left on tires...
I have read some forum posts that 2008 CTS owners had to wait to get parts. But its still a new vehicle. I would expect that as we get into the 2nd and 3rd model years, that it will be easy to get parts for the CTS after they have built up inventory.
A also am considering the CTS, but I am waiting for the 2009 model. I am waiting for any improvements, bluetooth, improved opaque sunroof shade, etc.
If I bought today, I am really liking the Black Raven exterior with Ebony interior and 18 inch wheels and the DI engine. I saw this exact combination this week in a parking lot. It really looked impressive. I also like the titanium interior to break up the totally black car. But I am flip flopping on the color. Can't decide.
Research the vehicle, there are 2 recalls that I know of, the rear end was locking up and there is something wrong with the power windows and sunroof.
I have yet to get the recall for my 2007 SRX, but the rear end is not leaking yet as far as I know (no sign of lube on the garage floor).
Yet I do not think it is reasonable to
expect my Chevy dealer to loan me a
Corvette, when mine ( an '07 ) is in for warrantee service...
Honestly, If I am driving a Caddy I would much rather to driver a Caddy loaner car than a Chevy Impala...
As far as I am concerned, if the car is only going to be in the shop for a day, getting a ride to work or home and then back is a reasonable solution. They would need a lot of loaners to give everyone one. I can see them giving out used cars to drive for the day, but then the car is not there should someone come in to buy it.
I'm not trying to start an argument, I just would like to you to clarify a little of what you are saying about the Escalade being the world standard for SUV's. Granted weekly I would call it the king of SUV's until I hear a recall or see a bunch of reviews where people complain about the engine or tranny going bad. I know that all cars have problems, but the Escalade is a great looking truck which I simply adore. But the lack of fold flat 3rd row seats and intelligent key leave a taste in my mouth for a Japanese or German full size SUV.
I was also disapointed to see that that beautiful caddy still uses a live axle and a prehistoric SOC engine. I'm torn between that and the QX56. Plans are already underway for a redesign on the QX aside from the recent one on the 08. Per dealer.
When Cadillac won the Dewar Trophy for "standard of the world", it meant that they were using interchangable parts to make Cadillac's, while the European cars were using custom made parts for each car.
There was only one Dewar Trophy for this category, and that Trophy is still Cadillac's. They are therefore still the "Standard of the World" and this topic should be terminated.
I have never heard of that, do you have a link to this info?
This was too easy.
Back in the teen's all those cars were hand built. Parts were made one at a time. So Cadillac put specs out and made sure parts were interchangable on the vehicle.
Regards,
OW
Regards,
OW
Back when my dad had the E320, the MB dealer usually gave him an Intrepid loaner (the Dodge dealer was on the same lot), which I thought was kind of skeezy of them. There was one time, though, when he had the car in for the third time in two weeks he told them "No, I'll be taking the S-class today." And he did.
The issue here is how many people can a dealer keep happy at any point in time. How many "loaner" vehicles must a dealer keep in stock. At something like 100 grand per S-class, there really must be a limit.
By making rental vehicles available at a nominal rate, I think my dealer is doing something. The Suburban rental that I got cost Cadillac $20 per day.
As far as BMW and Lexus go I haven't heard anything yet on the dealers give out loaner cars that are not the same brand.
Back in the late 90s when my dad impulse-bought a 35K Chrysler T&C and the transmission puked up after 6 months, he got an 85 Celebrity as a loaner. He was not pleased.
I appreciated the lighter feel, slightly sharper feel of the TSX, but mor appreciate my TLs power!
'21 Dark Blue/Black Audi A7 PHEV (mine); '22 White/Beige BMW X3 (hers); '20 Estoril Blue/Oyster BMW M240xi 'Vert (Ours, read: hers in 'vert weather; mine during Nor'easters...)
I will say this: if the dealers loaner policy is important, then this should be part of the deal when buying the new car. You need to have something in writing which will probably mean that the sales department will have to supply the car.
I was thinking the exact same thing, I love the Escalade I just wish that Infiniti builit it.
Why??? Hasn't Infinity had some problems with their Armada based QX 56?