Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Some people may make more per hour than they pay per hour to have an trained person do the work for them.
And, of course, I'd rather spend my free time on the golf course, playing with my grandkids or even having a beer with friends (lol) than crawling under a car scraping my knuckles & cussing my head off.
As most of you know, I own a 2005 Mazda6. The current Mazda6 is not due out until late this year, and I really do believe Mazda has their work cut out for them. The 2009 Mazda6 is already done, and we have seen it, but, I just hope it is enough to keep me as a customer. Every mfgr is really stepping up their game.
Is it going to ever debut?
Ditto on that. I always laugh at the claim that "the only way you know it is done right is to do it yourself". Instead for me that would pretty much ensure that it was done wrong .
In addition, I have to believe that in some cases the do-it-yourselfer may convince him or herself that they did it right, when they actually did it wrong :surprise:.
There are plenty of people who do their own maintenance, and don't do it right. They think changing the coolant is as simple as drain the old coolant out, and pour new coolant in. It's far from that simple. There is a procedure to follow (bleeding the air from the system, and circulating the coolant through the heating system). With a factory service manual, some basic tools, and a little know-how, an owner with common sense can save loads of cash on basic maintenance.
Also, as I previously mentioned I thought the Sonata was a decent car so why would it miff me that he likes the Sonata? Like I said previously in this mid size price segment it is really hard to make a bad choice as most of the cars bring a lot to the table. I am not sure how that comment is stirring the pot...to me it is just the opposite.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
I did own a 1992 Galant (bought used) and it was fine. I recall around that time that the Galant was one of the top-rated cars in its class. I don't think that has been the case for some time. I rented a previous-gen Galant a couple of years ago and thought it was actually quite a pleasant-driving car, albeit with a tight back seat for a mid-sizer. But again, no compelling reason to get one over many others in this ultra-competitive class.
I had great experience with them up to that point though, they kinda pulled a Subaru and just stopped making anything of interest to me.
I did get to play with the top of the line Galant at the NAIAS this year. IIRC, it had paddle shifters for its slushbox, and a moderately sized touch screen in the center stack (mounted high and visible) with a functional but dull menu structure. I remember liking the steering wheel and the seats, but that was only sitting in it while taking measurements at the show.
It felt comfortable enough to sit in, I am not sure about driving dynamics, and not being a manual its not of interest to me personally, but it seemed like it had a reasonable amount of gadgetry for the price.
It was car of the year when introduced in 1989. In 1991-92 it was available with the Eclipse GSX drivetrain in addition to 4 wheel steering, and dubbed the Galant VR4. It was competing against the Subaru Legacy GT (a 2.2l turbo) and Dodge Spirit R/T of the day ( and to a lesser degree, the Taurus SHO).
Give me a fire-breathing 1995 EVO III on a WRC special stage ANY day :P :P
However, I just don't see a great need for Stability Control on relatively low, wide, long sedans with a low center of gravity.
I can clearly see the use of ESC on tall SUV-type vehicles, as every long trip I take in icy conditions reveals that the ONLY cars to ever tip over are SUV's.
Am I alone in seeing only marginal need for such a feature? :confuse:
I also think entry level vehicles typically driven by younger less experienced drivers could benefit from that type of assistance.
I also think there are times when road conditions are poor enough (weather, generally crummy road, mountainous driving sometimes) that it would be nice if most people had a vehicle equipped with a driver assistance system.
I think the issue comes with how the system is implemented; how invasive or how hard to defeat is it? How well does it figure out that it needs to let the driver do more and it do less (very low traction situations, ABS on snow, etc)?
I think that most of the time, it compensates for driver error by lowering the overall limits of the vehicle, but that might be a fair trade off.
I don't get this part. :confuse:
Maybe they didn't like it? :confuse
Maybe they wanted a true 4 cylinder. The Altima 2.5L is so torquey and responsive, that you almost have trouble calling is a 4-banger ,compared to the shorter stroke, rev happy Honda 2.4L.
I'm suprisd they didn't look a the hyundai Sonata. I was fairly impressed with eh overall quality.
Maybe. I don't like the exterior looks, interior looks or the way it drives. And can't seem to get rid of the images of problem plagued Altima of just a few years ago from my head.
Myself, I would rather drive a "boring" old Accord.
I agree the rear is a little smaller, but it wasn't a deal breaker for us.
I drive mine almost every day. But it is a prior-gen 1999 LS with the 3L V6. With 138K miles it's been more reliable than my previous Mazda, Toyota, and Nissan vehicles. I still get 22-25 (winter-summer) City & 27-28 Highway.
I read the forums and stay interested in cars more as a hobby as the newer cars have relatively few features that would convince me to take on a payment. And while mileage is improving, it isn't by much and certainly doesn't do much to overcome the added expense of buying a new vehicle.
The tight back seat someone mentioned is certainly a legit gripe. Doesn't impact me much as I rarely have more than one passenger. I suspect it happened because '99 was the first year the Galant moved from compact to midsize. I originally went to the dealer to look at the Diamante but found I liked the then-new Galant much better. The main car it was up against was the TL. The TL was nicer but in a bland, or many I should say monotonous, way and still had a cramped rear seat. In the end the only compelling benefit of the Acura was traction control and potentially brand cache but they weren't dealing and those minor premiums would have run over $8K more than the Galant so Mitsu got my business.
I never cared for the Galant's '04 redesign but this year's refresh does a lot to improve the look. Still, I'd rather stare at a Lancer in my garage than the new Galant. If only I could get sufficient WAF* to get the Evo.
*WAF = Wife Acceptance Factor
I'd easily buy another Mitsu as long as they offered the right product for my requirements. The '04+ Galant is not the right product.
Talk about a niche business! :confuse:
Do you suppose they would consider cleansing a Malibu, too, since they share so much under the skin?
I am here to observe the midsize car "wars" and sometimes the arrows start flying and it's edu-macational to see what bothers people about a particular brand or what impresses them about a particular car or brand. It appears to me that Mitsubishi builds a solid car and SUV and the L200 is a very impressive truck as well. Mitsubishi keeps winning the Dakar Rallies and then incorporates lessons-learned improvements in their cars they build after the Rallies. I think they are very industrious workers and very good engineers at Mitsubishi and very accomplished car builders. If I wanted a mid-sizer I'd give the new world order Mitsubishi Galant a long, hard look, indeed.
2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick
What do you think?
As it's been discussed repeatedly, the midsize column isn't just limited to the models listed at the top of the page. We'll be happy to include any discussion of the Galant, Passat, Legacy, and even the Avenger/Sebring twins.
In fact, let me start by saying that with what I've seen/heard about the upcoming '09 Passat, I'm impressed. Now if they get their quality/reliability up to par with the rest of the class...
And the Mazda6 and Fusion/Milan platforms will diverge soon with the introduction of the 2009 Mazda6.
Aura and Malibu (and G6) share a platform, but the tuning and results are so different that I don't think they can be considered clones.
Isn't the Passat included in the "Mainstream Large Sedans" comparison? I've always thought of it being compared to the Avalon and Azera due to pricing.