Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
EX - $500 off MSRP,
apprx. wait time 4-6 weeks
would do 0 60 60 in 8.4 seconds but no mention
of the automatic EX.Anybody know this?I have made the purchase and get the car next week but never drove it on the freeway, just trusted the glowing
reports.I hope it is better than the Acura coupe
I traded in with a 150 hp 2.3VTEC with automatic.
1)supposed to be a trailer lite connector behind the drivers side rear speaker, does the speaker just pry out easily? I want to install a 4 flat connector. Also, Looks like Putnam hitch is the only one with 2 cross bars to the framework to be the heaviest handler for 2000 lbs. Is this so?
2)like I've seen posted, seems to be excessive road noise in cab, I have the Bridgestone Dueller tires, will others be quiter? Would any extra soundproofing or undercoating be of value in this area?
Other than that, everything seems great. Was looking at the 2001 or 02 Rav 4, but very pricey with this "One price, no haggle" baloney up here in Canada.
Thanks everyone.
Given what we've seen so far, it looks like the 5 speed will get to 60mph in the mid to high 8 second range. I'm guessing that the automatic will run low to mid 9 second times. The standing quarter mile seems to average between 16 and 17 seconds.
There are quiet tires that you can buy for the CR-V. They do make a difference, but most are street tires without the traction necessary for off-highway driving and snow. This link provides a comparison of the two tires fitted as OEM equipment. Living in the North East, I opted to live with the noise and keep the all season traction.
I added Dynamat sound dampening to the front half of my 99's floor and also fit it into the door panels up front and in back. That upgrade only made a minor difference (I'm not a pro installer, so you could have better luck). I spent less money on a hoodliner and got the same modest results. If I were to do it again, I'd go with the hoodliner and a paste/coating of the wheel wells.
> the drivers side rear speaker, does the speaker
> just pry out easily? I want to install a 4 flat
> connector.
The cover just prys off with a flat head screwdriver. Look at the bottom of the cover for a slot to insert the screwdriver. The speaker then can be unscrewed to expose the wiring.
> Also, Looks like Putnam hitch is the only one with
> 2 cross bars to the framework to be the heaviest
> handler for 2000 lbs. Is this so?
The CR-V takes a Class I hitch. Class I hitches in general are rated for up to 2,000 lbs, but the CR-V itself is only rated for 1,000 lbs. by Honda. The new 2002 CR-Vs have been rated for 1,500 lbs, but they have a more powerful engine and 4 wheel disc brakes. Having said that, there are CR-V owners that have successfully towed trailers weighing more than 1,000 lbs.
will not get it!She has a 2001 Acura 3.2 TL which
Honda is missing a bet if they don't make a wagon version of it.I only drove the V a couple of miles on city streets but love it.Even at MSRP
there is no competition.The Escape is the closest
in performance and price but it suffers from poor quality materials,and less room inside.Just for comparison here is a list of acceleration numbers
0-60 mph which is important in So Cal.,Santa Fe 11.1 sec.,Toyota Highlander 4 cyl 10.8 sec.,VW Passat wagon 1.8T 9.9 sec., CRV 8.9 sec., Escape 8.5 sec.In addition a new issue of consumers guide gave the Escape a bad reliablity rating.I
was seriously considering the Escape but little
things like in the cargo area the carpet was not even trimmed,it would have cost a few cents.In the mountains it feels gutless unless you keep the revs up by turning off overdrive.I could have
gotten the Escape for under invoice because my son works for a Ford dealer but sometimes money isn't everything.
Funny. Enjoy the V
INKY
painless.You still have to play the game where you
tell the guy what you want to pay he writes it down then goes back to some mysterious room then
we repeat the process till we reach an agreement.
They are still trying to extract all the cash they can for the deal.The only positive thing is you eliminate dealing with the wolves hanging
out on the lot.You are just dealing with one very smart wolf who will eat you for lunch.Sure the internet price may be fixed(in this case msrp for
CRV)but the variable is the extras added to the deal and the value given for your trade.Here a typical price on sticker is msrp +$1000 +$600 propack.I paid msrp ($22740)and that included the propack and dest.70 miles north the sticker is msrp + $600 for propack.The key to a good price is
location and availability.I did not get a good
deal relative to msrp but I did get a good deal
if you look at other cars in it's class.
If you look at the 2001 SE compared to the 2002 EX you'll see that the '02 EX is better equipped than the '01 SE, other than not having leather seat covers.
JM2C
Thursday Ladies hockey Canada 3 U.S.A. 2
Sunday Men's hockey Canada 5 U.S.A 2
Canadians rule- Go Canada Go
On the freeway, while power was no problem, the loud road noise was very annoying. Before we left on the drive, I checked the tire pressure(was about 28) on the Bridgestone Dueler's. I asked the salesman about the BF Goodrich tires, and he didn't really know. If those BFGs are quieter, why isn't Honda equipping all CRVs with them? Unfortunately, we came to the conclusion that we couldn't live with the freeway road noise in a brand new car. Buying such a vehicle would mean that we couldn't take it for any trips out of town.
It looks like Honda has done a great job in significantly reducing the engine and wind noise on the 2002 model, but must have decided to not bother with road noise. I'd be willing to pay $1K more on a $19K vehicle to get the pleasure of a quiet ride. One more thing: these dB measurements done by car magazines cannot be a substitute for actual experience. That tire/road noise on the freeway at 60 mph is very distracting. I think many Honda owners (me included) have a tendency to be more accepting of such things just because it's a Honda, particularly in the honeymoon after purchasing one. Even though I am a Honda owner, I decided not to accept such a noisy freeway cruiser. Hopefully, Honda will make a few tweaks for 2003, just like they did on the 2002 Civic.
That's the beauty of this world, everyone has an opinion. Try the Pilot, or MDX, maybe those are more to your liking.
FWIW, I found the noise levels in the CR-V to be perfectly acceptable at highway speeds.
Why doesn't Honda use only the BFG's? Because they can. The Bridgestones are apparently readily available to them and, while they may be noisier, they are generally a better truck tire.
Susanlm - According to a poster at the CR-V IX, the bushings that connect the seat to the rail may become warn out way too easily. I haven't seen anything to confirm this yet, but that's the rumor. The CR-V seat does have a new design to help prvent whiplash, but I have serious doubts that it is responsible for the movement of the seatback.
I have 2000 miles on those Duellers now, seem to be quieter than when new.
In any case, I've put down a deposit on a '02 CR-V and just waiting for it to arrive. But I am really concerned about some of these problems being reported. I realize that any new car is going to have some 'bugs', but in many respects, this is not a totally new car for Honda - it is a redesign. And from what I gather, the previous model used the same type tires. Along with the headliner problems, ABS light coming on, seat rocking, rough ride (differing opinions on this, I guess).
Could it be that Honda, in an attempt to get something out as quickly as possible to match the stiff competition (when the CR-V was first introduced there was really no competition) that Honda has put an inferior product (inferior to their standards/reputation) on the market?
Heat will cause the pressure to increase in the tires - so, if overinflated to begin with, the tires could gain 5-10 psi. while driving at highway speed. Could lead to a rough noisy ride. Does that sound correct? I do quite a bit of highway driving and do NOT want a rough noisy ride. I've never had a car that I had to overly concern myself with what tire or pressure was used - as long as it was a good quality and properly inflated.
One interesting thing was mentioned by a Toyota salesman when I said I was condidering a CRV, he said "Oh, they have Bad transmissions!" Anything to this? Funny things can be said by competing salespeople.
-juice
Overall reliability for the past CR-Vs has been great. Pick up the Consumer Reports guide and see for yourself, especially the row of "bullseyes" under the transmission category. For the sake of complete disclosure, here are all the significant technical issues I am aware of for the first-generation CR-V:
1) 1997 models had marginal vacuum capacity for the cruise control, leading to loss of speed on steep inclines.
2) Many brand-new CR-V owners complained of a pulling to the right (PTTR). The PTTR issues seem to have been attributed to bad alignments from the factory, bad tires, or a combination of both.
3) The published change interval for the rear-differential fluid (RT4WD models) is 90,000 miles. Enough anectdotal evidence exists to suggest that intervals of 30,000 miles is more realistic to avoid problems.
The Toyota salesperson should have just stuck to dismissing the CR-V as too minivan-like.
From Automotive News Online
February 08, 2002
By Joe Kohn
-----
More than 3,000 Toyota owners have been at loggerheads with the automaker because of a buildup of sludge in their engines. Toyota is in the unusual position of having to defend its quality.
To read more about this topic go to http://www.autonews.com/news.cms?newsId=1534
For news headlines throughout the business day, go to: http://www.automotivenews.com
Information needed for Class Action Lawsuit:
1. Date of purchase of vehicle
2. Type of engine in vehicle
3. Dates of oil changes and at what mileage intervals
4. Date first noticed problems (smoke, oil light...) and at what mileage interval
5. Dates and summary of what Toyota repair facility did
6. Did you write letters, provide proof, or get anything in writing from Toyota
7. Did you go to arbitration
8. Where is your vehicle now
9. What monetary damages has this caused
10. What other type of damage has this caused (time, inconvenience, stress...)
Rami Amaro, Attorney at Law
1424 Sherman Ave, Suite 200
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho 83814
Tele: (208) 667-4002
Fax: (209) 667-9992
Email: Amarolaw@msn.com jlamaro@aol.com
So I’m torn between paying $4500 more for a HL 2WD V6 or being more economical and getting the CR-V EX. The HL is luxurious inside and out with an awesome quiet ride. The CR-V looks and feels very durable (easy to clean and hide dirt) something I value having a 4 year old boy, tons of storage space, the back seat are more comfortable but that is compromised by having my rear view blocked by the headrests. You can’t go wrong with either one. The CR-V seems a bargain even at MSRP. The HL at near $30K sticker has a stick antenna, no 4WD, single CD, no side airbag, no leather but it’s a Toyota, which is worth a lot.
All that said I’m still leaning towards the HL because it’s about as close to owning a Lexus as I’ll ever come.
Steve
"buying such a vehicle would mean we couldn't take it for any trips out of town"
Really...?
I have to TOTALLY disagree! We have a 2000 SE which is noisier, but it sure isn't THAT bad!
I think you are the RARE exception!
I have heard ZERO complaints from my customers on this issue.
stuck.What if you never actually take possession
of the vehicle?In this case I did all the paper
work but the car is still at the service department because it needed some parts replaced because it was on display at the auto show.Meanwhile I am driving the car I traded in.I did this because 2002 CRV EX is hard to come by,
at least in San Diego.
rockycow
I just purchased a Silver LX AWD with SSRS this last weekend frm a dealer in KM and the salesman drove a Grn EX up to Riverside to get my crv in exchange. I wonder if that Grn EX might have been the one you had first thought about getting.
At this point in time, having driven Hondas for many years, I'm looking for a little more refinement, which includes a quiet ride in the city and on the freeway. And before I get any suggestions about looking elsewhere (Highlander, MDX) etc, no, I'm not interested in those big vehicles. If I have a choice between the CR-V and our other vehicle(a quieter sedan), of course I'm going to take the sedan on trips out of town because of the much quieter freeway ride.
Besides my personal experience, I have read numerous comments on this board and others about the 2002 CR-V being very noisy on the freeway. I have to assume that those people probably elected not to buy the 2002 CR-V for that reason, or now regret having bought one.
Likewise, I'm sure there are plenty of people who have no problems with the noise level, and are happy owners. As I mentioned in my earlier post, the CR-V is Lexus-quiet in the city, but I wish it wasn't so noisy to my ears on the freeway.
Know what's even more amazing, but true? Under normal conditions, the transmission fluid is supposed to last 90,000 miles too. I wonder how many dealer service departments are in line with THAT recommendation?