Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I think Ford might have tried that drop-in gas tank in just about everything, at one point. I remember reading a story about some Ford executive who got rear-ended in a Lincoln, and even its tank ruptured and the car caught on fire. He was able to get out of the car without injury, but supposedly that incident prompted him to push Ford to move away from those drop-in gas tanks.
And then Ford gave us the Pinto. Which, for all the bad publicity it garnetred, had about the same death-rate-due-to-fire as any other small car of the era.
Average age of cars on U.S. roads rises to record 10.8 years (LA Times)
I guess I'm setting the curve - the van was purchased in Dec. '98 so it's a bit over 13 years old now. The '97 wagon is still humming along too.
Left to my own my cars tend to rack up a lot of years and/or miles. I don't even blink at 100K anymore. Just make sure the timing belt has been done.
I can identify with your car retention habits.
I don't have any reliable statistics either, and even my personal experience is sketchy. For example, my '00 Intrepid was way more reliable than my '89 Gran Fury. The Intrepid was still going strong at 150,000 miles when it got totaled. The Gran Fury needed a new engine around 73,000, when the #8 cam lobe wore out, and the city of Richmond, VA, retired it. Now, the place I bought it from threw in a 318 from a wrecked '88 Diplomat with 75,000 miles on it. I got rid of that car with 118,000 (120,000 on the engine). So I guess you could argue that while the original engine only made it to 73K, the second engine made it to 120K! But, as far as things that Gran Fury needed under my watch, that the Intrepid never did: 4 or 5 new starters (I lost count!), fuel pump, radiator, freeze plug, two power window motors, distributor, and a water pump. Thing the Intrepid needed, that the Gran Fury never did: a/c compressor, new front rotors, and bearing hubs. It still ran okay when I got rid of it, but the water pump was starting to go. And by that time I had too many cars, so I was starting to pull parts off of it...
But, on the flip side, my 2000 Park Ave Ultra, at 78,000 miles, doesn't seem like it's going to turn out to be half the car my grandmother's '85 LeSabre was. That car was pretty reliable up until around 144,000 miles, when she gave it to me, but then it started going downhill. Still ran well by 157,000 miles when we got rid of it, but the brakes had gone out, and I knew it wouldn't pass emissions the next time around. Plus, it was just one of too many cars that I didn't need, so we got rid of it.
In contrast, the Park Ave has already needed suspension work, a rebuild on the front brake calipers, rotors, new belt tensioners and pulleys, and other odds and ends.
My Mom and stepdad had a 1991 Stanza, which started to lose its transmission around 90,000 miles, although they managed to get it to 110-120,000 before selling it. It also needed exhaust work and a few other odds and ends. Their replacement '99 Altima lost its transmission completely at 35,000 miles, but was replaced under warranty, and the car now has over 330,000 on it.
Oh, as for the cash for clunkers qualifications, I think the car had to be between 1984 and 2001, or something like that, and the combined EPA rating had to be either less than 18 mpg, or 18 mpg or below. To get the combined rating, I think they took the formula they apply to 2007 and newer cars and back-dated it to 1984. So for the most part, the only vehicles that qualified for it were trucks, SUVs, maybe a few minivans, and cars that had an engine displacement of around 5 liters or greater.
I'm only ~65,000 miles overdue on the Quest for that one. Did the Outback, but it's an interference engine.
I don't know if the van will make it to 200,000, but it'd be a fun milestone to reach. I'm getting pretty insufferable about it already, having passed 150k in October of 2010.
I've had two vehicles that had surpassed the 200,000 mile mark, although not completely under my watch. First was a 1968 Dart that I bought with 253,000 on it, and finally retired at 338,000. I had let it sit around too long, fuel pump went bad, and it wouldn't start. I didn't have the time or money to mess with it at the time, so I just let it sit, and it deteriorated pretty fast, unfortunately. The guy who bought it from me though, got it to start back up, and it sounded great, for the few seconds that it ran!
The second was a 1979 Newport that I bought from the junkyard, with 230,000 miles on it, for $250. Got rid of it with 250,000 on it when the water pump went out. I replaced it with the '89 Gran Fury I mentioned previously, a car that, 10 years newer and with roughly 30% the miles, I figured HAD to be more reliable. Alas, it wasn't. Although it was easier to live with, as the a/c worked, it had power windows, and a nice stereo. And was a lot quicker!
I seriously doubt any of my current fleet will make it to 200,000 miles, simply because I don't drive enough. My '85 Silverado has about 137,000 on it, but it's such a guzzler that we try to drive it as little as possible. I think it only went about 2200 miles last year. Mom gave it to me back in October 2002, over 9 years ago, with 109,000 on it. With the way the body and suspension are deteriorating, there's no way it'll make it to 200K, although the engine and tranny probably could.
The Park Ave had 56,372 miles on it when I bought it in December of '09, and is currently around 78,500 or so, so it's averaging out to around 11,000 per year. But, at that rate, it's going to take 11 years to get to 200K. And I just don't think I'll have the car that long.
All the other cars are antiques, under 100K miles (although my '67 Catalina is suspect), and rarely make it over 1,000 miles per year, so I don't see any of them ever making it to 200K, either.
Now, one of my friends has an '06 Xterra with 85,000 miles on it. The way he drives, I guess he could see 200K. His previous vehicle was a '98 Tracker that he traded for the Xterra, at 134,000.
The '95 was getting pretty tired by the time he traded it. Paint was starting to peel, and it was actually rusting in that sloppy, exposed seam where the top of the C-pillar meets the roof. Check engine light was on, engine was clattering, and it was smoking a bit. The '04 is holding up much, much better. I think the most expensive repair he's had to make on it was when the intake manifold started to leak. At one point, the windshield wipers were acting up and started parking in the upright position, which I think was a common problem on those panthers. Now, it had other issues over its life, I'm sure, but overall it's held up pretty well.
So, I think overall, cars definitely are getting better. Only problem is, nowadays you can have one single component fail on them, that makes them cost-prohibitive to fix. For instance, if the transmission went out on my Park Ave, it would cost around $1800 to replace. That's not too bad. But just think of how much these modern 5, 6, 8+ speeds, etc are going to cost to replace, as the cars they're in age!
My '98 Grand Caravan wouldn't have. Great mechanicals on that van, but the electrical system was a nightmare! I sold it at 215,000 to a guy who claimed to know what was acting up on it, and I still see it on the road now and again two years later. I was a little sad to see it go because listening to it purr like a new car upon start-up, I just hated to give up on it.
:shades:
I posted elsewhere about getting a flat on the interstate last week in the '97 Outback. A new car with TPMS technology would have let me safely exit, and perhaps I wouldn't have ruined yet another tire like I did last September on the van.
More than two airbags would be nice too.
But geeze, I just rolled over 86,000 miles with it this trip. Be a shame to retire it.
Was looking at the gas logs too - last year I filled up the Outback 12 times, about once a month. Already filled it up six times this year. What a difference a road trip makes.
Well, provided something didn't break in the TPMS system. My buddy's 2006 Xterra, with about 85,000 miles on it, has had two sensors in that system replaced. Fortunately, when they fail, they've (so far) triggered the idiot light, letting you know something is up.
But, I guess that can be dangerous too. As the vehicle ages, I can see someone getting tired of replacing those sensors and just leaving them alone. Or, after having the system cry wolf a few times, they might think it's just another sensor going bad when this time it really is a tire going flat!
Oh, as for dumping a beater, I am thinking that 2012 might be the year to finally retire my aging Silverado. It ain't looking so great, these days...
The other half are F-150s that look just like that.
Those sensors aren't cheap and on some, when the batteries fail after ~5 years, you have to buy a whole new sensor.
Of course, part of the reason for that is my having to drive the plow truck ('76 F250) into town a couple days ago, which more than made up for the fuel savings on the Escort.
With old cars, having a spare can be handy. So long as you don't get too carried away like Andre, LOL.
Its the vacuum solenoids in the control head. Specifically the "o" rings aren't sealing any longer. If you are handy I bet you could do it yourself.
Pretty good explanation: Click Here
2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic / 2022 Ram 1500 Bighorn, Built to Serve
So, to get the tuck home, I pulled one of the wheels off the Catalina, which uses the same 5-on-5 bolt pattern.
I think the front tire on that truck is a 255/70/R15, and it's mounted on an extra-wide 15x8" truck rally wheel. In comparison, the Catalina rally wheel is a comparatively petite 15x7", and the tire is a 225/70/R15.
No, I seem to recall Andre relating on another thread that he had a flat and went through quite an adventure getting it home.
Oops! He beat me to the punch.
But you were smart to get off the freeway. A tire is a small price to pay for your life.
Friend of ours back in Boise got hit by a sleepy Prime trucker changing a flat 12 or 15 years ago, and it wasn't pretty. Long recovery. Prime had a pretty bad reputation but that was a bankruptcy or two ago.
After I got the spare on I exited at the next exit for the last two hours of the drive.
So, very roughly speaking, it costs 1000 gallons of gasoline to build your new car.
So if you buy a new car that gets 45 mpg to replace your old "gas hog" that got 25, and you drove 12,000 miles a year, you'd have to drive the new car 5 years to break even on your energy consumption.
Body never rusted, but I hit a telephone pole and crunched a fender (but not bad enough to really replace), had the front bumper torn partway off being yanked out of the mud, 4 different sized tires on it and a sagging rear suspension. Top it off with no mufflers (just a couple of pipes that were cut off just behind the cab and it was a hell of a beast to look at and hear coming down the road. But it's my favorite vehicle I have ever owned. It had probably close to 200K on it when I left home and left it behind.
Your's is nice (except for the rust spots) compared to what mine looked like... I'll have to see if I can find a picture of it somewhere...
Well, mine looks nicer in pics than it does in person! It has a big dent in the passenger side door where it looks like someone kicked it in, and the rust is actually worse on that side.
I'm not sure how, exactly, the rear bumper got that bend in it. I had gotten rear-ended twice in late 2006. First was a hard hit from a 2000 Infiniti I30 (or I35, or whatever they called the Infiniti version of the Maxima). Here's a pic I took of it, after that impact...
The bumper itself didn't seem to get bent, but the brackets mounting it to the frame did. The repair shop replaced everything, and it was about $350, paid for by the other person's insurance company. As for the Infiniti? Headlights smashed out, hood pushed back, radiator appeared to be pushed back at an angle. Grille was gone. I don't remember if the fenders got bent or not. It didn't deploy her airbags. I'd guess the damage could have been an easy $5,000 or more...it doesn't take much to rack up big bills on modern cars.
Well, about a month or so after that little misadventure, a girl in a 2003 or so Hyundai Elantra ran up under my bumper in a traffic jam in DC. The light was green, but traffic was gridlocked, so there was really nowhere to go. However, as traffic inched forward, I let off the brake, let it idle forward, and then when I stopped, happened to look back and see this Hyundai wedged under there. She had tried to change lanes, I guess because she thought the other lane would move more quickly, but was too close to complete the maneuver and hit my bumper when I stopped. And, you know what she had the nerve to say to me? "Why did you stop at a green light?!" Umm, because traffic was GRIDLOCKED?!
That impact bent the edge of the bumper. Got it fixed, but then a couple months later, I happened to notice it bent again. I'm guessing someone backed into it in a parking lot somewhere. That time, I just left it alone.
Anyway though, the old beast is still kicking. I drove it to work every day this week. It started every single time, never stalled out, and nothing fell off of it, so I guess it's not time to put a bullet in it just yet!
Well I forgot that my mom had music lessons (why I forgot I don't know because she taught music lessons every day) and forgot there was another car parked in our driveway. I jammed the truck into reverse and floored the pedal. Ad mist the spraying gravel I failed to notice the car behind me. I crunched it right at the A-pillar. It was a Chevy Cavalier and I ended up totaling the car out. Bent the door, the fender and the frame so much it wasn't worth repairing the car. And the truck?? Wouldn't even know it had been hit, aside for the the already slightly upturned real bumper.
It sounds about right to me. Do you agree?
I'd say 150K is the new 100K, and I'd also offer the opinion that 150K is a very good time to bail out of a car. "nice enough to sell, old enough to be risky".
The problem with modern cars is that after 10 years, they are vastly depreciated, even though they become more expensive to repair as time goes on. This means that their market value is often more or less equal to the cost of a major repair. So if your 150K car is running well, maybe you can get $6000 for it, but as soon as the transmission goes, you lose MORE than the price of a new transmission--essentially your vehicle becomes a parts car in the snap of the fingers.