Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Also sent Subaru an e-mail suggesting liners for the holders.
In order to not void the warranty, do I just need to keep the receipts and document the mileage if I plan to do the changes myself?
I use a 3 jaw filter wrench similar to this one:
http://www.partsamerica.com/productdetail.aspx?MfrCode=PBI&MfrPartNumber=648659&- CategoryCode=3401A
and have never had a filter I couldn't remove. Mine looks to be a little more beefy than that one, and I paid a few dollars more, but you get the idea.
I really wish my Miata had this. Convertibles should make this feature mandatory, esp. with the top down.
storage slot for the retracting cargo area cover under the load floor is a great idea
I agree. I don't use it much, by my wife uses it all the time. Perfect.
mute button on the steering wheel audio controls
My minivan has volume controls but no mute, which stinks! You have to manually go back up and it doesn't remember the level you had set before.
just found out today that the dealer ordered the wrong unit.They charged me 405.
just for the unit it is a SIR-CL3 Clarion Compatible tuner.
It will not work bacause the cable that connects this unit to the existing radio is not the correct size and shape.
This gives me the reason to return this thing to the dealer and get my $405. Back!
What a hassle. by the way I found this unit online for 99 bucks.
I am going to wait until the correct sirius tuner can be had somewhere else.
If anyone knows please let me know. I will work on it and if I come up with anything I will post it.
Secondly, it seems like the engine kind of "whistles" (very hard to describe sounds without hearing them) at just above idle, i.e. as soon as you depress the accelerator. Don't remember hearing this sort of sound at first and wondering if this again is a normal sound for the engine. Also, the engine seems to be a bit louder as it revs.
Do engine sounds change as it breaks in or is it all in my head?
Could you clarify? Although Subie has recently upped the frequency of service for its turbo models, that has not changed for the regular engines with LOAF at 7500miles. I've never seen Subies described as high maintenance. There will be slightly more parts which require inspection but that is true for any AWD vehicle. My WRX with the Turbo has been far from needy and my only issue ever came from the dealer installed remote start/alarm.
I've also heard sounds of valves and other systems setting themselves during vehicle startup (whole process is usually done within a minute or so). Subaru states in manual tests of various systems are done during startup to make sure they are working.
Sometimes at mid throttle I will hear a moan or sigh that disappears when accelerating. Might have to do with the turbo system.
One of the things I like about Subaru is the company itself. They actually listen and care about the customer. If you should have a problem it gets resolved. People rave about Toyota, and I also have a Tundra. While it is also very reliable, the company and the 2 local dealers are a real pain to deal with. I had an issue and the company spent more time trying to get out of doing anything than trying to make the customer happy, for something that cost about $100. Let me repeat, that was the company not the dealers, and something that a TSB was issued for. I finally just bought the part wholesale and fixed it myself. This has not been the case with Subaru. My wife just had her entire moonroof track assembly and motor replaced because of an intermittent problem. That was handled correctly. I don't care how good the product is, I will never buy another Toyota.
As far as maintenance, I don't find Subaru more demanding than any other, with the one exception being rotation of tires. This is something that can be neglected in other non-AWD brands, but is important to Subaru. I do this myself every 7500 miles because I like to torque the lug nuts, so if I had someone else do it I would only have to check the torque myself, so I might as well do it.
I find all service departments today try to push extra things. This is to help pump up their profits, and I understand that, but the responsibility and decisions rest with the owner. If you stick to the Subaru recommendations and not fall into anyone's scare tactics, such as "engine treatments" and any other extras I think you will find that costs are comparable.
Throughout the daily travels both my wife and I bump into many other Subaru owners. Besides meeting some nice people, we have never run into an unhappy owner, never, and many are repeat buyers. To me, that says something.
I'm the lucky owner of a new 2009 Forester, my second Forester. The first one was a 2006. Got such a great deal with the guaranteed trade-in program going on now.
Anyway, I do have the experience now to compare the 2009 with an earlier model, and I must say that I am greatly impressed. All those niggly complaints I had about space and that my husband (6'4") had about leg room and ride are g-o-n-e. I got the LLBean model with the navigation and just had the bluetooth accessory installed to be in conformance with California's no-cellphone rule going into effect in July. Once I figured out how to synch my phone with the set, it worked fine.
Every day that I drive this car I marvel at all the changes Subaru made. I call them the 3 S's--safety, space, and style. Am sure that this model will get the 5-star rating just like the others. Space is so available (although I think they sacrificed a bit of space behind the rear seat to increase the legroom) and they brought the deck up and somehow decreased the wheel wells for more space across. And STYLE, well, inside and out it's stylin'. I added the body side moldings to protect against dings in the door and wheel well mouldings which really look great.
My last highway trip got me 27.6 MPH going 65 with cruise control on for about an hour. I though that that was pretty nice.
I am really impressed with what Subaru did with this model!
Nancy
By the way any thoughts on the comparison between the rogue and the Forester. The Rogues seems to have higher tech toys and the sexier look. At this stage in my life the only thing sexy i might have would be my car.
http://www.vanbortelsubaru.com/ServiceSpecials.asp
Again, you need to be careful of the difference between what the dealer recommends and what Subaru does.
I don't see a power steering flush anywhere.
http://content.subaru.com/sub/media/pdf/schedules/2009SchedFed.pdf
They do not require LOAF until 7500 unless driven in severe conditions. Then add basically usual inspections at 15k and inspection and plugs at 30k.
I guess it all depends how much you drive, but at 10k miles per year that would be less than $600 over 3 years. That's pretty typical isn't it? I stick to the manual, not what my dealership service manager wants from me. I consider winter as severe conditions so bring the schedule forward accordingly.
Cavets? The label warns against using abrasive cleaners on it, or slamming the hood down. The shield also makes it a bit harder to get fingers under the hood to raise it.
Hopefully it does the job. Cost was $95 (dealer gave me a discount). Workmanship proved their good service reputation and I will be back there for the 3K oil change.
aesthetics:
the forester has the best interior in the class, hands-down. and the panoramic moonroof cannot be beat. the rav-4 was second with nothing particularly nice or ugly about it, though the plastics seem much cheaper. the outlander was nice except for two things: a massive front-dash area with a lot of unusable space between the windscreen and the front; and the auxillary jack for mp3 players is in an impossible to get to location. the crv is just ugly on the inside, and the driver's arm-rest is uncomfortable. in the same general price-range the forester feels like it belongs in a price class above. and it has much better visibility than the rav-4 and the crv. the outlander is pretty good in this area as well.
in terms of exteriors, the outlander is probably the sharpest looking. we placed the forester 2nd. the rav-4 lost points for the ugly spare tire placement and the side-hinge rear door. the cr-v is boring on the outside.
cargo space:
we have two 50 pound dogs and so this was a major consideration for us. the outlander probably has the largest usable dog space with the forester a close-second. i say "usable" because the rav-4 has 3 cubic feet more, but a lot of horizontal space is chewed up by the cup-holders etc. for the optional third row seats. not a big deal if you don't have dogs, but if you have two that have to be in there together, losing 7 inches of horizontal space is big.
the drive:
i had some trepidation because of the reviews of the 4-speed automatic, but i have to say i was pleasantly surprised. it doesn't have the power of the rav-4 v6 obviously, or the outlander v6, but the feel was comparable to the 5 and 6 speed v4 rav4 and i4 outlander models.
on the whole, the forester gave us the most bang for the buck. we paid $23,412 for the automatic 2.5x with the premium package. this was about the same for the basic rav4 v4 but with a whole lot more features. the outlander probably compares most favourably at the price but the things the outlander was marginally better for (cargo, 6 speed shift) did not outweigh the things the forester is clearly far better for (the interior--especially that moonroof!). and the outlander has lower rated mileage, and probably lower resale value down the road.
overall, i would rank the class as follows, adjusted for price:
1. forester
2. outlander
3. rav4
4. crv
if you want more power and a 5 or 6 speed shift, the rav-4 and outlander v6's might appeal more; but we are not amateur rally drivers and the forester seemed more than adequate for our needs, and a huge jump in power over our 2000 camry. and while it might be nice to occasionally have more power to pass grandma and grandpa on the freeway, it is always nice to be in such a nice interior.
finally, we bought our car from a local fixed price dealership (walser subaru in burnsville, mn). i can't tell you how much of a pleasure it is dealing with fixed-price dealerships compared to regular commission-based places. we might have paid a few hundred more, but it was worth it for the lack of smarm, scam and sleaze.
hope this is helpful to someone else looking.
I know we already asked if it had the film still on it, but here's another silly question: is the brightness all the way up? It should have a little bit more difficult "click" on the dial than the rest to reach the brightest setting in the range.
In other words, is the poor interior enough reason not to buy a Forester? I presently own a V6 Outback and we Have to trade it in - we like the exterior pf the Forester but haven't seen the interior - we like the fact that it is a remodellled design whereas our 2005 Outback won't be redesigned until 2010.
Your thoughts are much appreciated! Thanks!
Also, for all those looking for recommendations of the Forester vs. CRV, Outback, RAV4, etc., read my previous posts on that--I looked at them all. If you get the XT Limited, it leaves all of the others for dead in performance, comfort and utility (only the RAV4 V6 comparably quick, but it doesn't handle as well and I don't fit in it). If you're scared of the premium fuel requirement, do the math--according to fueleconomy.gov (the government's official site), at 10,000 miles per year the fuel cost difference between the base Forester and the XT is $281. I don't know about you, but I think that's a pretty cheap price of entry to make a practical, comfortable, useful vehicle a load of fun to drive as well. (July Car & Driver: 0-60 6.2 seconds)
Be careful with sharp objects around the shift console as that surface scratches pretty easily. The headliner's fragile (but so are lower end RAV4's and a bunch of others).
Wrt radio/DC display, mine's slightly cloudy but that appears to be a surface treatment designed to minimize sun glare. I've had no trouble reading the Subie display when sunny (uMalibu Maxx's display was unreadable when sun was anywhere near it)
Wrt fuel economy, given huge hike in gas prices, $ difference between reg and premium is about 5%. Depending on octane in area you may be able to mix premium with plus (Turbo requires 91 octane but will run on lower grades for short time - too low and "check engine" light may come on).
I am contemplating getting the side door protection but I look around these days and see that when people open doors they have a point to them (most apparent on the rear doors because of the wheel well cut) and that if they did open their door into yours the side door protection wouldn't even be hit.
So far very satisfied with my 09 Sage Green Forester Premium and it just got it's first wash yesterday. Still at low miles...750
I do not agree that the console is cheap-feeling, and I like the design.
Overall, I got about what I expect in a car at this class. We are pleased with the leather trim in our LL Bean. The square cupholders are just plain bizarre, and I wish the sun visors had extenders. The radio controls are a bit small. The front passenger seat rides too low relative to the dash -- makes you feel like you're sitting in a hole, at least compared to the '08. In fact, our main reason for getting the LL Bean was for the power driver seat: We could not raise the manually adjusted driver seat high enough for my wife's comfort in the '09 Premium; the power seat goes higher. I wish they had kept the higher seating position.
I'd like a power liftgate like our van has. Didn't like having to order side moldings (they should be standard), but I just found out they have finally arrived at the dealer, and I'm getting a good discount on them through my sales rep.
Nevertheless, we really enjoy this car. It had fewer drawbacks than the others we looked at.
Take note though that subwoofer installation requires that you remove the center dash cover and that the paint on that surface scratches very easily. Make sure to use a plastic tool to pry it off.
we didn't get very many options. our car came with the dimming mirrors/compass, and all-weather mats installed. we're adding on the ipod interface and more rugged cargo area mats. and i think we'll have to get the rear bumper protector, because otherwise the dogs jumping in and out is going to scratch it up in no time at all.
As for Forester noises, the work on that Overhead console has gotten rid of nearly all the interior creaks and pops I heard when it was new. Amazing how a couple of vinyl tubes rubbing on the consoles' interior could make such a racket. :surprise:
Seating position - I am 6'0" and over 200 lbs. and found I could adjust the height and tilt to a very comfortable position....and the rear legroom is great!...more than my wife's Rodeo,
Interior - I really like the interior but my wife was a little worried about the durability of the seat fabric, so we got the dark interior which will do show the wear and soiling of the lighter fabrics.
jbkennedy, Nancy, birdboy, did I miss any? Seems like a new owner appears every day. I'm still waiting for my special order PZEV LL Bean. SoA just called me to let me know it arrived at the port. These guys have been great, in fact the boat arrived on the exact day they forecast weeks ago.
Glad to hear about the 27.6 and 31 (wow) mpg people are reporting.
unresolved: I suggest you get a Chase Subaru credit card. You earn 3% back in Subaru Bucks and that can pay for all your maintenance. Very few manufacturers have programs that let you get free maintenance that way. Your ownership costs will be a lot lower if you do that.
redrose: H6, not V6, on your Outback. Subtle yet important distinction. :shades:
The 4 cylidner RAV4 actually has a 4 speed auto, just like the Forester. Mitsubishi uses a CVT for their 2.4l 4 cylinder models, but I drove one and it felt very disconnected.
outlander has lower rated mileage, and probably lower resale value down the road
Right here on Edmunds, you can get the figures from car_man, a very good resource.
Using the same terms, 36 month lease with 15k miles/year, residual values are:
Forester: 59%
Outlander: 52%
So yes, it will hold about 7% more of its original value.
I just returned from a 10 day vacation in Florida, where I rented a RAV4 and drove about 1,100 miles (the vehicle had about 10K miles on it). This was my first up close experience with the RAV4. Overall, it was not a bad vehicle. The front seats were comfortable, the ride was fairly quiet, gas mileage was about 28 mpg (about same as my Forester - although the rental was 2WD, I think). The engine power was plenty adequate, and xmission shifts were smooth. The interior was not bad, with some nice storage cubbies etc. Controls, handling, visibility were good. I really liked the power window "auto-up" feature (not just "auto-down" as in Forester). And the stereo system (which was base model) definitely had a better, fuller bass response - though it did not have an ipod or external audio input.
The seating position in the RAV4 is very different from the Forester. With the RAV4, you are more sitting up high "on top" (like a full sized SUV/Truck) and "vertically-stacked", versus the Forester which is more sedan-like sitting "in" the vehicle "horizontally-stacked". As far as which is better, I think it comes down to personal preference.
Probably the thing I liked the least about the RAV4 is the side-swing rear door and outside mounted spare tire. Toyota did a good job making the swinging door heavy and functionally smooth, but I find this layout awkward and cumbersome (and ugly).
My other observation with the RAV4 is that while it is a "good" vehicle, it felt "pedestrian"...kind of plain...it was lacking a personality...a "soul, if you will. I think most of us who own (and love) our Subaru's feel a [at times "quirky"!]connection with our vehicle. No, they are not perfect cars, nor are they always the
best in their category in many feature areas. But they are different. They perform great in the important areas - ie snow/mud traction, safety, economy, fun-to-drive, reliability.
So, my bottom-line advice would be to drive both cars and see which one you feel better and more comfortable in. Neither one of them is going to be a "bad choice"
as a CUV. Hope this helps!
At this point I bought the Forester for the AWD and its reliability over the interior materials. So far the only minor problem is a vibrating drivers side mirror. I am liking the car and thus far have no regrets.
It was definitely a bit of work. Have to remove the rear bumper, mud flaps, the mufflers (both of them!), the entire spare tire area contents (foam storage dividers, etc). And you have to cut/trim away a section of the plastic bumber fascia - so be careful!
But the directions were clear, and I completed the install with no problems.
It helps if you have wheel ramps to get car up high to work under it. Also need a torque wrench to reinstall properly.
Allow yourself about 4 hours to do the install.
I found a few off market hitches cheaper than the Subaru dealer but they did not offer the correct wiring harness that Subaru says must be purchased with the entire package from Subaru. www.SubaruWRXparts.com offers discount parts and has the hitch for $340. Possibly a little cheaper than the dealer depending on shipping.
So far I am loving my 09 Premium Auto. Good luck and thanks to everyone for the great information on the Forrester.
We will definitely test drive both cars and let you know what we think!
A certain Mitsu owner didn't believe it was. Don't ask me why he thought they would have changed that. :lemon: