Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options

Houses cost too much!

1246714

Comments

  • Options
    berriberri Member Posts: 10,165

    Fin, those BRIC'ers may indeed be part of the reason behind the jump in desirable Seattle area housing. But another thing I believe is this Federal Reserve manipulating. I fear that one is going to end ugly with bubble bursts. Think about it; Volcker, then Greenspan - both ended up making a mess with their policies and the like. Don't expect Bernanke & Yellen will end up any different. Is Seattle diverse enough to absorb Boeing's apparent slow Seattle area divestiture efforts and Microsoft's apparent slow market attrition?

  • Options
    berriberri Member Posts: 10,165

    Stever, maybe you ought to consider just renting for awhile until you figure that market out? The tax advantages of home ownership are very overstated when you consider it on a cash flow basis and the costs of getting into and out of real estate purchases can be fairly expensive (especially if you make a mistake). A year delay isn't likely to impact you much on a long term basis.

  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169

    There are a few factors at play here - constant in-migration combined with a lack of developable land combine to inflate prices. Many places here are now building up instead of out. Financial policies like you mention can be an impact too - but I think many if not most of the nation isn't inflating, so I don't know if it is a real overall bubble. Regarding the local economy - Boeing moved some suits to Chicago and took bribes to go to SC, but everything I hear still has decades of work at local facilities. MSFT isn't what it used to be, but the talent it attracted launched several new industries, and that seems to be continuing today - look how many tech/IT firms are based here - many employers. This area is also being seen as a cheaper alternative to SF, and newbies seem to love the quality of life here - at least those from TX and FL I work with. Combine that with the offshore influence, and the market here will continue to be strong, even if basic fundamentals might not support it. It's all also very localized - my mother lives 2 hours from here, and prices in her area are barely higher in raw dollars than 15-20 years ago, and in many cases lower, if adjusted.

    Thetax benefits of owning might be a contributor to artificial prices, too. I don't know if any other nation does it that way - definitely a subsidy given to our FIRE overlords who are so deserving of adulation. I wonder what would happen if the powers would curtail the gifts.

    @berri said:
    Fin, those BRIC'ers may indeed be part of the reason behind the jump in desirable Seattle area housing. But another thing I believe is this Fed

  • Options
    berriberri Member Posts: 10,165

    I agree that housing inflation is mostly localized right now. But what artificially low interest rates do is encourage leverage and speculation, while also driving people into hard assets like real estate and commodities. That can result in pull ahead sales that later lead to a bust in demand potentially deflating the recently bought assets. I'm presuming banks will remain more vigilant on granting mortgages here, or otherwise watch out while it turns ugly once again.

  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169

    I think that might counteract the rates - tougher lending standards. No more 500K mortgages given to those with 50K household incomes like back in the mirage economy days when rates were higher but standards far looser and less ethical.

    If only the banks could be held accountable for their actions. Corporations are people too, my friend...right? :)

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450

    @stever said:
    Viewed a dozen of so houses in Las Cruces last week (and a few dozen more on the MLS sites) for our impending move from the UP.

    Found a "cheap" one in foreclosure but it needed work to fix it where we would enjoy living there. Windows, some limited remodeling, maybe $30,000 worth total. That would put the house in the higher end of the homes in the neighborhood (another attraction - very walkable and close to stuff). But it didn't really pencil out so we didn't follow through after the bank countered our offer.

    Now we're looking at a pricey (for us) custom home with a view. Not walkable (it's perched on its own little hill) and it's about 3 miles to the nearest shopping and restaurants. But it's got all the bells and whistles and needs no work.

    My wife keeps telling me to buy a more expensive house since if one of us winds up in long term care, the feds will let the other spouse stay in the home, even if we spend all our other "cash" assets on health care. The house will be the savings account if one of us dies and the other then decides to sell and move. And we starting to get of that age ....

    Homes there are pricey. How is the water situation? Cost of gas and electric service? Property taxes are not bad in Dona Ana County. I think renting may be a good idea. You may not like the dust storms that are getting more frequent. I like this place. They are proud of it.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2114-Calle-De-Picacho-Mesilla-NM-88046/2110359432_zpid/

  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited June 2014

    @berri (and @gagrice), renting is definitely on the table. We fully intended to rent in the UP but the housing stock was so junky and home prices so "cheap" we decided to buy instead. And lots of absentee owners here don't trust the renters so they keep their "second" homes empty. Those owners are usually kids who inherited a house or someone who had to go to North Dakota for work. Renting would let us explore the neighborhoods more and give us an out if the dust (or ag) is too much. But we had dust and ag in Boise and it rarely bothered us (never had the highway pileups like the recent one caused by a dust storm between NM and AZ though ).

    The water situation in Las Cruces is interesting. Like Boise, the water wars are always in the news. There's some aquifers around but people are concerned that the drought is causing farmers to sell their rights to the frackers, who pump stuff back in the ground and ruin the rest. Many of the neighborhoods have their own water company instead of being city run. Most have good reputations (and good wells). At least one subdivision in the foothills is rife with foreclosures and they've been hauling water in tanker trucks for a year or more.

    My realtor pays about $300 a month for AC. And his house is only 1300 sq. ft! So that's a bit of a concern. Another reason to look into solar to at least try to offset some of that. Natural gas is around but I don't much like it; rather have an all electric home. A couple of places have propane but the size of the tanks on the property leads us to believe that usage is pretty minimal (we're talking 100 gallon tanks vs the 250 gallon ones common in the UP).

    @gagrice), you've got us dialed in with the Calle De Picacho house. It's a bit more than I'd like to spend but may be doable. It's got the arches, stucco/adobe look, coyote fence, not much grass, tile countertops (I'm not much of a granite fan), tile floors and no carpets, vigas/beams in the ceilings and a courtyard. Nice touch with the Route 66 fabric on the overstuff chairs in one of the photos. :smile:

    And it's in Mesilla, a very desirable (and walkable) area close to their town square. And it's not far from the center of Las Cruces, where they have gotten rid of the pedestrian downtown mall that killed the city center, and they plan a new town square to be completed in a couple of years. Great new bistro has already moved in to that area.

    Read somewhere that the median home price is around $150,000. A one bedroom house we really liked had a view and was only $300,000, lol. Would give us an excuse not to entertain company.

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450

    @stever said:

    gagrice), you've got us dialed in with the Calle De Picacho house. It's a bit more than I'd like to spend but may be doable. It's got the arches, stucco/adobe look, coyote fence, not much grass, tile countertops (I'm not much of a granite fan), tile floors and no carpets, vigas/beams in the ceilings and a courtyard. Nice touch with the Route 66 fabric on the overstuff chairs in one of the photos. :smile:

    And it's in Mesilla, a very desirable (and walkable) area close to their town square. And it's not far from the center of Las Cruces, where they have gotten rid of the pedestrian downtown mall that killed the city center, and they plan a new town square to be completed in a couple of years. Great new bistro has already moved in to that area.

    Read somewhere that the median home price is around $150,000. A one bedroom house we really liked had a view and was only $300,000, lol. Would give us an excuse not to entertain company.

    It really is a cool looking home. Check it out on Google maps. It is in a compound with other homes. Been on the market for a long time. Could be issues with close neighbors. I would go knock on every door and talk to them. Find out what they like about the area. Their electric is not too bad at 11 cents per KWH. I would be concerned about water, if I was buying.

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450

    This was huge in Hawaii back in the early 1980s. Many of the properties ended up being rented as Apts during down times in tourism. They went into disrepair. A lot of Alaskans bought them to have a place to go in Hawaii. And let it pay for itself the rest of the time.

    Developers across the U.S. are reviving a concept that collapsed with the real estate crash in 2008: combining condominiums and hotels. In cities including Miami, New York and Los Angeles, a rebounding hospitality market is joining with rising demand for luxury homes, spurring developers to construct new full-service hotels and ask premium prices for residential units associated with a high-end brand.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-02/homebuyers-avoiding-chores-fuel-condo-hotel-rebirth-real-estate.html

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450

    With the announcement, while visiting my children in Indiana, that they are moving to Oregon, my thinking of moving back East has come to a screeching halt. Trying to find in Oregon what is all over KY, TN, TX etc is just not easy. Here is a typical place close to great fishing lakes in KY.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1630-Cypress-Rd-Benton-KY-42025/2106472956_zpid/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=emo-propalert-hdp

    For $200k more in Oregon you get 1000 sq ft less and a fixer to boot. Not sure Oregon has that much more going for it.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/36285-Row-River-Rd-Cottage-Grove-OR-97424/48429124_zpid/

  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454

    Oregon. Mountains ("real" ones), ocean, rivers.... Pretty nice place. (Maybe too many Californians there jacking up the prices, LOL?).

    Got one guy low balling us on our house (and houses are already cheap here). We're only about a used Subaru apart at this point but as much nickel and diming that he's doing on the offer/counter-offer, we're ready to just to let the house sit for a while and wait for the next interested party. He's waived the home inspection but who knows what crap he'll pull closer to closing. We have about the best house in the county for our price range as it is and the holding costs are pretty low, so snowbirding a year or two won't kill us either.

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450

    Hold in there. If you have it priced right, there are always bargain hunters wanting to turn a quick buck. 3 more months of good selling weather for the UP. I have two on the market now in Indiana. I won't give them away. I should get all I put into them and a few bucks for my trouble. Then likely put the cash into Oregon property, if the right place comes along.

  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169

    329K might get you a literal teardown (say, fire damaged) on a small lot on an unmaintained block where I live.

    Oregon west of the mountains definitely has nice scenery, mild climate, and proximity to expensive RE markets, which makes for competition, and higher prices. No doubt Californicators (as they are called here), too.

    Kind of a dumb site, but a fun read about the influence had on domestic real estate by the most favored kleptocracy.

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450

    @fintail said:
    329K might get you a literal teardown (say, fire damaged) on a small lot on an unmaintained block where I live.

    Oregon west of the mountains definitely has nice scenery, mild climate, and proximity to expensive RE markets, which makes for competition, and higher prices. No doubt Californicators (as they are called here), too.

    Kind of a dumb site, but a fun read about the influence had on domestic real estate by the most favored kleptocracy.

    It may already be declining. I have about 50 properties I watch. And I am getting about 6 a day showing price reductions. These are not the homes they are talking about. It is a trickle down result. I knew the cash was coming from somewhere. With 60% of homes being paid for with cash, there is something going on.

  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169
    edited July 2014

    Lots of local listings in the 600K+ range (which is still merely moderate here) have multiple "8"s in the price. That says something. Of course, nobody questions where the money comes from.

    Get outside of the cities, and it is different. You can get a mansion in many small towns for 300K, but the economy doesn't allow normal people there to pay that mortgage.

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450

    I am in Orange county with my brother. He just finished putting $200k remodeling a home he paid $915k for. Total fixer in Santa Ana hills. Was listed at $1.2 million. Should bring $1.4 million with the remodel. That home near me would bring maybe $700k. Both his sons make over $100k a year and cannot afford to buy anything but a condo, which they don't want. They are all talking about moving to Sacramento where houses are about 1/3rd the price of OC. The Niece that got married today is moving to San Jose. Her husband just got his masters and has a high paying tech job. They plan to rent for a while.

  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454

    The realtor ate some fees to make the deal work, so barring the usual potential hiccups, we should be closing in late August. The realtor will get around 4% so she'll do okay anyway since there's no other realtor involved. She's been so good on both transactions (and hopefully the MIL's house) that she really deserves all she can get.

    Some of the houses we looked at Las Cruces (that we veto'd for various reasons) have sold so that's encouraging I guess. There's a lot of housing inventory there to absorb, and if we don't like the town, it'd be nice not to get stuck and not be able to afford to move. We're pretty much focused on the great neighborhood at this point and those locations are usually better insulated against price dives.

    Fun, fun. B)

  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454

    Oh, "3 more months of good selling weather for the UP."?

    I dunno, the temp at 10 am this morning was 56°F. The durn furnace would have kicked on if we had not shut it off. There could be snow on the ground in 3 months.

  • Options
    stickguystickguy Member Posts: 50,557

    I could never live up there. Too cold and depressing.

    My dog, however, would probably live it.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited July 2014

    We're ready to move but we enjoyed being close to the MIL in her last few years and we made some good friends here. Surprising number of creative people, especially writers and weavers. And it was two days closer to my family than Boise was so we visited twice as often.

    Usually the local news around here is who hit a deer and banged up their car. This morning it was someone hitting a wolf on the highway.

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450

    @stever said:
    We're ready to move but we enjoyed being close to the MIL in her last few years and we made some good friends here. Surprising number of creative people, especially writers and weavers. And it was two days closer to my family than Boise was so we visited twice as often.

    Usually the local news around here is who hit a deer and banged up their car. This morning it was someone hitting a wolf on the highway.

    Is you MIL going to Las Cruces with you? I think I would rent for a while. The dust would get to me. I would rather live in Cottonwood AZ and get away from the dust and high taxes. Also a bit lower elevation. Just as hot I would guess. Then for me TN has more to offer than AZ or NM. Except for the mountains. That is what my wife loves along with the lower humidity. Though So CA has been humid the last 3 weeks since we returned.

  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454

    Oh, she passed away over the winter. So there's nothing keeping us in the UP any more. Yesterday wasn't bad - this morning's low when I got up was 48°.

    Renting is a definite possibility (although we said that when we moved here). There are some furnished condos with 3 month terms available.

    We want a bigger town than Cottonwood. Las Cruces is pretty "small" at 100k.

  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454

    Closing on the sale of our house in a few weeks. Have a furnished condo rented for two months in Las Cruces while we explore neighborhoods. Who knows where we'll be living come November.

  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169

    I assume another decent MI house that sold for the price of a nice Toyota? B)

    A co-worker of mine is closing on a place next week - something like 1500 sq ft, more distant from work than I would prefer, but it has a nice lot anyway, still 300K

    @stever said:
    Closing on the sale of our house in a few weeks. Have a furnished condo rented for two months in Las Cruces while we explore neighborhoods. Who knows where we'll be living come November.

  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454

    Hey, we're in the Honda Odyssey Touring Elite stratosphere.

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450

    I kind of thought there would be a leveling of home prices. Guess that was wishful thinking for some places.

    The average square footage of newly built single-family homes in the U.S. ballooned by nearly 57 percent to 2,598 square feet in 2013, compared with 1,660 in 1973. The Northeastern region of the country claims the second-highest average square footage, which rose by 65 percent – an even faster rate than the rest of the nation – to 2,636 from 1,959 during the same span, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, which does not track the figures by state.

    Yet the number of people living in each home continues to steadily decline. The average number of people per household in the U.S. dropped to 2.54 in 2013 from 3.01 in 1973. Families, more specifically, fell to 3.12 members from 3.48 during the same span.

    As expected, bigger homes mean far heftier price tags. The average sales price of newly built single-family homes in the U.S. exploded by 419 percent to $324,500 in 2013 from $62,500 in 1978, the earliest available year. Even with inflation, that 1978 figure would work out to only about $228,000 today, according the Bureau of Labor Statistics calculator. The Northeast owns the highest average sales price, which rocketed by 646 percent – also at a faster pace than the rest of the nation – to $469,000 in 2013 from $63,000 in 1978.

    "The people that are buying houses, more and more, tend to be the better-off-financially people," said Reinhart, of the Kislak Real Estate Institute.

    In fact, all-cash sales accounted for 42.7 percent of all U.S. residential property sales during the first quarter of 2014, up from roughly 20 percent during the first quarter of 2011

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2014/08/10/demand-grows-for-bigger-fancier-homes/13842881/

  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Week two in the new house and we're about settled in. Not jonsing for a road trip.

    Yet....
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Not in Flint Michigan. I told Rocky he should buy it and start fixing it up. Then rent it out and buy another. Too lazy, wants a guaranteed return for his work.

    Flint, Mich., was one of the hardest hit cities before and during the recession. Once one of the state's largest cities, and a prosperous one when auto production plants were there, it came under the control of an emergency manager, appointed by the governor, during two periods, long before Detroit did. While Detroit may be the home of the $1,000 house, one home in Flint is on the market for $188.

    The house does not have much to recommend it. Located at 2518 Dakota Ave., it only covers 1,225 square feet, which accommodates three bedrooms and a single bath. It sits on a lot of just 5,663 square feet. The house was built in 1928, before the Great Depression.

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2014/11/07/247-wall-st-least-expensive-house/18649751/
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    For those like me that follow real estate closer than the stock market, I am seeing some interesting moves in Oregon property. Actual foreclosed listings are starting to show up. Most homes will sit on the Pre-foreclosure list for a year or more. My guess is Oregon is several years behind the curve from states like CA, FL, NV & AZ. With the easing of lending we are back to pre 2008 prices in many areas of CA. I am seeing similar selling in Florida. Oregon properties are getting discounted like they were here in 2008. Big drops in price. This place was listed for $1,999,500 and is down to $680,000. That is significant cut in price. Owners that think land has a lot of value.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/88804-Windhurst-Ln-Bandon-OR-97411/2122031829_zpid/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=emo-propalert-hdp
  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169
    Bandon, vacation house for luckyboomers who got in too deep and couldn't keep up? The land must be something - many finishes in that house don't say $2MM to me. I'd also expect oceanfront for that kind of dough.

    A relative of mine bought a foreclosure in somehow sought-after Beaverton at the bottom of the market, early 2011. Just sold it for a huge profit, and are now looking to buy in a more rural area as they near retirement (Portland is almost as much of a rat race as Seattle).
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    My guess is they bought that place with an idea to split the 40 acres. Subdividing in OR may be tougher than in CA. It is about 5 miles to the ocean. The house needs maintenance. Looks like the borrowed more than it is actually worth. I would not get my wife out there without an ocean view. They can be had for a fraction of what you pay here for good ocean views.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1220-Queen-Anne-Ct-Bandon-OR-97411/2106320297_zpid/
  • Options
    robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    It looks like the owner was trying to sell it at $1.9 and then the bank foreclosed. The bank is probably just trying to get out of it what they are owed,

    Besides, the jump in value from $350K to $1.7 million over six months in early 2012 makes no sense. There has to be a mistake somewhere there or whatever bank loaned the money thought there were 4 houses like that on the 40 acre lot.
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I look for those sorts of anomolies. My guess is wishful thinking on the part of the owner. Wanting to catching someone from out of state that may think it is a real buy for that much land. It is a very pretty area of Oregon. Mild climate rarely freezes. Income and real estate taxes are high. No sales tax is nice. This place would be more to my liking for a get away from the city.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/86895-N-Bank-Ln-Bandon-OR-97411/2104535471_zpid/

    Or even this one:

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/52566-Knoll-Rd-Bandon-OR-97411/2106170869_zpid/
  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169
    Subdividing in an area with little job growth - I don't know if the lucky retiree market is that big. Also, the PNW coast is lovely in summer, painfully dreary in winter. My dad had a place in Ocean Shores for a few years, eventually he couldn't stand it.

    That other place does have nice views, as it should for the money.
    gagrice said:

    My guess is they bought that place with an idea to split the 40 acres. Subdividing in OR may be tougher than in CA. It is about 5 miles to the ocean. The house needs maintenance. Looks like the borrowed more than it is actually worth. I would not get my wife out there without an ocean view. They can be had for a fraction of what you pay here for good ocean views.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1220-Queen-Anne-Ct-Bandon-OR-97411/2106320297_zpid/

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Just reading about the building boom in Miami Beach. Most buyer of the condos are just investments like buying stock. And safer than where they live. Even with the potential of rising oceans.

    Simon Mass, a Canadian real estate investor (and longtime friend of Tansey), plans to buy a $23 million slice of land of North Beach and, as soon as the city grants permission, build a 230-unit condo tower. Many buyers, he predicts, will never visit the properties. They might as well be buying stocks on a computer. “Sea level rise,” he said, “is simply not a concern in those cases. That’s why people have insurance.”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/storyline/wp/2014/12/22/miamis-climate-catch-22-building-luxury-condos-to-pay-for-protection-against-the-rising-sea/
  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited July 2015
    Re @Micheall's house buying comments posted elsewhere"

    >You know, it probably wouldn't hurt to contact the bank where I keep my money .. I'm sure they'd love the >opportunity to make some of it back by loaning me a boatload of it.

    I was surprised; my ultimate "bank" fee was going to be $250 and they waived that when I opened an account with a minimum $1,000 deposit (which was fine since I needed a local bank). The other mortgage company said there was only one place they couldn't compete with in Las Cruces and it's my guy. He's doing the deal for our houseguest and got her qualified the same day we called him and he's come to the house a couple of times to get signatures and paperwork from her. And his kids cat sit for us - what a banker. :D
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    This one is for Fintail. Is this going to impact your city at all?

    One suggestion would help followers of Sharia law buy houses. That's virtually impossible now because Sharia law prohibits payment of interest on loans. The 28-member committee recommended the city convene lenders and community leaders to explore options for increasing access to Sharia-compliant loan products.

    http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/blog/2015/07/seattle-mayor-offers-plan-to-help-followers-of.html
  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169
    edited August 2015
    Luckily, I don't live in the city of Seattle. It's what I call "both pedestrian and vehicle unfriendly", and I find getting around to be annoying. Instead, I live in an eastern suburb with better parking and mildly better roads, where in my zipcode, a third or more of all sales are to offshore cash buyers - just don't ask where the (dirty, embezzled, laundered - I mean earned and bootstrapped, of course) money comes from.

    For that article, I won't comment much. Seattle has chosen some iffy mayors in general, this is more bleeding heart nonsense - all on someone else's dime of course, as is typical for that demographic. The same one that got very lucky in the crazy local housing market.
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    As crazy as Seattle is San Francisco always seems to top the nut job cities. Today in San Diego building permits are about $50,000 on new residential. I cannot imagine adding another $24,000 to build a home like my modest ranch.

    The cost of housing in San Francisco and Silicon Valley has been a national news story throughout 2015. On Wednesday, for example, USA Today reported that teachers could no longer afford to live in San Francisco.

    This has prompted hand-wringing from San Franciscans who worry that their city is well on its way to being a global symbol of income inequality. With the average home selling for more than $950,000 and average monthly apartment rent hitting $3,458 this year, with further increases expected in coming months, this fear seems well-founded.

    Residential builders will pay $7.74 a square foot on new projects, with those already approved by the Planning Commission grandfathered in. Non-residential projects will pay $18.04 a square foot, and production, distribution and repair (PDR) buildings will pay $7.61.


    http://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/07/new-fee-push-s-f-housing-costs-even-higher/
  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169
    edited August 2015
    I don't know if building permits are the real issue. Something more makes a stapled together house cost 750K++ than 25K in paperwork. Artificially low rates, sketchy outside influences, lucky parental help, lack of land, etc.

    I am educated and have a decent job, yet the idea of owning a detached house near where I work is laughable. I can rent, buy a money pit condo, or have an hour + commute to an old tract house. Nice. I have a friend my age who has scraped together a down payment and wants to buy - 300-350K range. He's losing on bidding wars on 1950s bungalows in areas that can be more than an hour from where he works. I've heard that supply in the once-distant area where my grandmother lives is at 30 days. It's crazy here, surpassing the 2006 bubble.
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    fintail said:

    I don't know if building permits are the real issue. Something more makes a stapled together house cost 750K++ than 25K in paperwork. Artificially low rates, sketchy outside influences, lucky parental help, lack of land, etc.

    I am educated and have a decent job, yet the idea of owning a detached house near where I work is laughable. I can rent, buy a money pit condo, or have an hour + commute to an old tract house. Nice. I have a friend my age who has scraped together a down payment and wants to buy - 300-350K range. He's losing on bidding wars on 1950s bungalows in areas that can be more than an hour from where he works. I've heard that supply in the once-distant area where my grandmother lives is at 30 days. It's crazy here, surpassing the 2006 bubble.


    It has passed the 06 bubble here as well. Difference is financing is a lot tougher. A lot more cash buyers. My guess is fear of the stock market bubble has got people pulling cash out and looking for something to invest in. A place close to me just sold to the Iraqi Chaldeans for $800k. It has 3 old houses that were all built before 1940. They are rented, but I would not have paid $500k for the property. I was happy for the lady that sold it as she now lives in NM and was wanting to liquidate. If my place hits $900k I am out of here. Probably just rent somewhere. Keep a little place in Hilo as my primary and spend time in Oregon with the kids.
  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169
    Or even more likely, pulling out of unstable foreign markets and putting it in US property, as this is still one of the best places on the planet, even with all of its faults. And of course, few questions are asked about the origins of money.

    If I was of similar age and had a similar windfall appreciation, I would do the same. Late last year I talked to an older woman, early run boomer, who along with her husband bought a house in 1987 for under 250K. They sold for 2MM. She was more than happy to exclaim she'd be renting for the rest of her life, and not minding it. Lottery jackpot, and this won't last forever.
    gagrice said:



    It has passed the 06 bubble here as well. Difference is financing is a lot tougher. A lot more cash buyers. My guess is fear of the stock market bubble has got people pulling cash out and looking for something to invest in. A place close to me just sold to the Iraqi Chaldeans for $800k. It has 3 old houses that were all built before 1940. They are rented, but I would not have paid $500k for the property. I was happy for the lady that sold it as she now lives in NM and was wanting to liquidate. If my place hits $900k I am out of here. Probably just rent somewhere. Keep a little place in Hilo as my primary and spend time in Oregon with the kids.

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    For Fintail, Interesting article on Seattle and their plans for the future.

    Amidst all the noise over the city’s recently adopted Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda (HALA), scarcely a word has been spared for the 4.35 million Seattleites who have the most to lose in the push to create more housing.

    These are Seattle’s trees, and they’re squarely in development’s sights, whatever lip service developers may pay to them. To take a particularly poetic example: At the corner of South Willow Street and Seward Park Avenue, an enormous cottonwood and a thicket of other broadleafs – nothing fancy, but a lot of green – lined the oversized front yard of a modest older home on a double lot. A developer bought that yard and, through some deft shortplatting magic, turned it into three lots. The trees were replaced with three looming gray and white boxes that look like all the other contemporary lot-busters going up around town. One scraggly, much-thinned ash and a few sidewalk saplings still cling to the remaining dirt perimeter.

    http://crosscut.com/2015/10/saving-seattles-trees-may-mean-saving-their-yards/
  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169
    Seattle property development is a mess. It seems you can build pretty much anything if you pay the city enough. Add to that a booming economy and a market filled with offshore investors and mysteriously wealthy newbies (don't ask where the money comes from). putting lots of pressure on new starts, and it's a recipe for chaos. Seattle isn't going to be what it once was, and I can't say that is entirely a good thing. The city becomes addicted to tax and permit proceeds, so the golden rule applies.

    The "affordable housing" movement is also amusing, as little is being built. It is moving along like Vancouver - I can't call it evolution, as that implies progress.
    gagrice said:

    For Fintail, Interesting article on Seattle and their plans for the future.

    Amidst all the noise over the city’s recently adopted Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda (HALA), scarcely a word has been spared for the 4.35 million Seattleites who have the most to lose in the push to create more housing.

  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    All that is being built here are apartment buildings. All are accepting the over abundance of section 8 vouchers. Extreme shortage of single family homes. If mine hits a million I am headed to the Southern Coast of Oregon. Mild climate rarely freezes or snows. Lots of cool places with enough land to play on.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/91547-Highway-42-S-Coquille-OR-97423/2101269437_zpid/
  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169
    Cool, a Geodesic dome. I liked those when I was a kid. Very 70s-80s, very PNW. I remember there was one like that in the town where I lived as a kid.

    Section 8 isn't an impact in my area, just values rising at something like 10% per year, outside influences in the market, speculation. I know nobody in my age demographic who owns a detached house and didn't receive family help.
    gagrice said:

    All that is being built here are apartment buildings. All are accepting the over abundance of section 8 vouchers. Extreme shortage of single family homes. If mine hits a million I am headed to the Southern Coast of Oregon. Mild climate rarely freezes or snows. Lots of cool places with enough land to play on.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/91547-Highway-42-S-Coquille-OR-97423/2101269437_zpid/


  • Options
    fintailfintail Member Posts: 57,169
    edited November 2015
    One of the seldom-discussed reasons property in most west coast cities is crazy right now

    Crazy world out there. The gold is flowing from other places, too, just don't ask questions.
  • Options
    gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Can't really blame the Chinese that have money. At least they will have clean air to breathe while they are here. Though I question their choosing Los Angeles to invest. That city is becoming a giant catchall. I got an acre+ of paradise I would sell them for a million bucks. Nice neighbors and pristine air. No traffic jams even during rush hour. Great produce store less than 2 miles away. One of my neighbors is selling his mini mcmansion for less than the average price the Chinese are paying.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1031-Khish-Ln-Alpine-CA-91901/16905583_zpid/
  • Options
    robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    gagrice said:

    Can't really blame the Chinese that have money. At least they will have clean air to breathe while they are here. Though I question their choosing Los Angeles to invest. That city is becoming a giant catchall. I got an acre+ of paradise I would sell them for a million bucks. Nice neighbors and pristine air. No traffic jams even during rush hour. Great produce store less than 2 miles away. One of my neighbors is selling his mini mcmansion for less than the average price the Chinese are paying.

    http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/1031-Khish-Ln-Alpine-CA-91901/16905583_zpid/

    They don't want that. They want to live in a vibrant urban environment, not a rural area. That they can get an hour outside Shanghai.
  • Options
    steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I vetoed a home here that had a curved living room (that wasn't the only issue, but I don't like curved walls). And that dome - ugh. Bet it leaks. :p
Sign In or Register to comment.