Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Pontiac Grand Prix - 2000-2005
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I put about a mile and a half between us before I slowed down, and while I'm not sure what the Sebring's speed limiter is set at, he wasn't able to keep up...he was sure trying though.
I'll bet that the GT's would go that fast if it weren't for the limiter, huh?
tsjay
For koolguy: The SE model is now offered only with the 3100 engine. It's a good engine, but not designed for "sports sedan" use. If you want good economy and reliability, the SE is a good way to go. If you wanna go fasta, the GT or GTP is your ticket.
Kazz
They used rate the engine's horsepower without accessories and right at the fly wheel, right? Now they rate them by power delivered to the pulling wheels, right?
Is the old rating something like 50% higher than today's rating for the same engine? In other words, would a car rated at 200 hp today be roughly equivalent to one rated at 300 hp under the old system?
tsjay
tsjay
A lot of it would be because of the tons of improvements in keeping the GTP on the road at launch. The GTO would launch (if I could control the wheelspin) and be all over the road. Tires are better, suspension is better, steering is better, traction is better on the GTP. If I got the launch down, it would be a good race between the GTP and GTO to 60MPH, though. If you got the GTO up to over 100MPH, it would get scary (compared to today), but the GTO would probably beat a GTP to 100MPH.
All that said, the best 1/4 time I got out of the GTO (at a track) was 14.6, bone stock. Without mods, I doubt the GTP could do that (although I've never run the GTP in the 1/4).
Once underway, the GTO could go 20-30 or 30-50 better than anything I've ever been in (short of a Corvette or a Boxter or many other cars that I haven't yet driven). The big V8s were torque monsters that would really pin you back. Cornering in the GTO was a whole different matter, though. Considering what you can do in today's cars, I would have ended up in the weeds with the GTO if I tried to drive it the way I drive the GTP.
Comparing a 60's camaro or trans am with a small block to a GP GT, I would say the camaro or trans am would take it, easily in the 1/4 or even to 60 MPH.
So you had a '67 Goat, huh? That was a really great car, I'll bet. My best friend in high school had a '66 silver-gray GTO, that I thought was one of the coolest cars ever. He put deep dish chrome reverse wheels on it with the red pinstriped tires that were popular back then.
The '66 GTO's were my favorite body style, but the '67's were my second favorite, and pretty close in my book to the '66's.
What color was yours? Did you have a four speed or automatic? What other muscle cars did you ever beat with your Goat, and which ones beat you?
I never had a car in high school, but I sure envied those guys with the hot cars.
Man those were the good old days!
tsjay
It was very solid with the original wood on the dash. It also had a working, stock, hood tach (it was actually in the driver's line of site on the hood instead of in the dash). He took very good care of it.
It got to the point that I couldn't afford the insurance on it at the time (I was a young pup with a less than a sterling driving record at the time) and sold it to a collector about a year after I bought it.
Word had it that it would have run around 14.2-14.3 in the quarter. I never could achieve those figures, though. I'm certain that someone with more track experience than me, could have done it. I actually babied it quite a bit and took very good care of it (except when challenged on the street). I only took it to the track twice and had a total of 6 runs with it.
The '66s had a slightly different grill and could be had with a 389 V8 with 3-two barrel carbs. In '67 they came out with the 400 V8...only 2 or 4 barrel single carbs. Mine was the HO version of the 400. The only one that was faster was the RAM AIR 400.
It truly was a great car.
I've driven some of the 70's version of the GTO and they didn't even come close to that '67.
I think the 421 engine was available in the late sixties GTO's, wasn't it?
My buddy had the 389 with a four barrel, and his was an automatic.
I would love to have a brand new '66 GTO, if that were somehow possible.
Later
tsjay
I can't comment about the 421. I don't remember it being offered in the '67 (or '66 for that matter...maybe earlier years) I know that the big difference between the '66 and '67 was going from the 389 V8 in '66 to the 400 V8 in '67. I do know that I took my '67 to a couple of GTO shows. The owners of the '66s with the 389 (with "3 dueces" for carburation) always told me that those carbs were a bear to keep adjusted. I never drove a '66, though.
The 4-barrel on the 400 felt like a turbo, all spooled up, when all 4 barrels opened up. I could literally see the gas guage drop when they all opened up.
heng--My favorite Chevy engine was the 396 V8 (in the chevelle SS). Mopar had a big block 440 V8 which was wicked...the 383 in the Road Runners was my favorite, though (never owned one...road in one with a guy at a muscle car show). I also owned a FoMoCo, 69 Torino GT with a 351 Cleveland engine, also a good one.
Of course, this hobby was before marriage and kids.
I often wonder what the big 3 could have done with those V8s if they had done as much development on them as GM has done on the 3.8 V6? Could they pass emmissions with today's fuel injection and computer controls? Could they have upped the MPG? How would they run on unleaded (in 1980 I could only find a couple of gas stations that still offered "leaded gas" for my GTO)?
I remember hearing gas flowing from the passenger's seat of a 430 Buick Wildcat.
A bunch of punks with 5 Trans AM HO 455s all starting up a once and then pulling out Le Mans style.
My family was too poor to own a car.
But now I could afford to buy a modern version of those muscle cars. Think Covette! That has to be the the most powerful re-incarnation of the V-8.
But I'm happy with my GP. You all know how effortlessly it can zip to 80 mph. Well, a '75 Cutlass with a 4 bbl 350 took forever to get up to 80. I remember flooring it from 65 on the LIE (that's Long Island Expressway) way out by Riverhead at 4am (was going fishing). It took forever! At least a mile of road. Plus started getting road rumble. Must have been the early generation radials overheating. The most that car got was 20 mpg (with a tail wind).
Take it to the dealer.
I have used Turtle Wax "Emerald Series" on my Grand Prix so far, and it seems to do a good job, but is there something better? I'm not going to go to all the trouble of the Zaino stuff or anything like that. I'm just asking what people think is a good one-step wax.
Also, how of often should a car be waxed? I usually try to get a wax job done about two or three times a year.
How about my leather interior? What is good to use to prolong the life of the leather?
Thanks
tsjay
If you want to go the "one step" route, I had a positive expereience with Eagle 1 Wet before Zaino.
I used Lexol products for the leather (I think it was their leather cleaner/conditioner combo).
Considering buying a Pontiac GP GT Sedan this weekend to serve as the "family" car. It's affordably priced, looks pretty sporty and just seems like a pretty solid vehicle.
Is there something severely wrong with the car that I should be aware of? Is it a diamond in the rough that I'll be lucky to own? Please share your thoughts, experiences, opinions.
When I got the insurance check, I looked at a lot of different vehicles (including Acura). I ended up getting another GP.
My current GP has over 40K miles. No squeaks, rattles...nothing that has sent me back to my dealer. The only thing I've done is change the oil, rotate the tires and I just put in a new air filter. This car has been cheap from a maintenance point of view.
I have to say that I've owned Hondas, Toyotas and BMWs...all good cars in their own right. Both of my GPs have been sterling cars no matter what measuring stick you use and they compare favorably with all the above brands.
I have gotten as high as 31.5 mpg on all-highway driving, driving at the speed limits. I can always count on 28+ mpg on highway driving, even if I "cheat" on the speed limit.
The car has a very nice-sized trunk for a "mid-size" car, and it is very practical, even though it looks so sporty.
I think it would make a fine family car for anyone.
There's some killer rebates and financing available on 2000 left-overs now. I would certainly check these out before buying a 2001 model.
tsjay
Basically, Impala Ls is the same car as GP GT, with the same engine, but the body is several inches longer. More rear legroom would make easier to work with the child chair. And the Impala have even higher crush rating.
The GP GT will handle well...get great gas mileage and have plenty of room for your budding family. They ride well and the 3.8 V6 with the automatic is a lesson in smoothness. Very comfortable! The powertrain will get up and "boogie" when you put your foot in it, too.
The GP GT is very feature rich, too. Lot's of very useful options like HUD, programable door locks, etc.
As said, if you can find a 2000 with the rebates or 0% financing, you can cut a heck of a deal on one.
The only real problems I've heard of were with regards to the '97s. They had a problem with water getting into the headlights. There was a guy who had some transmission problems that posted a few months ago. If memory serves me, he bought it used and it may have been abused, though. I think his problem had more to do with a bad dealer than anything else, however.
The only wish list I would have for the GP would be to have better headlights.
However, for family hauling chores the Impala LS is a bit better suited for the job. The car has more rear head and legroom and a bigger trunk (17.0 CuFt). Another point to consider, is that the Impala is the only GM intermediate sedan (W-Body family)that has the best safety score ratings (5 stars front, 4 stars side)and already meets 2003 government safety standards, the Grand Prix, Regal, Intrigue do not. Also the initial sale price is lower on the Impala LS vs the GP GT.
As far as content goes, the Impala LS does not offer the HUD display, but make not mistake...the Impala LS is loaded (Power seats, Trip Computer, dual temp A/C, Monochromatic mirror, power everything, RDS CD/Tape stereo system, steering wheel controls, etc)Alloy wheels and rear deck lid spoiler are also standard.
The Impala is more comfortable and boasts better safety ratings in my book without losing any sporty feeling or looks to it.
Now the GP GT is a great car and it is more sporty and can be obtained for cheap given the incredible finance and rebate incentives offer on it right now. However, overtime, the Impala LS will have a better resale value as is the only GM intermediate that doesn't have ANY special financial or rebate incentives since the car was introduced in mid 1999. the Impala is also the only W-body car that is in the top 10 best sellers in the nation.
You can't go wrong with either car, each one has it pluses and minuses but for family duty, safety and value, the Impala LS gets the vote.
Check it out.
Good luck.
The Buick Century, Buick Regal, Chevrolet Lumina, Chevrolet Montecarlo, Pontiac Grand Prix and Oldsmobile Intrigue all belong to the W-body platform.
I have two teenagers. They fit well in the back seat (they don't fight, so I'll assume they are comfy back there).
Can't comment about the Impala. I've never driven one.
But the comparison is with GP, not GTP. Impala LS (and the base Impala with the right options) have the same engine, the same transmission, and mostly the same suspension.
Major pluses for Impala: about 5 inches longer (more space), and have better crush rating. The both is very important with family sedan, with kids.
Minuses: no HUD, lesser radio. Probable minus: the first year design aluminum engine cradle.
The styling - external, internal, dash and instrumentation - is up to the personal tastes and preferences...
tsjay
I looked at an Impala first at the Chev dealer next door to the Pontiac dealer. I just didn't like the styling. As yurakm states, it's a personal preference thing. One of my account reps has a new impala and it's pretty sweet but I really fell hard for the GP.
I'll plan on giving a running commentary on my experiences with it.
Enjoy that new GP! Can you share pics of your new car with us?
Excellent choice. Be prepared to wash that car about every day, though. You know how black is: nothing sharper when it's clean, but every little bit of dust is going to show.
Give us the details. What option package and extra goodies did you get? Did you get a 2000 or an '01? If you got the 2000, what rebate and/or financing incentives did you get (if you don't mind telling).
Now that you've bought the GP, I can be honest with you without hurting your feelings. The Impala doesn't belong in the same league for looks in my book. Nothing about an Impala is sporty looking. EVERYTHING about a GP is sporty looking. I know, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and some people probably prefer the looks of the Impala over the GP, BUT I AIN'T ONE OF THEM!
Once again, congrats.
Enjoy that new car.
tsjay
You can look up my Edmunds profile and get my email address. So far, posting it there hasn't been a problem for me. I've only heard from a couple very nice people who frequent this news group.
tsjay
Was she cleaned up and ready to go? Did you show her off to friends and family?
tsjay
A black GP GT does look awfully sweet.
You have found out what we already know...the GP is one of the nicest handling, running, looking bargains on the planet.
I'm sure you'll enjoy it (even if you do have to wash it a lot).