Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
My 1970 Dodge van was purchased new and was the worst vehicle I have owned. However, I kept it 6 years and the 76 VW Bus that replaced it for only 4 years. My 1999 Tracker was purchased new and had repeat problem with bearings in rear axle so I traded it off and got the 2001 Blazer. Still driving the 93 Ford F-150.
I think a 96 or 97 Chrysler vehicle with major problems is NOT worth spending any more money on major repairs. Get rid of it. A 96 or 97 Chrysler product has virtually no resale value.
Suzuki has sued Consumer Reports for damages done claiming Consumer Reports rigged a test to make the Suzuki Samarai appear unsafe and then warning people not to buy it.
The big question is should I still consider the car a 1996 van? Sure, the body is 1996, but all the mechanicx vary in age from 1997 to 2003. On average, its probably a 2000 car
Seriously though, if I get rid of this car, I need to get a reliable second car. By reliable, I probably mean new (and under warrenty) and cheap--some sort of small cheap sedan.
What kind of small sedan should I get?
Steve, Host
Steve, Host
Some people brag about Hyundai and Kia entry level sedans with a very low price and best new vehicle warranty in the business. However, Hyundai and Kia are notorious gas guzzlers in EPA fuel economy ratings.
Based on your experience, you should not get another Chrysler product. I have a friend who got a new VW Rabbit that had so many problems he got rid of it after 9 months and just over 10,000 miles and says he will never own another Volkswagen.
Hyundai: Consumer Reports loves them!
Steve, Host
Since this is a minivan forum, the Kia Sedona at a paltry 15/20 is very much a gas guzzler compared to the Caravan 21/27 with 4 cyl, the Caravan 19/26 with 3.3L V6 that has comparable power to the Sedona 3.5 L V6, and even the more powerful, much more spacious Grand Caravan with 3.8L V6 rated 18/25.
Look at the more spacious Odyssey 3.5L with more power than the Sedona and rated 18/25 and the more spacious 2004 Sienna with more power than the Sedona and rated 19/27.
Hyundai and Kia gas mileage is poor for the size engines offered in any Hyundai or Kia. However, Hyundai and Kia do provide a good warranty on paper....but reading in forums for the 2 brands indicates many dealers take too long getting the parts to honor the warranty.
The much larger Grand Caravan has the same EPA fuel economy rating as does the regular Caravan that has more interior space than the Kia Sedona.
The Caravan has all red circles but 3 which are red half circles while the Sedona has 3 red half circles and one plain circle.
For the BEST reliability, get either the Toyota Sienna with all red circles but 1 or the Honda Odyssey with same reliability. Sienna with more power rated 19/27 while Odyssey with the MOST power rated 18/25.
Is the information in the EPA Model Year 2003 Fuel Economy Guide and April 2003 Consumer Reports considered "skimpy evidence"?
Could we please get back to Caravans here, for Caravan owners like me and others interested in Caravans, and stop trying to make this a comparison board? There are already other Edmunds.com boards for comparisons where you can post erroneous information such as the claim that the '02 Caravan and Grand Caravan have better reliability records per CR than does the Kia Sedona. The charts in their 2003 Annual Auto Issue clearly show the Caravan has a Below Average record, the Grand Caravan is Average (as is the Sedona), but overall (see p. 87) the Sedona tops both the Caravan and GC in predicted reliability. Also, the MPV vitually ties the Sienna and tops the Odyssey by a large margin in predicted reliability per CR. If you are going to quote a reference like CR, please try to post accurate information, for the benefit of people who look to these boards to help them make buying decisions.
IF a poster owns a Caravan, why is it not listed in the poster's profile?
I believe Dodge minivans are not as reliable as Toyota and Honda. Problems posted in Edmunds problems forums do not support the idea that late model Dodge minivans are not reliable.
Many friends who own Dodge minivans tell me they are reliable with very few problems.
As for why my GCS is not in my TH profile, you'd have to ask the TH people about that, as to why they only allow one vehicle to be listed. My Elantra is my daily driver, so I list that one. The GCS is my wife's daily driver; I get to drive it on weekends, vacations etc. Since you asked me about this, I guess it's fair to ask you why you're interested in this board since you've never owned a Caravan and apparently have no plans to buy one, based on your TH profile.
BTW, CR has made it easier for readers to figure out which vehicles are more reliable than others in their estimation than having to "count circles." They sum it all up for us in bar charts, which I referred to earlier. They also have check marks (or not) at the bottom of each vehicle for each year to indicate whether it's Below Average (blank), Average (black check), or Above Average (red check). I personally don't know why you insist on "counting circles" rather than just reading CR's assessments using the bar charts and check marks, but if that's your thing and you think you can come up with a reliability picture reading the circles better than CR can by using its raw data, go for it. But I prefer to use CR's assessment of their data vs. yours.
As I mentioned in the "main" Caravan discussion, my brother's '00 Caravan just got driven 5,500+ miles on a road trip (out here to Boise & back) and he's got over 60,000 miles on it now. No problems so far!
Steve, Host
Suddenly, the "outer joint" has broken, requiring a replaced left axle. Also, after the tow-in, it was determined that the valve cover gaskets needed replacing, as well as two different belt tensioners.
The dealership service department was courteous, and subtracted a significant amount from the labor charge, so I have no gripe with them.
I do find it very unusual and disconcerting that these things would happen at 46,000 miles, particularly the jammed axle. I know that cars have problems, things happen, and no brand of car is perfect forever. It just seems ridiculously soon for these malfunctions to occur, and stands in stark contrast to my 1984 Chevy S-10 pickup which is approaching 200,000 miles, and has had nothing replaced but the brakes.
There is certainly a high number of Dodge/Plymouth minivans on the road, and maybe this is a somewhat isolated incident, but I can't decide if I should raise "a loud complaint" with Chrysler, or accept the odds of it happening to any late-model Chrysler product. What do you think?
Since DC has been having financial woes and there is report of Daimler considering dumping the Chrysler part of DC, who would be a prospective buyer?
Would Toyota buy Chrysler from DC just to get hold of sufficient assembly capacity for the demand for the new 2004 Sienna and all the other "much in demand" Toyota vehicles?
DaimlerBenz made alot of vehicles sold around the world but Mercedes Benz has long held a reputation for requiring costly, frequent maintenance.
It would be a little extra clout when you ask DC to eat some of the repair bills if needed in the future.
Steve, Host
Any ideas? or if anybody had similar prob?
At the same time, I have to remember what brought me to her in the first place. Those curves, that sleeky showroom sexiness. I mean, she was stacked with features that an average Joe like me could normally only dream about! And when we were alone together--man, how she handled. That little dreamboat could perform better than any car I'd ever been with.
But in the end you just couldn't depend on her! When you really needed her should would let you down, leave . I can't tell you how many times she left me hanging about all those bitter lonely mornings in the servic department waiting room. And she ruined just about every vacation we ever took!
I used to ask myself if it was me? Did I not service her enough? Was I somehow not worthy of her? Was it because we went to Jiffy Lube once or twice instead of the dealer?
But I gave her everything--oil changes every 3 K, fuel injector cleanings, tranny flushes every 12 k, but it was never enough for her. She always needed more--head gaskets, starters, computers, valve covers, and oh-my-god--brake jobs, brake jobs, brake jobs! I've worked myself to death and gone broke trying to please her.
I have finally come to realize that the problem is her and not me. Yes, I'm alone and on foot for now. But I have faith that soon I'll find another. Not any thing flashy--maybe a used Honda or Toyota--but something that I can take car of and that will take care of me.
You can switch to an Odyssey, but they haven't been trouble free either, check the Odyssey problems and transmission problems boards.
Maybe you spoiled it by too much loving care!
To guy who's van let him down, sorry to hear that. Ours has 106k miles (about a week from 107k) and it gets heavy city and highway miles. In fact this last Tuesday I drove eight hours straight from MI to WI and then turned around 12 hours later and went back to MI. This included driving through 93 degree heat in downtown Chicago! I too only do oil changes, trans. changes every 30k and then whatever else our local mechanic says it needs (not much). Biggest expense was the head gasket at about 50k for $900 or so. After that though, not much. If my wife doesn't complain too loudly I plan on slapping some new tires on this thing this Winter and driving it until it pukes. (But odds are she's going to complain and I'll have to sell it to some kid who's going to do God-knows-what in the back seats of that silver bullet).
Have a great weekend,
Rob
I have had it a year now.
I have seen them on sale for $ 17000 which includes everything except leather upholstery.
If you can swing it financially with a 5 year loan at low interest, this might be your best option.
Called a Chrysler dealer and they told me to disconnect the positive connection on the battery and that would reset it . . . which it did. Unfortunately, the problem as repeated itself three times since then, with no apparent pattern . . . other than that it seems to happen after I have been driving for a while, turn the engine off, then restart it.
The last time it happened (Saturday night) I left it until morning and when I started it again the gauges worked.
I had the battery checked Sunday and it is in good shape, although it is missing the clamp that holds it in place.
Anyone heard of this happening? The dealer suggested it might be a problem with "the cluster" but I hate to turn it over to them without having a better idea what the problem is and if it is something I can fix myself.
One other thing: I did have the oil changed the day before this all started happening.
Thanks!
I would trade it in on a good Portkey or some floo powder!
(See what happens to your mind when you spend the weekend reading the new Harry Potter book to your kids?)
Steve, Host
It's also blowing a bit of blue smoke on acceleration, but I'm not real good on maintenance either. The rear sparks plugs are a *joy* to get to!
Tranny is good, and I just replaced both half-shafts.
Hope this helps.
Ed
It'll be driving fine at 55-65-ish, then suddenly act like I've taken my foot off the gas. I can press the accelerator and get more speed, but it surges back and forth. After a few minutes (sometimes a l-o-n-g few minutes), it goes back to normal.
Any suggestions on where to start looking?
Ed
The Plymouth Voyager just came out #2 in a JD Power dependability study (2000 model year cars were studied after 3 years on the road).
Here's a link.
Steve, Host
My wife would drive it and everything would fail and then I'd drive it the next day and it would be working and I'd look at her like she was nuts. But eventually it happened to me too. I DO know that I left it at the dealership and they eventually fixed it. But I seem to recall it was NOT a big deal, I think when they worked on the van they disconnected the battery and that caused something to power down the various controls intermittently. Somehow the did something to freshen up the battery and then tweaked the codes or computer or something. I wish I could be of more help but stick to your guns by telling them you NEVER had this issue until they serviced it and you've heard of this happening w/other dealers.
Good luck,
Rob
As far as the electrical problem with my DC, I think it is a problem with a lose wire in the cluster. Yesterday I got the gauges to come back up by pounding on the dashboard! I never felt more like my dad in my life.
A local shop said they could fix it, if I bring it in when the problem occurs. With my new "quick fix" I might wait a few weeks before spending any money.
Anyone know how hard it is to get the dashboard cluster out of a 97 DC?
http://www.detnews.com/2003/autosinsider/0307/13/a01-215697.htm
fastdriver
I read the link posted above and learned that the tragedy was the lack of common sense of the injured person.
Any person with a brain larger than a pea would turn the engine off when leaving a vehicle.
Rather than admit to being lazy and stupid, these jerks (of if deceased, their spouse, etc.) file a lawsuit to go after the deep pockets.