Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
quote:
DODGE GRAND CARAVAN
CHRYSLER TOWN & COUNTRY
2002 models
Vehicle tested:
2001 Dodge Grand Caravan Sport
http://www.hwysafety.org/vehicle_ratings/ce/html/0102_02.htm
A third test was conducted after DaimlerChrysler made a design change to fix the fuel tank fitting and retrofitted a 2001 model with the redesign (2002 models include the modification).
Examination of the redesigned fitting after the third test indicates no damage.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
so?
fix/replace my fitting, I already have the side airbags.
Could be a rock or a nail that is causing the sound
The chances of being involved in this specific type accident are less than the chance of being abducted by Aliens and taken to another planet.
I just learned of the Insurance Institute's recent crash test study and retest where they indicated that the 2001 Chrysler Town & Country and Dodge Caravan's had the potential for fuel leakage upon a crash. I also learned that you have corrected this problem on all 2002 models but will not be recalling or repairing 2001 vehicles. As the recent purchaser of a 2001 Chrysler Town & Country Lxi AWD, I hereby request that you recall all 2001 Dodge Caravans and 2001 Chrysler Town & Country vehicles and repair this potential problem at your expense. Since this potential problem is now public knowledge, DaimlerChrysler will be fully liable should a crash and a subsequent fuel leakage occur that results in serious injury or, god forbid, death. I bought a Chrysler Town & Country because of your promise of safety. To not repair a potentially deadly error such as this is negligent and short sighted on your behalf. Please recall my vehicle and all of the other affected DaimlerChrysler products as soon as possible, or you will forever lose this customer and tens of thousands of other potential customers. Please do not repeat the mistakes of your predecessors. As one should realize from the recent Ford/Firestone controversy, courts will take a very unfavorable view of automobile manufacturers who fail to correct mistakes that they have been made aware of.
Please contact me at your very earliest convenience, as I fear for the safety of my wife and our 21 month old child.
Thank You!
Why settle for a vehicle with average test scores when other manufacturers (Toyota, Ford and Honda) are proving they can optimize the integrity of the vehicle's structure and thereby give its occupants a greater chance at surviving a serious collision.
As to the test scores, most products are put through tests, but the ultimate test is how the product performs in customer hands. If you look at the insurance institue web site, they list actual injury rates for vehicles. You will find that the Town and Country does quite well with a low injury rate.
I am an engineer who is developing a product now. I tested the unit as best I could and sent several units into the field for customer use. Customer testing is far more important than lab testing becasue a customer can do things to a product that are simply not anticipated. Lab tests predict what might happen, actual customer use tells you what is happening and what is happening is that 400,000 2001 vans on the road and not one report of fuel leaking in a crash.
I have been collecting pictures of wrecked vehicles at various salvage yards (mostly Mercedes-Benz vehicles, those which were tested are rated "good" and "best picks" in the IIHS tests) and you will be able to see that many accidents are almost textbook offset crashes, some at higher speeds than 40 mph. There are pictures of a few Chevy Ventures/Pontiac Montanas (rated "poor" in the IIHS and Euro NCAP tests) located towards the end of the album and you will be able to see that every single one of them crumpled in an offset accident almost exactly like the Pontiac test van did in the IIHS offset crash test.:
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumIndex?u=137587&a=10126395&f=0&sp=0
FWIW, your insurance company, USAA, is one of the many funders of the IIHS.
Drew
Host
Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket & Accessories message boards
If one digs back a few months in the various DC van newsgroups one will find some good posts on the relative value of the crash tests and the real world crash data. To summarize:
Most real life crashes are recorded as full frontal crashes. However, rarely do cars run headlong into immovable walls at a 90 degree angle, which is what the NHTSA test does. Most crashes are against objects that have some sort of "give" and where the resistance is not uniform across the front of the car. Therefore, although the exact circumstances of the IIHS offset test are rare, the test itself more resembles real life crashes and does a better job of measuring a car's crash survivability than does the NHTSA test.
Meanwhile, the various real-life crash data are almost meaningless for determining the relative safety of competing models. The problems are: 1) most real-life data are actually measurements of the cost of insurance payouts, which are heavily weighted towards repair payouts and in which medical costs are actually a minor component. Therefore, in real-life charts based on insurance cost, cars with lower repair costs tend to do better, 2) In real-life charts that specifically measure fatalities, the actual number of fatalities, while numerically large (41k annually) are tiny when measured as a rate relative to miles driven. So tiny, in fact, that for individual models the fatality sample is too small to be statistically valid. To verify, check IIHS fatality data for minivans for the most recent year. The Quest and Villager, which are the IDENTICAL car but with two nameplates, have drastically different fatality ratings. One (Quest) is rated as better than average. The other (Villager) is so bad as to be almost off the chart. The only explanation for this wild variation is that the data are meaningless. Look at other twins in the chart, such as the Caravan v. Voyager, and you will again see unexplained variations.
In sum, the IIHS and Euro NCAP tests, plus the NHTSA side crash test, are the best current indicators of car safety.
Lets hope they don't take GM's aditude of years ago when they thought it would be cheaper to pay out a few lawsuits in deaths than fix the problem. Just think if Bush does for the Auto Industry like he wants for the HMO's, a cap on suits. The Auto Industry would never, never, ever fix a problem.
Think I'm making those numbers up? Think again. That's the rationale Ford used on the Pinto. Fortunately they got their [non-permissible content removed] nailed in court and it cost them big time in both legal costs and PR.
Transport Canada:
http://apps.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/Recalls/recintro_e.htm#If
DC Canada Customer Assistance:
http://www.daimlerchrysler.ca/corporate/en/assistance.html
My wife called Chrysler today, and here is a transcript of the telephone call.
Wife - "I am calling because I recently saw numerous reports on the potential for a fuel leak in the Town & Country minivan, and we recently purchased a Town & Country minivan. I want to know what you are going to do about this problem."
Mathew Long from the DaimlerChrysler Recall Center - "this test wasn't done by Chrysler. It was done by an insurance company."
Wife - "Not an insurance company, by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety."
Mathew Long from DaimlerChrysler - "Chrysler has tested the car 50 times and was unable to replicate the results. There is no problem, and there is no action to be taken."
Wife - "Well if there is no problem, why did you redesign the 2002 model?"
Mathew Long from from DaimlerChrysler - "For safety's sake."
Wife - "That is exactly right, for safety's sake."
Mathew Long from from DaimlerChrysler - "Well we are always redesigning cars for safety's sake. We are always making them safer."
Wife - "I have had the car for 3 weeks. I refuse to drive it. I am not going to explode in an impact. I can not get my daughter out of the car seat quickly enough. I want to know what Chrysler is going to do."
Mathew Long from from DaimlerChrysler - "Nothing."
Wife - "So you are saying that for safety's sake it was redesigned, but you are going to do nothing."
Mathew Long from DaimlerChrysler - "I am sorry, but it is our position."
The DaimlerChrysler recall center then gave my wife the number 1-800-992-1997 for customer service in Detroit. I have called the dealer to return the car. Luckily, the dealer had a 30 day/1,000 mile return policy. Needless to say. They are very unhappy with me and said that the report was media induced, yada, yada, yada.
Steve
Host
Vans, SUVs and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
Rationalize this however you want. I personally wouldn't bet against a billion(?) dollar industry that makes its money off of analyzing this stuff. Until an actuary group with years of auto safety analysis tells me its bunk I'm not discounting it.
You can read more information here:
http://www.hwysafety.org/news_releases/2001/pr071701.htm
Good luck,
Drew
Host
Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket & Accessories message boards
Really makes me wonder why so many people like to start and perpetuate "Hate Crimes" against DC minivans.
So, what was mentioned above may not be too far from the truth afterall.
Drew
Host
Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket & Accessories message boards
Really makes me wonder why so many people like to start and perpetuate "Hate Crimes" against DC minivans.
I'll bet it's the same troll that spreads hate and discontent about the Odysseys.
What I discovered from my search, and since have purchased and installed, is that the rear molded splash guards listed for the 01 Grand Caravan fit the '01 T&C very nicely. Only problem is that they only seem to come in black.
I have been following the posts but have not posted myself for some time.
I have a 2001 ES AWD Dodge at 18000miles now.
It is in service again today for
1.Engine computer light came on. Codes said-torque converter is faulty. Needs replacement. However significant back order for torque converters. Service has said O.K. to drive until replaced.May take a week or more until the new part is available
2.Had my rotors of my front wheels already turned once-I think slightly unusual as early as 18000 miles to get them warped-I am a highway driver mostly. /My old Caravan 98 had the same problem at 55000miles/Service suggested that new materials are being used in the 2001 minivans...
3.D/W Daimler Chrysler's customer service fuel leak issue from recent crash test results-was officially told that there is no problem identified. The redesign for 2002 consists of strengthening the front body structure not the fuel and gas tanks.
Also was told that there is no recall underway for my specific van that was produced in Aug/Sept2000
The cooling fans continue to be felt-still no solution...
Droning sound at 2100 rpms still there but not so prominent in the heat.
Doubt if I should continue using Chrysler products despite very good service from my dealer so far.
-Adam (16/M/CA)
Proud Owner of a 2000 Town & Country LX
Currently @ 25k miles; No Problems
http://chryslerpartsnet.com/tollfree.html
There was also another place that I spoke with in Texas but I can't find their info.
Most of the places that I found were just regular dealerships that sell for less over the internet. The two places that I called had the molded guards, but I kind of had to talk them through finding them (by continuing to tell them that I knew they were out there cause I had the picture catalogue). Then, when I went to my dealer to get them, I did notice that they were not listed with the flat guards for the T&C, they were listed somewhere else in the book (1 or 2 pages back if I recall).
I didn't look back to see, but if that part number that you don't see anywhere is the part number that I gave for mine, they certainly fit. I would take pictures to show you but I don't have any film right now.
My only warning with them, if it matters to you, is not to put them on a light colored van. Mine is steel blue -- dark enough so that the front ones look close in color to the black ones in the back. If a van is white/gold or some other light color, it will really be noticable that the back guards are a bit out of place (cause the front guards would be light and the rear guards would be black).
Some people may not even care because they do what they're supposed to -- they help keep dirt off the lower rear of the van. But, until D-C comes out with the body colored ones (and who knows when/if that will be?) they do fit and work well enough for what they do. This color issue may not matter to others.
That part number that I gave was straight off of the box that the guards came in.
The service department went out of their way on a Saturday afternoon to help.
Today they told me the whole transmission needs to be replaced.
Sad weekend...
if i were you, i would ask for a new van. plain and simple. while this many seem impossible and unrealistic, who knows!? chrysler could do anything, including replacing your obviously defective minivan.
hope this helps. good luck in the future!
-adam (16/m/ca)
00 town and country lx
Happy posting!
Drew
Host
Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket & Accessories message boards
The Long-Term Road Test has been updated in the past couple of days. The link is in the Additional Resources box on the left navigation bar.
Steve
Host
Vans, SUVs and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards