Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
The two gripes I see most, are, #1 it needs more power. And #2 it lacks a Nav system, or other personal favorite of the poster.
Had they offered a 3.0L, 200+ HP V-6 when Toyota, Honda and Nissan did, I think they would have had a huge market. They sure trounce the others in styling and are second to nothing in overall quality. One other complaint is due to the beautiful styling. It is very low with a lot of tumblehome on the side windows. ( compare the slab sides of the Avalon and Camry to the sides of the Millenia). This causes it to not be a great mommymobile due to the difficulty of inserting and removing kiddy seats.
Throw in the Nav as an option, and voila instant luxury car (it already is to me). I neither need nor want either of those, so I am thrilled with my '01 P.
True Cost to Own (TCO): Revealing the Hidden Costs of Car Ownership
http://www.edmunds.com/advice/specialreports/articles/59897/article.html
kirstie_h
Roving Host
Edmunds.com
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
I have no problem with the current TCO program, if they would also allow you to enter the real price you can purchase the car for, in place of the TMV they are using. The TMV they use is $5000 above what I actually paid for mine. And the "Purchase Price" is over $6000 too high. My OTD price was less than $23000. Not the $29000+ that the TCO is showing.
If that figure is that far off, something is wrong. Please use the Help link at the top of this page and send your feedback to Edmunds.com - I'm sure they will appreciate it.
Thanks!
Pat
Sedans Host
I also looked at the TCO, and it said the average annual insurance costs are about $ 1200 here in MI. But the LOWEST I could find was 1700, & believe me I looked!!! I was wondering if anyone here got that kinda premiums? (I haven't got a ticket in my life!!!) ;-)
What are your experiences??
How do you like the M after one year of wonership? Any troubles? What kind of mpg are you getting with mostly highway driving? What engine do you have (2.3L)? Do you pay $850 for insurance every 6 months? What is your age?
did you ask the dealer what exactly is included in 30K maintenance? I'd suspect he is trying to throw in a lot of stuff like "chassis lubrication" and such. Just ask them to price maintenance "by the book", and do only what is specifically asked for in the manual.
I had this with my old Nissan Stanza few years back - one dealer wanted $560 for 30K maintenance... but another did everything required by the manual for $170. Do your research, don't let them rip you off!
My insurance in MA for '01 Millenia S is $840 / yr with $1K deductible, and $720 for '00 Chevy Venture... full coverage on both. I live in a town with pretty good "premium zone", or whatever it is called.
Hope this helps -
Tomek
For my '02 S I am paying $1300 a year with full coverage and a $200 deductible in NM.
As for the insurance, since reading your posts, I've suddenly started feeling bouts of extreme self-pity for the amount I'm paying! I'm 26, so over the "irresponsibly-rash-untrustworthy-under-25-driver" category. Still looking for some "reasonable" premiums!!!
The car itself is great! I have the S. The power is pretty good, though a bit slow to shift up or down. I had to replace 2 of my tires after 29k miles though! Which really seemed strange, since I was of the opinion that they last about 50k miles on an average. My wallet was lighter $ 250 after that! And now the 650!!! HELPPPPPP!!!
Shop around some more.........good luck!
I'm sure you were running on underinflated tires. My car came with 30psi all around - the sticker on the door frame says 34psi front, 32 psi rear. Underinflated tires will wear out very quckly, epsecially on a heavy car like the Millenia.
What pressure are you running now?
Tomek
P.S. I'm tempted to call my Mazda dealer (so far pretty good, except for the underinflated tires issue!) and ask them what they charge for 30K service on '01 Millenia S...
Also, I've noticed an annoying tendency for the car to hop to the right ever so slightly when going over a bump. Happens mostly on suburban roads that aren't smooth going around 25-45 mph, not over speed bumps in parking lots. Could this be an alignment problem? Tire pressure? Something loose in the suspension? I wouldn't think it's shocks/struts since the car only has 41,000 miles.
Thanks for the help!
------------------------------------------
That is the exact specs for my "01 P. As to raising the pressure, you will wear out the middle tread faster. Also, when I picked mine up new, it's tires were overinflated by 5 lb. That caused a huge increase in tire noise from the rear. After reducing the pressure to it's proper settings, the car quieted down extremely.
My tires are Michelin MXV4 215-55-16.
The center console looks very cheap, mazda definatley could have done a better job; worst part is the "metal/titanium" finish isn't around the window switches like the standard model's wood trim. The black dash also makes the SE look cheap as well; I would also dread having that ivory leather as well.
What i do like about this model is that it comes standard with the autodimming mirror and the accented front grill is subtle yet adds a nice finishing touch.
The titanium wheels are okay, a high quality machine finish would have been better!
What are your thoughts about this model Millenia?
=======================================
I love my '01 P. But if it had an auto dimming rearview mirror, it would be instantly disabled. I have had that feature on two cars, and along with auto dimming headlights, I find it one of the most annoying features ever pushed off on the public. I suppose there are those that like both of those, but for the life of me I can't immagine why. They are both very easy to do manually, and at the proper time.
I very much dislike the titanium or aluminum consoles I have seen in any car. For me the same is true of the Millenia. It is wrong for what is basically a luxury oriented car, not a rally car.
I think the ivory is nice, especially in a black car. But I sure wouldn't want to have to keep it clean.
The center console looks very cheap, mazda definatley could have done a better job; worst part is the "metal/titanium" finish isn't around the window switches like the standard model's wood trim. The black dash also makes the SE look cheap as well; I would also dread having that ivory leather as well.
What i do like about this model is that it comes standard with the autodimming mirror and the accented front grill is subtle yet adds a nice finishing touch.
The titanium wheels are okay, a high quality machine finish would have been better!
What are your thoughts about this model Millenia?
I guess it's just a "luxury" thing. I too have a second vehicle with this feature and find it quite practical; but it did take some time getting used to. It made all light reflection appear green.
I don't mind an aluminum or titanium trim on vehicles, I just think the kit on the MMSE is low quality, its finish should have been made the same quality as the Infiniti G35 (for lack of a better example)
I was getting the itch for a new car in early '99. I really wanted a Millenia S but could not afford one. I got a good deal on a Base model (that's what they were called then) in Brilliant Black. It was a great car.
Fast forward to late 2001. I've put 60K trouble free miles (and I mean trouble free - not a single problem) on the MM, mostly in the worst kind of N. Calif rush hour traffic. Anyway, I'm starting to get the new car itch again (and I can afford a little more $$). I seriously consider both the Acura TL and Volvo S60 (both great cars) and can't decide. The itch is getting worse and worse - it's decision time... What do I end up with? A 2001 Millenia S in Millennium Red Mica. I guess it's the car I always wanted and after seeing the deals they had I just couldn't pass it up.
So here's my question. Considering you get the Miller-Cycle engine, traction control, bigger wheels and a better sound system on the S - what is the price point that with all things equal you'd be crazy not to buy the S over the P. I'd say it's something in the range of $2000 (maybe even $2500). In other words, if you can get the S for under $2K more then what you can get the P (with no options), absolutely go for the S.
I'm wondering what others think and I thought it might spark some lively discussion.
The problem with them is that you are seldom facing oncoming traffic directly head on, and at any angle they didn't operate properly. Heck, they didn't even work right when the opposing traffic was coming straignt at you. I got so tired of them flashing my lights up and down at the wrong time that I just shut them off and used the manual dimmer instead.
I have an opportunity to buy 98 base [but the nada book calls it a premium?]for $13k. The car is spotless and has 53k miles. It is loaded w/ all power options/roof/bose/tcs/leather etc..I drove the car and was impressed. Very smooth, quiet, pretty quick overall. I have a few questions I hope you can answer.
First, does this car require premium fuel? According to the manual, it does not but when I opened the fuel door, it says premium is recommended? Also, I have heard of the expensive miller engine 60k maintenance. This car has the 2.5 L, is the same maintenance required for this engine? When does the timing belt typically need a replacement on this car?
Thanks in advance for your responses!
masonovich
I had a 1995 MM P .I love my new car.
I traded the '99 in with just over 60K miles and never had the service so I can't be much help there, however, I can tell you the base and the S have different engines so any "higher-level" service required for the S would only apply to it.
"which is the best color" by obioha1
That is a totally subjective question I bought Platinum Silver, because I think it looks best. That said, red and green IMO detract from the luxury look. The other colors all look great, other than the tan interior in the silver car.
Like I say, totally subjective. You are really the only one to judge that for your personal car.
'01-'02 model is silver and for
'95-'00 white or white/sand, eventhough I have black/grey which also looks very nice when it's clean.
2000 Millenia S, 45008 miles and counting; troublefree off-course :-)
mated with the factory 17" chromes.......
There was no other choice for me.
There was no other choice for me."
============================================
I guess I am not young enough to agree with that. I personally do not like any chrome wheels at all (not just MM). They seem gaudy and dare I say cheap looking to me. OTOH, the stock wheels on the '01 P are nearly a color match for the Platinum Silver body of the car. This gives it a monochrome appearance I find very pleasing.
Frank
Tomek
P.S. No, I don't have "chromes"!
=============================================
Very interesting. I assume you go car shopping wearing a blindfold.
You must have a very interesting looking car. If you know what it looks like, maybe you could share that with us. It would be nice to know what a blindered person would pick out. I guess a Yugo with a 500HP V-12 and Koni shocks would fit that criteria.
I would imagine it would also need a 9800 watt stereo system with 6 24 inch woofers to qualify as great car. Oh, and of course Chinese red brake calipers.
Just having a little fun with his ignorance.