Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
The yaw sensor and the steering wheel position sensor and speed are used in combination to react and possibly correct oversteer, lateral yaw beyond that "commanded" by the steering wheel position, and understeer, insufficient yaw for the command input.
Hope that's not more confusing yet. It's clear in my mind, but not as easy to explain.
What you say makes perfect sense to me. Thanks.
OTOH, doesn't that suggest that the yaw sensor would be a more accurate nav. system info. source for dead-reckoning navigation?
In theory also, you wouldn't even need the GPS satellites since inertial nav doesn't need them - only a very precise knowledge of it's starting point. It then calculates position by measuring (thru those many and expensive sensors) the actual movement of the vehicle (inertia). These types of systems, used in airliners for years, can detect movement as small as a "push-back" from the gate at the airport.
The car's GPS, on the other hand, uses satellite triangulation to arrive at a map coordinate which it then compares to the stored map in your database and, thereby, "finds" your position on the map. That is one reason why it occasionally gets "lost" or off position - if the roads change slightly since the database was made, a mismatch occurs. Of course, there are other reasons also, but this is getting long - sorry.
When in dead reckoning mode, (no GPS signal) which provides better information, steering sensor or yaw sensor?
It seems that the steering sensor reads what the driver asks for, and the yaw sensor reads what the driver gets.
The difference would be slippage, (slip angle) which varys with speed, road & tire coefficient of friction (which in turn vary with weather & temperarure), road camber, and maybe other stuff.
Or, am I demonstrating profound ignorance of a yaw sensor's capabilities?
Is there just one yaw sensor in the car? Is it (them) truly a yaw sensor, or as you suggest, a lateral accelerometer?
Yaw: (Aeronautics) "To turn or deviate from the line of flight by angular motion about the normal, or vertical, axis"
I believe the "yaw" sensor in the Lexus VSC system is really a lateral accelerometer, not a yaw sensor as such.
Just my holiday humorous 2 cents worth.
Only if the posted speed is 45MPH..
I then asked, "If I don't renew, will the 'Lexus Link is active' message still come on?" They said Yes, the message will still come on but there will be no service provided.
To me the biggest complaint about the LS430 has been that stupid message interrupting my music or book-on-tape listening every time I start the engine. If that message still stays on even after I have cancelled the service I'll be really annoyed. Don't know what I may do . . . Better watch out, Lexus Link!
flint350 - the back-end of the new 7 is repulsive. I don't think Lexus and MB could have conspired to make a poorer rear design for their competitor. The front isn't bad though. Lexus interior still best by far. What do you think?
"The controversial new 7 Series
Do You Think This Car Is Ugly?
If so, you aren't alone. It could mean bumps ahead for BMW, just as it's stepping on the gas."
I posted this on the 7-Series board but thought people here might also be interested.
Here's the link:
http://www.fortune.com/indexw.jhtml?channel=artcol.jhtml&doc_id=205377
I won't be too quick to label the whole car/concept a failure (wouldn't want to upset merc1 after all), but I do believe it is starting off with self-imposed hurdles to jump. If I were buying my LS right now, I'd at least look at the new 7, but initial impression is that I'd stay with the Lexus. ljflx (and everyone else) have a good and safe holiday.
Stereo is really good, and for me the radar control is helpful. I really do not see how they are going to improve the ride in the future, other than a tire change, and interior is vastly better than four years ago. Right now I am a happy camper. Tony
M
I might be the only one on this board to think so, but I actually like the way the new 7 series looks from front and behind. It has a futuristic look to it, that I appreciate. =D The LS430 is a marvelous car, and I'm sure I'll enjoy the ride a bit more in the city than the 7, but I personally like the 7 series in terms of its exterior styling. Then again, I like the LS430 exterior too, which the motor press do not seem to fully admire.
...my$.02...
carnaught - S doesn't look so good when its dirty particularly when it's a black one. I think the S is a beautiful looking car though. But I also love the design of the LS430. The new 7 is looking worse and worse to me. BMW lovers must be stunned. The rear design is just atrocious and does not flow with the front of the car.
flint350 - a wonderful holiday and new year to you as well.
Seems it will be hard to fit and may have interface problems with Lev unit...
When I made up my mine to get a lesis(again) I was forced to gamble on interior. I got the black and bordeau, apprehensive cause I thought I would like light maple, but was not offered. The black is not really a black black, and is very peacefull to live with. I was way more impressed when I took delivery, and it has grown on me more and more. I am not even comparing price, but now that you mention it, sixty seven thousand is getting rediculous for a car. The victoria(ford) is a nice car, at least to look at, and if I have to pay directly (myself) all the guys are going to have to look to someone other than me. Imagine the next go around mb will be over one hundred and lexus better not be more than the last one. Tony
I know how you feel, pride in ownership.
Not a chance! :-)
Pat
Host
Sedans Message Board