Leaning towards the CR-V but ...
So I'm leaning towards the CR-V fully loaded but I was wondering if there was a better price out there or better value? Basically looking for Bluetooth, AWD, premium sound, XM radio, USB for MP3 connection in a crossover or SUV for under 32K?
Thanks
Thanks
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Getting a new Outlander, CR-V or RAV4
Highlander vs RAV4 vs Honda CR-V
Honda CR-V vs. Subaru Outback
Honda CR-V, Toyota RAV4 or Subaru Forester?
Mazda CX-7 v Toyota RAV4 v Honda CR-V
Nissan Rogue vs Honda CR-V vs Toyota RAV4
Tiguan vs. Forester vs. CR-V
Edmunds would also add the Acura RDX, Chevrolet Equinox and the Hyundai Tucson to the mix.
And there's the Venza and RX 350, just to try to confuse you a bit more.
What goes around comes around. This is not real estate, the value will NOT go up in years. Just my 2cents
What goes around comes around. This is not real estate, the value will NOT go up in years. Just my 2cents
To some extent...
A fully loaded vehicle will depriciate faster than a base one. In 5 years, a used base one will be priced about the same as the fully loaded one. If the fully loaded one has electronics, like GPS, voice commands... ect, it may even detract from the potential buyers because a repair of such complex system can be costly.
Don't believe me, check out used prices on the appraisor here for a 2005 CR-V LX AWD, and 2005 CR-V EX-L with same mileage. They are pretty much few hundred dollars apart.
But, in your scenerio let's say the LX was close in price to the SE - say a few hundred dollars. Assuming the vehicles were in relatively the same condition, which one would you buy? Most would take the SE. Bottom line is when it comes time to sell your car (and you plan on selling the vehicle on your own), one may get a quicker sale if they have the higher trim level.