Acura TSX vs Lexus IS250 vs BMW 325xi vs Honda Accord
moosey2010
Member Posts: 1
I am a 24 yr old female graduating college in one week. Currently, I'm in the market to buy my first car. For the past 6 years, I've been driving a 2003 VW Passat which is owned by my parents. For as long as I can remember, I've wanted a 3-series BMW. Every time I see one on the road, my palms get sweaty and my heart starts to race - weird, but true. So what's the problem? Well I got a job in a small town in OH - the nearest city is an hour drive, so I need something extremely reliable that I don't have to take to the dealer every other week. In addition, I'll be driving about 80 miles/day (highway) about 5 days a week. After doing some research, BMW didn't seem like the best choice for my situation.
I then looked at Honda Accord - probably the most reliable car out there based on what I've read/heard. I drove it and really liked it... but I'm just not very excited about it. Then I drove the Acura TSX with tech package... I really liked it and it's probably my top choice right now, but it's not the cutest car I've ever seen... and let's face it, I'm looking for cute and reliable. Is this a good way to shop for a car? Maybe, maybe not, but it's what I want. So now the Lexus IS250 caught my eye... it's very cute and I am assuming reliable because it's owned by Toyota. I also like the AWD option, which might come in handy for my commute.
So I guess my question is, is the Lexus THAT much more reliable than a BMW? Should I just buy the BMW if I'm gonna spend that much money? Or should I just go with the Acura since that may be the most reliable of the 3? Or should I just suck it up for the next 2 years and get the Accord until I move and don't drive so much? Any input would be great? Can someone rank these 4 cars in order of reliability? Thanks SO much!
PS I'm looking at 2010 Accord EX-L, 2010 TSX w/tech, 2009 CPO Lexus IS250 AWD and 2007 CPO BMW 325xi
I then looked at Honda Accord - probably the most reliable car out there based on what I've read/heard. I drove it and really liked it... but I'm just not very excited about it. Then I drove the Acura TSX with tech package... I really liked it and it's probably my top choice right now, but it's not the cutest car I've ever seen... and let's face it, I'm looking for cute and reliable. Is this a good way to shop for a car? Maybe, maybe not, but it's what I want. So now the Lexus IS250 caught my eye... it's very cute and I am assuming reliable because it's owned by Toyota. I also like the AWD option, which might come in handy for my commute.
So I guess my question is, is the Lexus THAT much more reliable than a BMW? Should I just buy the BMW if I'm gonna spend that much money? Or should I just go with the Acura since that may be the most reliable of the 3? Or should I just suck it up for the next 2 years and get the Accord until I move and don't drive so much? Any input would be great? Can someone rank these 4 cars in order of reliability? Thanks SO much!
PS I'm looking at 2010 Accord EX-L, 2010 TSX w/tech, 2009 CPO Lexus IS250 AWD and 2007 CPO BMW 325xi
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
TSX's are fun cars to drive, pretty reliable and I think they are cute. I think the IS, though, is the best looking of the bunch. It is probably the least fun to drive but if you are mainly doing highway, then the IS would be fine. Also the Lexus clearly does reliability the best and for me, is the best looking and ties the TSX for best gas mileage. Good luck!
1) The BMW 3 series was my choice, hands-down, until about three years ago. Run-flat tires became standard (rougher ride, worse handling, very expensive to replace, no one will repair them, can't get replacements in the remote areas of the West where I live), the cars began to stress technology rather than driver involvement (the ability to check/change one's own oil, etc.) and the "free" maintenance schedule increased service intervals and vastly decreased the number of fluids that needed to be replaced at regular intervals. Then, to top it off, the very attractive lease deals that were in place for many years were eliminated. These cars are great fun to drive, in spite of the above, but need much more careful maintenance than what is currently "recommended" by BMW to last the kind of mileage you're contemplating, without costing a fortune.
2) The Lexus IS has a relatively numb feel, compared to the BMW, in terms of handling -- nowhere near as much fun to drive. The back seat is a joke for anyone over 6 years old and/or 60" tall. I don't like the slab sides & fold-down rear seatbacks aren't available -- I need that for my bicycle. No doubt it'll run for 150K miles, but you won't have very much fun covering the distance.
3) The TSX ended up being my choice & I've driven mine ~35K miles in the past two years or so -- totally dependable & okay to drive, but not like a RWD sedan with decent suspension (a la BMW). The TSX is the Accord for the rest of the world, so it's smaller than the Accord that's sold in the U.S., especially for the last few years. It has a great suspension for an FWD car and generally I'm quite pleased -- I'm sure it'll run beyond a quarter million miles with minimal drama. It has fold-down rear seats, a real spare tire and a dipstick. The only thing is doesn't have is the correct pair of wheels driving it. It's available with a manual transmission, which is also a requirement for me, but then so does the small IS and the BMW. The Accord. . .
4) Well, then there's the Accord. It's big and dependable. So is a Buick.
Hyundai elantra
Mazda 3
Ford focus
I like the IS a little bit more than the TSX a little more in body style and ride quality, but as others have pointed out, the IS back seat is completely worthless for any kind of passengers! It really can only be use as an extension of the trunk to put crap back there!
That is luxury in an Infiniti G37.
I have to push a button on my key to unlock the door. After seating, I have to put the key in a slot and turn it to start the car. It's a soul crushing routine
You may not care about this, but there are others who do.
For Honda, it's the fact that they brand acura as their luxury cars yet they don't have the necessary features to be considered as one. Actually, I do like acura cars but it's just fact that their luxury brand cars (txs, rdx, mdx, and even rl) do not even offer something that's soon to be standard.
I'm confused.
After awhile, you take this convenience for granted, and recoil when you try to use a car that actually requires that you use or access a key.
So, in 2010, I don't think there is any excuse for upscale cars (e.g. Acuras) to be without this feature.
I recently bought an Infiniti G37S 6MT sedan and am enjoying conveniences like this in a car with excellent sports car performance. I came very close to buying a TSX or TL, but decided that they don't match the G37 (and the ugly snouts, especially on the TL were unacceptable).
However, I am thinking about buying the upcoming TSX station wagon. This is something I have been hoping Honda/Acura would do for a long time. I would put up with the snout in order to have a station wagon (which are rare these days). The only alternative I would consider is the VW sportwagen, but their reputation for poor reliability scares me.
It's interesting that you say the TL/TSX has an ugly snout. The exactly the same thing I thought I have. The G37 is nicer looking to me. Still I may still get the TSX because I like Accords so much. But it does bug me that the TSX doesn't have a wireless key either. So I'm not so sure anymore.
I agree that the 2010 TL is too large. That's another reason to lean towards the TSX for me too.
The car senses the proximity of the key, so that all you do is press buttons to open the door, trunk, or start the car. The key sits in your pocket or purse untouched. Makes for very convenient & rapid car access.
With a wireless key, you have to reach out to the car while your hands are full and push a button? For me, it's easy to carry the fob in my hand or dangle it from my pinkie so when my hands are full, I can open the trunk from several feet away.
Again, I can see how the wireless key might be nice in some instances, but many times, when you're carrying something heavy, it's easier to push a button that's in your hand than reach out to push a button on your car.
I guess it's a personal preference.
bimmer4me's BMW with the door that opens without even pushing a button sounds like the easiest.
And you won't have to carry a wireless fob in your pocket. Sensors near every door will scan your retina.
There will be no buttons inside the car either - every control (HVAC, radio, nav, etc.) will be voice activated. In fact, you will vocally tell the nav system your destination and the car will drive itself there.
Actually, this technology has been around for years. If you want to use transportation that requires no control inputs or manual manipulation, just ride the bus!
I expect mechanical arms to reach out, gently put me in my seat, adjust the seat belt, etc. My route will be selected by computer, which will track traffic congestion and unerringly alter course so as to get me to my destination as quickly as possible. While at my destination, the car will stop at a local gas station, where the car will fill the tank & pay for the gas. The car will follow with a complete wash & wax, and the car will be waiting for me when it is time to leave.