Jeep Grand Wagoneer
chrisbuick
Member Posts: 3
Could anyone help me with info on the old style Jeep Grand Wagoneer. While I know they're ancient designs, they appear to be fairly plentiful here in Eastern New England. I need a reasonably priced SUV of that size, priced well under $10,000, for use in central New Hampshire, and I've always liked the looks of these vehicles. Are they pieces of junk? What was the last year they were made? ('91?) How reliable is the drive train, etc. They don't seem prone to rust. If anyone has experience with these, I'd appreciate your input. Many Thanks - Chris
Tagged:
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I believe their basic design dates to the late 60's, which means their sheetmetal is thick. There was one for sale at a local park-and-sell lot a few months ago, for something like $2500 or so...it was a late 80's. Sitting inside it, I'd guess they're a little bigger inside than the current Grand Cherokee. It was very comfortable, too, and the interior materials seemed of a good quality, if a bit out of style. This one still had an AMC 360, which is of the same heritage as the old AMC 304/360/390/401. It was an auto, which I'm guessing by this time was a Torqueflite 727...one of the strongest trannies ever built, and often seen behind everything from the Chrysler/DeSoto Hemi's of 1957 on up to the 440 big blocks and even 426 Hemi. God only knows about the rest of the drivetrain or other mechanicals though, as AMC/Jeep used all sorts of parts from just about anywhere they could find them.
I think it would be neat to have one, just because they seem so sturdy and truck-like...how an SUV should be. I've got no need for one though, so I'll have to be content with window shopping!
-Andre
Loved the vehicle. It was just the right size - smaller than today's giant SUV's and larger than the compacts. Also wasn't as high which made it easier to get in and out.
Ran the thing to 90K and sold it to a friend. He ran it up to 160K until the tranny gave out. He didn't believe in maintenance though.
I'm not that mechanically inclined, but did all my own maintenance. Very simple mechanically with lots of space in the engine bay to work. AMC 360 engine was strong and didn't use any oil. Many AC/Delco parts in it which made parts cheaper and easy to get.
Weak spot - RUST. It is heavy metal, but very prone to rust in Minnesota. This affected not only the body panels, but things like the rear window mechanism (raise and lower the rear window). Radiators are weak, but not expensive to replace. Simple shocks and brakes. U-joints need to be lubed and have fittings on them. I had Quadra-trac and it needed to have fluid changed periodically with special Jeep fluid. As I remember, the A/C was a Delco unit. Tranny was a GM.
Overall it was very reliable. Always started in the cold. Couldn't get stuck. However it had lousy gas milage. If I was towing - 10 mpg. If I wasn't towing - 10 mpg.
I've had 3 SUV's since then. It was by far my favorite.
I'd consider one, but I sure wouldn't pay a lot of money for one. You can buy some very good used modern SUVs for $5K-$6K these days.
Those things are mechanical nightmares!
They also get HORRIBLE gas mileage!
-Andre
I actually like the truck, except it A) won't seat the 4 of us, isn't 4WD (which admittedly I rarely need, but it would be nice to have in our spare vehicle, if for no other reason but to justify keeping it around as a bad weather vehicle), and C) gets between 8-9.5MPG (400V-8 with CA emissions and what must be a low-geared rear end).
I'm thinking of selling the truck, and buying a high-mileage &/or old SUV in the under $4k range. I like the old Grand Wagoneer's, because they've got plenty of room to haul stuff, and they're eaiser to work on/less complicated than some of the newer stuff. Basically, they meet all but my gas mileage criteria; but since I've only put @ 3k miles on the F350, it isn't that big a deal.
I've always liked the Grand Wagoneer, and there's a certain classic look to them. Then again, there's something to be said for the "new" Cherokee (84-01?) which really didn't change much visually throughout its lifespan. But I'd probably feel safer in the larger/heavier G.W., even if it didn't have air bags, ABS and such.
BTW - My truck has 160k miles on it, and I've probably spent $500-700 over the past year on rear end seals/brakes/etc, so I'm used to being nickel-and-dimed on stuff. I also like the "largeness" of the truck, and see the G.W. as having a similar "presence" on the road.
So if you think the G.W. is really a "quick ride to hell", what else should I be looking at that would fit my needs/wants, and price range (and still be fairly reliable)? I've seen some really cheap Isuzu Trooper IIs around, but I figure there's a reason they're so cheap.
Any guidence would be appreciated.
Hunter Thompson had to kill his 66 by riddling it with bullets and blowing it up. Saw an old about 63 one in Afghanistan in an old movie too. Govt agencies used to buy them way back when when needed for forestry, geologic and outdoors work.
Very cool choice, if you dont mind water and wind leaks.