Rubicon or Sport? - 2012 Jeep Wrangler Long-Term Road Test
Edmunds.com
Member, Administrator, Moderator Posts: 10,316
Rubicon or Sport? - 2012 Jeep Wrangler Long-Term Road Test
Read daily updates on our long-term road test of the 2012 Jeep Wrangler and follow along as our editors live with this car for a year.
Tagged:
0
Comments
Great article Dan, definitely worth a read. I bought a 2012 sport and have done tons of mods on a budget....Dont regret the purchase at all. But the 3.73 upgrade was definitely worth the 50 bucks
The ball joints are [non-permissible content removed] though lol
First, a rear locker is a must. I didn't realize that until it was almost too late. Also, when going out with the Jeep club in my area there were some things I simply could not do until I got the locker. Heck..I didn't even know what a locker was when I bought my Jeep. Sure you can add one, and I did. While I would have lifted my Rubicon anyway and gotten bigger tires, I still think it's better to pay the +$8k on a Rubicon then spending $5k+ yourself to add lockers, sway disconnects, skid plats, etc. yourself because when you sell the vehicle, people will pay more for a Rubicon than a Sport/Sahara regardless...just my thoughts.
Still, love my Sahara and it does well with 4.88's, rear locker, manual disconnects but sure would love that front locker as well and the confidence of having Dana 44 in front. To add those would make my Sahara way more expensive than a comparable Rubicon.
Ricksrubicon however doesn't seem so open minded. Maybe a little ignorant? To explain: the 50$ dollar gearing meant a 50$ difference off the factory line, not a replacement or upgrade, rather a different factory package. AEV is the only aftermarket? Where does Mopar fit into this then? Sure they're all expensive, but we're talking about Jeeps here. You know, JEEP Just Empty Every Pocket, if you're not on board with that: enjoy your mall crawler and the occasional sidewalk curb ( meant with sarcasm )
Also, who cares what the bank or the dealer thinks about your Jeep, this isn't some leased sedan we're talking about. We're talking about Jeep Wranglers here after all.
The Rubicons are awesome! I would never argue against that, but maybe someone wants more out of their Jeep than what comes off the factory line. If a "Jeeper" is buying a wrangler with the intent to upgrade everything that makes it a Rubicon then a Sport might just be the right answer in that case. If you're satisfied with the stock Rubicon, that's great too! This article seemed to celebrate Jeeps but Rick wants to say he's the only one who is right.
IMO, personally, I bought a Sahara, I wanted at least a 2011 ( for the interior upgrades among other things, I want me and my passengers to be comfortable - luxurious is possible ) but couldn't afford a 2011+ Rubicon on budget, I could have gone with a -~2009 Rubicon. However, in the time I own this wrangler I'd like to replace a lot of things. I just bought the new Teraflex Dual Rate sway bar which seems pretty cool. In the future I'll have a lift/ lockers/ etc. This all would be much harder to afford if I were paying for the Rubicon price up front.
As far as resale, again, Jeep's aren't some Honda Sedan, the modifications DO increase the resell value ( as I've experienced it ), maybe not the trade in value but they will charge you for it if you buy a modified Jeep from a dealer. ( I didn't buy a modified Jeep BTW, Jeeps are built not bought! )
Whether its a street mod or a monster mod, they're all great!
Now my only quandary is do I wait for the 2017 wrangler redesign?