2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Edmunds.com

Edmunds.com

2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Edmunds.com

Small luxury SUVs are gaining in popularity, and the 2014 Range Rover Evoque is unique for its style and all-terrain capabilities.

Read the full story here

agentorange

I know cars have got expensive, and Land Rovers have never been cheap in the US. but that base price is eye-watering. Yes, it seems like it is a capable and comfortable vehicle, but $40k+?? Yikes! Still rather have one than an X3.

bankerdanny

IDK, in light of $32k base Explorers and $53k top line Explorers a $40k Range Rover doesn't seem unreasonable.

morey000

It's way better looking, yet smaller than the X3, Q5 or even the new MKC. And- while pricey, by the time you add seemingly standard luxury accouterments to ANY of these vehicles (heated seats, dimming mirrors, homelink, keyless entry, backup camera power liftgate, and the new lane departure/cross traffic/auto braking safety features- they're ALL pushing $50K. Even the MKC (which starts at $34K). Wish it had the MKCs noise cancelling system- very quiet!. Or, you could luxe out a Jeep Cherokee or Subie with all the safety and technology options, bigger engine, including Nav, and come in $15K less than any of these. Is the difference worth it? not yet sure.

kshankar

Isn't this powered by Ford's Ecoboost?

rwap

The New Land Rover Range Rover Evoque SUV...Comfort, best in design, great space, best in performance..But on this is not good, which is cost..Cost is high..Everything is ok but most expensive.I like all the models of land rover..

morey000

rwap said:

..Cost is high..Everything is ok but most expensive...

What comparative vehicle has a lower cost? They're all very close, similarly equipped. Maybe the RDX is less- but it's fugly.

Kshankar- yes, the 2.0T is borrowed from Ford. That's OK tho- it's a great engine. Feels faster in the Evoque than in the MKC. I presume due to a lower vehicle weight, and perhaps tuning/electronics. HP/Torque specs are the same.