Honda Odyssey Real World MPG
This topic will be for Odyssey owners to report their actual MPG.
"Real World" Fuel Economy vs. EPA Estimates
"Real World" Fuel Economy vs. EPA Estimates
0
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
The engine in the Odyssey is really tireless in carrying a load. I'm crossing my fingers the tranny is the same.
Doing another trip soon that should be mostly highway (but up into the hills). Hope to get 25ish on that one.
For what it is and what it does, and the type of driving, about what I expect and not too bad.
I figure I could easily get 25-27 on a straight highway run to the south, where it's mostly flatland.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
I am seeing alot of mention of terrible fuel economy in people's reviews. Seems like everybody has an "It is what it is" attitude. Can't something be done about this? Is it legal to advertise something so untrue?
Is there anyone out there that gets what is stated? ( 20-28 for mine)
but after hearing your milege numbers I'd have to say it's very disapointing to hear you getting 20 mpg even if the engine has yet to be broken in.
We were getting 21 in our '02 Oddy while fully loaded and pulling a 1,200 lbs trailer and the EGR valve was faulty. I'm now curious to see if our milege will improve.
I don't notice when the engine switches off cylinders. Is it when the ECO light comes on? I have not even read the manual. I have made an effort to avoid changing speeds quickly on the highway to hopefully eliminate the cycling back and forth. Probably a waste of effort but it keeps my mind occupied while driving. It just isn't as exciting as when I was 16!!
The 28 figure is real if you drive 60 mph, no AC and no family. Flat and steady.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT MPG:
*SPEED=65-75MPH, cruise control on 80 % of the time
*LOAD=4 adults (2 with 4 day vac. baggage plus 2 college bound students with enough baggage for one semester plus small refrigerator for dorm use)
*OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE= 85-95 degree farenheit
*AC= on all the time set at 75
*RADIO=on most of the time plus MP3 player and FM transmitter
*ROAD=70 % flat, 30 % hilly on the foothills of the OZARKS.( almost the entire lenght is interstate road)
RETURN TRIP=24.8 MPG (range=22-26)
FACTORS: almost similar as above except...
*two students and their baggage are gone
*radio=rarely use
*SPEED=70-80 MPH
OBSERVATIONS.....
1.Annoying engine/muffler loud sound at speed more than 75mph. this increases with speed. think it is inherent to the engine or muffler when the load to the engine is about its limit (though the rpm rarely goes beyond 3k) they may want to modify the muffler later (my suggestion, as i hate this kind of sound heard on soup up tiny car racing on a highway)
2.No wind noise whatsoever heard from doors, windows ( knock on wood!).
3.Dripping water near the tail pipe one foot from rear bumper ( saw this whenever I stopped for gas). it is like the one dripping underneath the engine compartment when using AC. Not sure why this happen. My old GC more than ten years ago did not have this.
4. Highest mpg was 27, on almost flat I-55 bettween St. Louis and Chicago with speed set at 65mph. I think the most probable reason why the two trips have almost identical mpg (24.8 vs 24.7) was the faster speed I drove during the return trip (65-75 vs 70-80). (Apparently more load on earlier trip was not much of a factor, just my observation)
5.The trip went well, without incident/mechanical problems.
When we bought the car it had about 300 miles on it and on July trip about 200 miles we were able to get there and on a single tank --400 miles and still not reached the low fuel light. (easily over 27MPG). We did the same trip this year and we had to fill up at about 290 miles on the return about 20MPG before the low light came on.
We noticed that we have been going to the gas stations more frequently even though our summer routine has been the same the past 2 years (kids in camps at the same locations). We barely get 250 miles mixed on city/hwy.
I took to a Honda mechanic (not dealer) for oil change and had him check it out and he could not find anything wrong. He also researched the TSBs and did not find anything. He was wondering if we were paying more attention to the fuel economy because of the high price of gas. I gave him the same example of our two July trips as above.
This has got me worried because fuel economy is not getting better. He changed the air filter too but nothing on the engine computer to indicate a problem. The van drives fine and accelerates as ably as the day we purchased it.
My van had only 5 miles on the odometer when I took it on a test drive. On the way home I've to tried to follow the Motoman's break in method MotomanUSA by varying the speed and loading the engine through the gears. I am thinking maybe the "ECO" mode is preventing proper break in of the Ody engine. I'm probably wrong, but the Motoman makes a good argument about the piston rings. I'm sure most new owners drive their new Ody home very gingerly, which could cause rings to not seat very well, especially with no load on three of the cylinders. I'll see what kind of gas mileage I'll be getting soon enough.
I haven't changed out the oil, yet. The dealer told me not to change the oil until as scheduled because it has some kind of additives in it, but I'm thinking I should as Motoman recommends.
I look at the other minivans and it doesn't seem you would be getting much, if any, better mileage with them. So if you're in the market for a minivan, would you agree that this may unfortunately be as good as it gets or darn close?
Driving 70-73mph A/C on I get 23MPG. Driving 60-65 MPH, I get 25MPG. I have done these checks several times.
The EPA conditions for "sticker MPG" is done on a computer model set at 48MPH, level road, no wind, & no A/C. Most stickers are inflated 10-15% and some are even worse.
We live in Utah.
We have had our 05 Ody Since First day they sold in Sept 04. We have, without fail, kept every statistic in our gas spread sheet. We only fill it up each time so we can easily have the spread sheet calculate the MPG stats.
We get 12-15 MPG in the city. and 19-24 (usually 22) on the highway (constant highway speed with 99% cruise (just start and stops not on cruise). We have taken the same (long) trips across Utah, Colorado, and Nevada several times now (approaching 20K miles) While we don't get 29MPG on highway - I can predict, now that we will get 22.3 MPG from SLC to Fort Collins. 21.8 MPG from Fort Collins to Glenwood Springs, 22.3 MPG from Glenwood Springs to St. George, and 22.1 from St. George to SLC.
We have done this trip 3 times now in the Ody'05 First trip started at 1,600 miles, second trip started at approx 6,400 miles, and third trip started at 13,100 miles. We always stopped at the same stations and use Cruise control full time on the highway.
Only the 100ths digit differed with each trip and basic loading was 2 adults, 2 toddlers, and 1 10 year old plus minimal suitcase for each. (no exterior cargo boxes etc.)
So much for 20/29!!! But hey, in some laboratory taking the Dyno Wheel average of 45mph and applying some formula, hey they got me to buy it!
The funny thing is, I own a 91 accord (311,000) and a 94 Accord (269,000) and they both get 4+ mpg over the original sticker on highway driving the exact same routes, speeds, and using cruise control.
I think I know why it is now called "American Honda" and not just "Honda". But hey, the leather is nice and as far as the ergonomic design - we love it. Hard to remember at almost $3/gal though.
I bought this car because I was loyal to Honda after my last two accords. Don't know what the future holds now. Lot's of wind-noise, rattles (more than my old accords already) 5 recalls so far (5 more than my last two cars put together and in only the first year) and they still can't figure out how to fix the headphones that don't always work witht he RES (although there is a tech note on it?)
An observation: This is a heavy van with a very powerful engine which can accelerate quite well (0-60 in 8.6 sec). If you choose to get on it, you will get bad mileage. There is no magical way to accelerate a heavy mass quickly without using a lot of energy, that is just physics. However, if you drive prudently, Honda has set this vehicle up to get what I consider to be exceptional mileage.
We are currently at the 900 mile mark, but we are keeping record of gallons, miles, MPG, city/highway %, etc.
It is unacceptable to be getting 13 MPG on car that is reported to have EPA 20 MPG for city driving! That is a 53% reduction.
Our Oldsmobile Silhouette never did below 20 MPG, and it was a much larger/heavier car than the Odyssey.
My advice to prospective buyers is to look elsewhere. At least review web sites such as this for real world MPG before buying. Knowing what I know now I would have selected a different car, definitely not one with a 7500 mile break-in period.
Actually that is a 35% reduction. Check your driving style/ habits, tire pressure, cold climate? that reduces mpg. 25mpg on hwy sounds pretty good. If dealer checked and said he got 30mpg I wouldnt worry about it. relax and enjoy your new van ratherbedriving.
I believe that you are getting the mileage you listed. My wife has a 2005 Pacifica which gets 15 mpg in town and I have been arguing with someone on the Pacifica thread who says they all get 17 mpg. Someone else listed 11 mpg! That being said, I have a 2006 Odyssey EX-L which gets very close to the listed mpg values. I know that when I drive this vehicle I must resist getting on the gas. It has so much "pep" (lame expression) that it is easy to drive spiritedly. If you do, you will get lousy mileage. The vehicle weighs 4500 lbs and has 240-255 Horse Power.
BTW I got 28.6 mpg on a 400 mile trip from 600 to 1000 miles on the van so I don't buy the "break-in" excuse. I hope my mileage gets better!
I believe the better phrase would be:
"All we're asking for is Honesty, EPA"
This is why new testing procedures are soon to be implemented. The EPA does not account for A/C load and other factors in their testing. It also does not go above 60 mph. The ECO light will kick on less and less the higher your speed, so likely, the EPA testing was quite accurate, just not well-evidenced by driving at more normal HWY speeds (75 mph w/passing maneuvers often at 80mph).
Trust me, your concerns are definitely legitimate as you aren't the only one with the lower than advertised mileage. The ECO is just more beneficial in the speeds the EPA tests than most people's average.
I wonder if anyone has disabled the VCM and how it affected MPG.
In city driving, I am getting 18 mpg.
make sure your tires are inflated properly. fill 'er up and take it on a good 300mi highway drive or more at 65. record your mileage. you're gonna do much better than 15.5MPG. then in another 3000mi, do the same thing. i bet your mileage will have improved.
On HWY driving, there are also many factors: load (how many people and luggage bags), speed (50-65MPH is best for gas mileage) and weather condition (Winter takes 1-2 MPG hit for cold area, tire pressure or thermal dynamic of engine?). The best we got from our Odys EX-L is 24.5MPG on 65MPH speed with full load in the summer. That is very good considering the size, power,... This winter, we barely get 22MPG. We have this vehicle for more than a year now. Of course, our driving habits do not change seasonally
Anyway, we got similar gas mileage from GM lighter and less powerful minivan. So no complaint. Note that others who own small SUVs (Santa Fe, Equinox, ...) do not have better gas mileage than my Honda van.
jt
I do agree that we should not trust EPA numbers. Honda probably is stretching their Odys gas mileage quite a bit here (similar to Horse Power overstating that they and Toyota engaged in recent history).
We currently have both Olds and Honda vans. Our Olds van is weighted ~4,000 lbs vs. ~4400 lbs for the Honda van. So unless you have the AWD version of Olds van, I do not think any normal Olds van is heavier than Honda van. BTW, the reason older generation of GM van was so tinny (and full of rattles), narrow (~5" narrower than Honda, Dodge, Ford,...) and light because they cut corner in structure enforcement to make their vehicle light weight for both US and European markets. And we are paying for all of those compromises here in the US for the last 10 years since GM Europe dropped their vehicles after two years in production. The current redesigned GM vans are just a warm-over revision of the old generation with some exceptions (uglier SUV nose styling, beefier structure enforcement for Frontal offset crash, better interior,...)
Back to the main Gas mileage issue: we got about 13-15 MPG for both vehicles driving around town (less than 8 mile trip). The Olds may have a slight edge (0.5 MPG may be). But on HWY, with full loads, we normally get 21-23MPG on the Olds vs. 22-24.5MPG on the Honda. So we observed a 1-1.5 MPG advantage of the Honda. I attribute that to their VCM (or cylinder cut off) and 5 speed AT. In addition, the Honda engine still have a lot more reserve if demanded. Everytime I drive this Honda, I just love it: great acceeleration, excellent handling, good brake, great ride (one of two in the market with true rear independent suspension (new Kia Sodena has one now) . It would be a perfect van for us if they fix the loud "humming" noise at 2200-2400RPM (quite a few complaints, not all vehicles have it).
BTW, People who owns lighter and smaller SUVs report 13-15MPG around town and low 20's MPG on HWY.
jt
Actually, your friendly Honda and Toyota dealers are the first in the auto industry to follow new SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) testing procedures for horsepower. They (SAE) have stricter regulations for testing, taking account driveline losses such as A/C and Power Steering.
Companies such as Nissan, on the other hand, have NOT retested their vehicles on the new standard, meaning that their numbers are STILL remaining overstated.
Honda and Toyota are the first two companies to retest all of their vehicles to comply with new standards.
* Note, carmakers aren't required to test under the new procedures until a new engine (or engine change) debuts. It is strictly optional until then; Honda and Toyota just decided to be completely honest with the public rather than allow the public to be in the dark about the new testing procedures.
Also, you say Honda is stretching their mileage...
Again, this isn't Honda's doing; this is the Environmental Protection Agency's estimate based on their tests. Also, keep in mind when VCM is at its best: under light load and highway driving. Low highway speeds (under 60 MPH, which is how CURRENT EPA HWY testing operates) do wonders for VCM equipped cars because at that speed, 3-cylinders is much more viable than at 75MPH (where many of us drive), and VCM stay active much longer. New EPA testing procedures are due out soon (FINALLY, thank goodness), and should deliver more realistic numbers on the window sticker.
I say this just to be informative, in case you (and other readers) didn't know about the new HP testing procedures.
i'm just curious how you're comming to this figure.
I have duplicated your problems too. I have not taken the car to the dealership yet because the shop I take the car too is very reliable. He has checked all the service bulletins and nothing whatsoever on poor mileage. I noticed that for the first year or so I had great mileage about 23-26 mpg mixed driving. Almost 28-30 on hwy. After I took my car in for some brake work to the dealer, I noticed that the mileage has slowly been degrading. The brake issues has been resolved, but in the back of my mind I keep thinking that something else may have happened, but I don't know what and neither does my car tech. The service shop reports that there is no computer codes, he has changed the filters w/o any improvement. I noticed around that time that the tire pressure was universally about 4PSI to low, I fixed that, the mileage appeared to improve but then I think it was purely wishful thinking. The main reason is that we take an annual trip over the summer to the same destination. In the first summer we made the trip we travelled almost 500 miles before we refueled this time around we barely made it past 400, and the low fuel lite was on for the last 30-40 miles. I am extremely disappointed with the mileage. These days I am lucky if I get 12-15 mixed driving. And with the price of fuel this is getting old...although I must say I love driving this van, its got plenty of power, handles well for a minivan and is joy to drive distances. :mad:
My wife has a 2005 Pacifica AWD and is lucky to get 15 mpg in town. I took it on an 800 mile trip and averaged exactly 22 mpg which is the EPA rating. The in town mileage is especially interesting because we had a 1995 Suburban 350 TBI, 4x4 6000+ lbs and it got 12-13 mpg in town, only a couple of mpg less than the Pacifica. However, the Suburban always got 15 mpg (+/- 0.1 mpg) on the highway. In the one trip that I have taken in our 2006 Odyssey (same 800 mile as above) I averaged 27 mpg, almost twice that of the Suburban. I get about 18-20 mpg in town in the Odyssey.