It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Design Flaws & Foibles
Some things that grind my gears...
-Cars being grossly under-tired, or at least appearing that way. Wheels that don't fill the wheel wells should be discarded.
-Brands having either a range full of lookalikes, or a range full of odd, discrete (not discreet) cars. Brands that have clear styling DNA across the range (Mazda, Cadillac) are good. Nissan has cars that look too similar; Chevrolet has cars that are far too disparate in their designs. When Chevy tries to join them all together, they end up incorporating a fugly design feature (big chrome bar, anyone?) that just detracts from any style the car has (in the case of the Malibu... none).
Another thing I can't stand? Cars with decent looking exteriors, but terrible, chintzy, cheap interiors. The domestics were and are often guilty of this.
By the way, your two cents are needed on another matter.... was the 1996 Ford Taurus _that_ bad? Even though it has some questionable elements and an over-reliance on one theme, I don't think it looks that terrible. But this comes from a guy who thinks the 2007 Camry is a 2007% improvement over the previous generation, and who actually likes the current Grand Prix.
Throw in your two cents. Let's get a bowl full of change. Ugliest cars? Things you hate? Pitch in the pennies.