Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
My wife and I (no kids) are thinking in terms of fuel efficiency and reliability, i.e. of buying an ECHO, or a Corolla. I was actually considering the Civic Hybrid, but it is way overpriced and, I believe, more subject to fast obsolescence due to changing battery technology.
Not to mention that there are increasing claims as to inaccuracies in EPA mileage estimates (although I think this applies across the board to many "economy" cars).
I was wondering, as I was on a dealer's lot last week I noticed sticker info to the effect that the ECHO is entirely made in Japan (100% sourced parts AND final assembly). This is not the case with the Corolla, or with other models.
My question is: do ECHO owners feel that this may make a difference in the long run to the fit-and-finish quality? Was this a consideration in your purchase? Have you been proven right? The dealer (he would, obviously) stated that all Toyota plants are the same, yadda yadda...but the sad fact is that people often end up disappointed buying cars they think were assembled in, say, Germany (like the VW Jetta), only to find out later it was in Brazil or Mexico. Having lived in South America for many years, I know what that can mean.
I have read recent posts about declining quality in the appearance of Corollas (and Civics), crappy paint, assorted rattles, and so on. Not to mention dealers and manufacturers being in total denial. I would like to hear your views as regards the ECHO. I have a 2-yr. old Accord, and have had only one problem (bubbling up of chrome finish on interior front door handles!, which was taken care of, but other than that, fine). So, it can happen to any car, really.
Also, does anybody here feel that Corollas and ECHOS (Toyotas and Hondas in general) are overpriced? An optioned ECHO retails for around $16K (!!!) here in Orlando, although of course you can try to cut a deal.
Fianlly, when are the '04s due out, and are significant changes expected?
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
I think if you go back and read previous posts in this forum you will find that the ECHO was been extrodinarily pleasing to us. Perhaps moreso than any other new car. It is a well loved car.
I would look around for a price. Here in NJ one dealer still advertises 2002 new ECHOs for 10499 which have the ps, 3 in 1 cd player and ac. Not a lot of options but a nice car nonetheless. Personally I prefer the first ECHO style over the 2003s but it doesnt matter you get used to anything.
Good luck ECHO hunting!
Three hours to a gallon of gas at idle sounds about right to me for a car like ECHO, but it might be even better than that. Perhaps on a not too hot day you could fill up your gas tank, let the car idle for an hour and go back and fill it up again to see how much gas was used. The car wont overheat under those conditions.
Anyone else have a rattling dash like this?
Your mileage will only get better. I have a 2001 with similar options -no 15" wheels though- and just reached 64k miles. Not one complaint or repair so far. My average mileage for those 2 years presently is 39.8. Not bad at all. It doesn't even use oil between changes. I've been on long trips and I other than the outstanding mileage I get on those long drives there are only two minor complaints. The seats are not very confortable and bother me after more than 3 hours of driving and during windy days the car is a little bit more unstable than heavier cars. But you will get used to that.
Good luck with you Echo and safe driving!
What do you all think?
Well I have another reason to be completely satisfyed with my ECHO!
We wanted a Tercel when we bought her first car in 1994 but it was too expensive and ended up with a Hyundai Excel. The Hyundai served us well but we still wanted a Toyota and decided it would be an Echo or Corolla. Corolla won due to its appearance and the fact that in Canada the Corolla is so aggressively priced - with auto, air, and the CE plus package its about the same price as a comparable Echo.
Any Echo owners out there with really high mileage on your cars?
My ECHO was not equipped with cold weather package and the rear defroster had a hard time dealing with fogging-tood very long to clear it.
The rear seat of the GT is actually less comfortable than that of the ECHO as the seat cushions are lower in the GT.
MPG in town is much worse with the GT (23mpg vs. 32mpg) but highway mileage is not too different (33mpg vs. 35mpg). Keep in mind my ECHO had high performance/low profile tires; not good for mpg.
If I were not looking at a possible move, I would've held onto my ECHO. If the Scion Xa were roomier behind the back seat, it would've been considered.
The GT stickered almost the same as my ECHO so monthly payments are about the same.
The white ECHO found a home pretty quick. I see many of them for sale for quite a long time in the paper and also at the Toyota dealer. In fact my dealer has new 2002 ECHOs for sale, if you can believe the ads in the paper.
True or false: Sidewall cuts/holes on tires can not be repaired.
True or false: Better to replace both tires on same axle than just one, and tires should be same brand/type/size.
True or false: When buying just two new tires, better to put both on front than the back.
I have been told by mechanic that all the above statements are true. Any other truths I should know?
As far as the rest I used to have beater cars which means all the rules go out the window. As long as it runs everythings fair. I often used different brands and even sizes. (On my motorcycle I have used radial tires on the front and bias ply on the rear. No problem.) Tires with differing ammounts of wear were used on the same axle. The result? No problem at all. But then I drove very conservatively and slowly and not in citytraffic. In winter or bad weather or in high speed city traffic, yes I would follow that advice the mechanic gave you. Or if an inexperienced driver is involved.
On the plus side it is ok to plug a tire with a hole in the tread. I even do it on the mc. Oh and one thing he didnt tell you about tires. Check you air pressure religiously! That is the main reason suvs are rolling over.
As for size, I used to navigate Manhattan traffic(lived in Staten Island for 9 years)on a variety of motorcycles nearly all year.
The car will be mainly for days off and such so mpg is not an issue.
I do miss my ECHO just the same!
Tires are still good, but having so many miles on them make me a little antsy. If you were me, would you go ahead and change them. I am looking at Dunlop SP Sport A2 which Consumer Reports gave a good write up on. I just wish I knew how my current tires (Goodyear) compared in wet braking, dry braking, etc. If it rated as high in each category, I would go with them again.
In its current issue, Motor Trend has an article about the Scion cars. Paraphrasing, MT says it will take away any justification for buying an Echo. I got some justification for you. How about the fact that the Echo is available as a coupe or sedan while the Scions aren't? How about the better fuel economy of the Echo? How about the better straight line acceleration? According to Motor Trend itself, the Echo (with manual) does 0 to 60 in 8.4 seconds while the Xa (with manual) takes a second longer. They expect the Xb will put up numbers similar to the Xa. Is that enough justification for you, MT?
Well, I want to check out a few more of the message boards before I have to get ready for work.
Happy Echoing.
It will last more than 80k miles, is excellent in rain and very quiet. Cost is: $ 50 plus installation -for P175/65R14-
Where? at www.tires.com
By the way, my Echo is a 2001 and the odometer shows 64600 miles. No repairs, no complaints, no oil consumption between changes.