Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I gather after reading this forum that (Invoice - Rebate - $500) is the best one could wish for. TTL should be the only additional cost. Is the destination charge included or it is an additional cost too?
Thanks for your help,
Raj
Most dealers came down $1000 to $ 33,029 for the XLE package 5 as of August 1. I had a trade-in, which one dealer offerred me $1000 for even though the books list it at $2000-2500.
Found a dealer tonight who has one coming in next week. He gave me $ 2000 for my trade and I paid $31,630 OTD with floor mats. At first he was asking $ 34,029 for the van, When I told him that everyone else was asking less he dropped it $1,000 on the spot.
One salesman told me that the package 5's are out there and that they are still making them. Mine was built last week.
Happy shopping:)
I am in Orlando - bought the 2007 XLE, Artic Frost - no dvd ... had dvd in my last vehicle - the kids were zombies ... got ipod videos with tadpole cases instead - less than 1/2 the price, and we then only use them on long trips
Every dealership has a 'nice guy' and there were a lot that were really annoying and played games - Keel @ David Maus was fabulous - you can even chat with him online before you head over - have the price negotiated and ready to go ... and if interested, I can double check - I think it is Steve @ Central Florida (he is an older gentleman originally from Massachusetts) - he seemed nice, and wanted us to call to give him a chance to beat our best offer from the other dealership ... we didn't - the other guy worked too hard and spent too much time with us ...
Good Luck!
PS - absolutely LOVE our new van! Great vehicle! David Maus has been great to deal with - in their service department, finance - they had a kids' room and made it a big celebration - it was fun!
In Houston, Joe Myers regularly advertises a CE for $20,888. You may try them and see if that loss leader is really available. Champions has also advertised the same price for the CE.
Good luck.
I am sure I am not the only one who is in this situation so I was thinking of gathering us into a Buying Group so we could attempt better pricing by dangling a volume purchase in front of some dealers.
I am looking for people who are within 100 or so miles of Boston, MA and are looking to purchase a Toyota Sienna Limited AWD or FWD with the 2008 equivalents of Package #2/3 (2 for AWD/ 3 for FWD) and #4 and want to take delivery in the first half of September. Please be a cash or credit-worthy buyer. I would hate to gather a group of people, get into negotiations, and then have the deal sabotaged by someone not getting approved for financing.
If you are interested in being part of this buying group, please contact me. I put together a special email for this: iwantasienna@gmail.com. :shades:
Does this help?
I paid $28,400.00 total out the door, including tax (7%), tag, title, rebate ($1,500), etc... I hope this helps others with their decisions. Love the vehicle so far!
A couple of questions:
(Invoice - $500 - Rebate) is considered the best price one could get. Does "Invoice" include holdback, financial reserve & TDA? I would think so. Right? Otherwise, how could a dealer go below invoice?!
Secondly, the dealer showed me that the rebate amount is just $1,250 whereas everyone else is talking about $1,500! She even printed out Toyota webpage for me. Or does $1,500 include financing-related rebate?
I will provide more details about how I went about buying it shortly.
Thanks,
This dealer had every dealer I spoke to in CT stuttering at this deal..Not one would touch it..If you live in a 75 mile radius- they are hungry bc they just opened this megadealer and obviously are looking for unit sales not profitability... Im impressed...
mlabq, "Toyota Sienna - Prices Paid & Buying Experience" #7517, 15 Jul 2007 11:07 am#7516
Cool!
*($695 msrp-- figures not posted but basically when they pushed me on the resistall I blurted out that I would give them $300 for it-- he stated that this was at their cost and I assume the markup for basically a non service product (more like a warranty) is similar to that-- Ill use $300 as the cost)
I mentioned the $23500+destination ($685)number because I didn't think anybody would find it for less than that, but you certainly proved me wrong.
David Maus Toyota in Orlando.
All internet negotiations. They came to the house to deliver the car and sign the paperwork.
Sienna XLE $31683 out the door with dual headrest DVD.
$2000 down inclusive of TTL
$488 per month for 48 months on a lease.
Residual Value is $14,410.00
Yes or no to the deal?
They offered me this after some back and forth (which I walked away on as they wouldn't move anymore) -
LE #3 -
$25,735 (INCLUDES $2,000 rebate and INCLUDES the $695 SE Advertising Fee)
+ Doc + TTL
I was asking for $24,400 + Doc + TTL
Thoughts?
TDA.....$500
Dealer Holdback...$530
Whsl Financial Reserve... $265
TDA - 492
Dealer Holdback - 513
Fin Reserve - 256
This was told to me by a friend at the dealer whom I have know for a very long time. They told me these were not negotiable.
Anyone know anything about these charges?
2007 TOYOTA SIENNA LE 7 PASSENGER
MSRP = $27,319
After the instant rebate and attached coupon
Internet Price = Only $22,785
Out of door price is $24,226. I am in MA. Is it a good price?
Bob
1) they are not flexible with offers
2) they don't care if they sell the car or not
3) tend to be the slimiest of all dealerships
look for other dealerships in your area
Sienna Price Comparator
I didn't see an "attached" coupon. What coupon is this. WOuld you mind sending it?
Thanks.
Your first statement...
"The model to calculate percentage uses TMV as the average and MSRP as the 2-sigma level."
makes no sense whatsoever. "MSRP as the 2-sigma level"??? Come on; that makes no sense.
Your second statement...
"That means that I suppose that 98% of people pay less than MSRP."
may or may not be true.
You're suggesting, on average, that the MSRP lies more than 2 standard deviations above the TVM. WOW, to say that the MSRP lies more than TWO standard deviations above the TVM is a real stretch and seems very unlikely! The TVM would have to be treated as a sample mean and not a population mean. We don't know the population mean.
The population standard deviation is also an unknown. A valid statistical sample would have to be taken (good luck finding valid data) and the mean and standard deviation computed. Then, we can use the law of large numbers coupled with the central limit theorem and use the sample mean as a point estimate for the population mean. If the two are indeed equal, then the sample mean is said to be an unbiased estimator of the population mean.
I'm not sure whether you're claiming that the TVM is the sample mean or the population mean. Because of the tremendous difficulty in getting an unbiased statistical sample, I doubt it's a valid sample mean and am certain it's not the population mean. Because we don't know the population standard deviation, we would need to use the sample standard deviation as an estimate and default to the t-distribution to draw inferences about the population as a whole.
You're inferring that 2.5% of all actual selling prices equal or exceed the MSRP (CL = 95%). If this, in fact, were true, then one would have sufficient statistical evidence to reject the fact that the TVM is the population mean at both the 5% and 10% levels of significance. This of course, assumes three things (1) that the null hypothesis is the population mean = TVM; (2) the alternative hypothesis is population mean doesn't equal the TVM; and (3) a valid random sample produced a sample mean that equaled or exceeded the MSRP. I don't know how or where you're going to obtain valid data to draw that conclusion.
It's important to recognize that TVM's aren't always accurate. I'm not sure of edmunds methodology surrounding the computation of TVM's. I'd be surprised if it came from a valid statistical sample. It may very well originate from a non-scientific survey.
I couldn't find your spreadsheet and so I can't comment.
John
Medina, Ohio
Ah, I managed to find your spreadsheet. I took a real quick glance and didn't see it right away.
I think, conceptually, you've got a good idea. But, I hate to burst your bubble... your spreadsheet is seriously flawed.
FIRST- The standard devation is not found using the formula (MSRP - TVM)/2. That is an invalid formula as any statistician will tell you. Standard deviation is just not computed this way.
SECOND- If you're assuming that the TVM is the population mean; that's not true. The population mean is an unknown parameter as I had indicated in a previous post.
THIRD- If you're using the TVM as a point estimate for the population mean and (MSRP - TVM)/2 as the sample standard deviation and, hence, an estimate of the population standard deviation, then you should be using the TDIST (t-distribution) and not NORMDIST (the normal distribution) as the population standard deviation is an unknown parameter.
I think you need to get a good textbook on basic stats like McClave's or David Moore's book.
John
Medina, Ohio
Apparently, you're using the formula for the z-score:
z-score = (obs. value - pop. mean)/std. dev.
re-arranging...
std. dev. = (obs. value - pop. mean)/z-score
According to your spreadsheet:
std. dev. = (MSRP - TVM)/2
You're setting the z-score = 2 which FORCES the MSRP to ALWAYS be 2 standard deviations above the TVM. Is this universally true? Of course, not. Do you see the problem with this? Think about what happens if the manufacturer were to change the MSRP... is it still exactly 2 std. dev. above the TVM? Not necessarily and it's extremely unlikely.
Again, the TVM is not the population mean as you have erroneously assumed. You should be using TDIST instead of NORMDIST assuming, of course, that you have a valid statistical sample which you apparently don't. Nice try though.
John
All of your points are well taken. I think it is important to say that all of my figures are based on data that is not scientifically verified or validated. I've no idea where TMV comes from. Why did I choose it as a mean? (Doesn't matter if it is population or sample because all of this is notional anyway) I chose it because it was between invoice and MSRP. Not quite in the middle, but around there. I figured that if Edmunds was quoting a TMV price as what people should expect to pay, they consider it an average. Half pay more and half pay less. It could be the mode or median though. I settled on MSRP being two standard deviations away from the mean because I couldn't see more than 2% of people paying over MSRP for their car. Again, this is a total guess on my part. If you agree with me, you can use the model. If not, don't use it. Of course, this is not the "right" way to calculate standard deviation. I would need to know the data to do it right, but it is a cheap shortcut that gives ballpark predictions. I'd never publish it in a journal article, but I'll put it on Edmunds for fun.
Thanks for all your hard work, though!