Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
My cousin was a service manager at a Nissan dealership and they routinely sent Maxima owners away giving them some BS excuse not to perform the TSB. I can give you the link to the TSB info you need so that the dealer cannot give you the brush-off!
This affects all Max owners 89-04. (ex., 02-03: hesitation that causes loss of power or delayed accel)
1995 Maxima SE w/ 190 hp/ 205 ft lbs mated to a 5-speed manual was generally tested at 6.6-6.7 seconds 0-60. Why subsequent 4th generations (96-99) were tested slightly slower is beyond me. They added a little weight to the 3,001 lbs of the 1995 model year, but not significantly so.
2000/2001 Fifth generation Maxima's seemed slower to me. I test drove one just about every time I had my Maxima in for service and came away unimpressed. The 222 horsepower / 217 lb torque rating was through "tweaking" the same 3.0 liter engine as in the 1995. I was always suspect of the real power increase. The actual weight gain, however, could not be disputed. I believe the 2000/2001 was tested at around 7.0-7.2 0-60 for the 5-speed, considerably slower for the automatic.
The 2002/2003 SE 6-speed is quicker and faster than the 1995. Not significantly noticable from 0-60, as I believe it was tested at around 6.3. But I noticed that it continues to pull stronger at highway speeds, assuming you have it in the optimum gear. On the other hand, the 4-speed automatic version of the 2002/2003 absolutely did not feel as quick to me as my 1995 5-speed. Perhaps I'm just used to the quick start afforded by a manual transmission. Or perhaps the cars I tested had not been fully broken in. But there is no way I would trade the quickness and responsiveness of my 1995 5-speed for a 2003 automatic. Consider that my opinion, not a statement of fact.
One thing was clear to me in driving the 2003 Maxima 6-speed. Any more power is a waste of effort in a FWD platform. In spite of LSD, the car could not put it's power to the pavement effectively and the torque steer was unbearable. Again, perhaps I'm biased by my Honda S2000 that, with almost no torque, will significantly outaccelerate the Maxima. Same, however, for the less powerful, RWD, 330ci. Congrats to Nissan for taking FWD sedan performance about as far as anyone can with the 2003 Maxima 6-speed. If you want more, look to Infiniti, BMW or another RWD direction.
I have not posted lately and wanted to get some feedback.
I have a 2000 GXE (yes, one of the 5% ever made!) with 87,000 miles on it. I generally commute about 120 miles/ day on the highways of NH. Everything was going along fine when my "Check Engine Light" came on last week.
The problems:
-One of the spark plugs blew out (I thought that they were scheduled for a 105,000 mile change?)
-Faulty Ignition Coil (took care of this bizarre knocking/tinny sound that I have had for about 50k miles that no one could figure out)
-Replaced Timing Belt
I hope that the problems are solved. Anything else I should be on the lookout for? These are the first problems I have ever had and I was hoping to keep this car for another 50k (at least).
Tire discussions: I replaced my originals with Michelin MXV4 Plus'. They are GREAT in NH snow.
Gas Dicussions: I attempt to use the Sunoco Ultra94 to reduce the engine knocking as much as possible.
I had virtually no repairs (other than routine maintenance, tire replacement, etc.) for the first 7 years & 115,000 miles on my 1995 Maxima. In the 25k miles since then, I've had to replace the starter ($500+/-), water pump ($500 +/-), tempurature sensor ($150 +/-), and a couple of other minor items items. Overall, still very good for nearly 140k miles. Engine power is still great and I consistently get 28-30 mpg on the highway.
I would suggest that if you had knocking going on for 50k miles, you consider having the engine checked out by a mechanic. If it's O.K. another 50k miles for you shouldn't be a problem, especially given that you drive a lot of highway miles.
OK, now re: my brakes - had the TSB on the rotors done, no questions asked at around 21,500 miles. I asked what will happen when they warp again in another 8K or so? Service said they will replace before the warranty is up if that happens. Fine. That was around 2,000 miles ago. Now, I have a scraping , crunching kind of noise after the brakes are heated up and the brake petal is half way pressed. The sound coinsides with the wheel turning, like there is a high spot somewhere. It's weird and definatly not right. Service also told me on the initial brake "visit" that my rear pads were 70 to 80% used up while the fronts only 40% or so. I am going to let service know that they should give me new pads as this shows me that there is some problem with the rear brakes which should not wear faster than the fronts. Do you agree so far? One more thing - all 4 calipers have surface rust on them. Looks crappy. Is this common on these cars?
Going in for all this Friday. By the way, other than these brake issues and the TSB on the front end part a while back, the car has really been great. Thanks much for your input.
My SES indicator lit up on my vehicle approximately 6 months ago. The engine ran smoothly and I did not detect any difference in mileage or performance. Thinking that it was a loose gas cap or that it was due to heavy traffic conditions (prolong idling), I disconnected the battery for 2 minutes to turn SES light off.
It lit up again shortly thereafter and I reset the light again. However,I did notice that this time, the car was prone to stalling only when depressing clutch and letting up on the gas.
I knew that there was definitely a problem and brought it in to the dealer (SES light remained off). They put it on the OEM Diagnostic machine , however, no DTC codes were stored in the car's ECM control module. They performed a Idle Relearn Procedure and readjusted the idle a bit higher.
The light went on again 4 days after getting the car back from the dealer. This time they told me that a P0420 was stored on the ECU. Although this indicates a problem with the 3 Way Catalyst, they attributed the MIL indicator to a problem with the car's original ECM program. They updated the car with a new ECM program under Nissan TSB NTB00070 and sent me on my way. No other problems have been detected although it ghas been only one week.
I am aware that a TSB (NTB01059) is out for a Code P1320. This was released to correct faulty coils. This code was probally obtained on your car.
Vanbo: I have always noticed a fine surface rust on the rotors after a day or two, especially when the humidity is high. I don't think that this is harmful since this quickly wears aways after braking a few times. However, the roughness can be quite noticable until it wears away. I think that its really more susceptable on Maximas than on any other car that I have owned. Maybe it's caused by the quality of the steel used in the rotor?
Good luck on getting your brakes cvered under warranty. BTW. Is warranty up on time or miles?
can others confirm this on their maxima's?
So as long as the parts are castings, the surface rust does not matter.
PS... consider The Pat Metheny Group for real jazz.
I honestly don't have time to log into each and every forum I subscribe to in order to read the messages. Can someone help me out?
Thanks.
Regrarding the Neon, I'm sure it is impressive in it's own way. But I'm not sure I'd want to be accelerating a 215 hp FWD Neon around a curve. At least not without increasing my life insurance.
P.S. How's your wife's 350Z doing?
The grinding / crunching noise that was coming from the car when brake pedal depressed 1/2 way after a few miles was - are ya ready - wheel bearings. Yes, at 23,000 miles. These things can happen. Cost me only time of course. What bugs me is that service tells me that the reason my rear brakes are wearing faster than the fronts is that the rear pads are smaller,(shorter) than the fronts so they will wear more evenly. What a load of crap but I guess that's whatit is.
I’m shopping for a car and am considering 03 Altima vs. 03 Maxima vs. 04 Maxima.
I’m looking for a tolerably smooth and quiet ride (tho I realize that these were designed as sport sedans – I know to avoid the SE model o f altima) and good seat position. Also want good build quality. I have seen a number of complaints about the latter in the owner reviews of Altima.
Re the seat position, the telescopic steering on the 03 Alt and new Max is a real plus. But I just don’t know if the difference in these cars (power and price) would be worth it. I’m not a performance driver. I can get a pretty good position with an 8-way power seat.
Also, I heard that 03 Maxs were built in Japan and the other 2 are not.
Thanks for any advice!
There is not enough data available on the new 04 Max model to know how problematic the car may be. I would be cautious about buying the first year model built in the US until they have time to work out the bugs. Also, the price increase on the 04 model is substantial. To get one equipped like the 03 GLE, you would have to spend at least $ 32K.
Altima is a smaller, less plush vehicle than Max and carries a lower resale value. Its interior looks really cheap compared to a Maxima.
A well equipped 03 model with a V6 3.5 liter engine retails for almost as much as the 03 Max GLE. The resale value will be much less, however.
Second, you don't need to be exact if replacing all four tires. +/- 3% in total tire diameter is the generally-accepted threshold to maintain accurate speedo/odo readings and preserve correct functioning of other vehicle systems (traction control, ABS, etc). However if replacing just one tire, it is indeed quite important to match the diameter of the other three. It is for this reason that replacing all four tires together is recommended.
However, if your question is regarding replacing all 4, the answer is "it depends". The increased height (radius) of the tire is 11.25mm not 5mm. You get that by multiplying the 225 mm width by the 50% vs. 55% aspect ratio for height. Overall tire diameter is increased from 25.9 inches to about 26.8 inches or roughly 3.5%. That would mean your spedo and odo would be reading too low (i.e. 60 mph on the spedo is really more like 62 mph). You could partially offset this error by dropping to a 215/55 size tire.
The handling differences are probably more dependent upon the manufacturer, speed rating and tread design of the replacement tire than a 1/2 step change in aspect ratio from 50 to 55. For example, the OEM "W" rated 205/55 & 225/50 Bridgestone Pole Position tires on my Honda S2000 are rated considerably better handling than a lot of the 40/45 series "V" or "Z" rated tires. Usually, however, the higher the sidewall, the worse the handling in hard corners.
Hope this helps - also suggest you log on to Tirerack.com for lots of usefull info and prices.
Has anyone else had a similar experience?
In your case the solution is obviously to replace all of the tires on the car. If I were you I would demand they go with a different brand tires as well. You cannot go wrong with Michelin Pilots, for example.
I have read quite a few complaints about vibration problems with the new Maximas, most of them problably due to lousy tires. When one buys a new car, few people feel like spending $ 600 to replace all four tires. My 98 Maxima SE came with Toyo tires. They lasted almost 60K miles and I never had problems with them. They needed first rebalancing after about 25K miles due to natural wear. There is absolutely no reason why Nissan should use shoddy tires on their new vehicles. They already lost me as a repeat customer. You must ask yourself this question: if they do this with tires, what other car parts are of dubious quality as well?
By the way, I believe that Nissan should have installed four good quality tires on your car after the discovery of defective tires and they could have purchased these in any local tire store. You would be better off with Michelins anyway. Why would they let you wait two weeks? This is unbelievable.
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
The tires have been excellent so far, but the ride is very firm. Also, they wear rather quickly and you must rotate them frequently, about every 5K miles, or the front ones will wear out in half the time as the rear ones. I do not expect more than about 35K miles from mine, although Sears gave me 50K tread wear warranty on these.
Expect less mileage for a V rated tire, and nobody will give you any tread wear warranty on that one.
One other tire I can recommend is Toyo Proxess. I also like Michelin MXVs which are softer riding than Pilots.
Frankly, I believe anywhere near $1,000 for set of tires for a FWD Maxima (let alone with only 15" wheels) is a big waste of money. That's more than a set of top of the line "Y" rated S-03 Pole Position tires for my Honda S2000. That's also more than replacement tires for an M3 or 540i 6-speed.
I love my Maxima, but a sports car it is not. There are very good tires out there that will run $400-$500 or less including balance and mounting. Putting a set of $1,000 tires on a Maxima isn't going to turn it into something it isn't.
Potenza RE 92's which were OEM on my SE.
Critique: These are ultra high performance tires
which have proven to be excellent on wet roads
even at interstate speed limits (and slightly above) They have a treadwear rating of 400 (which
is great for this level of tire) and a heat rating
of AA. If you choose a tire of this nature, expect
tradeoffs. They do ride noticeably "harder" and they are "noisier" than I expected they would be.
I have not had them on the Max long enough to truly
assess how they are wearing. Would I buy this tire
again? Probably not! In spite of their pluses, they
are too noisey to suit me. I would more than likely
go back to a "V" rated tire or a high quality "H"
rated tire in lieu of these. Just my two cents....
berbel
Well, anyway, thanks s for the input. I have read that the ride is harsh with the Pilots which could be tough as the ride over bumps is already harsh - my Max is an SE. I've got just over 24K on the Potenzas now and, should make 30K. Never had a balance problem with them. Rotate and ballance every 6 - 7K. What I have read, (mostly on TireRack.com is that the Pilots do have a better wear rating than the Potenzas and I believe, the Goodyears as well. I'll have to see what my wallet tells me when the time comes. I know a grand is a lot for tires but the Pilots are really supposed to be a good and very safe tire in the wet as well as the aformentioned long wearing nature.
Thanks.
Each vehicle has it own specific design requirements so the correct answer to your question it to always follow the vehicle manufacturers requirements.
They are noisier than the RE92s in dry weather, but the grip in all weather conditions is significantly better than the Bridgestones. Strangely, they did seem to quiet down after a few hundred miles - maybe they need to warm up and get broken in?
I was very happily surprised at how well they did in the snow (I live in Northern Virginia). Whereas the RE92s were absolutely hopeless in snow or slush conditions (felt like I was driving on ice all the time), the Michelins gave me great confidence. Considering the winter we had, I'm even happier with my decision to sink the big bucks on them.
A good example of how large wheels/tires will increase turning diameter is my 95 Nissan SE V6 king cab 4x4 pickup. It came with huge 31 X 10.5-R15 tires (these are even bigger than P265 R75-15) from the factory. To provide sufficient clearance, they use wheel stops on the truck frame that prevent front wheels from turning beyond certain point. This truck has a turning diameter like a bus! It can be annoying sometimes, especially because when the wheel hubs contact the metal stops, there is a grinding metallic noise like someting is breaking apart. If I went with smaller tires, like P235 -75 R15, I could adjust the wheel stops for a much tighter turning diameter.
I'm interested in getting the wood grain covers for door arm rests, dash covers, etc. Any suggestions where I might find such at a reasonable price. Is this stuff recommended? What are some of your feelings about this stuff. My husband has it on his path, but it came that way, but he really likes it.
Nice to be back.
I've read a lot on maxima.org, etc., and the 2-3 posters I've seen who installed it all wished they hadn't. I have your car's twin (Grey Lustre 2003 SE), and I couldn't imagine ruining the black and titanium interior with plood. Ugh, no!
But, YMMV.
If I was starting from scratch, I'd install about half the pieces and leave the other half off. The ones I'd put on are the center console pieces and the door switch pieces; the ones I'd skip are the side vent covers, the pieces that are left and right of the steering column below the gauges, and the clock piece. I'd basically use the big pieces and skip the smaller ones.
Not sure where to source the kits though.
My parents just put in a wood dash kit in their 2000 SE several weeks ago. I would suggest getting a molded kit if you decide on getting one. They look much better IMHO but cost more. I think my Dad got it from autoanything.com By the way, I posted some pics of their new dash at http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/view_page.pl?page_id=339589
Sean