Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Fortunately for me, I knew nothing about the Aurora when I bought mine. Just stumbled across it when I was picking up a Silohoutte for my wife. Test drove it over a weekend and it just seemed like a natural fit. Two months later I got the dealer to accept my cash offer and I am just as thrilled driving it today as I was the day I brought it home.
I must say that $5,850 at 111K does NOT sound like a good deal, especially sight unseen. There is a 95 with 73k miles on the local dealers lot, super clean, listed at $7,900 (actual market price will probably be around $6,500 when it sells). So I'd agree with the others that a much better deal can be found and I strongly suggest you look very closely, in person, at any car you are considering. I live in the Northeast andin general, Aurora's don't sell quickly here. I am watching a 98 with 38k miles as it sits on a dealers lot for five months now, price gets better every month.
I'll also share my experience with the 2001/2002 model. Test drove an 02 with the 4.0 and although impressed, was still content when I got back in my 95. Rented a 2001 and 2002 on my last Florida trips, only the 3.5 is available as a rental. Both cars were fine in stop and go and in highway cruises at 75+ MPH. If the 3.5 sounded less stressed under acceleration I'd be content with one.
Both the 01 and 02 had the front wheel vibration I heard others mention at around 65MPH. My 95 is smooth as silk at any speed, and surprisingly gets almost the same average MPG as the 3.5.
The olds dealer said the 3.5 goes away entirely after 2002 because it does not meet new emmission standards for 2003; they say that is the reason the Intrigue goes out of production and the Aurora can only be had with the 4.0 after 2002.
Happy hunting, take your time, look closely, get the service history and a new gas card with a zero balance, and you just might experience the ROAR for real.
Both my '95 and '97 Aurora's have the autobahn package with the 3.71 rear end. Both speedometers read about 63-64 at 2000 rpm. Both get extremely good gas mileage, from 25-27 mpg consistently at highway speed limits or a little over. I have taken several long trips in both, over 4000 miles, and they are a dream to drive on long trips. The '95 has about 86k and the '97 has about 43k. Aurora's aren't to hard to find in Kansas.
There could be a lot of little reasons that would make one of the cars a bit more responsive though. Who knows.
I think when the '96 Taurus (the freaky one) debuted, it was .30. The 84-96 Corvette was .34 and the current Corvette is .29 (the lowest of any gasoline powered car when it debuted in 97). The Honda Insight is .25. The GM EV1 is .19. The current Aurora's is a decent, low Cd, but nothing incredible. The classic Aurora's might be lower, and was probably more remarkable compared to other vehicles in 1995.
I know what you mean about gearing. Short gearing can make for jackrabbit acceleration, but it ruins economy, is tough on an engine, and doesn't help when the speed picks up. Plus, it can make a car rather annoying to drive. The car will tend to shift an awful lot. The comparison isn't just between final-drive ratios though because transmission ratios matter too (although they tend to be somewhat similar between cars). However, a car with a 4.43 final-drive is probably way short on gearing. I doubt any transmission is tall enough to need that. If you remember the Buick Grand National in the 80's, that was a car that had crazy gearing too. It was faster in the 1/4 mile than a Corvette due mainly to it's 4.11 rear end compared to a Corvette's 2.73-3.02 rear. This was a big bragging point for Buick, but the Corvette was a much better sports car (the GN still had rear drums) and was much faster at higher speeds.
The K&N filters I mentioned for the classic are listed for the 95-97 Aurora. There doesn't appear to be a K&N for the 98-99.
flk57702, I know the 3.5 is based on the Northstar. Still, I think it is a shame to get rid of it. Especially given the persistence of the 3800. The 3800 is a nice engine, but it is a bit rough around the edges, especially compared to the 3.5. The 3800 seems too rough for cars like the Park Avenue and LeSabre and even the Regal.
I too have heard about GM's new V-6's. Certainly a 60 degree V-6 would be a better starting point than the 90 degree design of the 3.5 and 3800. However, the 3.5 already exists, and is quite refined. I just hate to see it fade so soon. Hopefully, though, the new V-6's will be more exciting. The I-6 in the Envoy/Bravada/TrailBlazer is pretty neat, and makes an impressive amount of power. Hopefully the V-6's will follow suit.
I haven't read the C&D article yet on the future caddies. I just glanced it over. They seemed to talk a lot about the 7.5 V12 and mentioned it will find its way into future caddies. I thought the 4.2 was.
With Olds gone, I'm looking to Cadillac to produce something along the Aurora theme for the next car. GM seems to have done a great job with the CTS handling. If this transfers over to the other new cars, and they are powered up by some great new northstar engines, then they are going to have some incredible cars. I just hope they don't look too knife-edge like.
http://www.teknett.com/pwp/drmayf/tbls.htm
Keep in mind that Cd in combination with frontal area is what determines the resistance to movement. A car with a higher Cd but much smaller frontal area might have less drag than a bigger sleeker car. Indy style cars have Cds in the range of .6-1.2 depending on how the wings are configured, but have very small frontal areas.
I believe the Cadillac XLR (to be produced in Bowling Green) will use a higher-output version of the 4.6L Northstar in a rear-drive configuration. I don't think the Northstar (name at least, as it has already been completely revised) will be going anywhere anytime soon.
Does anyone know a source for these bulbs? I think there was a post several months ago by someone who had replaced one of these bulbs. I have looked through the messages back to August without finding the reference I am looking for.
Fjk - thanks too. It's may be many years away before I consider a new "used" car. I'm really hoping for something exciting from Cadillac. The imports in this segment are too darn expensive and the styling on most is boring. I'm watching Lincoln too. The LS is great too. I hope Ford's troubles don't slow them from future improvement on the LS.
woodranch1- I replaced my headlights with the "cool blue" ones I found a Meijers. I notcied a slight improvement and I also noticed when my headlight shined on something the light would have a blue tint to it. I'm satisfied with them. I just wanted something so my friends could distinguish my headlights from others when driving around.
Hope that helps.
Sorry to hear about the car. I think I will tell my car what happened to your Aurora so that it can reach out to form the "Great Link" to help your car heal in a timely manner.
LET THE WORD GO OUT TO AURORAS EVERYWHERE "AURORA NEEDS ASSISTANCE!" Feel the connection.
(Hmm. Too many Star Trek references??)
I'm trading in a 1998 Trans Am, so I'm sure I'll miss some of the handling and performance, but it'll be _much_ nicer for my commute. And the savings in insurance is a whole car payment a year, so it works out.
Poor Oldsmobile, here I am a younger target demographic buying the car they so desperately were marketing to us younger folks, and they don't even get to see if they stay around.
Three questions for this board:
1. It already comes with GM Major Guard for 5year/60,000 miles. It seems to me it should be much cheaper to add on to that warranty to get extended time/milage than for a vehicle with a lesser warranty. What's the best place on the net to buy this type of Major Guard upgrade? Do I get a break for already having the longer warranty, or do I have to eat it?
2. What modifications are available for this car? Specifically I'd like to see an chip or the like to get more power out of the engine.
3. I'm planning on de-badging it, at least in the rear. What's the best way to go about it, a heat gun? How hot is too hot for the paint?
I test drove the DTS and the STS, and for my money, the Aurora was a better value. The other car in the comparison set was the Audi S4 Avanti, which while quite nice, and remarkably quick, didn't have the luxury car feel to it as much, and I can't really bring myself to buy a foreign car. My wife has a '01 Subaru LL Bean, and it's an almost ideal wagon, the back seats of the S4 were so much less comfortable.
Any other good boards for 2002 Aurora's? It seems I'll be missing "ls1.com" quite a bit.
Buy American!
For older badges, or to absolutely avoid any possibility of paint damage, try some waxed dental floss. Use it to slice through the backing, then after the badge is removed, use fingers followed by bug and tar remover to get all of the sticky stuff off the car.
Always follow up with your favorite wax or polish. paying extra attention to the badge area.
Since you are comming off a Trans Am, you might want to put the "4.0" badge on the drivers side up near the engine just for fun.
If you were hoping for a vast array of mods, you might be disappointed. There are certainly more manufacturers of after-market parts for your Firebird than you will find for your Aurora. Read through this board for some tips on air-box mods and possible exhaust mods. I would be hesitant of chip mods since the Aurora is a bit more complex than a pushrod LS-1, and also most modern cars are pretty well tuned. Car and Driver did a very complete testing of aftermarket chips a year or so ago, and they found the biggest improvements were in transmission mods because the firmer shifts can speed the car up. For the most part, engine programming just made the car drive worse (knock and vulnerability to hot days), with very little effect on performance. You might not want your luxo Aurora chirping the 1-2 upshift, though... or maybe you do...
Here are some resources to check out that have been posted before:
http://www.chrfab.com/index.htm
http://webhome.idirect.com/~rsm1/
http://www.caddyinfo.com/
http://www.corsaperf.com
http://www.knfilters.com/
You might find more info about mods to the caddy. Many of these will apply in some way as the Aurora V-8 is a Northstar with a narrower bore.
I want to get my car fixed as soon as possible and sell it. I have other prioritys I should have tended to (a house)before buying such a nice car. I need something that is reliable and will get me place to place. Then maybe I will consider an Aurora again. (yes, I would buy an aurora again if the price was right ;o) )However, ever since GM announced the boot for olds, the resale on my car isn't that great. I might be better off keeping it. /
Henry- Thanks for the aura for my aurora. )
Performance mods - Don't count on a chip. I've talked to superchips a bunch and it just isn't going to happen. I also agree with RJS that these thing are questionable - even superchips gave my some horror stories. In the future, someone may come up with some computer thing - who knows.
However, you can modify the air box and drop in a K&N filter. I've done this and dyno'd it and it works. Check out what I did on http://www.caddyinfo.com It will get you close to 260 HP.
I've been running a Granatelli mass air flow meter as well. It seem to work well. Call Granatelli motor sports and ask for JR. Mine had to be custom made because my 98 has the air flow meter attached directly to the throttle body. http://www.granatellimotorsports.com
In addition, I also recommend visiting the corsaperf.com site. I've talked to Jim Browning Jr. and they can do cat-back exhaust systems for the new Aurora I think without too much trouble. It is apparently almost the same as the STS. They did a new Aurora 4.0 for a dealership down the street from them. Ask for a reference. Call them. You will get a very slight rumble "exhaust note" when highway cruising though.
Let us know what you do. If you do all these, you could be up to perhaps 280 HP. Maybe more.
Here is a direct link if anybody is interested in the pictures.
http://www.angelfire.com/stars/mycaddy/auroraair.htm
How does it look compared to the stock 95??
I'm still very surprised they can turn around a factory order so fast.
One more question for the board, with the navigation radio-- does it have an auxilary input?
I hope you didn't have happen what happened to my mother-in-law. She purchased her pearl white '98 Aurora back in October of 2000, and noted an intermittent suspension noise in the front - kind of a popping sound, seemingly more prevalent when turning.
She took her car to her local dealer (not the one she purchased it from, 45 minutes away) multiple times, but, each time, they completely blew her off (it still sucks to be a woman talking to an auto mechanic). Just before her factory warranty was up, not only did they blow her off on this issue again, but they also blew her off on several small things I had found wrong on her car (loose/moisture in front marker lamps, loose rear quarter panels, squeak in dash, sagging headliner - claimed these were fine or "operates as designed").
So, we ended up taking the car to my dealer (an hour and 15 minutes from her house). It took a couple of tries for them to pinpoint the problem, and it turned out to be the suspension crossmember under the engine cradle. Evidently the previous owner of the car must have scraped or hit something very hard, bending/pushing this up, and causing it to actually contact with the engine exhaust sometimes when driving. Total cost to replace this was $860 (and no, she couldn't go back to the dealer of purchase, over a year later. Rather than make something up for her insurance company, she paid for it out of her own pocket).
I'd recommend getting this checked out at a reputable mechanic, and then filing an insurance claim, if necessary. Don't wait...
Otherwise, in general commentary, it's sad to see Zinc go, but it seems his Aurora was cursed. Not sure how much of the problems were due to design or manufacturing flaws (mother-in-law used to work at the Lake Orion plant where Auroras are built, and has many horror stories), and how much was due to the care/abuse it had from his previous owners. From his site, it also seems that some of the folks he had working on his car were less-than-competent, as well.
I feel fortunate that I've owned/driven regularly 8 GM cars in my life (and my wife 3 since we've been married), most being made in the last 10-15 years, and haven't owned a lemon. The biggest recurring problem/expense I've had is brakes on my '91 Grand Prix (caliper design flaw), but, other than that, they've been pretty much gas/oil/tires/brakes, with the occasional alternator, water pump, etc. I've never had a major engine, transmission, or HVAC failure. Maybe I'm lucky?
I'm sure picky about getting minor things fixed under warranty, and fussy about getting maintenance done on a regular basis. My Aurora had some minor issues (mostly trim) when I got it April 4, but, other than a water pump at 34k miles, I've just kept putting the miles on it (over 13,000 so far - many from road-tripping to Green Bay for Packer games this year :-).
Feeling fortunate,
--Robert
On all the rear-wheel-drive cars I have owned that didn't have posi-traction and had enough power, it was the passenger-side tire .
-replaced AC compressor-1999(warranty)
-replaced fuel pressure gauge-2001
-replaced EDG valve-2001
-replaced tires 2001(Yokohama Avid V4's...excellent on the Aurora BTW!)
-replaced water pump,radiator and transmission tanks???)2001
total repair $$ excluding tires=$1700
I have 80k on the car now and it seems to be running perfectly. Oh yeah, I get the old 'Service Engine Soon' light for no apparent reason every few weeks, but it goes away as soon as I fill up and drive a few miles.
Tuned it up at the 40k mark.
I look at other cars and drive my share of rentals...none match the ride or power of my Aurora(light Teal Metallic).In fact I got a brand new Sedan de Ville as a loaner from the dealer and it drove great, but honestly not as well as the Aurora and the gas mileage sucked in comparison to my Olds. I drive 36 miles everyday to and from work and this car is every bit a pleasure to drive as it was when we bought it in May of 98. Every accessory works perfectly and it has no leaks or squeaks. It DOES consume oil at a pretty good clip....1qt.every 1000 miles or so.
If I can eak out 100k without sinking any more into repairs I'll be a happy guy. I do like the 2001 but I get the gnawing feeling that I should not press my luck with a car that is as sophisticated and mechanically complex as the Aurora is.
If all is finally well, I WILL BE a happy camper.
Henri
Thanks for the photos. I have not modified mine yet as I want to keep my original original. I located a used one on the internet, but haven't been able to get it yet.
Hope you enjoy your new Aurora as much as I've enjoyed my '97.
I debadged mine two years ago, just after I bought it. I used hardesty's technique (except with fishing line instead of waxed dental floss), and it worked like a charm; waxed dental floss may be better -- I didn't think of it. After removing the six individual letters from the red rear deck applique between the tail lights and using bug and tar remover to take off the adhesive, I used plastic polish to finish the job. I also removed the hood emblem; there is a faint "shadow" of the emblem remaining after several waxings if you look at just the right angle. You shouldn't have that with a new car.
I went a step further and covered the chrome strips around the side windows with black-out tape. Now my black Aurora is truly monochrome (except for the trim around the back-up lamps, which I will take care of eventually). I have been de-chroming my cars since my second one, a 1962 Olds Dynamic 88. Sure is a lot easier these days.
Zaino users can tend to rave about their products, and this has led to some flame wars. If you want to find out more, check out their web site, or the "Zaino Car Polishes/Products" thread going on over in the Maintenance & Repair board. I'll say no more here.
Just a happy customer,
--Robert
It's a nice enough car, but we had previously rented an Intrigue and had about the same interior room and trunk space. I certainly prefer my own Alero for trips with 1 passenger - a bit more maneuverable, well-sprung and good power/weight ratio - and I can see an advantage to the Intrigue when there's multiple passengers, but I don't see any advantage to the Aurora.
Maybe I just don't "get" the luxury segment, because I'm evaluating the Aurora based on practical considerations only. As in, would you get CDN$10-14K more capability from an Aurora than an Intrigue? Of course, Volvo, Saab, Acura, Lexus, etc. would do worse in that comparison. You would only get a re-badged Camry or Accord, or a relatively narrow Saab, Volvo for the Cdn MSRP of an Aurora.
kemo - A leather conditioner with lanolin is the best. I've tried a lot of them and really like Car Brite's leather conditioner. Unfortunately, they seem to just sell to detail shops and you probably won't find them on the store shelves. Their address is 1910 South State Ave., Indianapolis, Indiana 46203. I don't know their number, but you could probably get it through information. I'm sure you could call and order some. This stuff is great. It seems to get into the leather (that shifter leather becomes soft again too). It also has this great new leather smell - like walking into a leather store. The new leather smell lingers for quite awhile too, so every time you get into the car it has this great smell.
seegrit - 1 qt/1,000 isn't too bad. As soon as I switched to Mobile 1 oil, the consumption went down a lot. M1 doesn't burn off the hot cylinder walls as much. Also, I notice almost no oil consumption for around town driving, but if I run it on the highway at a good speed, it will use some. From what I've read, the higher consumption at higher highway speeds is to be expected.
Hopefully extreme motor sports x-m-s.com will have the northstar cold air induction this spring like they said. Who knows, but if they do it, and it fits the Aurora, then it should be better than the modified box. I'd hope for at least a solid +10 peak HP at the wheels from it.
As far as brighter, more blue headlights, I wonder if a better (costlier) brand would work better. Also, I wonder how nice the current bulbs are in the car. If they are sufficiently nice, then an aftermarket bulb might not work as well (aftermarket "comparisons" are usually to crappy non-halogen bulbs.) PIAA's Super White bulbs are intriguing me. I am skeptical of many of the claims of brighter lights because I too have tried some of the cheaper ones on other cars and they haven't done much at all.
Some bulbs that burn brighter use more wattage and can burn out the headlight wires and cause other electrical problems. PIAA bulbs claim to be brighter without using any extra wattage. I wonder if they are actually brighter, but I would try to stick with bulbs that use similar to the stock wattage. Also, the bulbs with higher color temperatures (more white) get that from a coating on the bulb. This blocks some of the light output. The brightness is rated without the coatings. Just something to keep in mind.
I really like the projector beam headlights on the 01-02s. The beam pattern is so well-defined.
kemo-444 I also suggest you use the Meguilars products for cars. I use the Leather cleaner/conditioner and the top of the line wax for the exterior. It is in a triangle looking box.
My wife was involved in a car accident in which a lady backed up and scraped her rear black bumper along the back driver's side quarter panel as she was parked at the grocery store.
I had just put on the Meguilar's wax the previous week and the other cars's black mark off the bumper down the side of my NEW Aurora just wiped off with windex.
NO DAMAGE TO THE CAR !!!!! I feel like the polymer in the wax helped as a shield. It also helped that the rear lower fender panel on the Aurora was of a pliable form.
So, here's what I have come up with. Buy a second LCM (lamp control module) and drill small holes in the very outside of the light fixtures (there's a space there) and put small incandescant lights of some sort in there. Hook them up to the existing LCM. Then, install the new LCM somewhere where it will fit (probably behind the console) and only provide it with inputs to the headlight switch and sunload sensor. Then run a pair of headlight wires to the HID lights. This way, the little lights will get flashed and be used as DRLs and the HID lights will only get used for true headlight situations.
Since the HIDs have warmup time and ballast wear, you don't want to be using them for flashing and DRL, just at night.
I haven't done this yet, but have the wiring all figured out so it will hopefully just be a one day mod.
I'm not sure that one is easy to find either. The shop said you can't find it in stores very easily. I'm not sure about that one.
These guys recommend conditioning the seats with every oil change and getting started by applying it once, again the next day, and again in a week and then follow a once per quarter routine as a minimum. I've tried conditioning it a bunch on the drivers side and it seems to make a difference. You can't over-do the leather seats.
I like that the Meguiars hardly even needs to be wiped off. Plus, it has some gentle cleaners in it already, so I don't need to make two applications.
yeah, that might sound like a lot, but I think the drivers seat is key. The upholstery place said that seats not used much will probably look fine without much conditioning. I'm always doing the drivers seat.
I dropped off the 98 for some basic maintenance at the dealer and went and sat in a new 2002 Aurora. The leather was considerably softer than my 98. I don't know if my seats were that good when it was new or the leather has been upgraded somehow. The leather on our new Impala isn't nearly as nice as my 98 and compared to the new Aurora it is a huge difference. I don't expect the Chevy to be on par with the Aurora, but the difference is surprising.
Has anyone tried their Medallion leather care? Actually, their vinyl protectant has a less than inviting smell. I like the way it goes on and isn't shiny or greasy, but it doesn't smell great (plus it is covering up my new car smell!) I love the way their endurance tire dressing smells (not the high-gloss). It smells like grape gum, and their Gold Class Wax smells awesome. I'm disappointed by the smell of their vinyl protectant...
Anyone know if the insert on the door panels of the 2001-02s is real leather? The more I study it, the more I am convinced it is leatherette (or whatever they call it), but I can't be positive.