Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
This discussion was sent over from another SUV discussion - sorry to drop in like this.
Paul P
The only fix I can think of is what they're doing to the ones that break now - installing remanufactured engines - the ones that failed and were rebuilt.
TSB#03-08-52-002 - (03/27/2003)
Remote Keyless Entry Inoperative (Reprogram Liftgate Module)
2002-2003 Chevrolet TrailBlazer, TrailBlazer EXT
2002-2003 GMC Envoy, Envoy XL
2002-2003 Oldsmobile Bravada
Condition
Some customers may comment that the Remote Keyless Entry (RKE) is inoperative at times.
Cause
An anomaly has been identified with the software in the Liftgate Module (RKE functions). The Liftgate Module software is affected when the temperature is approximately 40°C (104°F).
Correction
Using normal SPS reprogramming procedures, reprogram the LGM Liftgate module. The information was released on TIS version 2.75 or newer broadcast in March 2003.
Going back to when the engine quit, I remember the night before it quit, I started the TB and got on the expressway after a few minutes and had to floor it hard to get out of the way of a semi. The engine was still cold when this happened. The next day is when it quit. I don't know if this had anything to do with the failure. The new engine with about 15 k miles has been faultless so far.
Frank
My TB has never seen temps this high and I had the problem during the winter.
Very intermittent and only a slight annoyance
The "fresh of the assembly line" seems to be the line most service advisors give out, with any manufacturer's dealership, not just GM. I know, I was a service advisor/service manager and my guys would use that line, until I stopped them.
I called OnStar when it came on. They could not find anything. They said if light stays on for a day or two, then take to dealer to be checked. Mine corrected it self. Seems most correct themselves like that.
Mike
So far my experience has been that they are a hindrance. They write down about every 5th word you say onto the work order, then dumb-down the explanation of the repair when they call you.
Should I write up a description of the truck's issue and leave it in the vehicle for the mechanic to read? Can I bribe them with donuts?
We're calling the Service Manager this morning to talk about bringing in our '03 Envoy for the 6th time.. they replaced the spark plugs 2 days ago (supposedly got a 'low resistance value' code), but the stutter at idle remains. Hopefully we can convince him to have a mechanic drive the truck with us in it. I think if a mechanic actually gets to experience the stutter he may have some clues.
For over 10 years we've taken our cars to a local Goodyear dealer for non-warranty work. They are excellent - the dealership could learn a thing or two by studying how Goodyear does it. The Manager knows what he's talking about, spends time to drive the vehicle himself to experience the complaint, doesn't charge for "diagnostic" and "no problem found" issues.
I'm a former service manager/advisor - the LAST thing I want is my techs having to talk to customers. That sounds harsh, but the first consideration is time - customers who can't be "brief" take valuable time away from the technician's mission - to support his family by repairing vehicles. If he's talking to you for an hour, you just cost him $20-40 out of his own pocket, plus costing the dealership $80-150.
I've had real issues with tech/customer conversations because technicians seem to "tell it like it is", not sugar-coat things and most customers simply can't handle the truth. In this world of political correctness, most people want things candy-coated and all nicey-nicey, and technicians aren't generally people who have a regard for holding someone's hands during a car repair. The say what they need, get things done, and it's on to the next one - that's their job.
I refuse to allow customers in my shop for that very reason, and have had several techs who would completely stop working if someone bothered them with a gillion questions. That is NOT what they are there for - they are there to repair your vehicle, and the more of their time you take, the longer it takes to fix your car and backs the line of cars up that much farther.
And by the way, no offense to the fine folks at Goodyear, Firestone, Pep Boys, Jiffy Lube, etc, but if these guys were really certified and licensed to work as a technician, they'd be at a dealership, since the pay is generally 20-25% higher. You have to ask yourself why they're at Pep Boys instead of Jones Chevrolet. On many occasions, it's 3 DWIs, 14 tickets, on the non-ability to become ASE certified....
>people want things candy-coated and all nicey-
>nicey, and technicians aren't generally people
>who have a regard for holding someone's hands
>during a car repair.
That practice may be fine for 95% of the service calls. But we've had this truck in FIVE times for this problem and the SA keeps writing up a 5-word description of the problem.
We're trying to work WITH the dealer to get this problem resolved - I understand how frustrating intermittant problems can be to fix. But if they don't even bother to get a good description of the problem then how can they fix it?
If a doctor's office was run like this you would never get to talk to the doctor. You'd have to state your symptoms to the nurse and she'd relay 1/2 of them to the doctor.. then she'd call you back with a diagnosis.
If I was a mechanic I'd want as much accurate information as possible about the problem.
>And by the way, no offense to the fine folks at
>Goodyear, Firestone, Pep Boys, Jiffy Lube, etc,
>but if these guys were really certified and
>licensed to work as a technician
The Goodyear we go to has ASE technicians. And if we ask to speak with one, the manager calls him in and we all discuss the issue. 5 minutes doesn't cut into his "billable hours".
"I'll ask you to set aside the problems you're having with your vehicle and look at your point from the service manager's perspective."
I understand your frsutration. I have a PT Cruiser GT that's been towed 3 times for stalling on the freeway and has 6 total visits with "check engine" light activations.
The service manager has worked with me on it, and talking to a technician won't help - it's a software problem and the guy is only able to work with what the engineers send him.
This isn't supposed to happen to me - I'm a lemon law investigator - I'm supposed to sit back and evaluate other people's car issues.
I filed lemon law last week.
Apparently, inane comments like that and others ARE included in the marks against a brand. Go figure.
It's not the tech's job to make you feel any specific way or talk to you at all - he's there to fix your car. Leave him alone and let him do his job. His job DOES NOT entail "grief counseling".
The next thing we know, each tech will have to set aside two hours a day to take folks to Starbucks, have a cappucino, and group hug and share their feelings over how having their car worked on "makes them feel". Give me a break already.
I always gave my folks the choice to hear the story in a technical version or layman's terms, out of respect, told them what was going on and what we'd do to repair it.
Most of the vehicles I see, in gerenal (all cases) are below 25-30K.
I have not had this problem again but I am vigilant about double-checking my gas cap after every fill-up. I have not had the problem with it being difficult to put back on again either!
"And by the way, no offense to the fine folks at Goodyear, Firestone, Pep Boys, Jiffy Lube, etc, but if these guys were really certified and licensed to work as a technician, they'd be at a dealership, since the pay is generally 20-25% higher. You have to ask yourself why they're at Pep Boys instead of Jones Chevrolet. On many occasions, it's 3 DWIs, 14 tickets, on the non-ability to become ASE certified...."
I have several friends that are mechanics at two small shops. They would laugh at your generalizations. They work where they do by choice. They don't have any DUI's and are all certified. Dealers are just interested in throughput (read "sweatshop").
As for lack of ability to get ASE certified? It ain't like passing the bar. Getting ASE certified is cake and only requires a baseline understanding of how a vehicle works.
I've been in the car business for many years, and either your buddies are misinformed about dealer pay and production requirements, you have a few bad dealerships in your area, or they truly aren't qualified to work there.
What technician, with proper certfifications, wouldn't want to make 20-30% more, working possible less hours? I had two techs breaking $75K a year - not foreman, either - I'll bet your local Goodyear wrenchturner can't say that - maybe 1/3 of that....
You draw your opinions from 2 guys, I draw mine from hundreds of technicians that I've supervised, as well as industry publications that you, and probably they, don't even know exist.
Sorry to be so abrubt, but it's a known fact that 90% of the techs in private shops either have washed out of a dealership, aren't qualified to work at a dealership, or have driver's license problems that keep dealerships from being able to insure them.
If you doubt this, go ask the service writer at your local Pep Boys - he's probably like the two guys at my local Pep Boys - they got fired from dealerships for being rude to customers and being generally incompetent.
Pep Boys was the only place that would hire them, because their standards are lower and the job isn't so "technical".
Here's a sample question:
18. A cylinder bore measures 3.067" below ring travel at the bottom and 3.077" below the ridge at the top. The standard factory bore is 3.065". What would be the proper repair?
a) Deglaze the cylinder walls and install the old pistons with new cast iron rings.
b) Bore and hone the cylinder to 3.097" and install 0.030 oversized pistons with new rings.
c) Bore and hone the cylinder to 3.075" and install knurled pistons with new rings.
d) Bore and hone the cylinders to 3.095" and install 0.030" oversized pistons with new rings.
Scott - can't answer it, can you? Piece of cake, huh? And that's on the basic engine repair test.
Now, there are only 300 more questions, that detailed, concerning every other part of the vehicle.
http://www.careauto.org/nuts_bolts/archive/july_96/nuts_bolts_jun- e_96.html
It takes honest to goodness diagnosis - a skill many "parts installers" don't have, and that's in dealerships and chain stores/private shops.
I could seriously come up with a few, although none are directly related to the GM SUV triplets.
Pep Boys and others have a permanent relationship with ASE, and even at a given time where none of their techs were certified, they could still fly the sign.
I've had guys who were ASE Master Techs who were such pains that no one could work with them, so I blew them out. I've also had guys who were incredible techs, but had drinking problems or license problems - either way, a dealership can't risk the liability - I guess Pep Boys can.
I guy a few posts back said that getting an ASE cert is cake and all you have to have is basic automotive knowledge. That's bunk.
I've worked on cars since I was 6 (with my big brothers), have raced cars, been a pit crew chief, I'm an automotive expert for a lawfirm and I've testified in nearly 100 trials and arbs, and I just finished an automotive engineering degree - I test well, but I'm brushing up on the books before testing tomorrow night.
I ain't easy at all.
You got that right! :^)
Allright, I suppose it's not cake, but I got your sample question right, didn't I? I'm sure I would have heard about it by now if I was wrong.
Still, I view ASE certification as a marketing tool for shops and refuse to be overly impressed by it. You can get plenty of bad mechanics to pass it.
I've got a fried of a friend who works on my Chevelle who claims he used to be ASE certified. He's allright but has sure messed up a lot of things. Judging by the fact that he passed it, I could only assume it was cake. It's good logic, trust me.
In my industry I've met plenty of incompetent people who carry Microsoft certifications, etc. so I've come to not value pieces of paper too much. I'm not saying certifications are worthless, they just don't tell the whole story.