Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Later!
Tom
No, they should lower the compression ratio and use more boost.
On the Mazda 6: A british publication called it's interior "VW like".
--Dale
By the way, the 5 valve per cylinder thing really doesn't give you any real benefit over a 4 valve design despite what VW's marketing guys will tell you. One of the major motorsports (F1 maybe?) tried that and went back to 4 valve designs if I remember correctly.
Not to take anything away from the 1.8t. That's one sweet engine. But it's sweet because of the Turbo, not the valve design.
a. increases reliability for those that use the car for daily commuting.
b. more head room means more space for the tuners to maximize untapped potential.
Actually, I can see the reviews already - "The only criticism we had of the MP3 was with its lack of power. Mazda has taken care of that with the new Mazdaspeed Pro. Well, sort of. It seems like Mazda should be getting more power given the addition of a turbo, particularly when the premium paid for the MS3 over the MP3 puts it in the same price range as X,Y,Z, any one of which will out hustle down the drag strip ..."
Whatever. We shall see. FWIW, I prefer handling to power, if and only if the price is commensurate with the levels of each (a personal preference and accounting, of course). Ideally you'd get both, but that generally gets too expensive for my budget.
The 1.8T VW is $22K or so, and it comes with 180 or 200hp (dyno says close to 200, but they say 180). Make the Mazda at least have that much.
2) 200hp minimum. I'm OK with a bump to 2.2L if thats what it takes to get it to drink pump gas and be fairly reliable.
3) Absolutely must come in a wagon (P5) form.
4) Aboslutely must have leather as an option. I have a dog that likes to swim. Cloth seats and wet dog just dont mix well.
5) 5spd is fine but 6spd would also be nice.
Other options I would pay even more for:
1) HID lamps
2) Tractions control (with defeat switch)
3) Getting the spoiler removed.
4) Real fog lights.
If it sounds like a BMW 330Xi on the discount rack....it is. Thats what I want. Subaru is close but the WRX is really ugly to my eyes.
Actually, to me, more significant is the fact that the VW makes about 175 lb-ft of torque at around 2000 rpm, while the MS3 makes 155 lb-ft at around 4500 rpm. The torque curve on the VW engine is flat, and comes on relatively quickly.
LX-vs-ES: I don't think here in Canada they are different. My ES handles well and while bumpy it's a blast to drive. Went ZOOM-ZOOMing today since it was warm.
Dinu
http://www.michigandaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2002/03/29/3ca4019fad1fc
Lol! A VW owner talking quality.
http://www.womanmotorist.com/index-audio.shtml
It all adds up. Hopfully to not much more than 21K. I agree that a stripper version (similar to the Nissan SE-R, not V-SPEC) for a couple thousand less would be a great idea. Mazda is also at the end of the 3rd gen product cycle with the Protege. It's going into it's 5th year. Rather than waste alot of R&D for a new variant that will only be around for a year or 2, it would probably be more benificial for them to spend that money developing the new generation 2.3L I4 engine and chassis instead.
How I learned to drive stick...you know...I don't really remember. I was in Germany, and bought a little British two-door sedan from an American school teacher returning to the states. My buddies helped me learn to drive it but I can't remember the details. They were sports car buffs and all up on MG-TDs and TFs of the day.
I wanted a VW Beetle, but even in Germany the wait was 6 months to a year in 1954. They cost, get this, the export model -- $1,750! Thousands of American servicemen were on the waiting list.
We were forbidden buying the domestic VW because they didn't have American car safety features: they had plain glass windows -- not safety glass; they had mechanical brakes; and the fuel tank was under the dash without a steel "firewall" to protect the occupants in a crash. The export model was an entirely different car.
But I did drive stick and when I came home I went back to AT's, finally bought a Beetle in 1960, and then during the Oil Embargo of 1973-74, when I bought an Audi Fox...and drove stickshift until 1992. Sometimes I had two cars -- one AT and one 5-speed.
fowler3
.....and this was THE QUITEST ride that I ever had in my Pro ES.........as quite as my bro's 6 yr old plush Infiniti Q45.......
The BFGoodrich Touring T/A Vr4 tires are simply the quitest tires out there for the PRO.....no wonder they are named "Touring" tires....... absolutely the best for touring.......
my wife was initially cribbing when I changed tires.....unnecessary expense...et al...... and now she was the one who kept on praising my decision throught the trip...... these tires made my day....
Absolutely the most minimal of Noise, Vibration and Harshness with the definite crisp absorbption of road bumps as expected of a PRO ES.
Corolla: "Toyota Corolla Sport Edition" <Oxymoron
Sentra: More hp, but it has been recalled lately. Handling is probably similar, I don't know. Ugly rear end, spoiler or no spoiler.
Civic: I can't justify paying for a car as reliable as the PRO, ridiculous interest fees (in Canada) and a wrong general attitude from their dealers.
Elantra: Has anyone sat in those cardboard seats lately? CHEAP plastic dash, questionnable styling and lack of fun to drive factor to me.
Focus: The Ford Recallmobile you mean? I just can't buy a Ford (or Chrysler or GM or Daewoo or Kia for that matter).
Neon: What a BIG joke! Sure yiu have the cab-forward design, but you don't have the mechanics that won;t leave you stranded. Opti-space is pretty good too.
Dinu
Protege-related things though:
The Protege was liked by everyone, even one of my friends that has a farm and always drives pick-up trucks. The interior room is great: had 2 6'1" guys in there sit w/out banging their heads on the rear glass. Could be larger, but for a small car, impressive.
The 2.0 auto pulled harder with all that weight in the car. First time I had 4 people in the PRO and you could feel the engine wasn't off-th-line as usually. On the way back home it was just me and my cousin, so ZOOM-ZOOM we did
Dinu
Verdict: next!
Dinu
"there could be no protege owner who deliberately drives the longer route home "...zoom zoom joy
BFGoodrich Touring T/A VR4 tires: I did not get a change to test them in the snow but they have been rated as M+S
per their own rating system, BFG has rated touring tires as:
Wet : 7
Quiet ride: 10
Handling: 5
winter traction: 8
but handling is obviuosly better for the V rated as compared to their S,T & H rated Touring tires.
BTW, I made another 2 hour trip to Hershey Chocolate world today along the scenic route 322.
Once again, AMAZING is the only word that comes to mind. Usually I need to keep the stereo at 3 black bands to down the noise, which in sort makes sure that me, my wife and kid CANNOT have a healthy dicussion while touring. NOT THIS TIME. No stereo. We had a great time talking with each other and discussing so many things..... wow...thanks BFG .....for the quiet & quality time that I got "EXCLUSIVE" to be with my family.... with no disturbance.....
As far as cars in the Pro's price range that made me feel inadequate ... no other car made ME feel inadequate but they did give me serious concern over my decision making ability. While I loved the Protege and hope it goes to a good home I am totally and completely in love with my SI. I could drive the Protege and recognize it as a nice car but I would also be the first to point out some of it's flaws. Not so with the SI. I dare you to talk about my car I will keep this car until it starts giving me more problems than it's worth fixing.
I am in Florida visiting family and we went to our favorite place and got the windows tinted on the SI. It looks great. And since it was only $135 vs. $350 in GA I saved a few dollars too. The SI does rev kinda high but it's smooth as glass and I still got 30MPG with the AC on and running 80-90MPH.
"":#10761 of 10763 dinu by chikoo Mar 30, 2002 (04:34 pm)
u said the magic words:"there could be no protege owner who deliberately drives the longer route home "..."" That doesn't make sense. That means no protege owner likes driving. I think you meant the other wasy around. Anyways, it's all good. We're all enjoying our cars.
Here's what I really said about 60 posts back:
"Many folks around here can confirm, they end up taking the long way home when they're in their PROs. I guess that says something about it"
Dinu
Now we all know the PRO loses more value than a Civic, but:
1. You pay LESS for it when new (MSRP+INTEREST)
As you'll often see me complain, interest rates on Hondas in Canada are ridiculous.
2. You knew that when you bought it, so....?
Bottom Line: If you bought your PRO to trade it in after 2-3 years, you made a HUGE mistake. Actually with any new car, you gotta own it for at least 5 yrs so when you sell it you don't loose money. The longer you keep it, the better.
Of course some people want to have a new car every 3 years. That's why you can lease it, not buy it and deduct it with your taxes. Speaking of which, I gotta get mine done. Need that extra $ for the NX.
Dinu
Dinu
PS: Please don't sue me for copyright infringement.
Remember supply and demand -- that old law still works its tricks on us. I've never agreed with it entirely, but everyone else does.
A car that suits you perfectly, is the one you bought, I hope, regardless of what the competition had to offer. The longer you keep it the better off you will be.
What really surprises me on here is the number of people buying used cars with over 100,000 miles on them. I had always been told to NEVER by a used car with more than 40,000 miles on it, and closer to 30K miles if possible. The only thing that looks used on it should be the ODO reading.
Times change. Cars get better, last longer. Fourty years ago I know people who bought used cars with high mileage, but they paid only $700 for them and drove them until they broke down, then looked for another *clunker*. Little risk, little $$ lost, small insurance payments, practically no taxes. But there are NO $700 cars anymore.
When I sold my '98 Odyssey I was looking for an older Honda Civic and the average prices were $14,500! I just would NOT pay that for somebody's cast-off. So, I bought the Protegé LX at not much more and had a warrenty and lower payments. Even the Pro DX would have been a better deal, IMHO.
fowler3
Not nice to slam a car you have not seen or driven. Really, $10,000 in deprecation in one year? Again, Paul, I would like to be validated as a used car pricing expert. How & where did you get your validation?
-love train
Love And God Bless,
Trudy, L J & Larry
The Protege was a very nice car if you HAVE to have a new car. I don't. I have a basic knowledge of what to look for in a car and have never regretted any of my purchases. In the last 5 days since I bought it I've changed the oil to syntec, changed the timing belt, and aligned it. Drives like a dream.
The Pro's engine kept it in the driveway when I wanted to go somewhere even though it handled great. There is just too much vibration and it generally sounds strained at high rpm. There's only two of us and we live in the 'burbs, so I don't worry about how my Civic may react to being loaded with 4 people in traffic. The Pro handles great but wouldn't most cars handle great if you stiffen the suspension and put 16" 50series tires on them. We'll see when I put 15" 50series tires on the "silver" car how it compares to the Pro cause Zoom Zoom's Si does a pretty fair mimic on 15" 55 series tires.
I got it wrong...thanks for the correction
Vocus....sorry but I did not realize that...i always kind of thought u were in D.C....i guess that is where u work
Uh, no. It's not that simple. Pontiac Bonnevilles have a stiffer suspension and 16 inch tires. Are they handling beasts? Here's a quote from the new Motor Trend on the P5
"(it has) an extremely well-engineered suspension package that runs with the best of them yet doesn't beat it's occupants to a frothy foam"
Here's another quote regarding the 135 lbs-ft of torque:
"Because of this around-town-rpm earnestness, we'd hardly say the Protege 5 is slow--it's merely horsepower challanged. Still, it doesn't embarrass itself at the test track, returning a decent 8.82-sec sprint to 60 and clips the slalom cones at a pace (66.4 mph) that would challenge most sports cars"
See? I TOLD YOU that a real auto mag could get a quicker 0-60 time. Hmmm, if the wagon is 8.82 seconds, the sedan must be a little quicker right?
And about depreciation, everyone is going to get skinned trading in vehicles with dealers, regardless of the brand. I had an A4 for nine months and had to sell it to get into our house. Bought it for 25,500. Best offer from a dealer was $20K. Sold it in one day for 23K, leading me to believe I could have gotten more.
As for the 8.82 seconds for the P5 ... 8.8. 9.0 What's the difference? The 96 "silver" car is in the low 8's with 3 less HP and 20lb-ft torque less. And we won't even go into the difference between the engines when you are on the highway. And I really won't compare the Protege performance with that of my SI cause that wouldn't be fair.
I do know where someone can find a nice used Protege for $12,998 if you want one I regret that I wasn't able to keep it longer. It was a good car and I liked driving it. It was also pretty to look at.
Protegenic: Are you sure that the reason that you aren't able to hear me is all of the creaks and rattles the Protege makes when it's cold?
Yes, I will admit the Civic is a revver. But at least it's smooth and it's even pretty quiet considering it revs at 4400 at 80.
I think if you want to trade cars every few years then you should buy used cars. I've learned my lesson.
About the 0-60 time. I only brought that up because you said the new Civic EX is faster and quoted some third world auto publication as the source of the Protege's 0-60 time. Also, the Sedan should be quicker than the P5 which makes the alleged performance gap between the EX Civic and Protege even narrower and irrelevant considering the class of cars.
A Bonneville. How absurd. I thought it was a given that we were talking small economy cars. I mean for that matter the new 745i probably does worse in the slolam than the Pro on 18's. There's nothing that can be done about that. It's an enterely different class of car.
I really don't bother with 0-60 because I don't like to beat up on my cars like that. And that's only 8 seconds... What happens after that?
How about when you're in the Protege on the highway doing 80 and someone is riding your tail?Or if you want to follow the "train" of cars doing a hundred on the interstate. It's much more important to me what happens between 3500 rpm and redline. Above the 3500 threshold the Pro started sounding and feeling strained. That's why the Pro stayed in the driveway and why we'd take the "green car" on trips. The engine liked 80mph+ speeds much more than the Pro.
As far as engineers and puking??? What about a 2.0 liter engine only putting out 130hp??? Or a Turbo 2.0 with only 170hp??? The VW or even Toyota engineers would kick the Mazda engineers out of the union for the Turbo. The 1990 Celica all trac had 200 hp out of 2.0 liters. 4 wheel drive, awesome seats, killer stereo, VERY nice car.
Variable valve timing is more reliable, more efficient, cleaner running, and less expensive over the long haul than a Turbo. The technology is proven. But then again the 2.0 still has iron block aluminum head construction. Talk about technology that should go the way of the Model T.
By the way the Model T didn't have independent suspension. BUT you might be able to take a 1987 Protege and run much quicker times if you did the same to it. It DID have the RX7 rear suspension in it. Twin Trapeziodal something....
Now as far as performance numbers, anything with about .5 sec difference for economy cars is really not a big differance at all. For example I've seen numbers from 10.1 sec all the way down to 8.5 sec for 0-60 times for a 1.8L 5spd Protege. There are just to many factors involved. I would say that a comparison test is probably the best from one magazine since all the cars are probably tested in the same day under the same conditions. But as we have stated before, 0-60 numbers are not everything. Track times are even better. There is an article in Grass Roots Motorsports on some of the new high performance compact cars. MP3 was the slowest of the bunch 0-60 and had the least horspower on the dyno but on an autocross course, it beat out alot of the cars including the new Civic Si.
I don't think if you put stiffer springs on a Corolla and slapped on some 16" tires it would handle better. Mazda's have always been better handling cars than most cars in their class. It's not something that's new.
I'm not here to slam the Civic (I owned one and appreciate those cars a lot). I just wanna let you die-hard Civic fans know that the PRO is:
1. better in the city (torque...yeah!)
2. still pulls very well up to 100mph
3 after that it's ALL CIVIC territory as the PRO's engine buzzes too much
The verdict? To everyone his own. But don't slam the PRO just b/c you're Civic-obsessed.
So ZZ79, what engine did you have on the PRO? 5MT or 4EAT? What year was it?
Dinu