Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Well, I ran across a Jetta and Golf TDI while roaming a bunch of dealerships today. Unfortunately, because of California's new emissions laws that just went into effect, no passenger car manufacturer will be selling diesels here anymore for the time being. The diesel technology exists to easily pass the emissions requirements, but the diesel fuel sold in the U.S. contains way too much sulfer and won't run in the new engines. Thanks for the suggestion.
Oh. I meant it is too small overall. The front seats are fine, in fact roomy. But, the overall feeling is cramped and I am spoiled by the extra room of a midsize, especially while creeping in traffic 3-4 hours per day. Plus, my runs to Home Depot and coming home with a couple of 2x4s just won't work well with a Mini. In the 6, fold down the rear seats and the 2x4 slides right in, no problem.
I have actually decided on a car. A Camry Solara SLE V6. It gets the same highway mileage as the 6i, despite its 225 hp, 240 ft-lbs, 3,450 lb weight, and 0-60 in 6.9 seconds. For gas mileage, I can't do much worse than my 6i, which is averaging just less than 20mpg. Plus, the Solara is amazing comfortable, eerily quiet, and Lexus-like smooth. It has options you just can't get in the 6 (like navigation, stability control, tire pressure monitoring, etc.) and it is even rarer to see one on the road than the 6. Price-wise, I was really surprised. They start at $19,635 and includes more equipment than the base 6. Loaded, it comes in around $27k with a whole lot more equipment and power than the 6. Sure, it doesn't handle as well (but not bad), but I just want isolated comfort while sitting in daily gridlock. I still have the Protege5 for fun.
The Mazda3 has the same design. In all fairness, I've done the oil change on my 6i two times and it's not that hard, it just takes longer.
They do? That's about the dumbest thing I've ever heard, on Mazda's part. Why would Mazda use two completely different filter styles for the same engine? It would make sense if there were clearance problems with a spin on, but there's more engine bay room on the 6i than the 3s. For the most part, Mazda's 4 cyl oil filters were the same and the 6 cyl oil filters were the same with Mazda engines. The little filter was for the 4, the longer one was for the 6. Simple. Not anymore I guess. Now I'm really curious about the reason for the internal filter on the 6i, and the spin on for the 3s.
I barely drive it because I carpool with 2 other people and we take turns driving each week. So, I only drive to work one out of every 3 weeks and I only live 7 miles from work. If I go out on the weekends, I usually get a ride or take a cab. The miles that I put on my car are mostly leisure driving.
http://gcubed.sytes.net/gcubed/oilfilter.pdf
In the lower left corner, it shows the 2.3L and 2.0L filter adapters. The part numbers are hand-written on the scan. I didn't write them, so I don't know how accurate they are.
Also, if you used the spin on filter adapter, how would you by-pass the internal filter?
The place where each fits on the engine block (to the top-left of the part designated #6) shows 4 small holes in a rectangular arrangement and two larger holes within the rectangle described by the smaller holes. I assume these are the inlet/outlet holes for the oil.
I would think the spin-on one would be much easier to change out with less mess, though the cartridge would mean less metal wasted (as you just replace the filter media, and not the casing). Looks like they recommend changing the gasket on the cartridge filter system. Does Mazda recommend replacing this gasket with every filter change?
A concern I have with the cartridge filter is the filter cover. It has a spring-loaded piece that the cartridge filter slides onto. It is all plastic, and you can imagine what will happen after years of exposure to high heat. Eventually, the spring-loaded mechanism or the piece that holds it will become brittle and break, meaning a new filter cover. If that happens, it could be really inconvenient when the car is up in the air with no oil in it.
Yup. The last time I did it, I didn't change the big o-ring and when I started it up to check for leaks, oil was shooting out of the filter cap. What a mess. Good thing I had extras.
"A concern I have with the cartridge filter is the filter cover. It has a spring-loaded piece that the cartridge filter slides onto. It is all plastic, and you can imagine what will happen after years of exposure to high heat."
That's not the only part of the engine that I'm worried about. The intake manifold is plastic too. Most automakers are going this way, lets see how it turns out.
Also, is that spin on filter adapter a Mazda piece? I'd be concerned about warranty coverage by installing something like that.
Also, they don't have any specifics on options or packages the Mazda6 hatch yet.
And while Mazda's web site clearly states that the wagons come only with the V6, we have reliable reports from the LA auto show of displays and specs sheets showing a 4-cyl wagon.
I used to think that Mazda's marketing of their cars was merely incompetent; now I think these folks are total buffoons.
- Mark
What we need to know though is why some of them are canister filters and why some aren't and if there are any other differences besides the oil filter type. After working at oil change shops for years in high school and college, I still don't know the advantages/disadvantages of a canister filter. All I know is that they require more work to change. I don't know why automakers still use them. The spin-on filter was invented a long time ago.
Between the plastic shroud and the internal filter and o-rings, I just don't trust anybody to change the oil. They usually don't use master techs for oil changes at the dealer, just some kid that used to work at quicky lube. I can just imagine somebody being lazy and deciding not to change the filter. It'd be near impossible to tell if they did or not because you can't mark it and if you could, you'd have to take the shroud off yourself to check. Or maybe they do change it, but they drop a couple fasteners for the shroud and don't bother to find them. Maybe when they're changing the filter, they use a metal filter claw to get the cover off and scuff it all up. Maybe they have grease all over their shoes and they get it on the carpet. After working at quicky lube-type places myself, I'm just too paranoid.
But, who knows? Maybe Mazda will surprise us.
What Ford creates will find its way into Mazda vehicles in one form or another.
Have you seen this new Scion? It's a little coupe with Toyota's 2.4L. It's surprisingly good looking for a Toyota:
http://www.scion.com/drive/gallery/drive_tc_gallery.html
Go down to the dealer and take one for a spin. That will convince you.
There are plenty of BMW sedans with manuals. For me, it's manual all the way.
Its close enough that it depends on the driver and the course.
Those more experienced than I notice a HUGE difference in tossibility- the 6i is quite a surprise. Though obviously, the more straights the better chance the 6s has in beating the 6i. So far, I've more than held my own- only losing to a 6s (auto, nonetheless, but with a new intake) once out of 5 or 6 times, and that was because I was spinning out on the course.
I won't choose a favorite, but I will say the car has a possibility of being competitive in its class, which is AMAZING considering its size. In some areas, a 6s MT has won G-stock. It goes up against Celicas, Mini's, etc. You wouldn't see an Accord, TSX, TL, Solara, Altima, etc. do that. Some Saab's do OK though, but mostly the cars I fear are Celicas, Mini's, Focus SVT's, and Integras. Luckily anything RWD is in a tougher class!
Who wants a picture?
Note how well Liquid Glass works...
A very nice accolade as far as I'm concerned. With all the doom and gloom in this thread over various issues - and I'm not trying to downplay them - it is nice to be reminded of the overall wonderfulness of this car.
If all of the first year bugs disappear in 2004, it will continue to be a suberb choice in that category.
The reason that different manufacturers make different cars that are different from each other is because different people like different things.
To each their own.
It's OK. Apology accepted.
1) Spoiler was hanging off with adhesive tape exposed;
2) radio died 3 times;
3) finally car just wouldn't start.
When he called the dealer the next day, they said "great news" the spoiler fixed itself!! meaning that the spoiler settled back on the adhesive tape by virtue of its own weight.
It goes without saying that he got his deposit back and is now back in the hunt. He should have gotten a 6...
The 6 sedan is terrific for singles and couples who don't care about hauling a lot of stuff around.
Still, the rust issue looms. I was all set to pull the trigger on an 03 6s a couple of weeks ago, but the stain was all over three of the doors and the salesman and manager acted like they had never heard of the issue. Enough to dissuade me.
Anybody looking for a 6 now I would look at an 04 model where the rust issue should not exist. I would not buy an 03.
I do agree the 6 is a great car for couples and singles but for a family I can't see it. I would probably check out a VW Passat or a Toyota Camry for more room. I don't like the bland looks of the Camry but for a family its adequete.
I'm a big 6 fan but probably will never drive one so thats why I post sometimes. I also owned a 626 for a few years and my experience with Mazda was pretty good.