Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!

CR-V vs Escape

1161162164166167

Comments

  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "The new RDX has a turbo I4."

    And pretty poor MPG compared to the CR-V (same size vehicle).
  • dromedariusdromedarius Member Posts: 307
    Yep, but that's an Acura (I know, I know, it's a Honda at heart, but it's marketed to a VERY different crowd...and it's Honda's first). And like steve pointed out, the mileage is terrible compared to the non-turbo CR-V, about the same as a Pilot, in fact.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    Yep, but that's an Acura (I know, I know, it's a Honda at heart, but it's marketed to a VERY different crowd...and it's Honda's first).

    So since you stated that mfrs who make reliable engines tend to stay away from turbos, would that make Acura a mfr of unreliable engines then? Thanks for clearing that up. :P

    You guys can call it whatever you want. That engine was engineered by Honda. Yes it is marketed to a different crowd, but it came from the same mfr. Let's call a duck, a duck folks. ;)
  • blueiedgodblueiedgod Member Posts: 2,798
    Both Honda and Toyota have had turbo engines on the market for a long time. They just chose not to bring them to the US.

    Check out the Domestic Japanese market, and there are plenty of turbo powered econoboxes. Most of them are very small 4 cylinder or 3 cylinder engines driving cars that are small, but fun to drive.
  • dromedariusdromedarius Member Posts: 307
    I don't know, it's the first year for this particular engine. I do know Acura decided to go this route because the variable geometry turbo is a better solution because of less turbo lag and better fuel economy. Still, turbos are VERY sensitive, such as you are supposed to warm them up and let them cool down for the bearings, in addition to driving conservatively for the first couple miles, which for some people is their ENTIRE trip. None of that has changed as far as I'm aware.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "You guys can call it whatever you want. That engine was engineered by Honda. Yes it is marketed to a different crowd, but it came from the same mfr. Let's call a duck, a duck folks."

    I don't care to whom it is marketed. In my opinion getting Pilot-class MPG from a CR-V class vehicle makes it a turkey, not a duck.

    Anybody seen the sales figures for the RX?
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Been a while since I visited this room. Used to own a 2001 Escape XLT V6. After over 70,000 trouble free miles I felt like something else. Used this Escape as an SUV, towed my watercraft, visited the Cascade mountain range to skii and fish. Wife and I liked this vehicle so much she opted for a Mazda version Tribute V6 loaded with all options. Now it has just over 50,000 trouble free miles.. I use this now to do the work my Escape used to do.
    To dromedarius.. "Domestic" automakers have been producing reliable vehicles for years now, and for a lot less $$ than comparable Japanese makers. I know I am proof. I now own a sedan from a domestic automaker that also has about 30,000, once again.. trouble free miles on it ;) C'mon into the now....
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    Ford is making some good products these days, no doubt. I'll be eager to hear from ya after another 50k though - you're barely broken in at 50k or 70k! :)

    The Escape and Tribute are about 8 years old now, so they should be working their way down in price. Its not because they are bad, but people pay more for "new." To get acceleration comparable to the 4-cyl CR-V you must step to a V6 Escape*, however, which raises the entry price and lowers the fuel economy.

    * I say this based on Motor Trend's testing. Unless the Escape has found some hidden horses or lost weight (has it? I dunno!) the 10+ seconds it took to reach that merging speed of 60 MPH is higher than the CR-V which runs with a 2.4L 4-cylinder. I used the same source because they use the same launch methods. No, these aren't hot-rods, but considering the last (and only) test of the 4-cylinder Escape had 14 seconds or more to 60, I'd say the V6 is a necessity in that vehicle.

    All that said, when the Escape comes back with the 230hp V6 and Twin-Force 2.5L 4-cyl, it'll at least be a powertrain contender.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "I use this now to do the work my Escape used to do. "

    Well, scape2, I have changed sides, though I still think the CR-V is a fine vehicle.

    I'm now driving a 2008 Escape Hybrid. Mine is an AWD. I considered the CR-V when purchasing, but I like the hybrid powertrain and I still wanted an SUV. So the Escape was pretty much it for me. I considered waiting for the 2009 (rumored) diesel CR-V, but with the cost of diesel at about 70 cents more than regular here in L.A., it wouldn't have worked out cash wise.

    The hybrid has a 150K, 10 year warranty on the hybrid powertrain components, which should be plenty for me. I intend to keep it a while, so I'll probably purchase the extended warranty (I bought an extended warranty with my last CR-V as well).

    My CR-V was a Gen 2, so I haven't owned a Gen 3 CR-V, but the 2008 Escape Hybrid is VASTLY quieter on the road than my Gen 2. It is my understanding that the 2008 model Escape has more sound insulation than previous models. I can tell you that the hood and lift gate are heavier than I would expect, and I can see that they have put a lot of sound insulation under the hood.

    Speaking of sound, the sound system is much better on the Escape (I do have the Audiophile system). Again, I'm comparing to a Gen 2 EX.

    The Escape Hybrid also has the spare under the rear (outside the car), because the batteries are under the cargo area. In many ways I think this is better than having the spare inside the car, considering that the vehicle would have to be unloaded to get to the tire.

    The FEH is also a little bit smoother than the Gen 2 (not much), and I have WAY more leg room (I have to more the seat forward). It does have less rear legroom, but it is sufficient for my needs.

    I would also say that the CR-V has better interior space.

    For those interested, it is a bit too early to tell about the long term, but so far I am getting about 32 City and 30 highway MPG, very respectable for an AWD, in my opinion.

    In the handling the department, I think that the Gen 2 handled better than my 2008 FEH. I can't say exactly why I feel this way, but that is my perception. There is nothing wrong with the FEH handling; it is just that I consider the Honda to be more tuned to holding the road. It's a perception more than anything else.

    One more feature that I like is having a 110V outlet in the front seat, though I think this may be available only on the hybrid Escape.

    The last item is pretty subjective, but I personally prefer the styling of the Escape. I find the Gen 3 to be a bit too "bubble shaped", and I don't care for the nose job.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    I've seen differing opinions on one issue with the hybrid Escape, and I'd love your input! How does acceleration compare to regular models, or your gen-2 CR-V? I've seen wildly varying acceleration numbers (although I can't recall any right now), and was hoping for a real-world response. Does it lose power noticeably if the batteries are somewhat depleted?

    Sorry for playing 20 Questions, you're just the first person I know with one. ;) Congrats on the new car!
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "I've seen differing opinions on one issue with the hybrid Escape, and I'd love your input! How does acceleration compare to regular models, or your gen-2 CR-V? I've seen wildly varying acceleration numbers (although I can't recall any right now), and was hoping for a real-world response. Does it lose power noticeably if the batteries are somewhat depleted? "

    I have yet to deplete the batteries. If they ever discharge fully, it wouldn't be pretty - about 133 HP! But it would take a really long grade to do that, since the gas engine is constantly charging them as needed. In town, every time I use the brakes, energy is returned to the battery. In the mountains (for example), the batteries would recharge on the downhill and supply power on the up hill. I would say it accelerates about like any other 200 HP compact SUV (the batteries are rated at about 90 HP.

    As far as acceleration goes, it probably accelerates faster than, or about the same as, a CR-V under full throttle, but the engine would make more noise due to the CVT. But I am the wrong person to ask. Other than freeway on ramps, I drive for MPG, not acceleration. My biggest kick is when I move on electric power only, which is possible for about a mile under the right conditions, and when I am sitting at stop lights - and the engine is off. I have seen some FEH take off like a bat out of you-know-where, but I don't drive that way.

    You might check out the FEH forum:

    FEH Edmunds Forum
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    Haha, I didn't expect you to drive like a speed-demon, since mini-utes aren't made for speed anyway; the Hybrid version definitely wouldn't be! I was more curious about around-town get-up-and-go, and merging power. I'm fine with a 130hp Accord, so my needs aren't for big speed; just safe passing and pulling into traffic.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "I was more curious about around-town get-up-and-go, and merging power."

    The FEH is great around town. The ICE can be a bit noisy under full acceleration. No problem merging from an on-ramp.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    The FEH is great around town. The ICE can be a bit noisy under full acceleration. No problem merging from an on-ramp.

    That's all going to change in about 2 months when they drop the new 2.5L I4 in the hybrid. If you can find one that is. How on earth did you find one Steve and what happened to your Freestyle (that was you right?)? There isn't a Hybrid Escape to be found around these parts ever. You have to order and wait a while if you want one for the most part.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "That's all going to change in about 2 months when they drop the new 2.5L I4 in the hybrid."

    I don't think that the extra .2 liters of displacement is going to have that much effect on noise. It's going to be interesting to see the effect on MPG, if any. It's not like they can add another forward gear to compensate for the larger displacement, which is what has been happening on other vehicles. They will have to reprogram the computer to maximize the power. Considering that they will thus be blazing new ground, I am glad I got the 2008, which is now pretty mature technology (and computer code).

    "How on earth did you find one Steve and what happened to your Freestyle (that was you right?)? There isn't a Hybrid Escape to be found around these parts ever. You have to order and wait a while if you want one for the most part."

    I loved the Freestyle, but the lease end was coming up, we never used 7 passenger seating, and it only got about 19 in town (at best). So I traded it for an FEH.

    I don't know what area you are in, but Galpin Ford in North Hills, CA (just north of LA) had about 30 - 40 hybrids on the lot (between FEH, Mariner, and Tribute models). The salesman said they sell 8 - 9 per week.

    I personally saw the hybrids; we were looking for one with leather and the options I wanted. It turned out that there was only one on the lot to my exact specifications. For some reason the only ones with leather were AWD, so that is what I got. I didn't want Nav because the multi-CD changer is under the driver seat; I prefer to load them into the dash. Plus I already have a personal GPS that is quite nice. And I didn't really want the moonroof or satellite radio. I think I got all of the other available options with my FEH. I was able to transfer my locking gas cap from my FS to the FEH. The only other thing I have ordered is the wheel locks, which should be arriving this week.

    They did have some Mariner Hybrids with leather and FWD, but they were loaded and would have cost about $1700 more. FWIW, the Mariner is a far nicer car. It has the combination unlock on the driver door and audio controls on the stearing wheel. There is also an available "mood lighting", which my 8 year old liked, but which isn't available on the FEH. It also rode better and had slightly more comfortable seats, although the ride could be because it was FWD.

    My first fill up was at 29.6, a mix of 60/40 city/highway, but I'm not sure how full the dealer got the car. However that is pretty close to the 30.4 the onboard display was showing. I am enjoying trying to maximize my MPG...
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    I don't think that the extra .2 liters of displacement is going to have that much effect on noise.

    It's not just displacement.

    "Ford Hybrids: More Refinement, Safety and Performance

    The new 2.5-liter engine also is the new foundation for the Escape Hybrid and Mariner Hybrid models. Adapted for hybrid use, the engine is Ford’s first to use variable valve timing on an Atkinson cycle hybrid engine. Advancements in engine processor technology enable a nearly imperceptible transition from gas to electric mode.

    A new brake system also provides a more seamless transition from regenerative braking to traditional braking. It incorporates a new pedal sensor that gives the driver better feedback and pedal feel similar to that of a traditional vacuum-assisted hydraulic system."


    From what I've read about the Miller Cycle version of the new 2.5L is that it is smoother, probably due to the VVT, more powerful and more fuel efficient than the 2.3L. I don't see why the Atkinson version would be any diffferent. However it is not known which tranny Ford is using for the '09 hybrids yet. The Miller 2.5L's bump in FE is partially due to it being paired with a 6-speed tranny so it will be ineresting to see what it does with a CVT if that is still the tranny of choice for the hybrid.

    I live in Pittsburgh and hybrids are hard to find around here. I see them on the road all the time but never on dealer lots.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "From what I've read about the Miller Cycle version of the new 2.5L is that it is smoother, probably due to the VVT, more powerful and more fuel efficient than the 2.3L. I don't see why the Atkinson version would be any diffferent. However it is not known which tranny Ford is using for the '09 hybrids yet."

    I suspect that the new engine puts out about the same HP with better fuel efficiency - it is my understanding that the Miller cycle is more efficient for MPG than the Otto cycle, but puts out less HP. So it would be a wash power wise, yet a gain in MPG for conventional use.

    The Atkinson cycle version would simply be larger - the Atkinson cycle is already efficient - but it should have a bump in HP due to VVT. I'm sure the Ford engineers will adjust the electric / ICE programming to get equal or better MPG as the current 2.3. I suppose they could go to an Miller cycle with the hybrid, but I was under the impression that the Atkinson cycle was more efficient than Miller.

    The hybrids do not technically use a CVT. They use a planetary gearset system that functions similarly to a CVT, but does not have the traditional CVT belt. It is similar to the Toyota HSD. So I don't see them changing their transmission for 2009 - it would require an entirely different hybrid technology.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    My bad, the regular 2.5 is an Otto cycle. I had my cycles crossed!

    The hybrid will get an atkinson version of the 2.5 though. But unlike the Atkinson 2.3L you have in your '08, the new 2.5 has VVT to boot. Power for the regular Otto 2.5 is up 10 horses and 10 ft-lbs from the 2.3 while fuel econ increases by 1-2 mpg across the board. I would think the hybrid would see similar increases.

    The only think you'll lose out on by not waiting for an '09 (which didn't seem to be an option for you anyway seeing as your lease was up) is probably a slight increase in refinement and power. 1-2 mpg to a hybrid is nothing given its already high numbers so you won't miss that if that ends up being the case.

    Good luck with your new Escape Steve. Give us regular updates if you can. :shades:
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    " Power for the regular Otto 2.5 is up 10 horses and 10 ft-lbs from the 2.3 while fuel econ increases by 1-2 mpg across the board. I would think the hybrid would see similar increases. "

    We'll have to see, but I suspect not. The ICE only MPG increases are most likely due to transmission changes (typically an extra gear), so I wouldn't be surprised if we see a 5 or 6 speed automatic on the 2009 for the conventional Escape. I don't really know how the HP and Ft-lbs change in relationship to an Atkinson cycle engine, but it is certainly less gain than with the Otto cycle.

    The FEH doesn't use conventional gears, so the best they can do is modify the computers to attempt to use lower RPM when possible, but 10 ft lbs is not that much increase. With a conventional AT it is easy to add gears, but with the CVT there are no shift points to adjust. The programming used in the CVT has to be matched up to the new engine. Again, at this point (after 3 years), the current engine / CVT combination is well tested and refined.

    An unknown factor for 2009 is the new engine itself - the current 2.3 is very proven technology.

    Last, keep in mind that they have to account for that extra .2 liters of displacement.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    An unknown factor for 2009 is the new engine itself - the current 2.3 is very proven technology.

    Not really. The 2.5L is a bored out 2.3L and Mazda has been using VVT on the old 2.3L for a while now with great success and reliability. What's new besides the displacement bump is that Ford is FINALLY incorporating VVT on both the intake and exhaust. Most likely they tapped Mazda for that bit of tech so I don't see how it could be considered as an unknown factor at all.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "What's new besides the displacement bump is that Ford is FINALLY incorporating VVT on both the intake and exhaust. Most likely they tapped Mazda for that bit of tech so I don't see how it could be considered as an unknown factor at all."

    I have not seen that they are using VVT on the exhaust.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    IIRC that's how the Mazda VVT worked on the 2.3 and Ford has used what they call VCT on the exhaust side for years now. It was even present on the 2.0L Zetec in my '98 ZX2.
  • blueiedgodblueiedgod Member Posts: 2,798
    "Domestic" automakers have been producing reliable vehicles for years now, and for a lot less $$ than comparable Japanese makers.

    Welcome back, but...Don't start this fight again, you know you are going to lose.

    I have posted real world prices on comparable Honda and Ford vehicles, and Honda has always been less expensive to buy, and keep in the long term. They key word here is comparable.

    If I am not mistaken, you have a Ford Fusion, which is just Mazda6 with a Ford logo on it, but compare it to a COMPARABLY equipped Accord. I have not done price comparisons recently, but I am pretty sure that Accord will win hands down and the resale will be at least 50% higher 3-5 years later.
  • bcaptain78bcaptain78 Member Posts: 10
    Don’t purchase your new Honda at Hennessy Honda in GA. They ripped me off. They sold me a new CRV with a defect. A piece of front wheel well trim was cut out. They don’t want to pay for the repair. They knew about this defect. Theservice mgr. there told me that I should have caught this when I did the inspection of the vehicle! :mad: :mad: :mad:
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Georgia has a consumer protection agency. Plus there's always the BBB. Or you could write the owner of the dealer and complain (and copy Honda USA on your letter).

    Please visit Dealer Ratings and Reviews and fill out a report there too. Thanks, and good luck.
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 19,254
    blueie...
    you're still at it? when are you going to realize that there are plenty of people who like escapes and plenty who like cr-v's? just look at the sales numbers, year after year after year.
    i just bought an awd fusion. there is no comparable accord, and tell me why you are asking questions about leasing a fusion? :P
    2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "blueie...
    you're still at it? when are you going to realize that there are plenty of people who like escapes and plenty who like cr-v's? just look at the sales numbers, year after year after year. "

    And some (like me) who like them both! But I prefer the styling of the 2008 Escape over the Gen3 CR-V. Matter of personal preferences...
  • blueiedgodblueiedgod Member Posts: 2,798
    blueie...
    you're still at it? when are you going to realize that there are plenty of people who like escapes and plenty who like cr-v's? just look at the sales numbers, year after year after year.
    i just bought an awd fusion. there is no comparable accord, and tell me why you are asking questions about leasing a fusion?


    I didn't say anything about preferences. Scape2 stated that domestics make comparable vehicles for less, and I said, "show me the money" Preferences were not in the sentence.

    Girlfriend's lease on the 2005 Escape is up and Fusion is the closest I could convince her to get a Japanese car. Japanese design, Japanese Engine and Transmission, made in Mexico, labeled as a Ford. Talk about identity crisis. :P
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 19,254
    when i look at what you responded to from my post, i didn't say anything about preferences either. i just pointed out reality. some like the cr-v, others like the escape. they probably have different priorities.
    anyways, i will bet everyone refers to your g-f as your better half. ;)
    2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • blueiedgodblueiedgod Member Posts: 2,798
    i will bet everyone refers to your g-f as your better half.

    She is, but not without flaws: She likes Ford vehicles. :P
  • drive62drive62 Member Posts: 637
    I always wondered why you opted for a Mazda instead of another Ford? Especially with your anti foreign leanings. Yes the Tribute is essentially a rebadged Escape (or is it vice versa) but by purchasing the Mazda some of your hard earned money went to a Japanese automaker.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    I have seen some recent comments on the CR-V forum to the effect that the current Gen 3 CR-V is a bit loud on the road, so I thought I'd comment on my experience.

    I owned a 2003 CR-V. I enjoyed the vehicle, but road noise was high at speed, and when the engine went over 3000 RPM it was loud as well.

    I now drive a 2008 Escape Hybrid. One of the things I notice is that it is vastly quieter than my old CR-V, at all speeds. I recently had the RPM go past 4000 on a hill, and it was noticeable, but not loud.

    When I opened the hood I began to understand. The hood is very heavy, and it has a huge thick pad underneath for sound isolation. Similarly, the doors are a bit hard to open, and the hatch is also hard to close. All of these I think have to do with the door seals being thicker, thus requiring more effort.

    But this model of the Escape is much quieter than the CR-V.

    I also get about 31 MPG city and the same on the highway, but that is an unfair comparison because my Escape is a Hybrid.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    An initial review of the Escape I just read says the 2009 is even quieter than the 2008 FWIW.

    Here's one review

    Another one
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    I had read the 2nd one:
    "Driving away the updated models felt quieter and more solid than the older units which almost sounded tinny by comparison. The difference in the level of refinement was actually rather startling."

    I don't know what they were driving for 2008 models, but that doesn't sound like mine at all. It is not "tinny" by any means. I do have the AWD, which changes the way the FEH handles.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    You're right, it's hard to tell what they were talking about there. What was tinny? The engine sounds? The doors closing? The tweeters in the Audiophile system?
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 19,254
    mentioned 08's vs. 09's.
    2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "mentioned 08's vs. 09's."

    And your point is? :confuse:
  • richk6richk6 Member Posts: 87
    The second review mentioned Ford has incorporated a new braking system in the 09 Escape hybrid. I hope they will extend that to the regular 09 Escape.

    Consumer Reports stated in their test of 2 samples of the 08 Escape:

    "The Escape's braking distances were disturbingly long in both wet and dry conditions, and were the longest among vehicles we have recently tested"
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    It did because AdvanceTrac RSC is now standard on all Escapes and that involved an upgraded braking system. It's still front discs and rear drums for the gas versions but braking is said to be improved. Read the second page of C&D's first drive of the '09 I4, V6 and hybrid Escapes. I've noticed a few errors in their review however so I'll wait to see other reviews to pass final judgement on things like acceleration, braking, and handling which is where the big changes were made for '09.

    2009 Ford Escape first drive - C&D
  • dromedariusdromedarius Member Posts: 307
    It's not a bad vehicle. The problem is the design is essentially the same as when it was first introduced 8 or so years ago. Same w/the Focus, one of which I have thanks to an incident on ice here a couple months back. :sick: Ford has put WAY too much emphasis into trucks and SUVs for the past 15 years and now they have been caught w/their pants not only around their ankles but turned inside out over their shoes.

    The Focus, Escape and Ranger would be generating even more sales but they are competing against vehicles which are two generations newer. You can't expect to be competitive w/8+ yo vehicles. They are like the Yankees now. Just because it was good in 2000 doesn't mean it's good now. I think Ford, after the news they are cutting back on production, is in very real danger as a company as a whole.

    They already don't have a minivan to compete Honda, Chrysler and Toyota and now w/the move to subcompacts their pants have been pulled down just THAT much further.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "The second review mentioned Ford has incorporated a new braking system in the 09 Escape hybrid. I hope they will extend that to the regular 09 Escape. "

    My reading of the article indicates that the hybrid is the only version that NEEDED a fix, so it wouldn't apply to the normal model. Some people have issues with the way regenerative braking "feels" in the Ford design. It IS different, but so what (in my opinion).

    What Ford did was to program brake pedal pressure to simulate "normal" braking feel for the driver. I don't think it helps the stopping distances at all.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    The Focus, Escape and Ranger would be generating even more sales but they are competing against vehicles which are two generations newer.

    The Focus and Escape are selling like hotcakes right now. Search the news and you'll see that the Focus plant is running at full steam to keep up with demand and the Escape is catching up to the CR-V in sales once more. I'll give you the Ranger for now but Ford is planning a new one for 2010 or 2011 IIRC.

    I just had my Mustang inspected at a medium sized Ford dealer today and they had zero Focus' on their main lot for sale and ony 1 or 2 Fusions. I think they might have had a few of each on their back lot though. They had seveal Escapes but I have a feeling word of the improved '09s is slowing sales of the late '08 models.
  • dromedariusdromedarius Member Posts: 307
    But you are proving my point. Ford got caught w/their pants down. Here is a link to the 1st Quarter Sales for 2008. Of course I can't prove my theory but if they had a newer vehicle and were actually serious about producing these vehicles they would have the capacity to meet demand. As it stands, the Accord is walloping the Fusion and both the Civic and the CR-V are beating the Focus and the Escape respectively.

    And the bad news doesn't end there. Honda just announced three new hybrid models. Meanwhile, Ford is laying people off.

    Until Ford gets serious about something other than the F150 they will continue to get beatup in the marketplace, and they are getting to the point where they can't take much more of a beating. The Escape, Focus, original Taurus, original Mustang, Model T, etc., etc., were ALL excellent at the start but you HAVE to turn out something original sooner than every 8-10 years to remain competitive w/the Japanese. How do you think Kia/Hyundai has squeezed it's way into the marketplace? It sure as heck wasn't by making a F-Gazillion50. ;)
  • phisherphisher Member Posts: 175
    Last I heard Ford was discontinuing the ranger. The only plant that makes rangers and Mazda B-series truck is here in St Paul and as of the end of this year it will be closed down.
  • stevedebistevedebi Member Posts: 4,098
    "Honda just announced three new hybrid models. "

    But not an SUV. The Escape Hybrid is still the only I4 powered hybrid on the market. The FWD mileage of 34/30 (city/highway) is the highest of any SUV.

    Before I got my FEH I considered waiting for the (rumored) CR-V diesel. But with diesel prices here in CA, it wouldn't have been a good purchase in my opinion. I have seen diesel at $5 / gallon at some stations.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    Last I heard Ford was discontinuing the ranger.

    I believe that's still correct. The new one most likely won't be called Ranger but rather may be called F100 and is supposedly going to be a shortened F150 with an EcoBoost I4 and a V6.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    I'm not getting into another this vs that mfr with you drom. We all know your hatred for Ford and it doesn't matter what they do because it will never be good enough for you.

    The current Focus, Fusion, and Escape are stopgap solutions until all of them, and the Fiesta (Verve), are globalized in the next year or two. That means we get the fantastic Euro versions soon and then the real fun begins. So you don't have to worry about them only being serious about the F150 for long. :P
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 19,254
    toyota only redesigns the camry platform every 10-12 years, they change the body and everyone thinks it is all new. obviously they have good design to start with, but it really isn't so different from other manufacturers. a lot of it is perception.
    2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • dromedariusdromedarius Member Posts: 307
    I'm not getting into another this vs that mfr with you drom. We all know your hatred for Ford and it doesn't matter what they do because it will never be good enough for you.

    Uh, I OWN a Focus, I sold my 1990 F150 last year and our family car before our CR-V was a ZX2 so I'm not quite getting where you are coming up w/your analysis.
  • baggs32baggs32 Member Posts: 3,229
    Because you're constantly bashing Ford for not having anything "new". If you don't like what the have to offer so much why do you keep buying them?
Sign In or Register to comment.