Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/online/ccd/snowfall.html
I think you answered the so what. It all depends on what your requirements and priorities are.
In my own case, if the car is primarily for 1 or 2 people, and only an occasional back seat rider or 2, then the 3 series is more than adequate for me.
But if I want to carry 1 or 2 passengers in the back seat on a regular basis, or for long distances, then the 3 series is not a good choice, for me.
We have another car that fits passengers in the back seat more comfortably than the 3 series sedan, an X3. I find it quite roomy, especially considering its only 1.6 inches longer. But that doesn't rule out my interest in one day having a sedan with more back seat room so we don't always have to take the X3 when we have 3 or 4 in the car.
I'm surprised you consider the IS oversized.
Thanks
Bruce
I was saying the back seat of the GS-350 was about as tight as a 3 series. In fairness, it was not as tight as the 3 series.
I cannot get into the back seat of my 3 series with the seat in my driving position. In the GS-350, I could get into the back seat, but it took a lot of work and I felt really snug once there. The biggest problem for me was trying to get back out - that took a lot of work. This was in contrast to the roomier back seats for other cars in that category, such as the M35/M45.
Thanks
Bruce
My feeling is that if it has a back seat it's good for any normal adult for 30-45 minutes. They may not like it but suck it up.
The 335i weighs 3600 lbs. For comparison an e46 330i was less than 3300 lbs. That's a big, big jump and no amount of HP will offset the physical bulk now added to the vehicle.
They didn't add 300+ lbs of safety to the new 3 series. They simply fattened the calf with an assortment of worthless add-ons (sound deadening being one of them).
During the TSX's first year, it gave the BMW a very good run for the money, but Bill Auberlein and the E46 325i dominated the series. In an effort to even the field, the following year SCCA handicapped the 3-series with more ballast and throttle body restrictor plates - it worked. The BMW dropped down to a mid-field runner and Auberlein et al left the series, only competing in a handful of races (which they still managed to finish on the podium).
The TSX is a terrific sedan with great potential for performance (and lots of aftermarket speed parts available). On the street, it's a worthy competitor to the E46 325i (and a luxury/performance bargain). On the track, it's FWD layout and forward biased weight distribution puts a damper on the fun.
I started doing HPDE's back in 2003 and to my mind, rather than tweak the TSX and try to turn it into a more balanced sport sedan with better tires, thicker rear sway bar, more HP, etc, I decided I'd much rather start from scratch and get a proper RWD sport sedan - which is why I sold my TSX and bought a BMW 2 years ago.
On paint chips - try this kit. http://www.touchup123.com/default.aspx? I bought the basic kit for my M3 a few months ago, and with great care and patience, I repaired numerous chips to the point that I won't get the car re-sprayed like I originally planned. Here's a before and after shot of my front bumper (the white chips in the after photo are new chips I've acquired since doing the repair (the Pacific NW is very hard on car finishes!).
You can still see the repairs if you get in close and look, but they don't jump out and grab you like they used too.
Regards,
OW
"The engine is the lightest V8 in the world, weighing less than the previous M3's inline-six."
Regards,
OW
Best Regards,
Shipo
Let's hope the stock suspension is dialed in better than the E46 was out of the box.
I know guys, this isn't typically my forum, but I troll around occasionally, and just had to comment.
I'd rather that BMW concentrate on weight reduction, rather than increased horsepower...
Unfortunately, it seems much easier (cheaper?) to increase horsepower, than to reduce weight.
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Any comments from this crowd ?
Rocky
I want a light and fast car. It's silly how a new 3 series is heavier than a 96-02 Mercedes E-Class. It's only 100lbs lighter than this:
http://consumerguideauto.howstuffworks.com/1991-to-1996-buick-park-avenue-4.htm
Something's just wrong if the smallest cars are now almost as heavy as a ten year old Park Avenue.
Rocky
Regards,
OW
Rocky
1966 Pontiac Lemans, 1968 Dodge Dart GT, 1969 Buick Skylark, 1976 Pontiac Grand Prix, 1988 Lincoln M7 LSC, 1997 Pontiac GP GTP, 2003 Lincoln LS
I am ALL-Americaned OUT!
Regards,
OW
Otherwise, you die, and there's no one to sue.
That approach has been shown to be way, way out of date.
The 330 does quite well despite the added weight, IMO. I' read the same about the E92 also. I am sure this would improve with -200 lbs. but it is what it is.
I was in shock to see a Semi driver on the cell phone the other day negotiating a wide right turn onto the freeway with 16 wheels following his un-funfocused direction and thought about defensive driving can only get you so far...
Regards,
OW
Rocky
That's a waste of bandwidth. Let's confine the discussion to cars that are in showrooms today.
Rocky
Rocky
Regards,
OW
Not me, not with certain performance cars. I'm looking at older Porsches. There's too much sinew and gut left in them. I do like the 335 coupe and convertible though.
Regards,
OW
Rocky
The 335i? The latest generation (E90) BMW is an attractive machine, but I don't lust over it the way I did over the E46. My 2001 330i (sport package, stick) is at least as much fun today as it was 6 years ago. I won't replace it anytime soon.
Regards,
OW
The right place to discuss the Genesis is the Mainstream Large Sedan Comparison board alongside with the Charger, 300, Avalon, etc...
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2022 Wrangler Sahara 4Xe, 2023 Toyota Tacoma SR 4WD
If we consider the performance data, these cars are by far more advanced in every way than the bretheren of old.
They just are a little more portly, may I say!
IMO, I really thinks it's a matter of perspective. Coming out of the US boats all my life, this E90 feels like a butterfly! Does anyone really think a 335 would perform worse than the premium E46 given the extra weight in the twisties?
Regards,
OW
I disagree somewhat. Unless you are talking about driving a Sherman tank, it is my opinion that the cars in this thread are safe cars for their weight class and are at least as safe if not safer than other comparable weight/class size vehicles. Certainly the 3 series is no less safe than the CAMRY or Accord and in fact might be safer.
Because safety is a given in this category. When you buy a motorcycle or go skydiving, safety is a priority. If you do not plan safety before hand with those, kiss yourself good-bye sooner or later.
Sport is not compromised by weight if sport is only one factor in your preferences rather than weighted predominatly as the goal. When one is at that higher level of sporting desire, to me, you are out of this category of vehicle. You might track the car, but there are many other choices that can excite at a much higher level.
When I buy a vehicle for the road, safety is a high priority. Better brakes, handling, ridgitity and improved systems such as airbags are a priority DESPITE extra girth.
Again I look to racing with ever-improving saftey system for high speed sporting as a learning for the rest of the industry!
To each his own at the end of the day.
Regards,
OW
Not really. We're all stuck with a 3600 lb. 335i. Think of how cool it would be to have a choice for one that weighed 2800lbs. This is the basis for complaint about weight gains over the years. Even the pure sports cars have gotten heavier, ponderous.
BTW, regardless of what safety measures one takes in any sport or endeavor, said endeavor comes with inherent risks and some are much greater than others. For instance, flying small aircraft is said to have the highest risk out of all manner of transportation. Also, hit an unanticipated oil slick on a bike and you're going down, I don't care how safely you ride.
I agree with the idea of an ultimate 2,800 lb 335. There would be a market for that car.
I'm not sure the pure sports cars are ponderous, however. They are gaining weight but a C6 Z06 is hardly ponderous. A Caymen S is even lighter, 2,976.
Yes, you can always go down on an oil slick but you need to understand the risks and provide for the best result each time you play. Same with managing a Piper Cub. Pre-flights are no guarantee but without redundant safety systems, the risks grow rather quickly.
Regards,
OW
Heaven. Yank the sound insulation, take out the trunk carpeting, delete the power seats, switch the roof to CF, fenders (back/front) to plastic, hood and trunk to aluminum and for god's sake let's get rid of those awful RFTs.
Now, some cars can do it right. The Altima, which isn't a small car, mind you, is 3000lbs. And a lot of people are impressed with it, mainly because it's 500-600lbs lighter than most of the competition. It needs less power, smaller brakes, and can get by without 17 inch rims.
Or take a RX-8. 3000lbs, fully loaded. It handles almost as well as a 3 series because it weighs 20% less. With mods, I've seen people drop another 200lbs off of it for racing without hardly changing a thing in its daily functioning(mostly aluminum parts, carbon fiber hood, etc). 2800lbs and 240+ HP is a rocket in the twisties compared to the new cars. 3/4 the weight will do that for you.