Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
And Chrysler is infamous and Subaru not. Life is not fair.
Maybe it is because Subaru has 2 head gaskets (the boxer feature) ?
Krzys
PS I hope to buy WRX some day and its engine seems to be quite bulletproof. People are complaining about transmission (clutch shudder ?) but not about engine.
I spoke with Subaru (1/28) about the 2 Subes with head gasket problems. They are interested, but don't have anything pending as far as a recall or a voluntary campaign. The bitter cold is probably a factor (CT has been bone-chilling cold most of January), but these cars & head gaskets should survive much worse. I do have a case # for the '98 Outback (the engine was built 3/14/98) and will be getting information back to them on what we find, if the heads are warped and need machining, etc. They also took info on the '01 Legacy 2.5L GT Sedan but will see reports on that from the dealer with the repair. I recommend to everyone with coolant leaking and head gasket problems get in touch with Subaru on the web-site or the Customer/Dealer Services Department at 1-800-SUBARU-3 (1-800-782-2783). They could do a Voluntary Campaign bulletin if there is enough of an issue.
It could also be something stuck in the HVAC hoses, like dry leaves. Maybe crank the vent to full blast and use a strong vacuum to see if you can suck anything out of those vents.
Maybe visit the dealer when it's raining to show him where the seal isn't tight.
krzyss: I did some in-depth research into that tranny/clutch issue, and here's what I found.
First off, every case of tranny failure I could find had modified powertrains, most producing in excees of 280hp (claimed), and were power shifting into 2nd gear and proceeded to shave some teeth off 2nd gear. Noone with the stock 227hp had that problem.
This is just my opinion, but if you invest that kind of money into the engine, you should be getting the STi's 6 speed tranny while you're at it, plus an ACT or Ludespeed clutch. It's just plain dumb to dump the clutch and power shift ANY tranny, let along a stock one.
The other thing is that all were 2002 models. The 2003s got a force limiting valve in the clutch mechanism, and while that may limit the fun you might have with wild burnouts, it also saves the tranny and the clutch. I've seen no failures.
The "chatter" does occur on the clutches, mostly the 2002s once again, but it doesn't seem to affect longevity.
I followed a thread on NASIOC and some folks were even recommending owners not discuss their mods in public. Shame on them, those liars might make a claim and cost Subaru dearly, then the costs get passed on to loyal customers.
-juice
No offroading, treat the car real nice. Hopefully not the CV joint... Leaves are a possibility. Gonna check with the Sube tech on Saturday. Thanks for your ideas. I'll let you know the outcome. Rachel
Back to the subject, they found the leaks R and R transmission to access leaks from oil seperator co verseal leaking. I am not sure what is that mean, can somebody tell? On the reciept, I can see all of the part#. They replaced 4 seals and 1 belt. Oil seal, oilseal - 32 X 45 X 8, Oil separator cover sealer, cam seal both side and cam belt. They told me that they took out the entire transmission in order to replace those seals. One thing I was suprise, they washed my car.
Luk
The important thing is they covered it and you got it back. Watch the oil level carefully, just to be safe (we all should anyway).
-juice
I'm thinking of going with the SP5000 or, maybe the Sport A2s.
Is there anything one trades off by going from the Sport A2 to SP5000? I'm sure dry grip is better with the SP5000, but how about wet, snow, tire noise, ride?
I want to order these soon!
Ken
We had 3" of slushy wet snow here yesterday, which turned to sleet late. They went well most of the time but I did hit an icy patch not far from home where they didn't grip and I slid a bit at about 25-30 mph. Last week we had 2-3" of dry powder and they were fine. They're no worse than the Geos in snow but I can't say they're substantially better either, at least not yet.
Ed
http://www.vtr.org/maintain/oil-overview.html
A key point: 10w-30 synthetic has a much lower pouring point than 5w-30 dino, and pumps easier when cold (this is slightly different than viscosity). So, you will probably experience quieter startups going from 5w-30 dino to 10w-30 synthetic just because the oil pumps better in spite of its higher viscosity. Note that 5w-30 synthetic pumps only marginally better than 10w-30 synthetic. I think 10w-30 synthetic is a really good choice -- gives you good low temp pumping performance AND better lubrication (higher viscosity) at low temps. Best of both worlds, so to speak.
Craig
I run 32 psi all around.
-brianV
On face value, this makes sense. I am just having a problem understanding how PP and V differ.
Also, as 'weight' is a time-distance test (fluid travel down a tube at low temp), what is the new Mobil 1 grade 0w-30 ??? And can there be anything below this 0 grade?
Confused in oil land,
Steve
Example: The gap between the Mobil 1 10W30 and 5W30 Mobil Drive Clean (conventional oil) is narrowing. Mobil 1 10W30 now has a pour point of -49F and the 5W30 conventional has a pour point of -38F (from mobil1.com and mobil.com).
By that chart, M1 10W30 used to have a pour point of -65F! Hmmm, basestock changes? Hello ExxonMobil!
-Dennis
Thanks for your replies. I do remember reading your updates on the tires before.
The price difference between the SP5000 and Sport A2 is about $10/tire at the local Discount Tire shop. It's small enough that I would cross shop them.
Ed -- I don't think any all-season tire is going to do well on ice. I remember a scary moment when I was gliding over a patch of black ice with my Geolandars. I don't think anything short of a dedicated winter tire could have made a difference then.
Ken
V = measures its ability to maintain lubrication properties.
???? My guess ????
-Dave
Ed
A jar of oil at a certain temperature has a certain viscosity no matter what you do with it. even if it just sits on the shelf. If you pour the jar out in a specific standardized test, you get a measure of its pouring point. That's my best understanding of the concept.
Regarding 0W oils, my understanding is that it's a bit less viscous than 5W oils. I found a chart on the AMSOIL website that rates 0W at 57.2 cSt viscosity, while 5W is 59.5 cSt. I have heard about the "timing" of oils to get 5W, 10W, etc.., but have never seen that referenced, so I can't say if it's correct or not (please let me know otherwise). Clearly, zero seconds is not possible for a viscous fluid, but perhaps that's the nomenclature used for a timing less than 1.
Craig
Bob
Soon as I put the Spectrums back on, though... winter will make a grand re-appearance! Sheesh!
Cheers!
Paul
We electrical engineer types only have to worry about electrons flowing thru wires and across junctions!! Of course for the last 10 years or so I have also had to deal with how ions in a vacuum are influenced by electrostatic fields, and the phonon induced chemical reactions they can cause.... God, do I hate this stuff!
Steve
I recommend to everyone with coolant leaking and head gasket problems get in touch with Subaru on the web-site or the Customer/Dealer Services Department at 1-800-SUBARU-3 (1-800-782-2783). They could do a Voluntary Campaign bulletin if there is enough of an issue. A recall gets done by federal action, so this probably won't fit in that category.
Thanks for the better understanding of PP vs V Craig.
Electricity? I do know if you ground yourself and hold the hot wire... you get a good buzz.
-Dave
Craig
Steve
"Unfortunately, the life expectancy of any mechanical component is indefinite. As a result, we issue the subaru powertrain warranty with the hopes that any problems you may experience will be taken care of without expense to you. However, as you may be aware, the warranty expired at 60,000 miles. Beyond the warranty period, we are not in a position to offer financial assistance with repairs unless there is a recall on the component. There are no open recalls pertaining to your vehicle at this time. Should a recall ever be issued on this, or any other vehicle component, we will contact you by mail."
As for tires... I've had the Sport A2s for about a month now and I am very happy with them. No comparison to the OE tires. For the money they are hard to beat.
-eirik
-juice
-OR-
Are those of us on a group like this just a very minor subset of all Subaru owners, such that the statistics are biased?
There are about a million 2.5l engines out there, remember.
If you want your engine to run cooler, you can get a bottle of Water Wetter by Redline, it's about $7 or so from any good speed shop.
If you have a gasket leak, odds are you'll know before any damage is done to the heads, at least I would hope so. The temp gauge would also register so you would have time to shut off the engine.
-juice
Should I request both heads be repaired? What other work (parts replacement) should be done that could save me disassemble costs later. The car has ~28K miles, put into service July 2001
Larry in Alabama
http://www.shellglobalsolutions.com/base_oils/library/base_oil.ht- - m
http://www.repairfaq.org/filipg/AUTO/F_oil_facts.html
Both of these address pour point.
My question is for new car purchasers: We just bought an '03 TS wagon, and are wondering about the timeframe of the 1st oil change. Old school thinking is that it should be done @ 1000 to 1500 miles to remove metal bits and such that are inherent in breaking in a brand new engine. Our dealer says change at 3000 because it has "break-in" oil that needs to stay in that long before changing. However, this is the same service dept. that told me to only replace one strut on another vehicle at 90000 miles and one was leaking badly. You could say I lack confidence in their information.
I called Subaru, and they said 3000, based on the normal service oil change interval of 7500... BUT, in "severe" environments, which in reality apply to many drivers, the interval is half, so 7500 becomes about 3000 and 3000 becomes 1500. So, any other opinions, as I probably can only get less confused from here. Any info from someone who has gone down this road before would be great, as this is my 1st new car purchase. Thanks.
(yet another) Steve
I changed mine at 1k the first time, and I have 49k miles now and average 25mpg, so it couldn't have been wrong.
-juice
Greg
Thanks in advance,
Len
Craig
Bob
Craig
Wish I had seat heaters to find out!
-juice
Greg
Greg
Ron
Len
Another glare ice event a few days later showed the same results, though I also added excellent slide recovery to my assessment by playing a bit in the streets.
Packed snow, they're amazing - idiot proof.
Other than the ice/packed snow performance though, they've been kind of disappointing. On a few inches of snow, or slush they do not track well - constantly threatening to ease you off the road. They also broke loose easily on wet on ramps. Oh, also the braking performance on ice was not as strong as the cornering and acceleration ability.
They're quiet and ride far better than the winter tires I've typically used (steel studs, aggressive tread), but lack directional stability - a trait I attribute to the soft compound and heavy siping.
We have the 4X4 Alpin version on the LandCruiser, which has been excellent in all conditions. The tread pattern is more like the Alpin Pilot, which I'd have gotten were it available in a 15".
Would I buy them again? Definitely not. They're not a well rounded winter tire - too specifically for ice and packed stuff for my taste.
IdahoDoug
Interesting review of the Michelin's. I have a set of Blizzak's mounted on steel wheels for my Forester and the wife's Outback (both 5 speeds). Although we've had several snow "events" this winter season, only the December 5th storm was significant, dropping around 9-10 inches. Anyway, I mounted the Blizzaks on the Forester that day and was quite amazed at how well they did, in deep, loose and packed snow. I started, stopped and turned in every manner I could on the roads I drove on, and never once slipped or got stuck. The ABS hardly ever kicked in either, leading me to believe the traction was so good that ABS wasn't triggered. Because our roads were cleared by the next day, I removed the Blizzak's and put the Geos back on.
I didn't have the opportunity to try the Blizzak's on ice, so that review will have to wait for another day. However, I can honestly say that the Forester with the Blizzak's did better in every situation in that particular storm than my '87 Montero (also a 5 speed) used to do with it's Goodyear Wrangler AT's. I realize that the Montero's higher ground clearance and part time 4WD with low range would do better in really deep snow, but the Forester did great in the conditions I've encountered so far.
Len
They grip like hell in any condition,and try as I might I have only been able to get the ABS to kick in once, on dry pavement they are much quieter than the eagle RSAs that I run in the summer.
I would have no hesitation recommending the winter Slaloms.
Cheers Pat.
Plus the wife's '95 Jeep Cherokee (Selec-Trac transfer case) has a set. That goes in full time 4-wheel in November 'til April (normally).
Steve in Minnesota