Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!

Subaru Crew Problems & Solutions

1373374376378379385

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Just tryin' to keep it friendly & constructive.

    Any how, you shared pics which were useful. :shades:
  • samm43samm43 Member Posts: 195
    A U haul 8x10 dual axle covered trailer is one heavy beast even when empty. And besides the static weight, it will have considerable wind resistance. Plan on keeping your speeds under 55 and 50 would be far better still. I think you are going to be quite overloaded if truth be told here. Very good, defensive, think-ahead drivers can manage overloads but that still won't protect them in an unfortunate event of liability issues.

    If you could post a picture of the tools I think we collectively could guesstimate the weight. From what you describe, I think there is a lot of cast iron involved which is very dense and heavy metal. Without knowing the size of these tools it is next to impossible to help guess a weight. Table saws alone can range from 2' to 10' in length. Dining room furniture could be solid oak, maple, birch and are all very heavy hard woods. If you have a fairly accurate bathroom scale, it might help if your tools are small enough that you could set one end at a time on it. Or stand on it while you lift one end of the saw and have someone else add up all the numbers. The scale will be very handy to find out your tongue weight as you load and sort to get the desired tongue load. Going heavier is preferable to lighter if you have trouble getting an exact ideal tongue load as per the link sites you get advice from. I think tongue should be 10% of gross trailer weight (gross meaning trailer curb weight empty and the payload).

    Once you get some pictures for us or a weight, I would ask some of the Subaru guys here about exhaust manifold temps with this trip and whether you are doing hills or not and whether Subaru's have sturdy e manifolds or not.

    U haul should be able to give you weight of their trailer over the phone. I'm going to throw a guess out there of a U haul dually covered 8x10 will be at or over your 1500lb limit empty. They make them heavy (strong) because they know people will fill them with bricks, gravel you name it.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    http://www.uhaul.com/Reservations/EquipmentDetail.aspx?model=MV

    You were very close, 1,250lbs empty. 2,800lbs gross trailer weight. 1,550lbs max carrying capacity.

    It does include the brakes that do not need a controller, so that's good.

    Here is the bad part...

    Forester Towing Capacity 2,400 lbs.

    2,400-1,250 = 1,150

    That's 1,150 for all the cargo in the trailer AND all the cargo in the vehicle and passengers.

    So that really isn't an option IMHO.

    -mike
    Subaru Guru and Track Instructor
  • kurtamaxxxguykurtamaxxxguy Member Posts: 1,798
    edited March 2011
    Hi there. I had my '09 Forester XT in for 30K service and its required transmission filter change. I had asked the dealer to flush the transmission, but they never did (they __did__ change the spark plugs ahead of schedule, though. :surprise: ).

    To get this flush done, I took it to an independent shop with subaru trained techs and the trans was flushed for real with the warranty required Subaru Trans fluid. The shop had an excellent reputation from several discerning friends of mine.
    Surprise, surprise, I learned the old trans fluid was marginal, showing signs of breakdown despite relatively modest driving.

    The new fluid didn't change how the trans works (that 4 speed AT sometimes grabs rather roughly, but the 2 different dealer techs I spoke with claim its behaving normally), but at least it's clean. :)
  • sgloonsgloon Member Posts: 323
    Thanks all for pointing out all this info I would not have known about!!!

    Unfortunately, I don't have weights on anything as the stuff is in ME and I'm in CO, so won't know until I get there, which would be too late to plan anything, as Im just going there and coming right back. :-( I'll try to see if my brother is willing to get over there and take a pic or two, but he tries not to go there as it is about an hour out of his way.

    The dining room table/chairs are Cherry, I believe, so not as heavy as Oak. It's the kind with the fold down sides and leaves to make it much larger. The sewing cabinet is cherry, too. All nice hardwood and much lighter than the furniture being made now a days because it is solid wood, no glue composite.

    The Table saw I don't think is more than 4x4, it may be more like 3x3 (I'm going on a distant memory). Band saw was more like 2x2 but tall. I have no idea what they would weigh? Both are probably 20-30 years old?

    I found the 5X8 trailer doesn't have the surge brakes and weighs 800# alone, leaving me only 200# to put in the trailer. The 5x10 or 6x12 are about 1800# and both have the surge brakes, so I could go to the 2400# limit with them, per the specs, which I believe would be plenty.

    Re: manifolds, I'll mostly be on interstates and will not be going up into the mountains in CO, I'll stop just before the foothills start. So, it'll be 5000 foot elevation gain over 2200 miles. Otherwise, just the hills I'll hit on the highways or near to highways.

    I didn't realize that the weight limit includes what is being carried in the car. The owner's manual words it as though it is only talking about the total trailer weight, (ie weight of trailer + stuff you are carrying in the trailer) not total trailer weight plus passengers and other stuff in the car. Comments??
  • samm43samm43 Member Posts: 195
    edited March 2011
    Glad we all could help.

    Pretty sure that gross weight they are talking about includes everything, car and trailer curb and payload weights. I know this for a fact on my last 5 or more cars and I think all before then too. Could you type out the exact wording? But OTOH there are some Subaru old hats here that will be able to confirm I'm sure without you going to that trouble.

    So according to your size guesses, I'll put a few weights out there and see what we all come up with. I agree with you on the cherry being a lighter hardwood. Makes a real nice set too. So I say the bandsaw is 250lb to 300 (allow my guesses 50 lb +or- each) The band saw likely has the most cast iron because likely both drive wheels, base and table will all be CI. If the table is 2x2 then it could have 20" wheels. Sounds like a nice old saw. Old tools like that are such a joy to use compared to so many of the Chinese stuff nowadays. And they are made to have bearings replaced and sized with common sizes that are readily available too. Tablesaw at 200 to 250lb. But to be sure it would be so easy to add 100 lb each to these without seeing them. You must have the turbo? Do a nice fresh oil change with 100% synthetic before you head out too. Unless others here say not to use the synthetic. I suggested it because it endures heat better than mineral and your turbo will be creating some pretty good heat at times.

    Not sure when you are leaving but would like to wish you a good trip. Successful and safe. ;)

    Sam
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 16,780
    edited March 2011
    Okay, here's the skinny on the total allowable vehicle weight, per the 2010 Forester owner's manual (beginning on page 8-12):

    Vehicle GVWR (does NOT include trailer): 4480
    Vehicle curb weight (manual transmission): 3250
    Max Payload (total weight of people, things in the car): 1230
    Max towing: 2400

    Now, while the GVWR for the Forester does not include the towed weight, it DOES include the tongue weight and the weight of anything borne by the car, such as the hitch receiver.

    So, the weight of your hitch and associated accessories will add 50#, plus your tongue weight of 200#, puts your effective total payload for the car at 980#. Remember, this includes the driver, so subtract your weight to get what is left!

    Sam, sgloon noted earlier that his car is a manual transmission, so no, it is not a turbo. From my own experiences, that won't be a problem as long as he is not expecting a speedy drive home! I should also note that fuel economy will likely be in the 18 mpg range, so plan on frequent stops for refueling!
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100, 1976 Ford F250
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    On my 98 Forester manual towing reduced my mileage from the usual 25 to about 17mpg, so your estimate is pretty much spot-on.
  • phil2000phil2000 Member Posts: 195
    I am having trouble uploading a contact to the phonebook through BlueConnect. I did one last week then could not do any others. Today I as able to do one more and that was it. Looks like BlueConnect has a one entry per day limit. Anyone have a similiar problem?
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Depending on the frontal area of the trailer, you may further reduce down the MPGs. A flat front facing trailer like that can really bog down fuel economy.

    -mike
    Subaru Guru and Track Instructor
  • tommy312tommy312 Member Posts: 15
    Can't seem to download my phonebook. Is there a way to get all the contacts from my phone to the car? (2011 outback3.6) I own an 06 X5 & leased an MKX all I had to do was hit a button & say the name??? :confuse: :confuse: :confuse:
  • phil2000phil2000 Member Posts: 195
    Subaru uses a different system. I had installed an aftermarket radio in my 00 Forester and it worked better that the one I now have in my 11 Outback. The Outback has an additional speaker for the Bluetooth. With this system, I have to import contacts one at a time. See page 11 (http://www.autointelligence.com/upload/assets/pdfs/all 3 languages 40510.- pdf).
  • tommy312tommy312 Member Posts: 15
    what a bummer that sucks!!! Thanks for the help.
  • phil2000phil2000 Member Posts: 195
    I wish Auto manufacturers went to places like Jensen, Alpine, Blaupunkt for their radios. To add a USB connector in my car cost between $230-$300 just for the parts. With that kind of money, I can get a CD receiver even a low end DVD reciever both with remotes and cool displays.

    Wishing you the best on practical solution.
  • sgloonsgloon Member Posts: 323
    Yep, good point, Mike. I just found another option. You can rent a U-box and put it on a trailer specifically made to haul it. Uhaul said the box can handle the weight of the tools. The trailer & box are lighter than the 5x8 trailer, but alot taller (7-1/2' inside), so that would definitely be taller than the car by a couple to a few feet...drag there for sure...and I would have to bring it both ways, instead of a one way rental. But looks to be the cheapest deal so far...

    No surge brakes on this trailer.
  • sgloonsgloon Member Posts: 323
    Boy, did I come to the right place to ask my ???s. I'm learnign so much! Thanks! I'm leaving towards the end of the month, so still have some time to get this figured out for the best option.

    OK, so in my manual, it says the

    Maximum total trailer weight Condition
    1000 bs when towing trailer w/o brakes
    2400 lbs when towing trailer w/ brakes

    And, per xwesx , I'll have 750# left for stuff to go in the car...although, since most of the 'stuff" is pretty bulky, I'll probably only have clothes and coolers (lots of drinks!:-) in the car for the trip.

    But, it gets me to thinking, I may want to try to fit more in the back of the subie...perhaps the table saw taken apart would be able to fit in the back, and then I wouldn't be hauling as much in the trailer....

    While I'm talking to the experts here, I have another question. All things equal, would it be easier on the car to haul most of the weight in the trailer, and have the car lighter, as far as gas mileage, etc.? I'm thinking once underway there would be less stress on the car that way?
  • samm43samm43 Member Posts: 195
    edited March 2011
    The more weight in the car the better. Weight in the trailer creates what is called shock loading when going over bumps. You feel that shudder through the hitch to the car when the trailer wheels go over bumps. This shudder shock goes right through the car. The most negative effect from that would be in the transmission.
    So the extra weight in the car is absorbed through the cars far more compliant suspension which quells that shock loading. If I were you I would try to keep trailer height as low as possible because I think wind resistance will be the larger stress than weight. That is why I suggested doing only 50 to 55 max. I would be tempted to a affix a wind deflector to the roof rails since the distance is so great it might pay off the trouble or expense if you rent one from U Haul. Ask if a neighbor or friend has one you could borrow. The shorter the tongue the more affective it will be.

    Sam
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    If you live in a warm climate and recently bought a Subaru, a reporter wants to interview you. Please email pr@edmunds.com no later than Wednesday, March 9, 2011 and provide your daytime contact information and a few words about your decision.
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 16,780
    edited March 2011
    I agree, Sam. The more weight in the car versus the trailer, the better. In addition to what Sam mentioned, this also creates a more favorable weight ratio for the tow vehicle (which is especially important if the trailer will not have brakes on it).

    Personally, if I were to do the U-box (which sounds like a good idea), I would prefer it to be longer with a shorter height versus taller and/or wider. I know there are 5x10 utility trailers out there, which will be sufficiently small to not be much wider than the car and easy to see around using the car's stock mirrors with some small convex stick-on mirrors attached. The flat-deck trailer will also come in at substantially less empty weight than the enclosed trailer, and they are quite cheap to procure (I would estimate around $1,400 for a nice one in Colorado) while being fairly easy to re-sell, if you're interested in that option.

    Especially if you'll be towing both ways, you don't want to underestimate the loss of 10 mpg, or approximately 1/3 of your fuel economy! Also, if you're running a flat trailer with a low-slung box the full way, you'll probably get better economy than either the smaller-footprint trailer with a tall box or an enclosed unit. Again, I don't know what your options are in this regard (U-box).

    -----

    Sam also brought up another point I failed to mention before: trailer shock. Along with this, noise from the hitch-to-receiver connection is LOUD when the trailer hits any sort of bumps, especially if running empty. I mitigated this issue by firming up the connection between the two units using a home-made wedge, but you can buy commercial units that are supposed to snug up the connection as well. If you're looking at a 5,000-mile round-trip, I strongly recommend you stabilize this joint for your own sanity, if nothing else!

    The way I did this was to take a scrap piece of 1/8", 2"-wide galvanized sheet metal about 3" long (leftover chunk of a Simpson Strong Tie), bend it at a 90-degree angle, and use a hammer to tap it into the top or bottom of the joint (whichever is easier to access with your particular ball hitch). You'll likely have to customize it to fit your particular gap, but you want it to be quite snug. I used a small pre-drilled hole that was on the SST to run a nylon rope through in order to tie a loop to secure it to the hitch in case it worked itself loose.

    It dramatically quiets down / muffles the trailer noise, and so far I have not had any problems with it slipping out.
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100, 1976 Ford F250
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    Hmm, I'm going to have to look into shimming my Kuat bicycle trailer now. It's not that loud at all, but seeing the bikes dance 6-12" on bumpy highways is unnerving to me and I bet for drivers behind me too. ;)
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 16,780
    The shim isn't going to help with the amount the trailer dances, only the amount of noise its dancing sends through to the car. Additional weight on the trailer will calm it down, as will additional shock absorption (though, admittedly, that would be a little more complicated!). My little ATV trailer bounces all over the place when I pull it empty, but it settles right down with a 200-300# load.
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100, 1976 Ford F250
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Maximum total trailer weight Condition
    1000 bs when towing trailer w/o brakes
    2400 lbs when towing trailer w/ brakes


    Ok here is the point I've been making all along.

    If you get one of those box-in-trailer things that DOES NOT HAVE BRAKES, essentially you will be running across the country w/o an insurance on your car.

    If that is an acceptable risk, then I say go for it. But if you value your insurance, you may want to think twice about doing that.

    As for the portion in the car v. trailer. Make sure you put any heavy items in the car as far forward as possible, you don't want to load up the car with heavy items in the rear and the trailer front this will cause the rear to sag. Try to get as much of the load over the trailer axle and in the front most portion of the vehicle itself.

    -mike
    Subaru Guru and Track Instructor
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    I dunno, I think shims would help. It doesn't have wheels... actually I think I misspoke. It's certainly more of a bike rack than a trailer.

    It's this one.

    There's a hitch extender with has some play in it, and then the rack itself has play in the extender. That free play is what I would look to shim up.
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 16,780
    Yes, you're right. Sorry, I was thinking you meant one of those mini-trailers. :blush:
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100, 1976 Ford F250
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Colin, I use the receiver for bike racks and a cargo tray. In the case of the 2" cargo tray stinger, I have a stubby 2" to 1.25" converter as an interface to the receiver on the OBW. That's potentially 2 points of free play for noise and wobble.

    I addressed this by adding nuts and using hardened bolts as the joining pin. In the case of the hollow stinger, I embedded a nut in a block of epoxy, and glued the block into the core with flexible contact cement. You can tighten it down nicely. In the case of the solid 1.25" stinger, I machined in a 6 sided insert, and lightly tapped in a slightly thinned nut flush with the original surface. Again, it tightens up beautifully. No more free play!!
  • saywhatsaywhat Member Posts: 63
    Yesterday I noticed that the one-touch open feature wasn't working when I hit the button for the moonroof; as soon as I lifted my finger from the button it would stop. Then when I held it down continuously, it would only open about 6 inches at a time before I would have lift my finger and depress the button again.

    I remember there was something about closing the moonroof and holding the close button for over one second, and then opening it about 15 inches, and then closing it again, and holding the close button for over one second, but does anyone know for sure the proper procedure?

    Thanks Bob G
  • phil2000phil2000 Member Posts: 195
    I had a similar problem with my power window on my 2011 Outback after I reconnect the negative battery terminal.

    The proceedure was to lower the window halfway. Then raise it completely and hold the button for 1 second.

    It might be the same way for your moonroof.
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    Steve, I completely missed this reply somehow. I'm intrigued... do you have any pics of what you fabricated?
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    Colin, I e-mailed you two pictures. Unfortunately since the demise of carspace, I don't have a hosting site. Feel free to put them up somewhere if they are helpful to you.
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    Got your email, thanks! :)
  • pathtomaxpathtomax Member Posts: 215
    I will have a bunch of updates to report in the coming days. But, I tried to have my radiator flushed and the leak still existed. I called 800-SUBARU3 as I replaced the head gaskets at 106,000 miles and now with 144,000 miles they need to be replaced AGAIN.

    So, Subaru has been INCREDIBLE about helping me and I will detail for everyone soon. Just wanted to give you all big thanks!

    My loaner is a 2011 Outback. LOVE the dimensions of the new version! But, I have to say, I like the steering feel and feedback of my 2001 better!! I know they changed it for the 'masses'...but I will miss my steering when I buy my next Outback! :)
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    I wonder if a change of tires would improve the steering feel & feedback... what's the factory rubber?
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    Are you getting a new longblock or entire engine out of this?

    I can't imagine that subsequent head gaskets are going to last longer than the most recent set's... what, 38k miles?
  • fibber2fibber2 Member Posts: 3,786
    You guys are really scaring me! I went thru HG's at 15k & 62k. I'm now at 86k. What does my future look like? Crystal ball, anybody?
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 16,780
    edited April 2011
    Eventually, those gaskets will need replacing again. ;)
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100, 1976 Ford F250
  • pathtomaxpathtomax Member Posts: 215
    They are replacing my head gaskets free of charge! That is the really good part. I have done ALL of the recommended services including timing belt and water pump replacement at 103,000. Head gaskets replaced at 106,000.

    Now, the dealership called me back and said that my water pump is spewing all over the timing belt. Sooo...I have to get those replaced as well...and I have to purchase those parts out of pocket.

    So, the long and short of it...I am a VERY GRATEFUL that Subaru is picking up the parts and labor for the head gaskets.

    My real concerns as noted above:
    - If I am RELIGIOUS about all service and have done EVERYTHING Subaru recommends and serviced at a reputable NH dealership... why should I have to replace my head gaskets, water pump and timing belt after AT MOST... 40,000 miles?

    This will be my last year with the trusty beast... I plan on purchasing a 2012 Outback... so just need it to get through another NH winter....
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Knock on wood but half a dozen Subarus in my family, most of the vintage prone to HG issues, and not a single problem here.

    Everyone kept scaring me the same way, but the issue simply never came up. We still have an 02 (dad's) and an 03 (sister's) running like a top.
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    You'll easily make it through another winter. But I would firm up those 2012 plans!

    Subaru had several bad years for head gaskets and they made changes. My point is that when you have an all-aluminum engine and it has bad headgaskets-- especially if it severely overheats-- it's likely something is warped and you're going to keep blowing head gaskets.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Can't they true up the heads? Machine shop, I mean.
  • phil2000phil2000 Member Posts: 195
    I have a 2000 Forester and only starting having problems after the idler pulley went bad a caused the timing belt to jump. This was past the 200K mark.

    I like Subaru's so much, I bought a 2011 Outback despite the fact I hate car notes/payments. And have not had one in 10 years.
  • girlcarbuildergirlcarbuilder Member Posts: 225
    ah ha, someone asked the good question! To be blunt, dealerships that I have followed on repair work have been graded poorly. The guys are demanded to work fast and head jobs are something you do not do fast! No machine shop there! Chances are, the head has not even been shaved! Then there is the question about the block. Is it true? That would require tearing the engine down to machine it. We are talking some precise measuring tools here. Remember dealers make money selling cars!!!!

    Given all of the trouble you are having, I still say it is dealer caused, "prove it." or something is warped. Usually when you strip a bolt you damage the nut as well! Same applies when you warp a head, you do the same to a block! Question becomes, how much? Only takes once and the problem never goes away.

    Bottom line, someone is missing something very small when they are working on it. It is the small stuff that will screw you over every time!
  • samm43samm43 Member Posts: 195
    This was quite a good post in a number of ways in my opinion. When working on an engine and you are being paid piece work, and delays come out of your own pocket, I have been in shops and seen a 'mechanic' discover that a block thread was stripped previously and wouldn't torque up properly, but continued to nudge torque as much as dared and continue on with 'repair'. You do this with a headgasket bolt for example and it will give trouble prematurely as in what seems to be what you are experiencing. I would be tempted to chat with the mechanic doing the repair and tell him straight up that if he encounters what he suspects may be a similar situation, that you will pay him extra out of your own pocket to take measures to address a possible stripped thread, by using JB Weld or some other measure to help ensure greater longevity. This holds true down the road when some unsuspecting purchaser decides on the cleanest looking and cared for car that has ver 160k miles because high miles is what is his budget. That extra step might make the difference for him to actually get 50k miles out of your old car when he buys it at, say, 160k, rather than find out he just bought a car that 5 or 10k later he too is doing yet another HG, thinking that if he invests in that then hopefully he can get another 70k+ out of the car.

    HG's (that contaminate other components) every 40k miles (2 to 3 years) is considered pretty expen$ive repairs.

    Sam
  • danielldaniell Member Posts: 128
    Hi all,

    I took my car to the dealer to fix what i thought was a rear wheel bearing. They confirmed that problem, but said that in addition to that, I need a "trans diff clutch and seal kit" (that's what they wrote on the repair order). I did hear 2 different kind of noises from the back, one fairly constant, at highway speeds, like a propeller plane, and another one more like thumping that I could hear at speeds as low as 35 mph.

    My question is, what is a "trans diff clutch and seal kit"? What would be the symptoms of that failing?

    Dealer wants about $1460 + tax for these 2 repairs.

    Thanks,
    Daniel
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    Daniel,

    What year & model is your car? How many miles? Is it manual or automatic?
  • danielldaniell Member Posts: 128
    Hi Colin,

    It's a 2002 Forester S, 92k miles, automatic.
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 16,780
    I'm not sure about the kit mentioned by the dealer. Is the thumping you mentioned a constant thing at speeds over 35 mph? I once experienced a thumping in my '96 Outback, which could even be felt reverberating through the car. It was the result of a bad drive shaft bushing. The repair is simple, if not a little time consuming. The factory part, which includes the front half of the drive shaft attached to the bushing/bearing component is perhaps $250. Mine didn't make any noise while driving at any given speed, but it would thump when heavy torque was applied to the car, such as when accelerating while turning a corner or downshifting and romping on the gas.
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100, 1976 Ford F250
  • danielldaniell Member Posts: 128
    Yes, it's constant above 35 mph, does not depend on torque, or direction. Actually it's easiest to hear when coasting (less engine noise).
  • hammerheadhammerhead Member Posts: 907
    Is the 'thumping' occurring while turning corners after the running gear is warm?

    And is the constant noise a higher-pitched, speed-dependent whine?

    If so, like me, your center diff is shot. $1500 dealer repair is about right.
  • compensatecompensate Member Posts: 212
    edited April 2011
    My wife drives a 2001 Subaru Forester with 185,000 miles on it. For the last few months, the car will stall out if she has to brake moderately or heavily when the car has not been running for very long. Once the car is warmed up a little (not even all the way to the regular operating temp) it will no longer stall at all. It only does this during the first few minutes after it is started.

    We have replaced plugs, plug wires, fuel filter recently. We also had both catalytic coverters replaced not too long ago due to a check engine problem.

    Anyone have any idea what could be causing this?

    Thanks!
  • danielldaniell Member Posts: 128
    Nope, no connection to turning... I can hear right after the car has started or later, going straight or turning.

    I would say that the constant noise is medium pitched. Like a WWII bomber. But it does change pitch a bit with speed.
Sign In or Register to comment.