Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
-A pair of old MGs traveling in train, an MG-TC and a TD, both were pale yellow with tan convertible tops. An odd but nice sight in the middle of the downtown commercial district.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
A 57-58 senior "forward look" Mopar 2 door HT, I couldn't tell if it was a Chrysler or DeSoto - but it was the style of Andre's car. But here's the odd part - it was converted to a 4x4. It was sitting pretty high, on big tires. It looked pretty clean and cared for, but was just insanely weird. I wish I could have got a pic of it, but it was behind me in traffic and I didn't notice it until I was turning off the main road.
Malaise muscle
Light duty hauler
Andre should offer $100 for this
Not what most think of when they see "E-class"
You couldn't drive it much
Early-ish DS
Not pretty
" It has the GOOD Mitsubishi engine not the troublesome Chrysler engine."
Ultimate malaise muscle
Unhappy design
Early slushbox
Reliable no doubt
These seem to attract body damage
I think the Klopeks had one of these
Rebody
Pointy
Angular
My only issue is that I wouldn't WANT one that nice! I'd be afraid to touch it, let alone drive it! Honestly, that '79 Newport is more my style. And of course, you'd have to find one in Rockville, only 25-30 miles away. :P Actually, that thing is a bit of a rarity as well, as it has the 360-2bbl. Most of these just had a 318. Maybe I should at least watch that auction, and see where it goes. And if nobody bids on it, offer them $100 or so. Heck, if it moves under its own power and isn't all rusted out, I'm sure it's worth $500. They're crazy though, with that $1400 buy-it-now, price. Here's $1400 worth of R-bodies...
The blue one was $500, and old yeller was $900. And the sad thing is, the blue one is in better shape! (but more likely to leave me stranded )
Still, if the only other choice was the crusher, I'd definitely be up for rescuing that '79 Newport.
Perhaps we should call this era the "Spurning Point" for the American automobile industry. :P
That car was eventually destroyed in the film.
And consumers began the spurning not long after.
The low mileage car is hard to value...drive it and kill the value, but let it sit and get little enjoyment out of it.
On the other hand, if you put a rare European car in a Kruse Auction in Iowa, well the bids might not reflect anything like the car's real value.
I guess, all things considered, I've been pretty lucky with cars. I've had 18 of them now, and have only destroyed one engine...a Buick 3.8 in an '82 Cutlass Supreme. Well, the 2.2 turbo in my ex-wife's LeBaron self-destructed, but it was her car by that time! This guy with the Galaxie also has a 1959 Dodge Coronet with a dual-quad 383, and he muffed that one up, too. I think it threw a rod, as well.
Oh, I also got the LeMans to fire up today, and gave it some exercise as well. So, today was a pretty good day as far as my old mastodons are concerned.
Mopar ex-dealer and collector
My friend Dr. Monty has a VW/Porsche 914 powered by a built-up Chevy small block--that goes like stink and handles very very well. But about one hour of thunder and flames is enough for me...and no heater.
There's also a Porsche in the neighborhood with Chevy V-8 power, but I'm down on that guy because he cut up, of all things, a perfectly good 1970 Porsche 911E, which is a rare car. Also not as well done as the Torvair by any stretch.
be happy for the exposure. :P
Then, a moment later, out of the corner of my eye, I spotted a '67-69 Firebird, sitting on top of a car carrier, in a junkyard. It was high enough up that I could see it over the fence. I saw it so briefly that I couldn't tell if it was a hardtop or convertible, or how damaged it was. I could see it was missing both outer headlights, but had the inners, and it was black.
I also spotted one of those fat '71-73 Mustang convertibles, yellow with some black trim, with a for sale sign in the window.
A different trim-line from the Trans-Am..
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Also, I did a little googling, and found that the Firebird I saw in the junkyard was a 1969. It had this style of front-end...
Instead of the 1967-68, which was like this...
I've wanted a 69 Firebird Trans Am ever since that day in 1970 when one blew by our Family Truckster on the interstate at about 100 mph.
It looked exactly like this one, http://dallas.craigslist.org/ftw/ctd/1175991673.html
Although the look is right, the guy doesn't call it a Trans Am, so I believe it's a clone.
I know that they almost all had Pontiac 400 engines in them (the street cars) but weren't some that actually had z/28 engines in them, or a destroked Pontiac 305?
Anyhow, I want one with a small block...this guy is asking $25K without mentioning the engine..... Fortunately, I don't have $25K.
Looking at the two grilles at the same time, I think I prefer the '69, as well, and I can think of a few reasons why. First, on the '67-68, where they put the headlights inside a loop bumper/grille, it makes them appear inset too far. This is the same basic look that a '68 Pontiac intermediate or full-size goes for, but those cars were big enough to pull it off. I don't think the Firebird is big enough to successfully pull of the quad headlight look, at least not in this guise.
On the '69, with the grille being smaller and the headlights being moved outward, I think it balances the front-end of the car out a bit better...all the components...grille, headlights, and turn signals, appear about where they should be.
I think the '69 also has a more upscale, expensive look to it, probably because of the grille being more prominent and a bit more vertical. Unfortunately, the above example appears to had some pretty poor fit and finish, which betrays the "upscale, expensive" qualifiers a bit!
Still, good looking cars in general, and something you don't see everyday, unlike an old Camaro or Mustang.
As for that Z28 engine, it was a Chevy smallblock. They called it a 302, but it was really a 301. It had a 4.00 x 3.00 bore/stroke, same as the Pontiac 301 of the late 70's and the Ford smallblock "302"(in addition to not really being a 302, Ford's engine wasn't really a 5.0L, either...it really came out to 4.942L)
I dunno if any of those went into Trans Ams or not. According to Wikipedia, the Trans Am engines were: Ram Air III 400 with 366 hp, Ram Air IV 400 with 370 hp, Ram Air V 400 with 500 hp. A few of them might have been built for racing though. SCCA Trans Am race had a displacement of 305 cubic inches, so ironically enough, Pontiac's Trans Am wouldn't have been eligible!
I had a 68 400, so I guess I am biased toward its styling. IMO, the 68 was trimmer, leaner, tighter, better integrated lines than the 69. The 69 seems bulbous and fat overall to me and the grille seems like an add-on and not integrated with the headlights.
The 69 grille reminds me of the full sized 1970 Pontiac line, with that kind of overdone neoclassic grille.
If I won the lottery, or had unlimited funds, I might go for something extravagant like that. But my biggest issue with it, is what do you do with it? I'd be afraid of something that low-mileage and pristine. I'm actually envious of my buddy TJ with the Mark V. It only had around 10-11,000 miles on it, almost like a new car, but he drives it pretty regularly. I forget how many miles he has on it now, but I know he's driven it to Rehoboth a few times, and taken it to some local places. This year was the first time he took it to Carlisle, though. Back in 2006, he took his other, "beater" Mark V up there.
If I bought something like that NYer, I'd probably keep it forever, so I guess even if I did start miling it up, it really wouldn't matter. And that's what my friend intends to do with his Mark V...so then maybe driving it around and such isn't such a bad thing. Even though it hurts any value for extra-low mileage, that doesn't matter if you never plan on selling it!
Plus, I could probably throw $12,000 at either one of my New Yorkers, and they'd still be nowhere near as nice as that 4,000 mile one!
If I had my senses about me, I would have bought that blue 1980 NYer we saw at the Mopar show back in 2006. It only had the 318, which was down to 120 hp by then, but it only had 34,000 miles on it and looked almost new! I was a bit worried about my finances back then, though. The market tanked, and I was down about 10%. Of course, 2008 taught me the real meaning of "tanking", and suddenly the thought of losing 10% doesn't even make me bat an eye anymore. :sick:
I also saw the local little old lady who drives a Mustang California Special. I drove behind her for a mile or so...she's a pretty iffy driver. Floors it off the line until she gets to about 10 over, then slowly goes down to the limit or 5 under. She must like the noise it makes. The car is immaculate, almost certainly has been restored - but I have a feeling she bought it new.
http://chicago.craigslist.org/wcl/cto/1222238406.html
unusual body/trim style, but I'd say about double what it's worth:
http://chicago.craigslist.org/sox/ctd/1222874738.html
hate the rims (wonder if they come with), but the price seems excellent:
http://chicago.craigslist.org/chc/cto/1222880821.html
kinda cute, but too pricey for me for what it is:
http://chicago.craigslist.org/sox/ctd/1222878388.html
not collectible, but I kinda like it for the price:
http://chicago.craigslist.org/nwc/cto/1222834859.html
can't stand run-on sentence ads, price is laughable:
http://chicago.craigslist.org/chc/cto/1222781158.html
it was pretty much 'blacked out' all over.
didn't looking like a home made custom.
Nova and Ranchero are from the same seller and appear to be the same color. That might not be a good thing.
Porsche 928 has to be a liar....wheels aren't stock, those didn't cost 100K new, and I would imagine the original owner would have better grammar and spelling.
Acura seems like a harmless car.
http://chicago.craigslist.org/chc/cto/1222781158.html
Assuming that it really has nothing wrong with it, and that it's really been maintained properly till now, what's the maintence going to be like to keep that car as a light daily driver? My wife has a 12 mile a day round trip commute to work, and I could drive it on the weekends . Are parts going to be readily available?
Of course it's going to cost like a Porsche to maintain, but what's the down side?
I'm paying old BMW maintenance prices now.
I mean, an Aveo is going to cost you $12K and the depreciation is going to be just as bad or worse.
Why NOT buy it and use it as a commuter till something expensive looms and then sell it to a dreamer for, say, $4K... "immaculately maintained; only 75K miles"
Is my internal optimist turned up too high again?
Oh, and I'm in Dallas - how's the AC in these cars?
I bet "some rust" for the 914 means "don't put your feet on the floor".
I agree with you Fintail... I'm sure if we talked to the seller, we'd be saying "Sir, I don't think that you and I have the same definition of the phrase "some".
On that Nova - the 305 wasn't that great an engine, it's a 78, and it has a pretty ugly vinyl top. "Try to find one of these?" Uhm, no thanks. YOU found one and YOU'RE trying to sell it. That makes things clear enough to me.
I saw this early (79) example at a local show last year, a twin to a period Matchbox car
It had some insanely low mileage...maybe not even into 5 digits...and the funky bug/rock deflector is worth a chuckle
Maintenance and repairs? --very expensive. Yes you can get parts but you'll pay for them. Radiator? $1400. Clutch repair--figure $2,400. Timing belt? $1600. Brake job $1000. Engine rebuild?--throw the car away or put in a Chevy.
Hell to work on, too. There's nothing under there that won't fight you, and that you won't need special tools for.
A 911 is a much easier car to cope with. 928s are extremely complex automobiles. I mean, who ever heard of a steering wheel adjustment that raises the instrument panel up and down? Or dual clutch plates? (clutch is in front but differential is in the rear).
Chevy small block conversions are pretty nifty actually. I think the company that sells the kits is called Renegade.
Thanks Fintail & Mr. Shiftright.....
The automatic eliminates a lot of clutch hassles but it also takes away from the excitement of the 928 quite a bit. The 928 is a GT car, a super-fast highway cruiser. It's not really a sports car in the sense I know a sports car. so you'd think an automatic would be great---like in a Bentley---even plenty of new Corvettes are ordered with automatic. So there IS an argument for ordering up big heavy fast coupes with an auto trans.
But the rather old-fashioned 928 automatic just doesn't cut it.
That or a very early car with the op-art upholstery would be interesting...or maybe the right S4. But the ones in-between...I don't know.
Some people do not care for the claustrophobic interior "feeling" however. Similar to a Volvo P1800 in how low down you sit...with your shoulder at sill height.
It's definitely a "man's car". I don't think I've ever seen a woman driving one, although certainly I'm sure there are ladies who could drive the wheels off it.
It feels like you're driving a BIG car. This isn't a ballerina, although they can handle beautiful if you muscle 'em around.
I like MB W126 remember...big Germans don't scare me :shades:
The Last Year
1995
* Model designation: 928 GTS
* Engine displacement: 5.4 L
* Valves: 32
* Power: 345 hp/350 PS (257 kW)
* Torque: 369 ft-lb (500 Nm)
Those specs are nice...but my not-sporty-looking E55 sedan can probably keep up with it. It also has much less intensive maintenance demands.
0-60mph: 5.14 seconds
0-1/4 mile: 13.7s
Top Speed: 171 mph