Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I agree above comments about price, The price difference should higher enough to be covered by the saving on gasoline bill. If Ford asks $3-$5k difference, I don't think it is worthed to buy.
lease an 04 Vibe for two or three years, wait for the Escape Hybrid waiting list to shorten, then get on the list and buy the Escape Hybrid.
I think anyone who tows more than 3000lbs will probably get a larger SUV or truck if it's a regular duty they need it for.
As for the Silverado, I believe they stated they can improve fuel economy by 4-6% ? IN the end the question would be, is it worth it ?
Year's ago Ford had plans to build Hybrid Explorer and they killed that idea real quick when they saw it would only increase fuel economy by just 4%. Then again, THAT was year's ago.... techonology has improved 10 folds since then, so it can happen at a feasable pricepoint (for the Explorer that is).
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2004-05-13-ford-hybrid-suv_x.- htm
Test Drive:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/reviews/healey/2004-05-13-esc- ape-main_x.htm
Note that towing is rated at 1000 pounds. The ICE version is rated at 3500 pounds if you want to compare.
Judging by the first link, if you want one, get in line now!
Granted, this is just one reviewer's opinion and there was no quantitative performance data, but it is not encouraging.
The reviewer used the term "underwhelming" when comparing the Hybrid's performance to the V6 model. However, near the end he commented that it was the most enjoyable hybrid to drive so far.
For the record I will not be getting in line. I don't care how much gas costs right now and fuel mileage is never on my list of needs when shopping for a new vehicle. I'll stick with the good old ICE until I'm forced to give it up. Yes, I'm one of those guys.
I saw an earlier post about seat comfort and wind noise. I must say that my '02 Escape XLT has about the most uncomfortable seats (hard as a rock) as I have ever sat upon. Windnoise is significant. I even tried removing the radio antenna mast and installing an inside mount antenna. That helped some, and in a major radio market the radio works fine. Get out in the boonies though, and I need to switch to CD.
The bottom line - Projected 30-40% better fuel economy in city driving and lower emissions. And projected cost increase of 600$ over a standard transmission.
References:
http://popularmechanics.com/automotive/auto_technology/2004/3/04_- - - sae_congress/index4.phtml
http://www.iags.org/n033104t3.htm
http://www.ford.com/en/innovation/engineFuelTechnology/modularHyb- - - ridTransmission.htm
We may have a new topic here.
Topcop, the new '05 Escape addresses the issues with the hard seats, and wind noise you had, as well as material quality has improved, gearshift lever moved to the center floor console.
These were common consumer complaints that were addressed.
___I can only hope This would work great with a Ford diesel from the Euro Focus in an 06/07 Escape. The Hydraulic Hybrid was one of the EPA’s top scientist’s own goal for higher fuel economy for all vehicles at a minimal cost. Given the technology is child’s play for most automobile mechanical engineer’s with a small host of electronic and computer engineer’s thrown in for good measure, you can see its promise for less expensive fuel economy.
___A must read for you As a precursor, the following article has a plethora of information in regards to Mr. Charles Gray’s (the EPA guy) as well as the Big 3’s past activities in achieving fuel economy most anyone would love to achieve in the automobiles we drive today.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/car/one/chi-startingu- p-special.special
___Good Luck
___Wayne R. Gerdes
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040213/nyf007_1.html
We can only wait and hope and maybe write a congressman that this does not go into a bureaucratic stalemate like the 80 MPG Super Car
Optimistic Regards
Michael
http://www.theautochannel.com/N/news/2004/04/30/192590.html
and
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040311/nyth077_1.html
http://www.waxahachiedailylight.com/WAXAHACHIEDAILYLIGHT/myarticl- es.asp?S=420&PubID=15955&P=980926
Both very positive in my opinion.
All these numbers were generated by drivers working hard to maximize fuel efficiency. Later results fell dramatically in real-world driving , underscoring the caveat for anyone considering a hybrid."
This is the crux of the matter. The Escape is far heavier and has a much lower c/d than the Prius.
I'm betting real world mileage will be around 30 MPG for most drivers. Still better than 22 for the ICE, but if the cost is high it won't be worth it. There is a very real possbility that hybrid technology won't be very useful unless the car is small and light, like the Prius, and has a low c/d. PLUS it has to be driven correctly.
Any increase is great, but it just goes to show, there ain't no such thing as a free lunch. TANSTAFL. Weight + poor areodynamics + 4WD = lower mileage. Hybrid technology is no subsitute for smaller cars, which the American public has (so far) turned down.
The premium is rumored to be over a comparable I4 model which should put the hybrid right in line with the V6 model when it comes down to sticker price. If that's the case paying the V6 price for similar performance and 8+ mpg more would be a very good deal.
Just don't plan on putting too much weight in or on the thing. Stick with the V6 or something bigger if you need that.
You also have to factor in that the Hybrid won't have an incentive, and the V6 will, further pushing the prices apart. Could well be 4-6K difference when incentives are factored in.
I don't know how true this is but it does make a lot of sense.
Incentives on the Escape are (or were) the lowest of any Ford product. Usually around $500 - $1000 and $1500 near the end of each MY.
The ICE is a better deal up front but you'll probably end up saving more than the incentive amount in gas during the first year or two. The rest is just gravy.
How about insurance? Will it be higher on the hybrid version due to it's potential higher cost of repair?
If the Hybrid gets only 30 MPG overall, vice about 20 MPG, it would take a long time to recover, say, $5500 (4K hybrid and 1500 negative incentives vs. normal Escape).
At $3 / gallon, it is about 110K miles, if I figure correctly, and about 139K miles at $2.50 / gallon, plus the complexity of the design requires that you use Ford to fix problems. I saw a post in the Prius board in which transmission repairs cost $15,000 (under warranty). Imagine that after the warranty ran out.
And then there are the batteries to consider when trading in the vehicle or selling it.
You only need to recoup the $1500 rebate because the HEV premium is over the I4 and not the V6 which we are comparing it to. The I4 already gets better mileage but does not perform as well as either the V6 or the HEV and therefore doesn't fit into the equation. The V6 and HEV will cost about the same according to information posted on this thread and that's what I was going by.
So in keeping apples with apples, and using Steve's math, it would take about 30,000 miles to recoup the $1500 rebate. If the government brings back the hybrid vehicle tax credit, which was about $1500, you'll recoup the money even faster.
One other thing, the 30 MPG figure was not an average but rather their worst mileage during heavy footed "normal" driving. If you moderate the right foot ~40 MPG is quite achievable in city driving.
The key is that it has to perform like the V6. Otherwise the HEV is a big waste of money. This is where Steve's figures then become a reality (give or take a few miles because the I4 does better than 20 MPG) and everyone might as well opt for the I4 model if they want to save gas.
http://www.fordaxz.com/pdf/2005.HYBRID.ESCAPE.pdf
I was basing my numbers on the V6. I personally don't think the Escape will perform quite as well, so will probably be in between the 4 and the 6 cylinder. And forget it for towing anything of significance, one of the main reasons for choosing the Escape.
I suspect most people will get 30 MPG, not 40. What kind of SUV driver really wants to carefully drive? It is a much larger car with poorer c/d than the Prius, and even the Prius has been known to get below 40 MPG if pushed.
So, to compare apples to apples, you cannot compare the EPA rated mpg for a V6 and the "real" world mpg for a hybrid.
If you assume the V6 gets 15mpg and the hybrid 30mpg and you drive 12,000 miles per year with $2.25 gas, you will spend $1800/year on gas for the V6 and $900/year for the hybrid.
-Jon
http://www.edmunds.com/townhall/chat/townhallchat.html
6-7pm PT/9-10pm ET. Drop by for live chat with other members. Hope you can join us!
kirstie_h
Roving Host & Future Vehicles Host
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
Jonemyers bringa up an interesting point. Either way if you have the V6, or Hybrid and you drive aggresively, your MPG will reflect your particular driving habits. So (like myself) can probably get 15-18MPG out of the V6 version, would probably be getting 25-30MPG out of the Hybrid version. While someone who may have light foot, could get 23-25MPG for the V6 while getting 45-40MPG for the Hybrid version... It's all relevent to your driving habits.
Thanks,
Jeannine Fallon
PR Director
Edmunds.com
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
However, there are a lot of factors here. For example, my father has a 2001 Lincoln Town car that gets 20 MPG in town and 27 on the road, drive it any way you like. It has a V-8 engine. The point is that a larger engine can be mated to a transmission that takes advantage of the engine size and characteristics. So that Escape V6 may not be as fuel inefficient as some posts indicate.
http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content.mv?port_code=autoweek&cat- _code=carnews&loc_code=index&content_code=01564449
Source: Autoweek.com
Although I'm not fond of the screen, it's a bit too small for my taste, although the placement of keys are much better than most other systems.
Notice the Nav system in the Expy, is a bit different as well, from the Escape Hybrid. Look for that version (Expy), to trickle onto other products, but of course... only if consumer's buy them. If not, they won't be made available.
If in fact the NAV system is CD based, there is no excuse for Ford to be putting in such antiquated technology into its new hybrid.
Can anyone from Ford confirm whether the NAV system is CD or DVD based?