Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
The japanese alwayse built FWD cars, the camcords are fwd and they sell at about 400K per year each. This is very very important.
GM spend alot of money during the 80's i think to convert there entire platforms to FWD. Now they are gonna spend more to convert back. The truth is you need FWD, RWD and AWD in your portfolio so you can better deal with changes in the market.
The G6 has FWD, and its just fine to me. It is a nice car inside and out, and if it has to be fwd then fine. if a GTO or a Camaro were FWD it would be a different story, there cars are in a totally different market. I do not think too many people cross shop G6's and GTO's. or even mustangs and g6's for that matter.
I was in a mall a short time ago and saw a G6 coupe inside, standing next to a contest where it was one of the prizes. I have to tell you this car is very attractive, and it looks better than in the pictures. I am still not thrilled with the rear lamps, but they are LED and are starting to grow on me.
The thing that really botherred me about this beautiful white GTP with 18 inch wheels and tires and auto trans with two tone interrior, was the backseat.
can any owners tell us if its confortable over there? I sat in the back of an accord and it was allright. The only thing that botherred me about the GTP was the lack of an armrest for rear seat passengers. There was a grove dug into the middle with cupholders (trim pieces on top of the leather). I think its nice because you have a place to put your pens and what not. An armrest would be better, with the cupholders on the end of it.
Please don't tell me its because the rear seat flips down. I just don't buy that, because they could still put an armrest in there like im sure they do for SAAB and others. I want to go test drive one but can't find the time lately (school work is kicking my A***).
nice car overall and a very nice interrior. nav and xenon, anyone?
Loren
Torque steer is barely an issue on most GM FWD cars. It may be a problem on some Acuras and Nissans, but not GM products. GM had V8s in FWD cadillacs for years with barely a hint of torque steer.
Its platform and drivetrain started off as front drive car. Then they added SH-AWD, stability control, traction control, antiskid system, 4-channel ABS and hence the $50,000 price tag.
Take for example the Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger:
All the same hardware as the RL plus some. And because it is RWD(AWD is an option), they even can squeeze a HEMI under the hood. All for around $33k. Bigger car and more amenities over the Acura.
I do admit my G6 GTP 6-speed is one of the most balanced and easiest to drive FWD cars I've ever driven. The European and the Japanese models are not so good in FWD. The Maxima, TL, Mazda 6, SAAB 9-3/9-5, Volvo S-40/60/80, are all plagued by torque and bump steer, which is extremely annoying in spirted accelleration, with these cars supposedly to be sports sedans.
There are a few exceptions: The Accord is extremely balanced, the new Sonata, and even the Audi's without Quattro are just fine.
As a light duty, just for fun car, it is OK I guess. Would
make a cool looking truck with the HHR front on it, but GM
has no imagination.
Loren
maybe GM doesn't expect the "fun to drive" set to be looking at the G6...because they are looking at a souped up Civic, instead
;-)
Generally these two are in very different segments, those that want fun to drive are looking at more than just civic, if thats what they can afford, they are also looking at the Cobalt.
Nedless to say, the G6 looks to be a very fun to drive car, its just in a higher market. I would suggest for gm to do what they did to there big suv's to the pontiac line (as well as the buick), take all those iron ohv v6's and keep the design, just make it out of aluminum. That would save what, 300 lbs? It would make the G6 accelerate faster and get better fuel economy, so they would not have to resort to fuel economy destroying gearing.
I hope they have enough budget after the heath care deal with the UAW to do that.
HOWEVER, having said that, my understanding is that the GTP version of this car has a different steering system. I haven't heard about lockups in the GTP, so I'd consider the GTP. Being fast and having stability control are also critical--I'd just like to drive one, but none of the dealers around here seem to have a GTP with a stick, which makes no sense to me (but perhaps tells me something about the average Pontiac customer).
Sounds like more of an argument to buy a non-GM car than anything else.
Sounds like more of an argument to buy a non-GM car than anything else.
No he said he liked the EPS steering. He also said he disliked what he had in his truck which had heavier steering.
I don't think that you'll have a problem in doing this. You may have to pay the difference, but the equippment that you get and the fact that you are assured that you want have steering lock-up is worth it, IMO.
Pump, bracket, hoses, hydraulic rack all cost money.
Pump, bracket, hoses, hydraulic rack all cost money.
Actually EPS costs more $$ about 5 years ago. It was put on some GM cars for the gas savings. It runs off battery power and does not take power directly from the engine. Today I would imagine costs has gone down though.
GM and Pontiac is testing this in the new for '08 GTO(all-American baby) and the soon to be produced Buick convertible hard-top. So the General is catching up. The new GMT 900 SUV's and pick-ups were supposed to get it but the upper management scrapped the plan to rush out the trucks. I just wish they'd do more R&D on their products before they release them. There would be less quality problems, thus less warranty claims and more potential customers not let down by GM's as of late reputation. I for one believe in GM. These are the people who invented the electric starter,power brakes(Citroen company used it's technology tho), and so on yet they can't build a safe steering system. Come on Rick Wagner, the G6 is otherwise a fantastic ride. So why let something so minute destroy it's good traits?
As for the rest of the G6 car, the verdict is out for another year or so, as one must see how things go with a new model. This could be a reliable car. I may a competitive car as prices fall. If GM stays in business, with no major strikes, and a future which looks better, this may be one of the GM cars to consider--Actually the GTP which doesn't have the electric steering assist. And no sunroofs.
Good luck, Loren
I for one believe that if they do go to electric on all cars, then it should have hydraulic back-up like the Mercedes and BMW's. It's just taking a precautionary measure. I don't own a vehicle with full electric steer and do not plan on it.
Funny how GM can spend millions on electric steering yet can't manage to stay in the black. Oh, just figured out my own ponder.
I own a G6 GTP 6-speed and I feel like it doesn't get the publicity that the Mazda 6 or the Nissan Altima receives. I know those are great performing cars, but I believe the GTP is a more fun car to drive than either. My particular GTP ran a 5.22 0-60 and a 13.7 1/4 mile run(yes I do have extra on it). I don't know if anybody knows this, but those times actually beat the Mustang GT's numbers that M/T tested.
So would I buy a Mustang GT over a G6 GTP? Ah, no. I save hundreds of dollars on insurance and my GTP is such a sleeper against Mustangs and yes even GTO's believe it or not.
Thanks to all who are trying to get to the bottom of this problem. CA Mike :confuse:
I am trying to decide between the G6 and the Malibu. I have driven the Malibu with the 2.2L Ecotec and the mpg numbers (from real world users) are quite impressive. I like the styling of the G6 better, but most 2.2L Malibu owners seem very satisfied with their mpg.
Soo they arnt all bad.
Thanks all.
do you calculate at fillup, or by DIC?
also, does anyone know the bolt pattern for the g6 i4? would it be the same as the v6? i assume so because it seems all that is really changed is the engine/PCM, etc.
anyone drive the i4 in snow without traction control? i'm wondering how the stockers hold up to winter driving as well.
thanks all,
Tom
sorry to see you go to the torrent, nice SUV though.
i'm not concerned about the steering issues with the G6. i drive a Saturn Ion Red Line, and it has electric steering as well, and any issues that were present in the ION were eliminated for the RL version, and i actually LOVE the steering in the RL.
i assume most with steering issues are '05 owners, first year models, and i'm sure it'll be worked out in no time. i also have faith that the 2.4 G6 doesn't have this issue, as they likely used calibrations/settings from the cobalt/ion/malibu 4cyl. cars for release of the 2.4 in the G6. i'll make sure to post if i do have any issue though.