Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Toyota Sienna 2004+
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
BTW the Aspen Green which we drove had the NAV system with the rear view camera. So you can try that out as well.
If you go on Sunday, the Aspen Green was out front under the front overhang, the Blue Mirage was around the right side of the building, (I think it was waiting to be prepped.) I don't know how you get to it because there was a wall between it and the front lot. If it's still in the same place, maybe you can go around the back of the building and all the way around to nearly the front on the right side. (we went through the building w/ the salesman.) Hope this helps, I know how you feel about ordering without seeing the colors, I called all the big dealers in Denver today to find a Blue Mirage and we drove up from the Springs to see it.
BTW. John Elway is a big dealer and they may be able to get you a car faster, and they seemed willing to meet anyone's price. We shall see about that.
Good luck (and happy mothers day.)
Dan Jaecks
Take the trouble to call a few city police departments in MT and/or WY until you find the few that were forced into FWD by city managers and the auto manufacturers, mainly Ford and Chevy.
They will tell you, to a man, just how unsafe FWD can be for wintertime use.
Lived in MT myself for a few years in the sixties, before FWD.
And I will continue to tell anyone who asks about FWD or front biased AWD just how unsafe they can be in adverse roadbed conditions.
Or shall I put my '82 thru '00 years in Anchorage driving only FWD up against your trips to Montana from WA?
Here's one link that I think we both can use for ammo: Front Wheel Drive Police Cruisers.
Steve, Host
Travelled to Anchorage and Fairbanks, even Barrow, quite a lot back in the seventies, but didn't do much driving. The one incident I do remember was backing out of a hotel parking lot early one morning, after unplugging the engine heater, just to discover that the power steering fluid was frozen and I couldn't turn the steering wheel. Went back in and had a few cups of coffee with the engine running.
The police FWD "shill" wrote:
"By placing both steering and acceleration loads on the front tires, the limit of available traction on dry pavement will be reached sooner with FWD when compared with a similiar rear-wheel-drive vehicle."
Pardon me, "available traction on DRY pavement", Ontario, Canada?
Should have said, "available traction on dry pavement, of very serious concern as roadbed conditions grow worse and worse during wintertime driving...." !!!
But a very good article overall, now if only we could get EVERY FWD owner, or potential FWD owner, to read and heed.
The most important point made is that for FWD the inception of loss of control is more benign, less noticeable, and the corrective action is non-intinctive for most drivers, "ease off the throttle"(EASE being the operative term here), "shift into neutral".
Basically glad you obviously learned the non-intinctive "tricks" of driving FWD early enough that you survived. Some don't.
Thanks for the link.
As to handling and traction (by the way southern Canada doesn't just receive snow and is not the great white north), this article is written from the point of view of a rear drive tester. Most police training revolves around rwd vehicles (though that is changing to some degree) and the features of rwd. As an FYI, police officers are not the best drivers and are certainly not performance drivers, they just drive alot. They are given rudimentary training in high speed driving which is designed to keep them out of trouble. The number of loss of control police car accidents is staggering.For someone who has never driven rwd (which includes most drivers under the age of 40), they do not have the "instinctive" skills that the police evaluator speaks of. Rwd handling characteristics are not instinctive, they are learned just as they are for fwd.
On a race course where traction and handling are taken to their ultimate limit, fwd and rwd in low horsepower situations come out nearly equal. A perfect example is the Show Room Stock class in SCCA racing where you have Miatas against Civics, Neons and other fwd vehicles.
All vehicles are dangerous and have handling and traction peculiarities that must be learned in order to effectively control them. Whether or not a vehicle has fwd, rwd, awd or some other drive system, they need to be treated with respect and care (in most snow storms the vehicles I see in major accidents are 4wd SUVs who's drivers fail to understand this issue). For most drivers "The most important point made is that for FWD the inception of loss of control is more benign" characteristics are safer and more easily handled by the average poorly trained driver.
Thanks,
Bev
Yesterday, I installed my rear-facing convertible car seat in the second row chairs of my 2004 Sienna. My car seat uses tethers (the strap that attaches from the top of the car seat to an anchor in the car). The back of the 2nd row and the 3rd row seats have tether anchors, but I need someplace to anchor the car seat on the *front* of the 2nd row seat (since the car seat is rear facing.
I flipped up the 2nd row seat, and I found what I think is a tether anchor...it's a metal "loop" that runs directly underneat the seat. It's similar to the other tether anchors in the car, but it has a strap attached to it.
Does anyone know if this is another tether anchor? What is the strap for? I can't seem to find anything about it in the owner's manual.
Thanks!
P.S. For the families out there with young kids...the LATCH system is great. It was SO easy to install my car seats and make them *very* secure.
NHTSA | Child Passenger Safety
You should not use the front facing tether anchor (on the Sienna car seat) as it is designed for forces running in the opposite direction.
When I test drove a Sienna there were several stout tubes under the seat that allowed for easy attachment. Remember to run the tether so it goes between the seat cushion and the slide release, not over the seat slide release.
Yes the LATCH system and the tether made for a very fast, easy and secure installation.
I ordered one LE and was told it would arrive in about 5 weeks(end of May).
Then, I received a call that they had another one that was similar and would be arriving sooner (in 2 weeks). They said they weren't sure when the 1st car would arrive (due end May originally). I changed my order and took the one arriving sooner. Now the 2 weeks for this car has turned into 4 weeks (due end of May with this "earlier" car).
I'm wondering if things are taking longer than they planned, or if I'm just having bad luck. Have any of you experienced this? Longer than estimated deliver dates?
Thanks
As far as a topper for the roof rack, the roof rack on the 2004 Sienna says 150 pound limit on it and I would think that a topper would also have a negative effect on gas mileage due to poorer aerodynamics. But, I assume a trailer would give you even worse gas mileage.
Our thoughts go like this..
Do the second row air bags and air curtain systems save lives? What about the kids laying against the air bags in the second row?
We have had a 4WD Suburban for 4 years (we are selling) and have used the 4WD a hand full of times (we live in Maryland, but make frequent trips to NY in the winter). Is the traction control system really worth the extra money?
I guess we have seen too many Volvo and Michelin commercials and that is why we have decided to play it safe.
And finally, anyone else worried about two posts for transmission problems?
I don't really know how the sienna will rate for these airbags, but I'm going to take the chance. I asked the same safety question about a month ago, about the air bags. I was told they drop from the ceiling, not the side of the van. My GUESS is that its like a seatbelt. Sometimes it can cause injury, but overall its much better in a crash.
I am a LITTLE concerned about the transmissions, but my HOPE is that it is very rare.
Congrats on your new van!
Bev
I'll be moving the tether strap to the mounting tubes this morning, thanks kmead.
Kim
Actually, the main reservation I have about the car (besides the price!) is the poor rear visibility. It is harder to back up than our old Nissan Quest van, the windows are smaller in the rear and the 3rd seat cuts your view, so you can't see anything (or anyone) less than about 4 feet tall. I think it would also be hard to parallel park, though I didn't try. You also have to look more carefully before changing lanes on the freeway than in our old van.
Good luck,
Dan Jaecks
How about package 4 (BI)? I also doubt that
the traction staff is necessary or not when
I am not a aggressive driver. To avoid the kids
to sleep close to the side air bag, I suggest
you buy 8 passenger trim. Then pull down the
middle seat in the second as armrest, and
the kids mostly will sleep over the middle
seat.
I'm afraid I agree with the rear view. I did have problems when I demoed the van. They had me back up to a gastank to fill it. I'm hoping that I will get used to this. It was dark and I was nervous driving a new car that wasn't mine. That was part of the problem too. Hoping I'll get used to it.
Thanks for the help with the color.
Bev
Thanks,
Bev
And do not, I say DO NOT, rely on the Sienna AWD system in anything close to the way you might have had occassion to in the Suburban.
Assuming the Sienna owner's manual is written the same way as the RX330, for the safety of you and yours ignore that bit of snowchains ONLY on the front, that will exacerbate the hazardous nature of FWD and front torque biased AWD on adverse roadbeds dramatically.
If you do find a circumstance wherein snowchains are the only option, put them on all four if you can, otherwise only on the rear.
And if you have the infamous Toyota automatic climate control, when the front windshield fogs over spontaneously during colder weather ignore the front defrost/defog/demist button until you have first, quickly, turned up the heat and the blower.
sheeeesh......
Now THAT'S funny! LOL!
Not that anyone needs any reason to participate in Town Hall....
Steve, Host
If someone does bug you on Town Hall, the down arrow works well....
Steve, Host
I thought it gave a really good description of the shortcomings of FWD in adverse, snow and ice, roadbed conditions.
There's a new AWD vs FWD topic in Vans that just got started:
AWD vs FWD with VSC + Traction Control
See you there!
Steve, Host
Ultimately, personal perceptions of colors vary, so its best to see it. I'm sure someone in town will be getting one soon, try calling the big dealers once a week and tell them you haven't made up your mind yet and want to look at the blue color when it comes in. You'll have to pretend to be still shopping or they won't bother to call you back when its in.
Good luck,
Dan J
PS, after you've seen the car, when they pressure you to buy, tell them you've got an offer for $500 over invoice, but if they meet it you'll switch. They won't bother you any more, at least that was my experience.
"Be careful when accelerating, up-shifting, downshifting, or braking on a slippery surface. Sudden acceleration or engine braking, could cause the vehicle to skid or spin."
NOTE: "ENGINE BRAKING"
(DO NOT LIFT YOUR FOOT FROM THE THROTTLE QUICKLY!)
Or else quickly shift into neutral.
The Sequoia is predominantly a RWD biased vehicle, what did you suppose will happen with a FWD or AWD with front torque biasing?
Same manual, Page 143, center column yellow high-lighted CAUTION note.
"Under certain slippery road conditions, full traction of the vehicle and power against 4 wheels (4WD mode) or rear wheels (2WD mode) cannot be maintained, even though the active traction control system is in operation"
I read this statement as verification of a firmware time-out to prevent the ABS pump/motor from being over-taxed and over-heating due to continuous pump activity requirement.
This statement would likely also apply to ANY Toyota or Lexus vehicle with ACTIVE Trac and/or AWD using braking to apportion torque, HL, 4runner, GX470, RX300, RX330, Sienna, and obviously the Sequoia.
You likely have only about 45 seconds of continuous Trac or AWD "duty", then you're left with a vehicle that has 3 open diff'ls.
And obviously the ABS and VSC would now also be non-functional until the time-out expires (unless you need to do a restart cycle??) and the pump can again be activated.
The difference for me to get an AWD is $6000 and frankly not worth it to me. I'm not going drive my new $35K van on the road when it snows and in Seattle that's pretty rare.
I'll drive my 5K sedan instead.
And trying to point out the limitations in the use of ABS pump/motor implementations of VSC, Trac, AWD, and ABS itself.
The VSC/Trac on my 01 RX300 was disabled after about 30 seconds of continuous use, and the "failed" indication remained on until the next time I restarted and then drove about 100 yards.
It now appears that during that "failure" period I had no ABS, VSC, or Trac functionality at all.
I really wanted to respond to wwest's posts and pointed out how totally irrelevant his "references" were and how the only explanation for his RX300 behaviour was mechanical failure and that he had a faulty car.
But then, I would be just "copying and pasting" all my old messages. So I gave up, listened to Steve's advice and used the down arrow key. However, I do worry about new users coming here looking for information - as they would be totally confused by wwest's rambling which was totally wrong.
Issues of reliability, early owners experience, option choices, every day use.....come on give us something, availability, regional differences
my solution to the above is a "nwd" no wheel drive, so things can never happen driving characterisics of vehicles are important but get a life, make up a dribble forum and have those that want to wollow in it move there. people are looking to these forums to enhance their knowlege and share experiences i guess it's too much of a challenge.
KarenS "Honda Odyssey Owners: Future Models" May 12, 2003 10:58pm!make=Honda&model=Odyssey&ed_makeindex=.ef138ce
Unless by "we're inclined to wait for the new Ody due out this fall" you just mean the minor changes manufacturers do on their same models each year to make them slightly more appealing. Or have you heard different?