Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
It will cause detonation and at best the ECU will have to pull WAY back and you will have terrible performance. At worst you will very quickly cause severe damage to your engine.
Some engines can live with lower ocatane,a t least for a while. But not these turbo engines!!!!
Sly
Sly
It's been 16 to 20 cents more for years in my area.
Unless the additives / octane boosters (or whatever they use to get premium) change in price, the price of crude should not affect the price difference in grades.
I'm sure Colin will set me straight if I'm out of line. :-D
DaveM
I'll tell you right now, I love my XT, but if gas mileage and gas costs matter a lot to you, then it's not the right vehicle for you.
CRaig
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
- I am seriously considering an automatic, after 12 years of driving a standard car. Has anyone purchased the automatic and in hindsight wished they would have got the manual instead? Am thinking about the cars 'get up and go' (and dont want to go for the turbo model due to $$...too many student loans to pay off first!!)
- with respect to mileage, it seems you folks are getting somewhere in the mid to high 20's with your Subaru's. Out of curiosity, in order to improve the mileage has anyone tried an 89 or even 91 octane fuel in their 2.5i? I know in my Honda using the higher octane (91) fuel made a significant difference in the mileage which more than made up for the extra cost, so I always used the premium fuel. The Subaru manual says the minimum recommended octane is 87...just curious to know if anyone has tried something better.
- any other advice re: purchasing my Subaru would be appreciated. I am hoping to have bought and received it within the next 2 weeks.
Thank you.
It is called ground clearance not AWD ;-)
Krzys
That engine was surprisingly peppy with the manual, but was too slow for me with the auto...
Just my 2 cents...
Sly
AWD would get me suspended further down the road.
Krzys
PS 3ft of snow asks for ground clearance. Which and how many wheels are spinning is minor issue if they cannot touch the ground.
PS2 Do you have 3ft of snow on the ground when you drive or road is plowed and you just go through the bank the plows made ?
Other SUVs have probably wrong or bald tires. Driver could be an issue too.
If Hyundai stays on track, then my guess is 5 years from now the public will think of them as a quality car maker. The jokes have already mostly stopped.
OTOH, Lexus could slack off completely for 4-5 years before the public would recognize that.
-juice
Cheers Pat.
a US gallon is 3.785 litres, and the exchange rate is about 1.22. Currently gas is about 79 cents in Ottawa, so that is .79 x 3.785 / 1.22 = $2.45 US.
Premium is usually 6 more cents per litre which would be .85 x 3.785 / 1.22 = $2.63 US or 18 cents more per gallon).
And if you go across the river to an Ultramar gas station on Thursdays, the premium is the same price as the 89 octane, saving you 3 cents a litre.
Sly
Yes, but a CAD earned and spent in Canada is equivalent to a USD earned and spent in USA.
CAD 3.87/gal is expensive.
-Dave
I can pop it through some pretty deep burms and short stretches of maybe 50', but my front bumper is feeling the effects of that..... Subarus plane up on deep, compact snow pretty well, so as long as there is momentum and a straight line, it glides quite admirably.
Now, let me also clarify that I am one of those stubborn fools who currently uses all-seasons. A real winter tire could probably help the car plow through at least another 6" of relatively dry/light snow.
Sly
Since then, I have had an 02 LL Bean with the H6/auto and it was nice. I now have an 05 XT with the 5EAT and couldn't be happier. If I was going back to a base engine (and that is actually appealing for the better gas mileage) I would either get an Outback with a 5-spd manual or a Forester with auto-trans. My wife had an 03 Forester XS with the base 2.5 engine and a 4EAT and it was a blast to drive. Much better vehicle size for the engine/transmission combo.
Other things to consider -- auto is better for offroad use, for creeping along at slow speed, and for heavy traffic. Those things gradually drove me to automatic over the years, despite the fact that I preferred manual. Fortunately, the 5EAT matched with the turbo motor in my XT is quite good, and I don't miss manual so much anymore.
Craig
However, if you are the type that likes more spirited driving and engine control, then you may end up wishing for a manual in the end. But beware -- Honda makes some of the best manual trannies in the industry. Subaru's is okay, but not one to bring in rave reviews. Be sure to try both out before you buy.
As for gas milage, the answer is it depends. With my former 98 Forester 5MT (similar engine to the 2.5i) I never really saw an improvement in performance or milage when switching octane. Since the EJ25 engine does not have the ability to advance timing (only retard it based on knock), it doesn't have the built-in ability to take advantage of the knock-resistance of higher octane fuel. In fact, I've even heard of some folks getting worse milage and performance when going to 91.
Happy shopping!
Ken
Incidently I just filled today and payed 85.9 you can find it sometimes at 79 cents a litre if you are lucky enough to be out in the particular half hour each day that they are selling it at that price.
And I don't know what station you are using typically Petro can and Imperial oil premium is 10 cents a litre more.
Cheers Pat.
Sly
Not surprisingly, I noticed a difference in how the two behaved on the same loop. The OBXT leaned more through turns especially on freeway on-ramps. The long travel suspension also did allow for some brake dive and squat. In contrast, the GT wagon seemed to corner relatively flat and exhibted very little brake dive/squat. The other thing to note was road feel. The GT with lower profile tires and stiffer suspension does communicate every little bump more than the XT.
From a braking perspective, I don't believe I noticed a difference. The GT does have better hardware which may make a difference under repeated braking either on a long downhill or at the track. Again, the only marked difference was in the amount of brake dive between the two models.
Ken
I owned a 2000 Legacy L with the 2.5 litre and 5 speed. It scooted around pretty well and got an average of 26 MPG. I traded in on a 200 wagon wagon with the 4EAT auto trans. The auto shifted firmly but the performance was hurt badly and averaged around 23 MPG.
It took me less than a year to dump the Legacy with the AT.
I now have a 2005 Legacy 2.5i Sedan manual trans. Performance is acceptable, I only have 3000 miles and have taken no road trips and I am averaging about 26 MPG on winter formula fuel. I expect to average around 27 to 28 with summer fuel and warmer temps.
I experimented with some higher octane fuel and noticed no better performance or MPG.
With your recent experience with the Prelude, I feel you won't be happy with the automatic in the Subaru unless your willing to pay for the turbo and tolerate MUCH lower MPG.
Hears the math... Legacy weighs in at 3200 lbs, probably 400 lbs more than your Prelude. It has 168 HP, but the extra weight, friction and inertia of the AWD will use at least 8 HP. An Auto Trans will suck another 5 to 10 HP (big price to pay).
I am willing to accept the AWD penalty for the traction and handling advantage, but until arthritis hits my joints, I am happy to participate in shifting on my own.
Just my 2 cents.
Jim
And this is your problem.
There are U.S. Galons and Imperial Galons.
One is 3.7.. l and the other 4.5.. l. You are using wrong galons.
Krzys
So before you correct someone make sure you have the horse before the cart.
(Here is what I posted.
The price of gas in Ottawa is 86 cents a litre, and has been for the last 2 weeks and I priced a gallon for what I am paying for it albeit is imperial and not US. So 4.5 times 86 cents ==$3.83 CDN an IMP gallon.Or 86x3.785=$3.26 a US gallon)
Cheers Pat.
Tom
I was all set to trade my 02 Outback in on a 05 GT wagon, and drove an XT for the heck of it. That turned out to be the best blend of what I wanted in a car. And I am glad I got the XT -- just this weekend I was driving through an unplowed parking lot to go skiing, and I really appreciated the extra ground clearance.
If you don't plan to go offroad or drive in the snow, and you value on-road handling and looks, I would get the GT. Otherwise, the XT is a great bet and probably one of the best handling "sport-utility" vehicles out there.
Craig
Did get stuck going through snow about the height of the grill that drifted across the driveway. Just packed her out and tried again, no problem!
-B
I think extra GC & XT looks very upscale
And then others corrected you ?
"Regular in this area is costing about $3.87 a gallon and premium usually runs 50 cents a gallon more. For those that don't know my location, it is Ottawa Canada.
Cheers Pat. "
Krzys
regards,
kyfdx
(its a joke, son)
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
The vehicle's acceleration with the auto is definitely not a strong suit, with off the line response adequate at best. It isn't terrible, its just that the vehicle builds speed progressively, rather than jumping off the line with any enthusiasm.
I'm not particularly impressed by the throttle/transmission interaction either, regardless of Normal or Sport setting. Theres been much talk about the transmission lag in V6 Toyotas. However, I notice lag with this engine/throttle/transmission combo, too, and I dont think its an issue per se, just something to be aware of. Hit the accelerator in this car from a steady state, wait while the computers think, then....BAM! downshift. Takes a while to get used to, but once the vehicle does kick down, passing ability is actually quite decent, and much better than performance from a standstill, in my opinion.
If you get the auto, you might spend a lot of time in manumatic mode, which I find more responsive than similar technologies in other vehicles in this price range. That gets really tiring too though, because you cant shift into neutral as you slow down.
In terms of MPG, we are typically averaging around 25 in a fair mix of city highway, the best I've seen is on a longer trip with moderate speeds... 29.4 MPG for about 150 miles (according to trip computer).
Hope this helps. Definitely test drive both.
-Joe
Years ago, we had a Geo Prizm LSi with the 5 speed which was essentially a Toyota Corolla. After 4 years and 125,000 miles we traded it in for an '02 Prizm, that last year they were made. However, this one had a 3 speed automatic in it that we absolutely hated!! We tolerated it for one year, said life it too short, and got the '03 Legacy 5 speed.
I think we will always have MTs as long as our knees allow!
-juice
In Actual fact so that there would be no misconception I gave the location I was living. Ottawa Canada. So in fact my origional claim was and is correct.Here is my origional post.
(Regular in this area is costing about $3.87 a gallon and premium usually runs 50 cents a gallon more. For those that don't know my location, it is Ottawa Canada)
Cheers Pat.
Krzys
Not here, please.
I'm still having the hesitation prob on accel though with my OB XT MT. Tried 94 for one fill up and did not notice a change.
Cheers,
Jay
Was stuck behind plow. Of course, it was pushing snow towards the driveway side of the street. Got through that wall of snow just fine, but then hit a big drift at the steepest point of the driveway and just stopped. Let the three wheel spinning begin! Hehe
Just backed on out straight and on the second attempt, no problems.
-B
Go out in the morning it would be 86 Cents, noon it could be 79, and by dinner back to 86.
Made it almost impossible to get a deal, guess they figured most people realised the change on every Thurs was too predictable.
Cheers Pat.
To get back on topic, I wish Subarus had bigger gas tanks.
And for the record I don't care if the extra gallons are Imperial or not. ;-)
-juice
-Dave
Not it's not, at least for the XT. 300 mile range is ridiculous. 400 is more the norm and many cars can do 500 nowadays. It is by far the worst range of any car I have ever owned.
Sly
But the low fuel light comes on with 2.3 gallons left, and they don't recommend you go beyond that. So you have 14.6 gallons to use on a regular basis.
Forester and Impreza have a gallon less.
-juice
-Dave
Thanks!