Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
if you have auto transmission, you will get less mpg than manual one
Hey, it's better than a Z4.
I live in North Collins we get the same weather that Springville gets. I will be back in NY in the spring.
other wise I am enjoying driving it.
what he meant with that?
is octane 87 better than 93?
any body knows?
But the Aveo's horsepower and torque peak at a relatively high RPM level. So I think in a "mixed" driving environment, the Aveo is going to spend more time in the lower gears and higher engine speeds... climbing hills, trying to reach freeway speeds, etc.
I haven't driven a VW with the 1.8 turbo engine, but I imagine it has enough low-rpm torque so that it doesn't "need" to downshift as often.
And finally, turbo-charged engines are just more efficient overall.
less than that, will damage the engine
The 1.8T Passat does get worse mileage, as reflected in their EPA estimates. Our Aveo gets 25/34 almost exactly, depending on where we are driving.
The 1.8T's low end torque is probably from the turbo - and it most likely gets worse mileage when boosting. However, between the high price and poor reliability of most VW products (TDIs excepted), I don't think you are getting particularly good value no matter what the mileage. (which is worse than the Aveo with the 1.8T)
Why are turbo-charged engines more efficient? From a specific output standpoint?
I average 37 mpg with my ECHO in mixed driving, actually I'm getting a little better than that now that it's winter.
I think good gas mileage is an underated feature. Even Edmunds Top Ten Features of Commuter Cars article has gas mileage ranked pretty low (IMO) Ranking it below having satelite radio and in-dash CD changer? C'mon give me a break.
When gas prices were at 2.15/gallon my ECHO was saving me a bundle of money, and the savings was a whole hell of a lot more important than having an in-dash CD changer.
http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/list/top10/102588/article.html
http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/list/top10/102019/article.html
http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/list/top10/103164/article.html
BTW... its kind of funny that some of Chevy's other offererings get about the same - possibly better gas mileage than their "bottom of the line" economy car ???
That top ten list is moronic.
How much did you pay for your echo?
I mainly purchased the ECHO because I thought it would spend the least amount of time in the shop compared to the other low-end sedan models.
I've got 23K on it with no problems, and I like the mpg.
The knocks on it are the usual cons of driving a small car - gets blown around a little on windy days and the wake of semis.
I still see the special value 2004 Aveos advertised for $6200.00 in Chicago. That kind of savings can buy a lot of gasoline.
Yesterday I finally returned my rented Aveo to Enterprise. 32 days, about 5000 total miles. I actually drove two different cars, having returned the first one when it needed an oil change and other servicing.
For two days earlier this week, we had some strong gusty winds. And on one occasion, driving across the Coronado Bridge from San Diego to Coronado, I was... concerned. Not scared, exactly. But I slowed to 35 mph and turned on the emergency blinkers. It did not feel safe to drive at normal speeds.
But if one accepts what the Aveo is, and does not pretend that it has the capabilities of larger and more expensive cars, then it is a reasonable choice for someone who doesn't have much money to spend.
I am very happy to be back in my VW Golf TDI. I have about 80k miles on it, and expect to get another 200k-300k miles... something that one should not reasonably expect from an Aveo.
But I have this final report-card on the Aveo. If you rarely venture onto the freeway; if most of your driving is on streets and boulevards at less than 50 mph; if you drive an average of 12k miles per year or less; and if you don't mind sacrificing the safety of a larger or better-handling car... then the Aveo is an acceptable choice.
IMO that's a bit harsh. If you regularly drive across windy bridges like the Coronado Bridge, that's one thing. When I drove the Aveo 5-door on the freeway with 40 mph cross winds--about as strong as they get where I live--there was no drama; the car tracked straight and didn't feel unsafe at all. I was actually pleasantly surprised how the car moved down the highway.
It's not unexpected that a small, light and relatively tall car will get buffeted in strong winds. If you regularly drive in those conditions, across windy bridges and such, maybe it is best to go with a heavier, more to-the-ground car. But a general warning about driving on the freeway with the Aveo is not warranted, IMO.
In our previous comparison, we left out one piece of significance - repair costs. I highly doubt your TDI will see 380,000 miles, but the costs of repairs are likely to make driving that car significantly more expensive overall than the Aveo.
That said, your car cost $10k more than many Aveo owners pay, so it should be the better car. Good luck to you.
flytle - wow, that's terrible. Let us know how this turns out.
However, 5-year-old Golf TDIs with 75,000 miles are currently selling for about $9,000-11,000. They lose about $7,000 in value (on average, for rough comparison).
This compares to 5-year-old Daewoos with that mileage, which sell for about $1500, and have a trade-in value of less than $1000. I don't know what the Daewoos cost new, but it had to be in the $8,000-10,000 range. So they also lost $7,000-8,000 in value.
Given a choice of two cars, both of which will lose about $7000 in value over 5 years and 75,000 miles -- and one gets 40-45 mpg and the other one only about 28-32 -- and the first one is stronger and safer to boot, with more standard features, it really is foolish to buy the cheapo econobox.
The Aveo is fine as a rental vehicle, but it doesn't make sense to buy one. It's costing you more per mile to own an Aveo, than it does for me to own a Golf TDI.
Assuming 5 years of ownership, the TDI will only save you money if you are driving more than 50,000 miles a year. If you were going to drive 15,000 miles a year - the Aveo will have saved you $5,000 in the end.
However, the $10,000 you save up front could be invested, and when you have $10,000 of tax free investments (not even calculating potential earnings) sitting in a Roth IRA by the time you sell your car, the VW looks like it's cost you a lot more than you planned. Know what that $10k is worth after 30 years @ 8%? $100,000. So who is foolish? (replying to your own use of the word)
From an economical stanpoint, the VW will never be worth the extra money. The 5-star crash tests of the Aveo are good enough, and the standard features of the VW are hardly worth a $10k premium.
30 years from now, the TDI and the Aveo will be long gone, but the $100,000 you would have made says that the TDI cost you a LOT more per mile to own than the Aveo.
http://www.carbc.com/albums/album213/kalos3dr_04.jpg
http://www.carbc.com/albums/album213/kalos3dr_05.jpg
2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick
I bet this car would be a lot of fun to drive with a short shifter, sport oriented stiffer springs, and an intake/exhaust. That package could be EASILY put together for under $1000. I bet you could even get better tires in for that price.
Make the 3-door slightly cheaper, and have a Aveo "GT" package for $9999. I wonder if anyone would buy that?
Heck, go the Scion/aftermarket route with it. I don't understand why that isn't more common.
I have never driven a Aveo, but I have sat in one and the 2 vehicles are not even in the same ball park as far as interior feel goes.
Reliability: I agree, VW's have allot of work to do in order to be taken seriously in the reliability realm. But my 2 VW's I have owned, (2002 Jetta and 2004 Passat) have been mechanically sound.
Maybe Chevy has identified a similar problem but hasn't released a recall. I would complain about it to the dealer and see if there is a tsb to fix it.
in nyc, we got about 15" of white stuff, and i have no problem at all drive on snow or ice like any other SUV.
This is the Aveo 2004 with the engine meltdown, the dealer had a new engine block put in the car: it runs worse now, and the mileage absolutely sucks! Living in cold climate may not help but I am getting 320 km to 3/4 tank of gas...is this good, b/c I think it is awful, it is less than half the travel I was getting in an old beater????
The clock on the car is still on the fritz, the engine doesn't sound good, and dealer will not help...I'm at a loss now, what to do with a car like this? Keep it and run it down? Or trade it for way less than I bought if for 3 months ago? Any ideas???
Flytle
---------------------------------------
Try another dealer? Why is the clock still on the fritz? Did they replace it? If the dealer will not help time to bump it up a level...regional manager.
So is this normal or a design flaw somebody start blowing some smoke please.
I have a slot on the driver side door. It is about 2 inches vertically. Is this some type of Korean power outlet, mp3 thing, or graham cracker storage?
I'd appreciate any wisdom you guys got for me, thanks- Robot-man