Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!

Lincoln Zephyr/MKZ

1262729313260

Comments

  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    If you'd bothered to read the text you'd see that he acknowledges that would be a better test but he wasn't able to do that because the cars were at a dealership. This was the next best solution.

    Obviously it would be better to actually measure the interior temperature of identical cars, but for some reason we can't find that type of experiment, at least not with a google search.

    If you walked up to a car and wanted to know if the interior of the car was hot or cool before you opened the door, what would you do? Look for an interior thermometer or feel the glass?
  • I am on Scooter's side of this, because no matter how reasonable a "theory" (hypothesis) may sound to some people, it has no real basis until it is tested. Auto glass is insulated to some degree...and to what degree has not been determined by this article. Even that is beside the point, because it is the interior where people sit (not the glass that they touch) that anyone cares about.

    Most people who lives in very hot, sunny climes will continue to eschew black interiors. And the Zephyr happens to have an attractive light one. But I say, give it up, guys. This is definitely one of those discussions not worth a hissy fit.
  • rj123456rj123456 Member Posts: 140
    I took it in for service and they declared that nothing is wrong with the airconditioner. However, they claimed that the calibration of the AC was set wrong (allegedly, this vehicle was set for "a colder climate" than here (San Jose California), and they recalibrated it.

    Never heard of this before but whatever they did has made a big difference. The air blowing out is much colder - if I set the auto climate control at 67 as I used to, I'm freezing by the end of my 15 minute drive to work. It's now set at 70 degrees.

    BTW, I still haven't seen a single other Zephyr on the roads here. MPG midway through the third tank is now 15.6 - doing a little more city driving, but I'm wondering if I have a chronic lead foot and/or the AC adjustment has made the MPG worse!
  • rj123456rj123456 Member Posts: 140
    Since I sparked this discussion with my AC question (now resolved), I should add for the record that I have the tan interior.

    The window temperature will have a positive correlation with the inside temperature but it's unlikely to be DIRECTLY proportional. The outside panel of an oven that is set to 500 degrees isn't twice as hot as that of the same oven set to 250 degrees.
  • 06zephyr06zephyr Member Posts: 32
    I have had the car since Dec. and I love it. No issues at all,knock on wood, and a pleasire to drive. MPG is around 22-25 on the open road and about 18 in stop and go. All I have gotten is compliments and WOWS from so many people.
    BTW....the 221 HP is fine even for entering highways and passing other cars

    :)
  • bigtbigt Member Posts: 412
    I have always received 19-20 average MPG since I owned. I get 28-30 on the highway. I start the air around 72 and later move it up to 75 as I am freezing after about 15 minutes. The power in this car is just fine. It is a little noisy when accelerating. I drove a Chrysler 300 this week and you do not notice any noise when you accelerate. I was driving the touring version, not sure what type of engine was in it. I know it would price out more than the Zephyr. Can't wait for the 2007's. I wonder when you will be able to pre-order them?
  • exalteddragon1exalteddragon1 Member Posts: 729
    Glad to hear 221hp is enough for you. I mean i guess even last year it was mederatley enough, but with toyotas new 268hp and 305hp V6 221 ain't gonna cut it.

    Its very good to know Ford has that new 3.5 on the way. Are you considering test driving the MKZ when its out? You would have only had your car a year and could trade it in for what seems like a more advanced car with the same shape.

    I don't think the 3.5 is oing to do much worse than the 22-25 you mentioned, thats the whole point of why it takes automakes a while to make a new engine, they up the power while keeping or increasing MPG.

    This car should be a REAL threat to the ES350 since engine power is the same but the MKZ will have so many things going for it... as long as they DON'T up the price :mad:
  • caliddcalidd Member Posts: 60
    I just drove from Maryland through Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama to Nashville, Tennessee. Through all this traveling, I saw only one Zephyr. What's up with that?
  • 06zephyr06zephyr Member Posts: 32
    No im not interested in trading this one in for more HP.The car is a pleasure to drive just as it is and the HP is plenty to get on to highways and pass other cars. I have a sports car for the HP rush and the "luxury" one is fine just the way it is. Unless they do something with the torque im not so sure that an extra 29 HP will be that noticeable to the everyday driver.

    :)
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    They're selling great relative to production capacity but they've not sold that many to date in total numbers, so you won't see that many, especially in rural areas.
  • exalteddragon1exalteddragon1 Member Posts: 729
    Yet another reason to buy the MKZ. Its very good to see that at least some us cars don't give upmuch to the competition.

    Hopefully there are some interrior revisions as well.

    It will be interesting to see if they have dealt with torque steer from the FWD version, since that much power might have some.
  • bigtbigt Member Posts: 412
    Now the Lincoln boys need to get going and cannot sit on winning best cup holders. Just saw in the new redesigned Chrysler Sebring that they will have heated and chilled cup holders 140 - 35 degrees!

    The battle continues. It never ends and hopefully we (the consumer) will continue to benefit! :shades:
  • hondacbr1khondacbr1k Member Posts: 12
    Well the one nice thing about 221hp in a front wheel drive car is that it is much more controllable. I had a 2004 Maxima with 265 HP and that thing had really bad torque steer. The Acura TL the same thing. I'll trade a few ponies for more composure. I just can't use the HP I have anyway between fear of tickets and no place to open her up.
  • rolo77rolo77 Member Posts: 31
    Does any one know the Ratio of the AWD, front/rear power and with 263 HP, I would think the AWD would have no problems with Torque steer, also with the extra weight of AWD drive, how much would that effect MPG (2 to 3 highway ?) and 0-60 times maybe (.3 to .4 second slower ?)

    just weighing pros/cons AWD vs FWD
  • buckwheatbuckwheat Member Posts: 396
    "Designer Anthony Prozzi is putting his touch on a new interior for the next-generation Lincoln Zephyr (to be called the MKZ). It's quite a challenge -- especially considering that the current model has won accolades for interior design." No specifics, just clues!

    http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=23722
  • It may have won accolades from some quarters, but anything Lincoln can do to stand out or lead will be even better. The current interior is a great improvement over what had been offered in American designs, but it still doesn't have the refinement of Audi or the coming S80 Volvo or even the 2007 ES350.

    As I was driving by the Lincoln store today, the line of Zephyrs at a quick glance looked like Fusions with a Lincoln front end. CTS Caddys certainly don't look like gussied up Malibus. So jazz up that interior and try to hang in there until Lincoln has enough money to make Lincolns look like Lincolns again.
  • buckwheatbuckwheat Member Posts: 396
    While dates are always subject to change, today is reportedly the last day of Zephyr 2006 model year production. 2007 model year MKZ production reportedly commences on 9/4/06..
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    I would hope not, since Malibus and CTS are totally different vehicles in different platforms.
  • I would hope not, since Malibus and CTS are totally different vehicles in different platforms. My point exactly.
  • bigtbigt Member Posts: 412
    Introduced only last autumn, Lincoln's dealers sold only 4895 Zephyrs through the beginning of February.

    No wonder you do not see them on the road.
  • bigtbigt Member Posts: 412
    I do not see any difference in the 2007 in the areas of the grill or wheels. I put up the photos from Edmunds for the 2006 and compared them to the 2007. Besides the engine it looks like a work in progress.

    http://media.ford.com/newsroom/release_display.cfm?release=22595
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    They sold 2,264 in June and have sold 15,672 YTD. Lincoln sold 50K LS's every year for the first 2 years and you'd hardly ever see one on the road. They sell over 30K camrys every month and I've only seen a few new ones. It takes a LOT of cars to see them frequently on the road.
  • bigtbigt Member Posts: 412
    Thanks, where do you get these actual sales figures from?
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    Thanks, where do you get these actual sales figures from?

    From Ford, of course! http://media.ford.com that is. They post them at the beginning of each month. Here's the June sales figures:

    http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=23686
  • It's too bad the Zephyr does not have more production. I don't think it has the drawing power that the LS had at introduction, but I think it would not take much effort for Lincoln to sell more than half as many Zephyrs as they did LS's initially.

    Sales of the MKZ will be very tellng regarding Lincoln's fate. 50,000 a year is good, but not a high figure. That is the projection for the MKS, and that is lower than Lincoln would like for a "volune" seller.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    The focus is no longer on volume but on profitability. They designed the Focus/Milan/Zephyr to be profitable at the current volumes. If they can grow them beyond that then that's fine but they want to avoid overproduction which causes huge incentives and lowers resale values.

    I think the 3.5L availability will keep the MkZ at current volumes for another year - then they might move production to the Edge/MkX plant where it could grow if necessary. Better to keep plant capacity high and dealer inventory and incentives low.
  • Agree on all your points. It is too bad though that Zephyr was designed to be a low volume car, since Lincoln could use a model with higher volume that is actually supported by demand. Like the original Navigator, or the 1990s Town Cars. Or even the 2000 LS. Of course the MKZ is not that, because it is a competitive-but-innocuous product that does not inspire passion or any significant "gotta have" feelings.

    Maybe the MKX will catch on. Having a handful of products, all of which sell at less than 50,000 units a year (even if profitable), will not bring Lincoln back to where it was six or seven years ago.

    I'd like to see Lincoln listed again on this forum's face page where common brand names are given, without having to resort to the drop-down menu to find it (Mercury isn't there either).
  • buckwheatbuckwheat Member Posts: 396
    In its second model year the Zephyr, now called MKZ has been significantly improved with a stronger, smoother engine, and 6speed transmission. A new front appearance, new wheels and available all-wheel drive. If its new appearance does not jump out at you thats because the changes do not overwhelm. The "waterfall" grille - has been updated which now shows seven "teeth" on either side of the central Lincoln emblem (the Zephyr has nine). The chromed horizontal bar in the lower facia between fog light assemblies is new. The wheels have been changed for 2007 they still have the eight spoke appearance of the 2006 but the spokes resemble the concept wheels but at 17" and not the larger that was on the concept.
  • bigtbigt Member Posts: 412
    Took a group of folks to lunch yesterday here in DC. All they talked about was how beautiful my car was outside and inside. They also stated that they have never heard of the car before. The Zephyr does turn heads everywhere I drive. Stands out in the city and where a Lincoln is still a Lincoln. Heard something about Lincoln is no longer going to make the Towncar. That is all you see around here in DC. I am going to get the MKZ when it comes out because I want the Navigation system, THX sound, and cool seat options.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Starting 2007, powertrain warranties for Ford/Mercury's will be stretched to 5 years, 60K miles, and 6 years, 70K miles for Lincoln.

    I've been at pushing this for years if some of you have remembered from earlier posts.
  • scootertrashscootertrash Member Posts: 698
    If anyone cared about Mercury, it should get the longer warranty.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Ant: You did a hellova job on the Fusion/Milan. Congratulations! It's a great car for the money, in the Ford tradition.

    I've been worried about you, ANT! You're my favorite engineer, and I haven't seen you around for MONTHS! Was afraid you were in the trunk of some MKZ!!

    NV
  • rolo77rolo77 Member Posts: 31
    ANT14

    This may not apply to you but here goes, get the boys at Lincoln to get moving on the AWD MKZ, I am stationed in Japan and put a down payment on the car, but I was told it would not be ready for a NOV 15TH-DEC delivery date, only the FWD will be ready, so my wife is putting to pressure to buy the infinti G35 AWD, if anyone hear's that the MKZ AWD will be ready by MID NOV please let me know so I can get the military sales dealer know, trying to but AMERICAN (a relative term) if I can.

    Chief
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Anything can go wrong at any time, although November seems about right when the AWD comes online.
  • rolo77rolo77 Member Posts: 31
    Thanks, I guess since my overseas lead time for my order is 3 months to build, thats why I can not order the MKZ AWD
    for a Dec 1st pick-up time, well thanks again maybe and I can cancel my order and pick-up one from a local dealer

    Chief
  • tiger16tiger16 Member Posts: 54
    I currently own an 06 Zephyr. I am somewhat intrigued by the 07 MKZ's new engine. Since my round trip to and from work each day is 85 miles, the small fuel tank of 17.5 gals has actually been my only complaint with the car. It may not sound like a big deal to many but, with work, grid lock on I-95 everyday and "other" driving, I find that I'm filling it up every 3 to 4 days - a bit of a pain in the butt. I've seen different specs from Lincoln that state either 17.5 or 20 gals for the MKZ. Does anyone know at this point? Perhaps this is a question for ANT. The extra 2.5 gal tank just might do it for me. If it's still going to be 17.5, I'll stick with what I have. There's not that much difference between the two to make the move. Seems like everything the MKZ competes with has a minimum of 18.5.
  • bigtbigt Member Posts: 412
    I wonder what car this is:

    http://www.leftlanenews.com/Lincoln_LLN.mpg

    Looks like the MKZ but could be the MKS.

    One thing for sure is that the MKX sure has a lot of technology features in it. I might make the switch if I coudl figure out what its fuel type and MPG ratings will be. I wish they would hurry up with the hybirds. We are about to really take it in the shorts on fuel prices. Anything that happens in the world is now used as an excuse to screw us at the pump. If the auto guys were smart they would disconnect themselves from big oil.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    That's the MKS concept car with LED adaptive headlights. The LEDS on the side light up for corners without having to move the main light. Unclear when or whether this will show up in production.

    The MKX has headlights that move but no HIDs or LEDs. In FWD form I'm estimating 19-27 mpg based on the current Fusion/Milan/Zephyr 3.0 ratings.
  • scootertrashscootertrash Member Posts: 698
    Reading, and trying to comprehend the last two posts has reminded me how lame the Alphabet Soup naming stragegy is going to be.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    For once I'd have to agree with you. They sound ok by themselves but when you put them all together and say MKZ, MKX, MKS then they quickly start to run together.
  • bigtbigt Member Posts: 412
    I also had to flip back and forward to make sure I got them right but if you just think:

    S = Sedan
    X = CrossOver

    and Z = Well, no ideal, oh yeah Zephyr! :)
  • They've had this car (MKS) out in cyberspace for quite a while now. Still, it won't appear for another year and a half. It certainly isn't godawful, but there is nothing Lincoln-esque about it. This company deserved better, but the present management team is getting their just desserts.

    Bill Ford has had several years to turn this thing around, but even with the Fusion, Mustang and F150 successes, they cannot figure out what to do as a company. It is so sad. (And the ton of money wasted on weird commercials...the weirdest being Mr. Ford himself droning on.)

    Ford has messed up royally before, one time being in the 70's and early 80's. They emerged from that with bold new designs: the 83 Thunderbird, the 86 Taurus/Sable, the Continentals of that decade, the Ranger, even the Escort and the Tempo (though a mediocre ride, it had bold styling for the time when everything else in that category was squared off). They built market share quickly.

    But instead of updating their bread and butter car (Taurus) as Toyota did with Camry, they bought Jaguar, delayed a total revamp for 10 years and then issued that weird guppy of a Taurus that was actually a much bigger car that looked significantly smaller than the previous one. It was the product of a team of dolts, and the 2000 re-do was much too little too late. So then the pendulum wildly swung from weird to almost unspeakably boring (500).

    There are people in that company who know what appeals. The 427 concept was widely praised. It could have easily been on the road in 2005. The Forty-Nine concept with some modifications would have been a far more successful 2002 T-Bird, because it had a back seat. The Continental concept was polarizing, and that love it or hate it quality would have insured its success in today's marketplace. The new European Focus would have done well here, just as the Mazda3 and Volvo S40 have. The Mondeo would have made a better Mercury than a Jaguar.

    I've been in focus groups and I found the experience strange and not reflective of real life. People have a natural tendency to be conservative, but when led to new and different products by a creative designer, often over time begin seeing the thing differently and more favorably. Focus groups do not give that transition a chance.

    Somehow I doubt the 86 Taurus or the 64 Mustang or the 57 T-bird or the Ford GT designs were fully dictated by focus group results. I also think it is possible the 500 was a focus group victim.

    Wow, did I deviate from the MKZ or what? It's an OK design and some people even think it is pretty. But I've never seen a non-car oriented person stare at one. Usually a person only takes note of how nice it is by getting a ride in an acquaintance's. And, sorry to say, the exterior does not look like a Lincoln.
  • aviboy97aviboy97 Member Posts: 3,159
    It's the trend now that all luxury vehicles carry names with letters and numbers, not actual words. (325xi, 325i, STS, CTS, RX350, IS350, MDX, RDX, RL, TL, S550, E320)

    Looks like one big luxurious bowl of alphabet soup.
  • scootertrashscootertrash Member Posts: 698
    "It's the trend now that all luxury vehicles carry names with letters and numbers, not actual words. (325xi, 325i, STS, CTS, RX350, IS350, MDX, RDX, RL, TL, S550, E320) "

    Notice the differentiating digit or letter for each model class is the FIRST one?
    3-series, E-class, RXxxx, S-XXX
    What makes the Lincoln version so ridiculous is that they are all MK-whatever. Then you need to get out the decoder ring and decipher what the suffix is supposed to mean.

    It's absurd and clearly an omen of Lincolns terminal status. It's clearly stupid and I suspect that everyone at Ford is so scared that they just say "the focus group liked it" and they all pat each other on the backs for achieving mediocrity.
  • exalteddragon1exalteddragon1 Member Posts: 729
    Ford acts to rev up stalled turnaround

    Bryce G. Hoffman / The Detroit News

    Advertisement


    GET FREE HEADLINES BY E-MAIL

    Ford Motor Co.

    Ford's generous warranty could boost sales and lift resale values, some analysts say. See full image
    Warranties at a glance
    While some warranties may vary within a company, here's a quick look at what warranties automakers are offering.
    DaimlerChrysler AG
    Drivetrain: 3 years/36,000 miles
    Basic: 3 years/36,000 miles
    Roadside service: 3 years/36,000 miles
    Ford Motor Co.
    Drivetrain: From 5 years/60,000 miles to 6 years/70,000 miles
    Basic: 3 years/36,000 miles to 4 years/50,000 miles
    Roadside service: Up to 6 years/70,000 miles
    General Motors Corp.
    Drivetrain: From 3 years/36,000 miles to 5 years/60,000 miles
    Basic: 3 years/36,000 miles to 4 years/50,000 miles
    Roadside service: Up to 4 years/50,000 miles
    Honda Motor Co.
    Drivetrain: 5 years/60,000 miles
    Basic: 3 years/36,000 miles
    Roadside service: Not offered
    Nissan Motor Co.
    Drivetrain: 5 years/60,000 miles
    Basic: 3 years/36,000 miles
    Roadside service: 3 years/36,000 miles
    Toyota Motor Corp.
    Drivetrain: 5 years/60,000 miles
    Basic: 3 years/36,000 miles
    Roadside service: Not offered
    Source: Edmunds.com

    Ford is increasing the warranty on all of its 2007 Ford and Mercury vehicles to five years or 60,000 miles. In addition, Ford will offer free roadside assistance for the entire warranty period. How important are these benefits when you're shopping for a car?
    Click here to vote


    Printer friendly version
    Comment on this story
    Send this story to a friend
    Get Home Delivery
    Ford Motor Co., struggling to gain traction with its North American turnaround effort, announced a series of moves Thursday aimed at cutting costs and boosting sales.

    Ford's Board of Directors voted to cut the company's quarterly dividend in half, from 10 cents to 5 cents a share, beginning in the third quarter. The dividend is now at its lowest point since Ford eliminated payments altogether in 1982 and mirrors a 50 percent dividend reduction at General Motors Corp. in February.

    Ford's directors also cut their own $200,000-a-year compensation by half. Chairman and CEO Bill Ford Jr. said the moves were necessary to maintain strong liquidity.

    Also Thursday, Ford announced that it is extending the standard powertrain warranty on all Ford and Mercury vehicles from three years or 36,000 miles to five years or 60,000 miles. Lincoln's four-year or 50,000-mile standard powertrain warranty is being extended to six years or 70,000 miles. In addition, Ford said it will offer free roadside assistance for the entire warranty period and allow customers to transfer their warranties if they sell their car or truck before the warranty expires.

    That makes Ford's warranty package the most generous of any full-line automaker -- a fact it hopes will bring more customers into Ford dealerships, which have seen retail sales drop 9 percent so far this year.

    "The headwinds we faced at the beginning of 2006 have only become stronger, as consistently higher gasoline prices in the U.S. have caused consumer purchase preferences to shift away from SUVs and large trucks to smaller cars and crossover vehicles," Bill Ford said in a statement issued after Thursday's board meeting. "While this shift plays positively to our new vehicle offerings, we must still get our costs in line in response to segment adjustments and higher commodity prices that are affecting the company."

    But Wall Street said the decision to cut dividends signals bad news ahead as Ford prepares to release its second-quarter financial results next week.

    "This certainly suggests that second-quarter earnings are going to be uglier than expected," said Bradley Rubin, vice president of credit research at BNP Paribas in New York. "People are finally realizing at Ford that this turnaround is a little more difficult than they anticipated."

    Ford shares closed down 32 cents Thursday to $6.56, a 4.6 percent decline.

    "The dividend cut telegraphs the board's mounting concern about the company's performance," said John Casesa of New York's Casesa Shapiro Group LLC. "It's a very pessimistic signal."

    The dividend cut is expected to save Ford about $375 million annually.

    "Strong liquidity is an important enabler of our ongoing turnaround efforts and this action will make an important contribution," Bill Ford said.

    But credit analysts said the move will not change the company's balance sheet enough to boost Ford's weak credit ratings, which have already fallen into junk-bond territory.

    "The cash savings are relatively marginal," said Robert Schulz, who follows the company for Standard & Poor's in New York.

    Craig Hutson, an analyst with Gimme Credit, said he expects Ford's ratings to sink even deeper.

    "It is a sign that the company is acting to shore up its liquidity amid greater headwinds in the industry than it originally anticipated," he said. "A dividend cut is never good news."

    But Ford's decision to extend warranties may be good news, at least for consumers.

    The five-year or 60,000-mile powertrain warranty being offered on Ford and Mercury cars and trucks is substantially better than the three-year or 36,000-mile warranty offered on all of DaimlerChrysler AG's domestic nameplates and most of General Motors Corp.'s brands. More importantly, it matches the warranties offered by Ford's leading Japanese rivals: Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co., neither of which includes roadside assistance as part of their standard packages.

    "Ford is setting its own path," said Cisco Codina, head of North American marketing, sales and service for Ford. "All of this is part of our strategy to become America's car company."

    The new warranties, which are effective today, will be applied retroactively to customers who have already purchased 2007 cars and trucks. Moreover, the company said it will offer extended warranties to customers who buy 2006 models. The new warranties apply to all Ford, Mercury and Lincoln vehicles, except for those like Ford's diesel pickups and hybrid SUVs that already featured more attractive terms.

    "It definitely gives consumers another reason to look at Ford," said Mike Jackson, an analyst with CSM Worldwide in Farmington Hills.

    Boosting warranties addresses one of Ford's biggest product problems -- the resale value of its vehicles. However, the move could increase the company's warranty costs substantially.

    Ford's second quarter warranty data shows that 2006 model year per-unit warranty costs are 24 percent less than those for 2005 model vehicles.

    "I'm glad that we're leading instead of following," said Kenny Shreve, owner of Kenny Shreve Ford Mercury in McLeansboro, Ill.

    "I feel better about Ford today than I have in years."
  • heyjewelheyjewel Member Posts: 1,046
    One figure this article fails to mention is:

    24,000

    That's the number of American workers Ford is getting rid of in the next couple of weeks.
  • rj123456rj123456 Member Posts: 140
    I'm doing 25% hwy 75 city mostly short runs of 3-5 miles and the daytime temperatures have been in the 90s, but I'm still quite appalled that the mileage is stuck right at 16 mpg.

    Are the EPA estimates that badly skewed by airconditioning and traffic lights?
  • driverdmdriverdm Member Posts: 505
    0

    That's the relevance that has to this topic. The company has to do something. Would you rather they keep workers and go out of business? GM got rid of more workers and Wall Street rwarded the company with an increase in stock price so what is Ford to do. If anything they are doing to little and should try to be even more efficient and bring out even better products. Lincoln should have been given this platform and allowed to do whatever they wanted with it and create a car where not even the roofline is the same, a more sweeping design if you will. This car should have been what the concept was period. With GM bringing out such great examples such as the new Arcadia, Enclave, Outlook triplets and all the good stuff going on over at Cadillac, Ford better buy a clue and do what everybody knows they should. Sell Jaguar and put the money into Lincoln. Jag hasn't turned a profit since they bought it. Lincoln on the other hand turned a decent profit all the way until recently.
Sign In or Register to comment.