Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
You won't do better than X unless it's on a vehicle that the dealer needs to get rid of.
But I wouldn't be surprised if they eliminated the rebate, at least as soon as people realize how much less expensive MKZ is than the competition. And that's not considering that Lincoln will typically take much more off the MSRP price than foreign competitors will. Bottom line, when comparing comparable cars with comparable equipment, MKZ is MUCH less expensive than it's direct competitors.
Many buyers looking at this vehicle are looking for a bargain price to justify the purchase or else they will pass on this vehicle and go get what they really want.
Does Ford even have Bluetooth available on any vehicles at all?
Lack of stability control in this price class of car is inexcusable.
But other people do, and both of these features are so common now that it is bad planning by Ford to not at least offer them as options. Stability control will soon be required on all vehicles because it works so well. And more jurisdictions continue to require hands-free cell phone use (I prefer people not use them at all while driving, but that's a lost cause).
So perhaps it is good that they don't have the capacity to build very many MKZs. This way they can sell all they build, even if it is not a fully developed product for the class it is in.
and the factory incentives which have come out for December are
exactly the same as in November. A $500 cash rebate or APR program of 2.9 for 36, 3.9 for 48, 4.9 for 60 and 6.9 for 72 months.
http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=24888
Note to MKS "designers": -That's what blah styling gets you.
Am really hoping I can get the MKZ next month at the rates offered this past Fall: 0%,72 months and $1000 rebate.
On the other hand, if you normally keep a car a long time (nothing wrong with driving the same car for a decade or more), you might as well use Lincoln's money to purchase it over time (e.g., 0%), and keep yours in the bank.
Still, I'd only want to buy a car for the longer term if it offered stability control now. By 2013, all new vehicles will have long made it standard equipment.
While out of town I test drove the MKZ AWD and had a wild Russian salesman who wanted to show me the ride of my life so we went gunning up and down hills, rail road tracks, around curves where he said half-way in 'now floor it and hold on'! Not sure what he was sailing, maybe a sport sedan! Nevertheless it was quite a nice ride.
I am planning on purchasing the MKZ this month. I am having a hard time deciding on the color. It is between the Vivid Red and Black.
It will be smaller and sportier than the MKZ.
Rear wheel drive of course, sexier styling and a smaller back seat than the MKZ due to being based on the Mustang.
I assume it would compete with the Lexus IS sedan.
Would you consider something like that?
What I will say is that it is my understanding that the Mustang was "partially" based on the LS, they tossed out IRS as being too expensive and modified the rest to not use aluminum or anything else expensive.
Mazda 6 modified for RWD does not sound reasonably do-able to me. If they have a RWD platform from the Mazda 6, what do they need the Aussi Falcon for? Doesn't make sense.
If you have quotable info to the contrary, I'm interested in seeing it.
What about you, Allen, akirby, what's your understanding of the genus of the Mustang platform?
S197 (mustang) is actually stiffer than the dew98 platform. The Tbird required cross braces behind the seats to make it stiff enough for a convertible - the mustang couldn't use those because it has a rear seat.
"The D2C (for "D-class 2-door coupe" and also known as DC2 and S197) is Ford's newest global rear-wheel drive automobile platform. The platform basics are a MacPherson strut suspension in front and 3-link solid axle in the rear with a Panhard rod. The 2007 high performance Special Vehicle Team (SVT) Mustang variation, called the Shelby GT500, will not include an SVT-designed independent rear suspension, but will also have the solid rear axle. Engines include a 4.0 L V6, Ford's Modular 4.6 L V8, and a supercharged 5.4 L Modular V8 in the GT500.
Despite rumours, D2C is loosely based on the Ford DEW platform which served as the basis for the Lincoln LS, Ford Thunderbird, and Jaguar S-Type. The 2005 S197 Mustang was originally designed to use a "Lite" version of the DEW98 platform, but while that plan was eventually scrapped as too expensive, most D2C platform development completed prior to that decision was retained. This led to the carryover of several DEW98 chassis components. These components include the floor pans, transmission tunnel, front frame rails, and fuel tank design.
Differences between D2C and DEW98 are most noticeable in the suspension: The DEW98-based Lincoln LS uses a 4-wheel independent double wishbone suspension. The D2C platform's MacPherson strut front suspension and solid axle rear suspension are less expensive to produce than DEW's more complicated setup. D2C also shares components with other Ford platforms. These include Ford's global C1 platform, with which D2C shares front strut and rear trailing arm components.
Ford's current The Way Forward plan calls for Mustang derivative models to be launched in 2007 and 2008.
Vehicles currently using this platform include the following:
2005-present Ford Mustang "
BTW: Z's are now being offered at Invoice by some of the dealers.
The MKX definitely does stand out more in the traffic stream (than the MKZ). Don't know how long that will last though, once 150,000 Edges are out there driving around.
Yesterday I had occasion to drive all over the SF Bay Area on some delivery missions for my art business. I saw several billboards announcing the new Edge. Passed several Ford dealerships. Not one had an actual vehicle.
Is this anyway to run a car company?
BTW, those TV ads for Lincoln now show their "family" of vehicles to be Navigator, emm kay exx and emm kay zee. They dont show the truck and they dont show the Town car. Why? Esp the TC - are they ashamed of it?
I think the Mark VII and VIII were based on the mustang. There is not much engineering that ford would have to do to make a new Lincoln mark IX, and if its based on this musang, but perhaps have the F-150's Aluminum 5.4 in it, I will be very interested in taking a look.
This is what lincoln needs right now, an American made Coupe, that could capitalise on the economies of scale benefits derived from the Mustang by using its platform, but dressed in lincoln duds, with at least the option of the 5.4. Hell, even if they keep the 4.6 it would be good.
It would do allot for lincoln's image. I think the marks were great cars. This would be the only lincoln that should be called a mark anywhay. Oh man, do you guys think its true? This would be so cool.
IIRC (big IF), the first mustang concept was built on the dew98 platform.
I love the color but it was the interior that sold me on this one. I really like the nickel satin accents throughout the cabin!
Sounds beautiful. Congradulations.