Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
All-New Active Torque Split All-Wheel Drive System
The Mazda6 MPS is equipped with Mazda's new active torque split, all-wheel drive system. Based on the road-proven system of the Mazda6 available in some global markets, but featuring more aggressive transfer of torque to the rear axle on all road surfaces in accordance with driving conditions, the new all-wheel-drive system achieves a fine balance between sporty control over the car that makes it particularly fun to drive and handling stability on snowy or wet surfaces or under other challenging road conditions. Power and torque are faithfully and thoroughly transferred to the road surface for maximum efficiency and performance.
The system uses real-time input data on steering angle, yaw rate, lateral G force and engine status to determine road surface and driving conditions. The active torque coupling mounted in front of the rear differential is electronically controlled accordingly, adjusting front/rear wheel torque distribution between 100:0 and 50:50 to deliver optimum drive power to each wheel. The result is powerful acceleration and positive handling regardless of constantly changing road conditions, as well as the ability to fully balance the car in a turn by deft use of the accelerator pedal.
The Mazda6 MPS's onboard computer automatically determines driving and road conditions so the driver can relax and enjoy the pleasure of the drive. Three different modes of front/rear torque distribution are selected by the system: Normal, Sports, and Snow, (for slippery surfaces). The Power Take Off (PTO) system that that aggressively distributes torque to the rear axle is fitted with its own water-cooled cooling system.
A new rear differential with greater torque capacity is employed by the system to deliver a high level of reliability. Increased torsional rigidity of the propeller shaft and rear differential mount improves the response of torque transfer to the rear wheels and delivers a more rigid feel to the ride under acceleration. And a limited slip differential is used in the rear differential optimizes transfer of torque to the left and right rear wheels, realizing solid traction and linear vehicle control that delivers a stable feeling ride when cornering.
Up to 50% to the rear axle is a weakness, IMO. Most German competitors actually carry a rear bias, 45:55 or even 33:67 in Audi's case, by default.
Subaru's is 50/50 or 45/55 depending upon the model, and VTD can actually send up to 100% of power to either axle. IMO it's better in two ways, being both full-time and more flexible.
The rear LSD is nice and matches what Subaru offers.
Far better than what the Escape gets, but still not quite a match for Subaru's AWD. Of course Subaru specializes in AWD and we should expect them to keep an advantage in that regard.
I can't wait to sample one in the real-world, though.
-juice
Who knows which numbers are correct.
Speed sensing wipers
SAB & curtain bags
Alloy pedals
18" wheels
17" f/r rotors
Active torque split AWD
stainless steel scuff plates
Auto climate
6-speed manual (no AT)
4 window auto up/down
2.3l DISI turbo 274hp 280lb-ft.
Limited slip diff.
DSC
HID headlights
Mazda6 MPS is about half way down.
Very poor color choice for a show car. It blends right in instead of sticking out. The 5 door would have been a better choice for body style, will it come that way?
No turn signal in the mirrors. The honey comb grille is OK, but I'd like to see a cross hatch pattern, it would look better.
That black trim around the fog lights screams of cost cutting, make it body color guys!
It does get what appears to be headlight washers, neat.
Rims and ivory leather look more Lincoln.
-juice
The wheels look very Volvo to me. Whatever they end up looking like, I'm sure they'll look great. I think Mazda has the best looking OEM wheels on the road.
BTW, it shares fewer than 100 parts with the current 6.
That extra bulge on the hood, does the regular 6 have that? I bet they made more room for the turbo.
Cladding on the lower doors looks nice, well integrated.
I wonder if those body-color mirrors are fold-aways. The regular car lacks these.
It's odd that some trim is body color and some is black. The door surrounds for instance, they'd look better painted.
That's funny because our 626's weren't, and later they added that to the 626.
I notice side markers, that's cool.
-juice
That Focus cabriolet looks nice. I'm sure we'll never see it over here though. Too bad.
No NAV in the car that was pictured, I wonder if it'll be an option. Legacy is often critized for lacking that feature.
Nice dual exhaust, integrated too.
Like the taillights. Where's the 3rd head rest? Not even a hump?
I wonder if those side mirrors fold away, the regular model's does not.
-juice
That's funny, they're measuring it the JDM way. The actual rotors are probably more like 12", but they basically call them 17" if they are the biggest possible brakes that will fit inside a 17" rim.
Funny thing is the rims are 18", that means they could have been bigger! :-)
Any how, the specs make it look pretty complete. 6 speed and HIDs are things the GT Ltd lacks. DSC, too. Plus the rims are bigger.
Depending upon how its priced it could potentially offer great value.
-juice
Nope. The hood is different to accomodate the turbo from what I've read here on Edmunds.
I wonder if those body-color mirrors are fold-aways. The regular car lacks these.
Me too, but I doubt it. They look identical to the "regular" one's.
It will be in the '06 "regular" model so I don't see why they wouldn't put it in the MPS too.
BTW I keep comparing the Legacy GT because I think it'll be the closest competitor. I'm sure the press will compare it to the TSX, A4, S40 AWD, etc.
-juice
Most likely. At least that's how it is on the Mazda3 and RX-8 as I remember it. I also think the MZ3's Nav is only about $1500 which is somewhat of a bargain these days. No?
BTW I keep comparing the Legacy GT because I think it'll be the closest competitor.
That depends on price. A Legacy GT Limited all optioned out (5-speed of course) is about $31k. Given the bargain prices of the regular models I don't see the MPS getting that high but I have been wrong about prices before.
-juice
Might be too early to tell.
Who's AWD system will Ford drop into the Mazda6 based Fusion and the Mazda6 wagon?
Let's hope that's it.
A much better choice than the rotary blade coupling on the Ford Escape.
The Ford 500 and Freestyle get the Volvo system, so it is possible Mazda will get that too.
-juice
Ford, unfortunately doesn't give us much info on it. Do you know something we don't?
Maybe blueovalnews.com would have some info?
The old RBC was reactive. Even though you could switch it on, you couldn't keep it engaged permanently.
One of the car mags did a test of several classes of SUV, their Escape was the only one that got stuck.
-juice
The new system is all electronic and actually predicts slippage so the front wheels never spin helplessly. No snow here yet but they haven't slipped one inch in rain, mud, gravel, or sand (at the beach a few weeks ago).
I think it's still a 50/50 max system with no LSD though. So it still has the potential to get stuck.
A recent MT comparo listed the '05 Escape as the best small ute (car based) for off-roading. There wasn't much competition there though. They had the VUE RL, Nox, and Santa Fe up against it.
Anyway, regardless of what system the MPS uses it's certainly not intended for off-road use and I'm sure will be just fine for the street.
Vue gets some form of RBC as well, similar to the original Escape's minus the manual control button.
SF I'm not sure about.
Agreed about the Mazda, it'll be tuned for street use. Basically I'd like to see it exiting a corner at full boost and not spin an inside front tire.
That'll impress me.
-juice
-juice
If the production numbers are low the dealers will surely hold firm at msrp (whatever that ends up being) or higher. That would be bad news!
Rich
It is for this same reason that Mazda went with the sedan body style and not the hatch or wagon. Neither of those two vehicles is rigid enough for what Mazda had in mind.
MazdaSpeed vehicles are no-compromise, performance oriented. If you want a sunroof and other foo-foo options, buy an Accord Coupe.
It will be optional, though, right?
-juice
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
But put that money towards something sport oriented.
-juice
You mean like having a gadget on your dash that can find a remote winding road?
;-)
-juice
However, as you say, Euro-spec can have diesel engines and the torque from these diesels can easily make the pick-up better than the N. American-spec V6 (yes, I'm a big fan of the current diesels that are available in Europe).
Handling of N. American-spec Mazda6 is different than Euro-spec. They tuned it differently and many parts are different (e.g. 50-series 17's in N. American-spec compared to 45-series 17's everywhere else).
sorry man, but these kinds of opinions kill me!!
The dumbest thing a car company can do aka Nissan Altimas, Maximas, is jack up the low end torque on fwd cars. It does only only burn out your tires faster, but it is most importantly dangerous when making a 90 degrees turn from a standstill or similiar situation.
There is absolutely no logic in having front wheel cars with high low end torque, leave that for trucks, vans or hummers.
Mazda especially i believe have one of the lowest low end torque kick in(compared to its competitors) for the reason, they want to stay clear from understeer as much as possible, and utilize their cost effective fwd cars to behave similiarly to a rich experience format of a rwd car.
Sure many think, this kind of engineer is pretentious but If you ask me, i think its smart, and with just capable funds to build such great cars, its ingenious.
My Miata's torque peaks at 5500rpm, so you have to "drive it like you stole it" for it to get out of its own way.
That's fine when you're out for a fun drive, but every day, in a commute? It gets tiring.
There should be a decent amount of torque available at 3000 rpm, not 5500 rpm. At 2000rpm, I think I could get out and push it faster than it will go on its own.
-juice
AWD
256 hp
280 torque
18" rims - 215/45R-18 tires
Price about $27k. Also heard this would be severely de-tuned and great for the aftermarket.
Not sure if any of that is accurate though.
Can I get them for my 2003 6s??
If so, anyone know where to order them??
Thanks in advance!
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
-Base
-Base w/navigation
-Grand Trouring
-Grand Touring w/navi
-Grand Touring w/moonroof
-Grand Touring w/navi & moonroof
(Grand Touring includes Leather, advanced keyless entry/start, pwr driver seat, heated seats and heated mirrors.)
20% build of base model apx $29K
80% build of Grand Touring apx $31K
33% moonroof
25% navigation
30% liquid platinum
30% titanium
10% black cherry
10% whitewater pearl
10% velocity red
10% black mica
Interior colors....base model will have black cloth. GT will have black leather or black/white leather.
job#1 is Jan 2005. production will be limited so mazda will be allocating units on a quarterly basis. Production will be spread equally over the quarter..so cars will not all come in at once... Next allocation run will be Feb 2005. So if you want an early MZSpeed6 you need to order on this order cycle...Remember order must be in by 11/11/04.
Do you know what the forecast is for first year sales? Or what % of 6 production will be MazdaSpeeds?
-juice
'11 GMC Sierra 1500; '08 Charger R/T Daytona; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '08 Maser QP; '11 Mini Cooper S
direct injection
6 speed manual
274hp @ 5500 rpm
280 lb ft torque @ 3000rpm
AWD
18'' tires
280 is schweet, and at just 3000 rpm? Nice tuning, MazdaSpeed!
Compare that to the V6 model, with just 192 lb-ft at a sky high 5000 rpm.
Night and day.
-juice
Any specific performance numbers on that?